Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, May 3, 2015

WANTED: Teachers — Education’s revolutionary uprising | The Underdog's Advocate

WANTED: Teachers — Education’s revolutionary uprising | The Underdog's Advocate:

WANTED: Teachers — Education’s revolutionary uprising



May issue-01


 by Ryan B. Jackson, Ed.D

If April showers bring May flowers then what, in turn, do these undeniable symbols of spring really bring? For the answer, look no further than your community school, job fair or university graduation ceremony: New Teachers.
Spring sets the stage or plants the seeds (to keep the analogy going) for fall’s new teaching recruits to embark on an age-old journey, where self-interest and financial fortune are abandoned and replaced with a commitment to one of the most noble yet unsung professions the world has ever known. Understandably, after reading that last line, skeptics just rolled their eyes and scoffed at the word “noble” and I cannot blame them. In fact, as an educator in-love with the profession and passionate about its indelible impact on society, I, too, often wonder why anyone in their right mind would willingly dive into a hurricane-infested profession that supplies no life preserver, vague swimming lessons, and reluctant lifeguards. Yet as a second-year administrator, I am astonished and admittedly proud to report that there are still those courageous enough to try their hand at teaching, all the while our nation’s educational landscape seems inevitably destined for civil war.
The question still remains, however: Why would any sane, self-respecting adult commit to a profession that has systematically been underpaid, devalued, even outright ostracized by society at large?
To even begin to answer this head-scratching riddle, I had to reflect on my own pursuits of the profession. In 2007 I simply wanted to teach kids how to write better. Working as a copywriter in the marketing department of a local business, I began tutoring a pair of brothers whose mother had sincere concerns about their ability to articulate thoughts into compelling sentences and paragraphs. And, like most teachers can attest, it only took one tutoring session before I was hooked. The mental connections, the synapse firings, the rush of reading a well-written essay — I knew instantly teaching was for me.
Unfortunately, teaching in the heart of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) era slapped a rude awakening on my dreams of Socratic seminars centered around the art and science of great writing. Immediately, I was inundated with an accountability-based standardized testing doctrine that was undeniably pressuring teachers to trim the proverbial creative fat from teaching and learning for a leaner, test-prep cut of education. Undaunted, I searched for meaningful, impactful approaches to a test-centered education paradigm. My teaching mentor Ryan Murphey (@ryanomurphey) became Butch Cassidy to my Sundance Kid, as we fashioned ourselves as teaching outlaws committed to thought-provoking teaching styles with universal themes as our ammunition. In those days, I primarily taught junior-level English, and our big focus was the Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program (TCAP) writing assessment, as well as the ACT (although the ACT had yet to really solidify itself as the go-to measure for college readiness — at least in the urban school I served). Laughingly, we thought the stakes were high then! In WANTED: Teachers — Education’s revolutionary uprising | The Underdog's Advocate:

My Position on the Senate ESEA Reauthorization Draft | deutsch29

My Position on the Senate ESEA Reauthorization Draft | deutsch29:

