Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, July 6, 2017

Twisted Thursday Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all

Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:

Twisted Thursday Diane Ravitch's blog 
A site to discuss better education for all





Parents File Complaint to New York State, Demanding Reduced Class Sizes

The press release is self-explanatory: Contact: Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters, 917-435-9329; leoniehaimson@gmail.com Wendy Lecker, Education Law Center, 203-536-7567, wlecker@edlawcenter.org NYC PARENTS FILE 

Ed Johnson: Neo-Colonialism in Africa–and Atlanta

Ed Johnson is a passionate advocate for quality education for all. He lives in Atlanta. Ed is a follower of the philosophy of W. Edwards Deming, who taught that you don’t blame frontline workers for the failure of the system and its poor leadership. He frequently writes letters to the members of the Atlanta Board of Education, hoping to enlighten them. Here is the latest: New-age colonialism in A
Graduation Speech: “You Said We Couldn’t Succeed, But You Were Wrong”

Jo Lieb, who blogs as “Poetic Justice,” posted the powerful graduation speech written and delivered by Coral Ortiz, with Coral’s permission. Coral just graduated from a public high school in New Haven, Connecticut. When we were young, we were taught that we were “one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Our country taught us that no matter our income or race, we would
A Guide to Voucher Jargon and Doublespeak

The NEA posted a handy explanation of the differences among current voucher programs. Learn to understand Betsy DeVos’s euphemisms. School vouchers are actually unpopular, which is why their advocates call them by another term. “Voucher devotees like DeVos know this, which is why the term “school voucher” has been ditched in favor of more appealing terms. “Take for example this line from DeVos’ s
Have You Heard? “Personalized Learning” and the Disruption of Education

Now that we live in the new gig economy, where kids in their 20s become instant multimillionaires by disrupting every industry, here come the hawkers of (de)personalized learning to replace teachers with smart (but not cheap) machines. These machines never need pensions or health care. They don’t care about tenure or due process. Jennifer Berkshire (once known as EduShyster) and historian of educ
Peter Greene: “Personalized Learning” and the Great Bait-and-Switch

Peter Greene explains the hoax at the heart of “personalized learning.” The appeal is that it is customized just for you. The reality is that it is a standardized algorithm that adjusts to your responses but doesn’t you from Adam or Eve. The Brand X that we’re supposed to be escaping, the view of education that Personalized Learning is supposed to alter, the toxin for which Personalized Learning

YESTERDAY

The NEA Demands Accountability and Transparency from Charter Schools

The National Education Association passed a resolution on charter schools on July 4, 2017, which is appropriate because public schools are the foundation of democracy. Add this to the resolution passed last year by the NAACP. And the statement by Black Lives Matter in opposition to privatization of public schools. And the statement endorsed by the Network for Public Education , saying that charte
The Heroes of This Blog! Add Your Name!

We have quite an amazing collection of readers on this blog. I often post your comments, because they are well-written, succinct, informative, and besides which, most of you know know more about teaching and the everyday life of the classroom than I do. If your name was inadvertently omitted, let me know and I will add it. A reader who goes by the name “Homeless Educator” sent this comment. “Dian
Is Texas the Future of America? Let’s Hope Not!

This is a fascinating and funny and scary article about politics in Texas, written by Lawrence Wright, a Pulitzer Prize winning author and staff writer for The New Yorker. The title of the article is “America’s Future is Texas,” and we better hope it is wrong. When I was growing up in Houston, the state was reliably Democratic, although the Democrats were conservative. Now the state is a red stat
Maine: Governor LePage Reluctantly Increases School Funding, Vows to Get Even Next Year

Governor Paul LePage of Maine is one of the worst governors in the nation. Twice he was elected by a plurality in a three-way race. He hates public schools. A citizens’ initiative forced him to raise state spending on them. He vowed to get even next yea r. LePage started his time in office by doing whatever Jeb Bush wanted, such as agreeing to sign on to Jeb’s Digital Learning business to benefit
Wendy Lecker: How Chicago Targeted Black and Latino Schools and Communities for Destruction

This article is an excellent analysis by civil rights lawyer Wendy Lecker of the deliberate destruction of public education in black and Latino neighborhoods in Chicago. Chicago has purposely sacrificed the needs of black and Latino students while protecting and enhancing the needs of white students. We have to bear in mind what Rahm Emanuel told CTU leader Karen Lewis when he was first elected:


Peg Tyre: Can a High-Tech Start-Up in Africa Educate Hundreds of Millions of Children and Make a Profit?

