EducationNewsToday
Gummy-bear fun offers a taste of science, engineering for girls
The conference at Seattle University encourages middle-school girls to explore science and engineering careers.
" style="text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; color: rgb(87, 108, 54); ">SAM COOK • SCOOK@NEWS-PRESS.COM • MARCH 14, 2010
1:10 A.M. — It seems like a no-brainer, even for those of us lacking acumen.
Surely, smaller class sizes are more conducive to success for Lee County public school students.
What teacher doesn't yearn for the mandate of the 2002 class-size amendment - 18 students in pre-kindergarten to third grade, 22 in fourth to eighth grade and 25 in high school?
"Our teachers love it,'' says Donna Mutzenard, executive director of Island Coast Florida Education Association, the service unit representing teachers. "You can do so much more with smaller classes.''
It's a teacher's dream, but an administrator's nightmare, says the boss.
After investing eight years and $16 billion, one-third of Florida's classrooms are too crowded and Superintendent James Browder says the law is expensive, unmanageable and needs right-sizing.
"The problem with the class-size amendment is it takes all flexibility away from the school principal,'' says Browder, 62, superintendent since 2003.
Which is like taking away the audible from the quarterback.
"It sounds really good on paper,'' Browder says. "But when you get to the mechanics of managing it, you realize real quick whoever put this together really didn't understand the long-term negative effect it could have on schools.''
KA-ching!
Browder, who endorses the right-size amendment for November's ballot, says he will campaign against the August initiation of the class-size amendment.
The right-size amendment offers flexibility, adding three, four or five extra students per class.
"We've spent $535 million locally and met the class size every year,'' says Browder about Lee's 80,000-student district. "But if we don't relax class-size requirements, it will bankrupt our state.''
by Ron Jacobs / March 13th, 2010
On March 4th, 2010, students, faculty, school workers and parents took to the streets in various cities across the United States. The bulk of the protests occurred in California, where the public education system is the target of a full bore head-on attack by the state and some of its corporate backers. There were walkouts, rallies, highway takeovers and a number of other protests and direct actions. The primary demand of the protesters was to rescind the cuts and fee hikes immediately. This day of protest was part of an ongoing series of actions dedicated to this goal. The movement’s organizers include students, community members, parents, and education workers. The politics range from anarchist to liberal Democrat. The movement has shown some success in organizing folks, but has yet to show any real victories as regards its demands.
In the spring of 2009, a similar movement developed in Vermont around the same type of issues. The primary difference however was that the Vermont movement was oriented toward opposing proposed college tuition hikes, layoffs, and other budgetary manipulations conceived by the administration and trustees at the University of Vermont. In addition, a fair amount of righteous anger was directed at the trustees and administration after it was revealed that the majority of the top-heavy university administration had received bonuses that totaled almost a million dollars. A similar situation exists in California where university and college administrators across the state have received salary increases and other monetary rewards while they tell the citizens of the state that tuition will be going up and that classes will be cut, thereby reducing the number of places available for high school students and others interested in higher education.
In Washington State, a movement is developing around announced budget cuts aimed at the public education system–from kindergarten to the university. Just as in other places mentioned in this article, the proposed cuts will hit those who can least afford it. That is, working class families, many of whom are either unemployed or partially employed due to the current
"I couldn't bare to see the garden neglected any longer. I thought it would be a great opportunity for me to share what made me so interested in science in the first place; the outdoors," said Nicole Calmels. "Luckily our school Principal, Chona Killeen, was very supportive of the garden. The administration's support can rally teachers to work together on such projects, while lack of support can crush the desire to go the extra mile."
Nanette Asimov, Chronicle Staff Writer
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Jamie Rector / Special to The Chronicle
Martha Garibay (left) and Hilda Sandoval (center), union members who work in food services at UCLA, protest at the home of UC Regent Eddie Island in Santa Monica on Friday.
View More Images (2)
Dozens of custodians, gardeners, bus drivers and cooks from the University of California snooped around picturesque Fort Baker in Sausalito the other day, trying to figure out where investors from Blum Capital Partners were holding an annual meeting.
They spied the group entering a building. Rushing in, they squeezed past the stunned financiers and marched around a meeting room chanting, "Dick Blum, you can't hide! We can see your greedy side!"
Blum, the company's chairman and a UC regent, is one of several high-profile university leaders to encounter the dramatic, in-your-face tactics of UC's lowest-paid workers.
The individualized protests began last fall after the regents unveiled a cost-cutting strategy that did not spare workers earning less than $40,000 a year.
The tactic stands in contrast to the mass protests March 4 that poured from school and university campuses up and down the state as demonstrators sought to bring the plight of public education to as wide an audience as possible.
The UC workers believe their more personal strategy is succeeding. But UC officials say such "strong-arm tactics" backfire by alienating leaders who are doing their best during rough economic times.
The employees staged a candlelight vigil at the Beverly Hills home of Regent Joanne Kozberg. They brought morning coffee and pastries to the Los Angeles home of Regent Monica Lozano, head of the finance committee. They knocked on the door of Regent Charlene Zettel in San Diego. And they leafleted at a gala for the After-School All-Stars hosted by Regent Paul Wachter and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger - then donated $1,000 to the charity.
"Our strategy is to approach key regents who have power and influence to change policy," said Rik Sandoval, a cook at UCSF.
Workers say that one year after UC signed a contract meant to lift as many as 9,000 service workers out of poverty, more than 3,000 of them remain in the same desperate
The Ides of March will be an ugly day for too many California educators. March 15 is the deadline set by the state education code for school districts to notify teachers they may not have a job in the fall. Given the continued sorry state of the state budget, layoffs will abound as districts do what is necessary to bring their budgets into balance.
The state Legislature has been wrestling to close a $6 billion gap in revenues in the current fiscal year while facing another $14 billion shortfall starting July 1.
The unfortunate and unintended consequence of Proposition 13, which slashed property taxes in 1978, is that control of local school budgets has been thrusted into the fiasco that is Sacramento politics.
Education funding consumes almost 40 percent of the state budget — there's no way to bring it into balance without cutting education funding.
So Livermore trustees have decided to eliminate 67 positions, and Pleasanton board members voted to cut 32 teaching slots. It's the same story across the state. State revenues have fallen from a high of $104 billion to an estimate of $84 billion this year, a number that is expected by the nonpartisan legislative analyst to remain flat for the next two years.
The governor and his co-conspirators in the Legislature have failed to effectively deal with this problem since the Governator came into office. He set up a blue-ribbon commission that
delivered recommendations to change the taxation system last fall — a report that gathered nothing but dust instead of the focused attention it deserved.So don't beat up the local school trustees who are doing what they need to do in a thankless job. Direct your ire at Sacramento. But, save some for the politicos in Washington, D.C., who are spending at a stunning rate — the difference, of course, is that Washington can print money.
BACKWARD LOGIC: You have to wonder just what the policymakers in the White House are thinking.