My Position on the Senate ESEA Reauthorization Draft






I have read (and reread certain sections of) the entire 601-page Senate reauthorization draft of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), written by Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray and named the Every Child Achieves  Act of 2015.
I have also read the 29 amendments that were added to the Act as it gained approval from the Senate Ed Committee on April 16, 2015.
In an effort to offer my readers a digest of the massive Senate ESEA draft, I wrote a series of six posts that can be accessed here. I also did the same for the 29 amendments, which resulted in a series of three posts that can be accessed here.
During this massive undertaking, I have had individuals asking about my position on the Senate ESEA draft. Even though some of my posts include glimpses into my thoughts about the Alexander-Murray draft (and now, its included 29 amendments), I have not yet offered a summative word regarding my opinion of this proposed ESEA reauthorization.
I will do so now.
Until something happens, whether that “something” is a new version of ESEA or killing ESEA, school districts across America are stuck with George W. Bush’s infamously ridiculous and punitive version of ESEA known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB). In short, NCLB told America that there would be “100 percent proficiency in reading and math by 2014″ or else teachers, administrators, schools, school districts, and states would pay. The premise of NCLB is that teachers and administrators could be scared into producing a never-before-known (in any country) level of test-centered “proficiency.” And states were set up to “prove” they were on the road to this perfection by setting up their own “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) toward this perfect goal, which was perched precariously on the test scores of at least 95 percent of a state’s students. Not achieving AYP could result in dire consequences, including the firing teachers and administration as part of school “restructuring.” (For an excellent summary of NCLB consequences, see Diane Ravitch’s Death and Life of the Great American School System, pgs. 97-98.)
As one might expect in such a ridiculous high-stakes situation, in an effort to avoid NCLB consequences, states gamed the system to create AYP goals that they could achieve.
An entire nation of school districts boasting “100 percent proficiency in reading and math by 2014″ was not to be, and any individual with a sliver of common sense knew it.
So, 2014 has come and gone, and states remain under NCLB until ESEA is either completely done away with or redrafted and reauthorized. And by “under NCLB,” that means states are subject to the likes of US Secretary Arne Duncan’s NCLB “waivers,” in which he has decided to leverage control over both state standards and teacher evaluation. Otherwise, without one of his “on my terms” NCLB waivers, Duncan can declare any state as having failed to meet that unrealistic NCLB goal of “100 percent proficiency in reading and math.”
Stupid, I know. But that is where we are (and where we remain) until something happens to dismiss or replace the ESEA version known as NCLB.
Now, I mentioned that one option is to completely do away with ESEA. That is my preferred position, one that I wrote about on February 1, 2015. That post included an email I wrote to Alexander in which I suggested that ESEA be sunsetted in favor of separate block grants.
The reality is that ESEA will not be laid to rest. It will continue, and either Congress will fail in its efforts to reauthorize it and default for another seven years to NCLB (which means NCLB “waivers”)–or– Congress will reauthorize a new version of ESEA.
There are two versions currently in the running, one originating in the House (Kline’sHR 5, the Student Success Act) and the Senate (Alexander and Murray’s Every Child Achieves Act of 2015). Both bills propose to retain the mandatory annual state testing in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school in both English language arts (ELA) and math. Both bills encourage charter school growth and expansion. Both include language forbidding the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) as a federal mandate. HR 5 includes language to make Title I money “follow the student,” which would be an accounting and budgeting nightmare.
I think the Senate draft is the better of the two bills. It appears to be a true, Republican-Democratic negotiation that could garner the votes needed to rid America of NCLB (and Duncan’s waivers), and it does not include portability of Title I funding.
As for the charter love in the Senate ESEA draft, I do not support the encouragement My Position on the Senate ESEA Reauthorization Draft | deutsch29:

