Twisted Thursday Diane Ravitch's blog
A site to discuss better education for all
Parents File Complaint to New York State, Demanding Reduced Class Sizes
YESTERDAY
Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:
Overall, the region lost black residents in the 11-year period, about 69,000 in all. All of the decline was in the city, which lost 104,000 African-American residents, with some but not most moving to the suburbs. “Those trends suggest that black residents from Chicago are choosing to leave the region altogether,” mostly for Sun Belt cities, the report says.That’s consistent with findings by Metropolitan Planning Council researcher Alden Loury, who in a recent report specifically examined what’s happening in Chicago proper. The loss is focused among low-income households, Loury added, and is much bigger than in most other major metros.The population of whites here has dropped, too, down almost 200,000 in the seven counties as a whole, according to Census data crunched by A city for the rich. The gentrification of Chicago. | Fred Klonsky:
One of things that the charter movement has done is let the benefits of choice inure to less affluent communities. As a progressive, I think that's a good thing.The question is, now, how can we be thoughtful about that choice? And I think L.A. has not been thoughtful.We've proliferated, but we haven't thought about why and how and where, and how to learn from charters.
I've been an advocate for a while of universal enrollment.Let's provide the same access to parents, and then let's build some safety valves into the system to make sure that it's not just the eager parents that are getting the options.
You have 40,000 parents on waitlists. Do you build a lot more schools to get parents off those waitlists, or do you improve our schools?I'm confident that, in part by learning from the charter school sector, we can improve our schools to get that list down close to zero.Until that day comes, charter options for families should be their right within the public school system.And one of the conversations we're going to have to have with the charter sector is this whole myth of charter growth.
It's this idea that, now, with four members of the board endorsed byTake Two® | Meet LAUSD's new school board member Nick Melvoin | 89.3 KPCC:

ACTION NEEDED!
Please CALL GOV. INSLEE: 360-902-4111 on Thursday, July 6! Parents are asking Gov. Inslee to veto a huge new tax cut for businesses that was created in the budget deal.Here’s the story: Even as legislators failed to fully fund public schools, they added a section to the funding bill (SSB 5977) that reduces the Business & Occupation Tax for manufacturers. That’s a 40% reduction in the business tax rate, and could cost as much as $40 million per year. (For perspective, the state could fully fund the Breakfast After The Bell program for just under $3 million a year.)Please call Governor Inslee (360-902-4111) on Thursday, July 6 and ask him to veto this new tax cut. Doing so wouldn’t require vetoing anything else. This tax cut never got a hearing in the House Finance Committee — there’s no way to justify this. If you can't call on Thursday, please email the Governor using this link: http://governor.wa.gov/contact/contact/send-gov- inslee-e-message
Here is the letter that WPD sent to Governor Inslee's Chief of Staff and Director of External Affairs on Sunday, July 2.
Dear Mr. Postman and Ms. Smith:
We are writing on behalf of Washington’s Paramount Duty’s 10,000 parents and public school advocates. We urge Governor Inslee to improve the health and sustainability of the recently-approved funding for public schools by vetoing the section of SSB 5977 that reduces the Business & Occupation (B&O) Tax rate for manufacturers to 0.2904 percent from the current rate of 0.484 percent. This tax cut, costing at least $40 million per year, leaves the state government with less flexibility and resources to fund our schools, especially in the event of an economic downturn.
Both the content of the tax cut and the process by which it was included in the budget provide a strong justification for veto action.
We need only look at the State of Kansas to see the disastrous impacts of these kinds of corporate tax cuts. When the Governor of Kansas signed major business tax cuts into law, the result was a nationally-known disaster for the state's schools and even the state's economy.
We share the legislature's desire to help boost the rural economy. But we also believe one of the best ways to do that is by fully and amply funding their public schools. It may be possible that this tax break may ultimately benefit schools and rural communities. We have no way to know whether that is true, because no analysis was conducted on this proposal. There is no fiscal note.
Instead, as the Seattle Times demonstrated, this tax cut was added at the very end of secret negotiations. This tax cut is a major change to our state's revenue system. It should have been proposed, analyzed, and debated in public. Perhaps this proposal would have been a good idea as part of a larger plan of tax reform. It is not a good idea as something included at the 11th hour.
We urge you to veto the relevant section of SSB 5977 and ask the legislature to revisit the manufacturing tax cut in full public view, with rigorous analysis of the proposal and its fiscal impact, particularly on our still-underfunded public schools.
Sincerely,
Tali Rausch
President, Washington’s Paramount Duty
Summer Stinson
Vice President, Washington’s Paramount Duty
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/ democrats-urge-gov-inslee-to- veto-tax-cut-for- manufacturers/