Peg Tyre, veteran journalist, published a balanced and well-written article about Bridge International Academies in the New York Times Magazine. BIA operates numerous low-fee, for-profit schools in Africa and its investors hope to spread 


Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:

New LAUSD board has its first meeting today, with charter school backers in the driver's seat - LA Times

New LAUSD board has its first meeting today, with charter school backers in the driver's seat - LA Times:

New LAUSD board has its first meeting today, with charter school backers in the driver's seat



After the most expensive school board election in U.S. history, charter school backers on Thursday will formally assemble their first-ever majority on the Los Angeles Board of Education with a mixture of high expectations and significant challenges.
Charter forces for years have criticized the mammoth school district as blocking needed reforms, pandering to employee groups and simply failing to significantly improve the education of L.A. students. Now, they will be in their best position ever to bring about change, and that brings both pressure and opportunity.
Near the top of the pro-charter agenda is likely to be an easier process for approving new schools and renewing existing charters, which advocates have long decried as too difficult. They also want charters to take over more space on district-owned campuses.
Some hardcore charter backers have favored a more radical agenda: a massive charter school expansion or even using charters as the vehicle to dismantle the school system entirely.

A closely watched agenda


But the new board, which meets for the first time Thursday, must also confront familiar limitations, including vastly underfunded retiree health benefits and steep increases in mandatory payments to state pension funds. Like the old board, this one still has a traditional school district to run, the second-largest in the nation. And continued charter growth exacerbates district finances, because when students exit the district, they carry with them state and federal funding.
For better or worse, the district bureaucracy, which at times has fought to limit the growth of charters, remains entrenched. The outgoing board helped see to this in June with a contract extension for Supt. Michelle King.
“If the charter school advocates’ expectations are to simply increase market share and create a deregulated environment for themselves, they will be disappointed, and they should be,” said Charles Kerchner, professor emeritus and senior research fellow at Claremont Graduate University’s School of Educational Studies. “The big issue is whether the new ‘reform’ board continues what I’ve called the Charter School War or ends the war and claims the very large peace dividend.”
Kerchner suggested a new, nonpartisan goal: “How to design a 21st century school system New LAUSD board has its first meeting today, with charter school backers in the driver's seat - LA Times:

18 States Sue Betsy DeVos Over Student Loan Protections - The New York Times

18 States Sue Betsy DeVos Over Student Loan Protections - The New York Times:

18 States Sue Betsy DeVos Over Student Loan Protections



Democratic attorneys general from 18 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit on Thursday against the Education Department and its secretary, Betsy DeVos, challenging the department’s move last month to freeze new rules for erasing the federal loan debt of student borrowers who were cheated by colleges that acted fraudulently.
The rules, known as borrower defense, were finalized in October by the Obama administration after years of negotiation and review, and they had been scheduled to take effect on July 1. But after President Trump took office, Ms. DeVos paused the planned changes, citing a federal lawsuit filed in May by an association of for-profit colleges in California that is seeking to block the rules.
Ms. DeVos also criticized the rules, calling them “a muddled process that’s unfair to students and schools,” and she said she would establish a new rule-making committee to reconsider the matter from scratch.
In their lawsuit, filed in Federal District Court in Washington, the states called the agency’s rationale for the delay — the California lawsuit — a “mere pretext” for repealing and replacing rules that had already been finalized. The states are seeking to have the rules restored.
“Since day one, Secretary DeVos has sided with for-profit school executives against students and families drowning in unaffordable student loans,” said Maura Healey, the Massachusetts attorney general, who led the multistate coalition. “Her decision to cancel vital protections for students and taxpayers is a betrayal of her office’s responsibility and a violation of federal law.”
A spokeswoman for the Education Department declined to comment directly after the lawsuit was filed, saying that the department’s lawyers were reviewing it.
Also on Thursday, two student borrowers sued the Education Department in the same federal court over the delayed rules.
The students both attended the New England Institute of Art in Brookline, Mass., a for-profit school that stopped enrolling new students in 2015. Its parent company, Education Management Corporation, agreed that year to pay $95 million to settle a government lawsuit charging the company with making illegal payments to recruiters.18 States Sue Betsy DeVos Over Student Loan Protections - The New York Times:

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Will IL legislators have enough spine to override Gov. Junk's veto?