Special Nite Cap: Catch Up on Today's Post 5/3/15



SPECIAL NITE CAP - CATCH UP ON TODAY'S POST 5/3/15


Special Nite Cap 

CORPORATE ED REFORM




Common Core jeopardizes foundation of learning (By Wendy Lecker) - Wait What?
Common Core jeopardizes foundation of learning (By Wendy Lecker) - Wait What?: Common Core jeopardizes foundation of learning (By Wendy Lecker) Fellow Connecticut educate advocate Wendy Lecker has been one of the most powerful and important voices on behalf of public education and against the corporate education reform industry’s unending assault of public school teachers, public schools and the r
LAUSD charter group gave food contract to an employee's firm - LA Times
LAUSD charter group gave food contract to an employee's firm - LA Times: LAUSD charter group gave food contract to an employee's firm os Angeles-based charter group awarded food-service contracts worth millions of dollars to a company partially owned by one of the schools' high-ranking employees, a state investigation has found.The probe involved Jacqueline Duvivier Castillo, who is the director o
BREAKING: L.A. School Board Candidate and His Charter Scandal | Diane Ravitch's blog
BREAKING: L.A. School Board Candidate and His Charter Scandal | Diane Ravitch's blog:  L.A. School Board Candidate and His Charter Scandal  Charter school founder Ref Rodriguez is running for the Los Angeles school board, seeking to beat incumbent Bennett Kayser. Kayser is known for his insistence that charter schools be financially transparent and accountable for their use of public funds.The Los
East Side student walkout energizes anti-Cami effort | Bob Braun's Ledger
East Side student walkout energizes anti-Cami effort | Bob Braun's Ledger: East Side student walkout energizes anti-Cami effort Nearly 1,000 students–more than half of the school’s enrollment–burst through the doors of East Side High School noon Friday and began a three-hour march around the city, determined to stop the state administration from turning their school into a “turnaround” school with
Still Waiting for Democracy: When the State Takes Over From the State | educarenow
Still Waiting for Democracy: When the State Takes Over From the State | educarenow: Still Waiting for Democracy: When the State Takes Over From the StatePosted on May 1, 2015 | 3 CommentsIf you’re paying attention to education matters in the state of Michigan, you know that Michigan’s Governor Snyder has come out with his plan for what is to become of Detroit Public Schools.  In a nutshell, it con
Will Market-Based Education Produce More or Less Student Uprising? | Cloaking Inequity
Will Market-Based Education Produce More or Less Student Uprising? | Cloaking Inequity: Will Market-Based Education Produce More or Less Student Uprising?In the post, Exclusive: Students Tear Gassed By Police While Protesting School Inequality I askedAre you ready for more protests?School “reformers” have argued that the Baltimore uprising is a call for more market-based education. I argue the opp
Karen Wolfe: Teachers! Turn Out for Bennett Kayser! | Diane Ravitch's blog
Karen Wolfe: Teachers! Turn Out for Bennett Kayser! | Diane Ravitch's blog: Karen Wolfe: Teachers! Turn Out for Bennett Kayser! Karen Wolfe is a public school parent in Los Angeles:She writes:“Just like a rash of neighborhood robberies reminds us to double check that our doors are locked, Ref “Reformer” Rodriguez’s campaign to take the school board seat away from experienced educator Bennett Kayse
Schools Matter: High School Charter Expansion in Memphis Assisted by Green Dot Exec on School Board
Schools Matter: High School Charter Expansion in Memphis Assisted by Green Dot Exec on School Board:High School Charter Expansion in Memphis Assisted by Green Dot Exec on School Board Yesterday the Commercial Appeal reported that the next corporate assault on Memphis public schools will be directed toward the hostile takeover of high schools next year.  Although the upper grades corporate charter
CURMUDGUCATION: Edushyster: Peter Cunningham's Woes
CURMUDGUCATION: Edushyster: Peter Cunningham's Woes: Edushyster: Peter Cunningham's WoesI have now met Jennifer "Edushyster" Berkshire, and I totally get it. I don't believe there is a human being on the planet who, upon sitting down with her, would not want to answer every question just to prolong the conversation and once you're talking, well, lying to the woman would be like kicking a
New study suggests Corporate Profits do significantly better in charter schools | Deseret News
New study suggests urban students do significantly better in charter schools | Deseret News: New study suggests urban students do significantly better in charter schools Students in major urban centers around the country perform better in charter schools than they do in traditional public schools, according to a new study from the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University.Th
When the Governor Sneezes the Whole State Catches a Cold - Finding Common Ground - Education Week
When the Governor Sneezes the Whole State Catches a Cold - Finding Common Ground - Education Week: When the Governor Sneezes the Whole State Catches a Cold"Instead of being a means of educational improvement, standardized testing has become an obsession in itself." Sir Ken RobinsonIt's been a year since I have been out of the role of principal in a public school system. Although I work w
Weingarten regrets supporting Cuomo's running mate | Capital New York
Weingarten regrets supporting Cuomo's running mate | Capital New York: Weingarten regrets supporting Cuomo’s running mate BUFFALO—American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten regrets campaigning for Governor Andrew Cuomo's running mate in last year’s elections, she told Capital during a union convention on Saturday.Weingarten, former president of New York City’s United Federation of
Why the movement to opt out of Common Core tests is a big deal - The Washington Post
Why the movement to opt out of Common Core tests is a big deal - The Washington Post: Why the movement to opt out of Common Core tests is a big dealThe movement among parents to refuse to allow their children to take Common Core-aligned standardized tests has been growing in a number of states, as recent Answer Sheet posts have chronicled (here and here, for example). As opt-out numbers have grown

YESTERDAY

Out-of-state Dark Money seek to influence Tennessee's legislators | Local News | Times Free Press
Out-of-state interests seek to influence Tennessee's legislators | Local News | Times Free Press: Out-of-state interests seek to influence Tennessee's legislators NASHVILLE -- Out-of-state interests have long sought to shape public policy in Tennessee, but some national organizations that are relative newcomers to the Volunteer State have added millions of dollars to the mix of political money and
Special Nite Cap: Catch Up on Today's Post 5/2/15
Special Nite Cap - Catch Up on Today's Post 5/2/15Special Nite Cap CORPORATE ED REFORMDyslexia and Teachers in a World with No Special EducationDyslexia and Teachers in a World with No Special Education: Dyslexia and Teachers in a World with No Special EducationMAY 2, 2015 BY NANCY BAILEY LEAVE A COMMENTWhat happens to students with dyslexia and learning disabilities when there are no more special