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Will IL legislators have enough spine to override Gov. Junk's veto?:

Will IL legislators have enough spine to override Gov. Junk's veto?

Today's funniest quote comes from Gov. Junk himself: "The people should come first in Illinois, not Wall Street."

Push comes to shove today in Springfield when a group of Republicans, facing right-wing death threats,  may stand with Dems and do the right thing by ending the state's budget nightmare. IL is now in its third year of operating without a budget, mainly because a sociopathic, ideology-driven governor has been able to use his veto power over the Democratic majority to try and bust the unions and dismantle the state's social services. 

Gov. Bruce "Junk" Rauner, in true Trumpian style, and with special enmity towards Chicago's working poor, has intentionally pushed the city as well as the state to the brink of bankruptcy. He's forced excessive borrowing to pay pension costs and operating expenses at exorbitant rates, thereby reducing credit ratings to "junk" status and lining the pockets of Wall Street banksters with billions in high interest payments for years to come. 

But with elections around the corner and Gov. Junk's approval ratings in the toilet, a group of 15 Republicans, not wanting to go down with the sinking GOP ship, may break ranks and voteMike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Will IL legislators have enough spine to override Gov. Junk's veto?: 

A city for the rich. The gentrification of Chicago. | Fred Klonsky

A city for the rich. The gentrification of Chicago. | Fred Klonsky:

A city for the rich. The gentrification of Chicago.



Having lived in my Logan Square neighborhood for 42 years, the current signs of gentrification are everywhere.
You only have to sit on our front porch and hear the quiet on a summer afternoon. No kids playing ball in the middle of the street. No paleta cart ringing his bell. No elote man honking his horn. No parking spaces because three single twenty-somethings, each with a car, are sharing a $3000 apartment next door that once was home to a family.
But those that have made Logan Square a poster neighborhood for hipsters and gentrification are missing the point.
The exit of poor, middle class and people of color from Chicago is a city-wide deal that goes way beyond Logan Square. The loss of population among African Americans is staggering.
Overall, the region lost black residents in the 11-year period, about 69,000 in all. All of the decline was in the city, which lost 104,000 African-American residents, with some but not most moving to the suburbs. “Those trends suggest that black residents from Chicago are choosing to leave the region altogether,” mostly for Sun Belt cities, the report says.
That’s consistent with findings by Metropolitan Planning Council researcher Alden Loury, who in a recent report specifically examined what’s happening in Chicago proper. The loss is focused among low-income households, Loury added, and is much bigger than in most other major metros.
The population of whites here has dropped, too, down almost 200,000 in the seven counties as a whole, according to Census data crunched by A city for the rich. The gentrification of Chicago. | Fred Klonsky:

Contrary views of education collide in Chicago (By Wendy Lecker) - Wait What?

Contrary views of education collide in Chicago (By Wendy Lecker) - Wait What?:

Contrary views of education collide in Chicago 
By Wendy Lecker



Writing in the Stamford Advocate, education advocate and commentator Wendy Lecker writes, Chicago is this nation’s third largest city, and among its most segregated. Recently, several unrelated reports were released about education policy in Chicago that, together, provide a vivid picture of the divergent views policymakers of have of public education; depending on who is served.
As reported by researchers at Roosevelt University, between 2009-2015, Chicago permanently closed 125 neighborhood schools, ostensibly because of low enrollment or poor performance.
The standard Chicago used for low enrollment was 30 students to one elementary classroom — an excessively large class size, especially for disadvantaged children.
The school closures occurred disproportionately in neighborhoods serving African-American, Latino and economically disadvantaged students. Professors Jin Lee and Christopher Lubienski found that Chicago’s school closures had a markedly negative effect on accessibility to educational opportunities for these vulnerable populations. Students had to travel longer distances to new schools; often through more dangerous areas.
School closures harm entire communities. As Georgia State Law Professor Courtney Anderson found, where neighborhood schools were a Contrary views of education collide in Chicago (By Wendy Lecker) - Wait What?:

Take Two® | Meet LAUSD's new school board member Nick Melvoin | 89.3 KPCC

Take Two® | Meet LAUSD's new school board member Nick Melvoin | 89.3 KPCC:

Meet LAUSD's new school board member Nick Melvoin



Listen to the interview live on KPCC at 9:10 a.m.

Nick Melvoin will be one of LAUSD's new school board members starting July 6.
His and Kelly Gonez's victories in the last election means a majority of board members have been backed by the California Charter Schools Association.
Melvoin talked with KPCC education reporter Kyle Stokes about his vision for charter schools and his other priorities in office.

Interview highlights



SOME HAVE INTERPRETED YOUR VICTORY AS A WIN FOR SCHOOL CHOICE BECAUSE OF THE ENDORSEMENT FROM THE CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION. OTHERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE GROWTH OF CHOICE AND ITS EFFECTS ON LOCAL NEIGHBORHOODS SCHOOLS. WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THAT?

One of things that the charter movement has done is let the benefits of choice inure to less affluent communities. As a progressive, I think that's a good thing.
The question is, now, how can we be thoughtful about that choice? And I think L.A. has not been thoughtful.
We've proliferated, but we haven't thought about why and how and where, and how to learn from charters.

BUT THE DANGER OF EMBRACING SCHOOL CHOICE IS THAT IT COULD AMPLIFY SEGREGATION, WHERE THERE ARE HAVE AND HAVE-NOTS AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO ACCESS CHOICE ARE THOSE WHO ARE PLUGGED IN.

I've been an advocate for a while of universal enrollment.
Let's provide the same access to parents, and then let's build some safety valves into the system to make sure that it's not just the eager parents that are getting the options.

YOU'VE WRITTEN ABOUT SLOWING THE GROWTH OF CHARTER SCHOOLS BY MAKING DISTRICT SCHOOLS MORE ATTRACTIVE. ON THE OTHER HAND, YOU ALSO SAY THAT UNTIL WE HAVE ZERO FAMILIES ON CHARTER SCHOOL WAITLISTS, WE SHOULDN'T DO ANYTHING TO LIMIT THEIR GROWTH. HOW DO YOU MESH TOGETHER WHAT SEEMS LIKE A CONTRADICTION?

You have 40,000 parents on waitlists. Do you build a lot more schools to get parents off those waitlists, or do you improve our schools?
I'm confident that, in part by learning from the charter school sector, we can improve our schools to get that list down close to zero.
Until that day comes, charter options for families should be their right within the public school system.  
And one of the conversations we're going to have to have with the charter sector is this whole myth of charter growth.

WHAT IS THAT "MYTH OF CHARTER GROWTH"?

It's this idea that, now, with four members of the board endorsed by 
Take Two® | Meet LAUSD's new school board member Nick Melvoin | 89.3 KPCC:

NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE | Class Size Matters

NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE | Class Size Matters NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE | A clearinghouse for information on class size & the proven benefits of smaller classes:

NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE


For Immediate Release:  July 6, 2017

Contact: Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters, 917-435-9329; leoniehaimson@gmail.com
Wendy Lecker, Education Law Center, 203-536-7567, wlecker@edlawcenter.org

NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE
Demand Department of Education Reduce Class Size as Mandated in State Law

Today, nine parents from every New York City borough filed a petition with State Commissioner of Education MaryEllen Elia, charging the City Department of Education (DOE) with failing to reduce class sizes as mandated by the Contract for Excellence Law (C4E). The City’s Public Advocate, Letitia James, and two advocacy groups, Class Size Matters and the Alliance for Quality Education, also joined the parents in the petition.
Education Law Center (ELC) is representing the Petitioners.
Please see Parent Petitioners’ quotes below.
In 2007, as required by the C4E law, the DOE developed a class size reduction plan for the City’s public schools, pledging to lower average class sizes in Kindergarten through third grade over five years to no more than 20 students; in fourth through eighth grade to no more than 23 students; and to no more than 25 students per class in high school core classes. The State Education Commissioner approved the plan.
The DOE never delivered on its plan. Instead, class sizes have increased sharply since 2007, particularly in the early grades, and are now substantially larger than when the C4E law was enacted. As of fall 2016, DOE data show classes in Kindergarten through third grade were more than 18 percent larger, classes in grades four through eight were six percent larger, and high school classes were 1.5 percent larger than in 2007.
“The growth in class size from 2007 to the present is breathtaking,” said David Sciarra, ELC Executive Director. “For example, in 2007, a little over 1,100 students in grades one through three were in classes of 30 students or more. As of November 2016, a staggering 43,219 first through third graders were in classes this large, an increase of almost 4000 percent.”
“New York City students have waited too long for a better opportunity to learn, and it is unacceptable that the City has reneged on its legal obligations,” said Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of Class Size Matters. “The research is crystal clear that smaller classes benefit all children, but especially those who predominate in our public schools: students who are low-income,  have special needs, or are English Language Learners.”
“A decade ago, the City committed to reducing class sizes to appropriate levels, a resource identified by New York’s highest court in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case as essential for a constitutional sound basic education,” said Billy Easton, Executive Director of the Alliance for Quality Education. “But now class sizes are even larger than when the court issued its decision. It is past time for the DOE to live up to this legal obligation.”
“The research is clear: smaller classes are better for our children. This indisputable fact can no longer be ignored. I am proud to stand with a diverse coalition of education advocates to demand the city provide our students with the smaller class sizes they are owed. There can be no equity or excellence when students in The Bronx and throughout New York City must sit in classes this large,”  said Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr.
The Petitioners are requesting that Commissioner Elia order the DOE to immediately begin reducing class sizes to the averages set forth in the 2007 class-size reduction plan and to reach those averages in no more than five years. Petitioners are also asking the Commissioner to order the City to promptly align its capital plan for school construction to the class size averages in the 2007 Plan, another requirement of the C4E regulations.
_____________________
Parent Petitioners Speak:
“My daughter has been in extremely large classes since Kindergarten,” said Naila Rosario, a parent in District 15 in Brooklyn. “This year, in fourth grade, she is in a class of 32 students. She cannot possibly receive the kind of personal attention and feedback every child deserves and needs to be successful in school. In fact, often her teacher does not even have enough time to answer all the students’ questions. There is no way my daughter or any of her classmates can get a quality education in a class this large.”
Deborah Alexander has two children at P.S. 150 in Queens, one in 1st grade and the other in 4th grade. Both are in classes of 3O students: “My fourth grader told me he doesn’t bother to raise his hand anymore, because as he said to me, there are too many kids, so I’m never picked. My daughter’s class is full of restless children, waiting their turn to be able to speak. Some of the children have social-emotional issues and clearly feel deprived, no matter how hard their teacher tries. It is time to aggressively address class size reduction once and for all so that all children know they are seen and heard.”
“My son, who has an IEP, has been held back twice and is at risk of being held back again,” said Rubnelia Agostini, who has a second grade child at P.S. 277 in the Bronx. “His class size is now 25, and he was in a class of 27 in Kindergarten at P.S. 205. After two months in Kindergarten he was bused to another school to address class size violations, since Kindergarten classes are supposed to be capped at 25. Now his independent evaluation says he needs a small class, but his school doesn’t have any small classes, and some are as large as 27. Why can’t my son receive the quality education he needs to succeed?”
Litza Stark’s son is in an inclusion, or ICT, Kindergarten class with 28 students at P.S. 85 in Queens. The ICT class contains 10-12 students with special needs“Especially since this is an ICT class where students present an array of extra challenges, his class size causes excessive stress on the teachers and the students alike. PreK is important, but so is the quality of education for children in Kindergarten and up.”
“My son’s class has 24 children, many of them requiring close support, and his teacher is not able to individualize instruction as she could in a smaller class,” said Reeshemah Brightley, the mother of a Kindergarten child at P.S./I.S. 76 in Manhattan. “Classroom management is difficult, and students are more disruptive in a large class than they otherwise would be, making it hard for the rest of the class to focus.”
JoAnn Schneider’s son is a fourth grader in an ICT class of 31 students at P.S./I.S. 113 in Queens: “My son receives special education services and has been in an inclusion class since Kindergarten. He’s making only minimal progress because he needs a more focused environment that only a small class can provide. It is not right that my child should be denied the kind of education given to children elsewhere in the state where classes average only 20-22 students per class – especially when the law requires it.”
Johanna Garcia, a mother of two children at P.S./I.S. 187 in Manhattan, explained: “My son is in third grade in a class of 28. He receives special services, but his class is far too big and he has trouble keeping up. When he was in Kindergarten, his class size exceeded the cap, and that’s when it became clear to me that it was impossible for him to receive the attention he needed with so many other children in the class. My daughter is in a class of 29 students in fifth grade, and many in her class have been unable to stay engaged and afloat. The city owes it to my children and all other students in the public school system to remedy this egregious violation of their rights.”
_____________________
To read the petition, click here or see below; a timeline documenting the DOE’s failure to reduce class sizes since the CFE lawsuit is available here; and data showing class size trends is available here.
# # #




 NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE | Class Size Matters NYC PARENTS FILE COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE LAW TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE | A clearinghouse for information on class size & the proven benefits of smaller classes:

Russ on Reading: The Third Annual National Give-A-Kid-A-Book Day

Russ on Reading: The Third Annual National Give-A-Kid-A-Book Day:

The Third Annual National Give-A-Kid-A-Book Day

Image result for National Give-A-Kid-A-Book Day

July 6, 2017 marks the 3rd annual National Give-a-Kid-a-Book Day. This day of book giving was initiated on this blog in 2015 as a way to get books into children's hands during the summer, a time when many young readers suffer "summer loss" because they fail to exercise their reading muscles over the summer break. While many educators talk about children's motivation to read, research has shown that the key variable in whether children choose to read or not is access to books. As McGill-Franzen and Allington put it,

Ensuring that books are available to any child at any time of the year will be a good first step in enhancing the reading achievement of low-income students and an absolutely necessary step in closing the reading achievement gap.

This week my children and grandchildren are gathering for a family celebration. My wife, Cindy, and I now have five grandchildren, so we will be keeping the bookstores busy as we load up the grandkids with the latest picture books, poetry volumes, and young adult novels. I invite you to join us. Find a kid. Give that kid a book. It will make you feel good about yourself and you just might be doing your part in building a life-long reader.

National Give-a-Kid-a-Book Day is dedicated to the many hard-working people and organizations who have gone to extraordinary efforts to make sure that all children have access to books. Toward that end each year on 
Russ on Reading: The Third Annual National Give-A-Kid-A-Book Day:



Seattle Schools Community Forum: WPD Urges Governor's Veto on Part of Budget

Seattle Schools Community Forum: WPD Urges Governor's Veto on Part of Budget:

WPD Urges Governor's Veto on Part of Budget


From Washington's Paramount Duty:

ACTION NEEDED!
Please CALL GOV. INSLEE: 360-902-4111 on Thursday, July 6! Parents are asking Gov. Inslee to veto a huge new tax cut for businesses that was created in the budget deal. 

Here’s the story: Even as legislators failed to fully fund public schools, they added a section to the funding bill (SSB 5977) that reduces the Business & Occupation Tax for manufacturers. That’s a 40% reduction in the business tax rate, and could cost as much as $40 million per year. (For perspective, the state could fully fund the Breakfast After The Bell program for just under $3 million a year.)

Please call Governor Inslee (360-902-4111) on Thursday, July 6 and ask him to veto this new tax cut. Doing so wouldn’t require vetoing anything else. This tax cut never got a hearing in the House Finance Committee — there’s no way to justify this. If you can't call on Thursdayplease email the Governor using this linkhttp://governor.wa.gov/contact/contact/send-gov-inslee-e-message
Here is the letter that WPD sent to Governor Inslee's Chief of Staff and Director of External Affairs on Sunday, July 2.
Dear Mr. Postman and Ms. Smith:

We are writing on behalf of Washington’s Paramount Duty’s 10,000 parents and public school advocates. We urge Governor Inslee to improve the health and sustainability of the recently-approved funding for public schools by vetoing the section of SSB 5977 that reduces the Business & Occupation (B&O) Tax rate for manufacturers to 0.2904 percent from the current rate of 0.484 percent. This tax cut, costing at least $40 million per year, leaves the state government with less flexibility and resources to fund our schools, especially in the event of an economic downturn.
Both the content of the tax cut and the process by which it was included in the budget provide a strong justification for veto action.

We need only look at the State of Kansas to see the disastrous impacts of these kinds of corporate tax cuts. When the Governor of Kansas signed major business tax cuts into law, the result was a nationally-known disaster for the state's schools and even the state's economy.

We share the legislature's desire to help boost the rural economy. But we also believe one of the best ways to do that is by fully and amply funding their public schools. It may be possible that this tax break may ultimately benefit schools and rural communities. We have no way to know whether that is true, because no analysis was conducted on this proposal. There is no fiscal note.

Instead, as the Seattle Times demonstrated, this tax cut was added at the very end of secret negotiations. This tax cut is a major change to our state's revenue system. It should have been proposed, analyzed, and debated in public. Perhaps this proposal would have been a good idea as part of a larger plan of tax reform. It is not a good idea as something included at the 11th hour.

We urge you to veto the relevant section of SSB 5977 and ask the legislature to revisit the manufacturing tax cut in full public view, with rigorous analysis of the proposal and its fiscal impact, particularly on our still-underfunded public schools.

Sincerely,

Tali Rausch
President, Washington’s Paramount Duty

Summer Stinson
Vice President, Washington’s Paramount Duty

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/democrats-urge-gov-inslee-to-veto-tax-cut-for-manufacturers/

 Seattle Schools Community Forum: WPD Urges Governor's Veto on Part of Budget:

At 2017 NEA Representative Assembly, Educators Vow to Hold Strong, Defend Public Education

At 2017 NEA Representative Assembly, Educators Vow to Hold Strong, Defend Public Education:

At 2017 NEA Representative Assembly, Educators Vow to Hold Strong, Defend Public Education


Vigorous debates and discussions over social justice, the dangers posed by the Trump-DeVos education agenda, and ending the proliferation of unaccountable charter schools dominated the 96th NEA Representative Assembly (RA) held July 2 – 5 at the Boston Convention Center. While addressing the serious challenges facing students and public education dominated the week, the spirits of delegates were lifted by emotional presentations from student poets that kicked off each day’s activities and a rapturously received appearance by actor and reading advocate LeVar Burton.
In her keynote address on Day 1, NEA President Lily Eskelsen García didn’t sugarcoat the dire challenges facing public education in the Trump era. But “we can win. We have the power, and they know it,” she said.
Eskelsen García assured the 7,000 delegates that NEA would not try to find common ground with Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who is pursuing an aggressive school privatization agenda, while refusing to protect our most vulnerable students from discrimination.
7,000 delegates attended the 2017 NEA Representative Assembly (Photo: Rick Runion)
“I will not allow the National Education Association to be used by Donald Trump or Betsy DeVos,” Eskelsen García told the delegates to resounding applause. “I do not trust their motives. I do not believe their alternative facts. I see no reason to assume they will do what is best for our students and their families. There will be no photo-op!”
Giving the close of Day 1 the feel of an organizing rally, NEA Executive Director John At 2017 NEA Representative Assembly, Educators Vow to Hold Strong, Defend Public Education:

Where Did All The Integrated Schools Go? Why Segregation is Still Bad | gadflyonthewallblog

Where Did All The Integrated Schools Go? Why Segregation is Still Bad | gadflyonthewallblog:

Where Did All The Integrated Schools Go? Why Segregation is Still Bad



School segregation is bad.
Still.
It is shocking to me that in 2017 making this argument remains necessary.
But everywhere you look in the education debate you’ll find people clinging to their segregated charter schools, pushing for more segregated school vouchers, and lobbying to increase segregation at our traditional public schools.
You might be forgiven for thinking that the issue was resolved way back in 1954 when the US Supreme Court ruled in the landmark Brown vs. Board of Educationcase.
Justices decided that it was unconstitutional to have substandard schools for black and minority students while also maintaining pristine schools for white children, as was the practice in most parts of the country at the time.
They struck down the previous justification of “separate but equal” because when you have separate schools, they are rarely equal.
You might think that’s just common sense. When you have schools just for blacks and schools just for whites, the resources aren’t going to be divided fairly or evenly. One group will always get the upper hand. Better to mix the two groups so it’s harder Where Did All The Integrated Schools Go? Why Segregation is Still Bad | gadflyonthewallblog: