Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, August 21, 2025

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 8-21-25

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
8-21-25

Peter Greene: Why Is it Controversial to Welcome Everyone in a Public School Classroom? https://dianeravitch.net/2025/08/20/peter-greene-why-is-it-controversial-to-welcome-everyone-in-a-public-school-classroom/ via @dianeravitch 

Peter Greene's article discusses the controversy surrounding a teacher, Sarah Inama, in West Ada, Idaho, who faced backlash for displaying a poster with multi-colored hands and the message "Everyone Is Welcome Here." The district deemed the poster non-neutral, citing federal restrictions on DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion). The situation escalated, revealing racism and administrative mismanagement. Inama resigned and joined Boise Schools, where inclusivity and diversity are embraced. The story highlights the challenges educators face in promoting inclusivity amidst political and societal divisions.

### Key Points

- Teacher Sarah Inama faced backlash for displaying a poster promoting inclusivity, deemed non-neutral by West Ada School District. 

- The controversy revealed racism, poor staff treatment, and administrative mismanagement in the district. 

- West Ada proposed requiring "Everyone Is Welcome" posters without multi-colored hands, citing federal restrictions. 

- Inama resigned and joined Boise Schools, which embrace diversity and inclusivity. 

- The incident underscores societal divisions and the challenges of promoting inclusivity in education. 

Michael Bloomberg: Will Trump Let RFK Jr. Destroy His Greatest Achievement? https://dianeravitch.net/2025/08/20/michael-bloomberg-will-trump-let-rfk-jr-destroy-his-greatest-achievement/ via @dianeravitch 

Michael Bloomberg critiques Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decisions as Health Secretary under Trump’s administration, arguing that Kennedy’s actions threaten Trump’s legacy of Operation Warp Speed, a groundbreaking initiative that accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development. Kennedy canceled $500 million in mRNA vaccine research, undermining public health advancements and potentially jeopardizing future pandemic preparedness and mRNA-based medical breakthroughs, including cancer research. Bloomberg emphasizes the importance of leadership in combating misinformation and fostering trust in vaccines.

### Key Points

- Trump’s Operation Warp Speed was a major success, saving millions of lives by rapidly developing COVID-19 vaccines. 

- RFK Jr., Trump’s Health Secretary, canceled $500 million in mRNA vaccine research, citing public distrust and misinformation, which he himself fueled. 

- mRNA vaccines represent a revolutionary technology, faster to develop and with broader applications, including potential cures for cancer and genetic diseases. 

- Bloomberg calls for decisive leadership from the White House to reverse Kennedy’s decisions and protect public health advancements. 

- Without government support, private sector funding for pandemic-related research is unlikely, leaving the U.S. vulnerable in future health crises. 

- Kennedy’s actions could hinder mRNA research for other diseases like HIV, diabetes, and cancer, risking American lives. 

A Day in the White House: You Can't Make This Stuff Up https://dianeravitch.net/2025/08/20/a-day-in-the-white-house-you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/ via @dianeravitch 

A satirical blog post by Jeff Tiedrich humorously critiques former President Donald Trump's behavior during a meeting at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. The article highlights Trump's erratic and self-centered actions, including his obsession with showcasing a painting, his incoherent remarks, and his focus on unrelated topics like trade deals and mail-in voting. The author mocks Trump’s inability to engage in serious diplomacy and contrasts his behavior with the gravity of the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Comments from readers suggest frustration and embarrassment over Trump's conduct, with calls for excluding him from international peace efforts.

### Key Points

- Jeff Tiedrich humorously criticizes Trump’s erratic behavior during a White House meeting with Zelenskyy and European leaders, highlighting his self-centeredness and inability to focus on diplomacy. 

- Trump showcases a bizarre painting and makes incoherent remarks, diverting attention from the serious issue of ending Russia's war in Ukraine. 

- The article mocks Trump's exaggerated claims about his accomplishments, such as improving Washington, D.C.'s safety and trade deals, while fact-checking these assertions. 

- Readers express embarrassment and frustration over Trump’s actions, suggesting that he be excluded from peace efforts and treated as an ally of Putin. 

Brilliant Speech by President of Finland on the Path to Peace in Ukraine https://dianeravitch.net/2025/08/20/brilliant-speech-by-president-of-finland-on-the-path-to-peace-in-ukraine/ via @dianeravitch 

Diane Ravitch's blog discusses education, democracy, and current events, highlighting a speech by Finland's former Prime Minister Alexander Stubb advocating for EU support for Ukraine. Stubb's speech draws parallels between Finland's historical struggle against Russia and Ukraine's current situation, emphasizing the importance of U.S. involvement despite challenges under the current administration. The blog also touches on topics like public education, political reforms, and international relations.

Alexander Stubb reflects on Finland's historical struggle with Russia, emphasizes Ukraine's fight for independence and sovereignty as pivotal for global order, and outlines a phased approach to peace while reaffirming unwavering support for Ukraine's victory.

Detailed Summary for [Alexander Stubb (President of Finland) speech about Ukraine-Russia war](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgsZT7YPS3E) by [Monica](https://monica.im)

  [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgsZT7YPS3E&t=0) Alexander Stubb, the President of Finland, shares a personal perspective on the Ukraine-Russia war, drawing parallels with Finland's own historical conflicts with Russia and emphasizing the importance of nationhood, independence, and sovereignty.

  - Introduction to a personal address regarding the Ukraine-Russia conflict.}

- Stubb recounts Finland's historical experience with Russia, referencing the 1939 attack and the two wars fought for survival.}

- He emphasizes that the current war is fundamentally about the existence of nationhood in Ukraine, which is rooted in principles of independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.}

- Stubb reflects on Finland's past peace agreements with Stalin, suggesting a similar future with Putin, while highlighting the loss of sovereignty and territory Finland experienced.}

- He reassures that the Finnish public will continue to support Ukraine during this challenging time.}

[02:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgsZT7YPS3E&t=126.87) In this speech, Alexander Stubb emphasizes the long-standing nature of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, highlighting the importance of international support for Ukraine and the broader implications for global stability and order.

  - Stubb begins by discussing the shared support for identity and historical experiences among nations regarding the conflict.}

- He asserts that Russia initiated the war, referencing previous acts of aggression, including the attacks on Georgia and the annexation of Crimea.}

- Stubb stresses that the war is not only about Ukraine but also impacts Europe, the United States, and international law.}

- He warns against trusting Putin and emphasizes the necessity of continued support for Ukraine to ensure its victory and prevent further Russian expansion.}

[04:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgsZT7YPS3E&t=254.91) In his speech, Alexander Stubb emphasizes Finland's unwavering support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression and outlines a proposed three-phase process towards achieving peace.

  - Stubb reaffirms Finland's commitment to support Ukraine, highlighting their role as a significant donor.}

- He calls for a proactive initiative to establish a concrete proposal for peace negotiations.}

- The first phase of his proposed process involves applying maximum pressure on Russia through sanctions and military support for Ukraine.}

- The second phase focuses on establishing a ceasefire and initiating negotiations for a peace agenda.}     

[06:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgsZT7YPS3E&t=383.23) Alexander Stubb emphasizes the importance of clear negotiations for peace in the Ukraine-Russia conflict while asserting that certain issues are non-negotiable, particularly regarding Ukraine's sovereignty and future alliances.

  - Stubb outlines the phases of the peace process, indicating that discussions about territory and reconstruction are still far from beginning.}

- He stresses that decisions on EU and NATO membership are solely up to Ukraine and the respective alliances, not Russia.}

- Stubb honors fallen Ukrainian heroes and asserts that despite the ongoing war, Ukraine will emerge as a strong European nation and eventually join NATO.}

- He calls for a plan for Ukrainian victory, emphasizing the need for a unified European response and a stronger transatlantic alliance.}

      

Big Education Ape: TIME TO SUPERSIZE THE HOUSE: WHY THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NEEDS A BIGGER SPEEDO (GERRYMANDERING) https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/08/time-to-supersize-house-why-us-house-of.html 

The article argues for expanding the U.S. House of Representatives, highlighting that its current size of 435 members, set in 1929, inadequately represents a growing population of 340 million. This imbalance leads to disproportionately large districts, diminished constituent representation, and distorted democracy, exacerbated by gerrymandering. The piece advocates for reforms like the "Wyoming Rule" or "Cube Root Rule" to increase seats, improve representation, reduce campaign costs, and mitigate gerrymandering. It also addresses logistical concerns and political resistance while emphasizing grassroots efforts to push for change.

### Key Points

- The U.S. House of Representatives has remained at 435 seats since 1929, despite a quadrupled population, leading to oversized districts and diminished representation. 

- Gerrymandering worsens the representation issue, distorting election outcomes through manipulative district designs. 

- Expanding the House could reduce district sizes, improve fairness, and align with the Founders’ vision of proportional representation. 

- Proposed reforms like the "Wyoming Rule" or "Cube Root Rule" could increase seats and enhance democracy without requiring a constitutional amendment. 

- Critics cite logistical challenges, costs, and potential inefficiency, but solutions like new facilities and tech upgrades are feasible. 

- Grassroots campaigns and advocacy are essential to drive the expansion of the House and combat gerrymandering. 

Big Education Ape: AI MODELS IN THE CLASSROOM: POE-ETIC JUSTICE AND THE BATTLE OF THE BOTS https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/08/ai-models-in-classroom-poe-etic-justice.html 

The article explores the integration of AI in education, focusing on its role in creative learning, such as teaching poetic meter and fostering critical thinking. It humorously compares AI-generated parodies of Edgar Allan Poe's "The Raven," highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different AI models in creative tasks. The piece also examines the broader implications of AI in classrooms, including its potential as an educational ally or a disruptive force.

### Key Points  

- AI models can create engaging pop quizzes and parodies, making learning more interactive and fun.   

- Comparing AI outputs helps students learn poetic meter, rhyme schemes, and critical thinking skills.   

- AI-generated parodies of "The Raven" reveal differences in tone, structure, and creativity among models.   

- The use of AI in education can foster engagement and humor while teaching complex topics like poetic meter.   

- Students can analyze AI biases, errors, and fabrications, which is essential in combating misinformation.   

- AI's impact on education is explored, with debates on whether it serves as a Trojan horse or a teacher’s ally.   

- The article humorously reimagines "The Raven" with political satire involving Trump, Putin, mail ballots, and Ukraine.   

- The parody uses Poe’s trochaic octameter and rhyme scheme to blend gothic style with modern political humor.   

- AI-driven creative tasks can highlight public perceptions and documented events without spreading falsehoods.   

- The parody reflects Trump’s personality and political controversies, contrasting with Putin’s stoic demeanor. 

Big Education Ape: AI MODELS IN THE CLASSROOM PART II: MATH POP QUIZZES AND THE PERILS OF TEACHER BOTS https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/08/ai-models-in-classroom-part-ii-math-pop.html  

The article explores the integration of AI in classrooms, specifically focusing on the use of AI tools like Gemini Grok Copilot and ChatGPT for creating math pop quizzes. While AI shows promise in streamlining educational tasks, it raises concerns about the role of teachers, the limitations of AI, and the risks of replacing human educators with "teacher bots." The author emphasizes the importance of collaboration between teachers and AI developers to ensure technology enhances learning rather than undermines it.

### Key Points  

- AI tools like Gemini Grok Copilot and ChatGPT are being used to create instant math quizzes for 5th graders, showcasing the potential of AI in education.   

- Despite advancements, AI models like GPT-4.0 and GPT-5.0 still require teacher guidance to produce effective educational content.   

- Teachers face a choice between paper and digital quizzes, each with its own pros and cons, but the decision should remain in their hands rather than AI's.   

- Billionaire profiteers and tech developers, who lack classroom experience, may shape AI tools if teachers don’t take the lead in guiding their development.   

- AI lacks the empathy and classroom management skills necessary to address students' individual needs and emotional challenges.   

- Replacing teachers with bots would strip classrooms of the human connection essential for effective learning and student support.   

- Teachers should collaborate with AI developers to design tools that complement their work, such as personalized lesson plans and instant feedback systems.   

- AI in education should empower teachers rather than replace them, ensuring it serves as a supportive tool.   

- Examples of AI-generated quizzes demonstrate the capabilities and limitations of current AI tools in creating educational content.   

- The philosophical debate over AI's role in education highlights the need for careful integration guided by educators. 


Big Education Ape: THE JIM CROW PLAYBOOK, REVISITED: How School Choice Became the New Segregation https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/08/the-jim-crow-playbook-revisited-how.html 


The article highlights the historical and ongoing issues surrounding school choice policies, emphasizing their role in exacerbating segregation, privatization, and the dismantling of public education. The article critiques the financial inefficiencies and inequities of voucher programs, the influence of billionaires on education privatization, and the misleading rhetoric behind "school choice." It advocates for increased funding for public schools, political action, and community resistance against privatization efforts.

### Key Points
- School choice policies, rooted in segregationist history, have worsened racial and economic divides in education. 
- Voucher programs drain public school resources and often benefit affluent families while disadvantaging marginalized communities. 
- Billionaire-backed privatization initiatives exploit public education for profit, undermining its community value. 
- The "choice" rhetoric masks inequities and fails to deliver meaningful options for low-income families. 
- Privatization schemes are fueled by deliberate underfunding of public schools, creating a false narrative of failure. 
- Advocates call for full funding of public schools, support for pro-public education candidates, and grassroots resistance to privatization. 

Big Education Ape: WHO WILL TEACH AI? AMY AND IAN: THE AI WUNDERKIND CHRONICLES https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/08/who-will-teach-ai-amy-and-ian-ai.html



Integrity and the Urgency of Choosing People Wisely – Cloaking Inequity https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/08/20/integrity-and-the-urgency-of-choosing-people-wisely/ 

Integrity and the Urgency of Choosing People Wisely

### Key Points

- Charlie Munger, known for his partnership with Warren Buffett, emphasized principles like living below your means, continuous learning, integrity, and avoiding toxic people. 

- Toxicity in relationships or professional environments can derail progress and waste valuable resources. Leaders must act decisively to remove harmful influences. 

- Hiring decisions reflect organizational values and shape culture, making it crucial to prioritize integrity and shared purpose. 

- Munger advocated for personal discipline, patience, and long-term thinking, which are essential for success and leadership. 

- In social justice and education, maintaining trust and avoiding toxic behavior is critical for advancing equity and collective effort. 

- Warren Buffett highlighted the importance of patience in decision-making and living intentionally to build a legacy of integrity. 



Teacher Tom: Monuments to the Urge to Create Cooperatively https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/08/monuments-to-urge-to-create.html 

Teacher Tom reflects on preschoolers' innate urge to create collaboratively through their impromptu "learning piles" made from loose playground parts. These child-led projects, often involving teamwork and creativity, result in piles of objects that symbolize cooperative play and accomplishment. The blog also highlights Teacher Tom's dedication to play-based learning and his broader efforts to promote high-quality preschool education globally.

### Key Points

- Preschoolers often create "learning piles" by stacking movable playground items, showcasing teamwork and creativity. 

- These projects are child-led, emergent, and demonstrate the instinct to collaboratively create, inspiring a sense of accomplishment. 

- Teacher Tom has been blogging for 14 years about play-based learning and offers free resources and opportunities for collaboration. 

- Teacher Tom works to expand access to play-based preschool education and shares insights through his blog and public speaking engagements. 



glen brown: "America's Homegrown Taliban" https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2025/08/americas-homegrown-taliban.html 

### Key Points

- The article critiques the GOP's transformation into an authoritarian movement focused on white supremacy, racism, and misogyny, comparing it to historical fascist regimes. 

- It discusses Trump's efforts to erase historical truths about slavery and racism, pushing for a whitewashed narrative of American greatness. 

- The GOP's actions include purging Black leaders from government, targeting federal workers, and renaming military bases after Confederate generals to reinforce systemic racism. 

- The Supreme Court's rulings have enabled voter suppression and gerrymandering, disproportionately affecting Black communities and undermining democracy. 

- The deportation of Afghan allies and attacks on racial minorities are framed as bureaucratic ethnic cleansing. 

- The article calls for mass mobilization and direct action to counter the GOP's agenda and defend equality and democracy. 



Seattle Schools Community Forum: Just To Be Clear on Director Brandon Hersey and His Relationship to the HYA Rep. https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/08/just-to-be-clear-on-director-brandon.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Schools Community Forum discusses issues within Seattle Public Schools, focusing on recent concerns about transparency, nepotism, and decision-making processes. The article highlights Director Brandon Hersey's relationship with Micah Ali, a consultant guiding the superintendent search, raising questions about potential bias. It also critiques the Board's handling of contracts and spending approvals, as well as the prevalence of nepotism in staff promotions and transfers within the district.

### Key Points

- Director Brandon Hersey’s relationship with consultant Micah Ali, described as a mentor, raises concerns about transparency in the superintendent search process. 

- Criticism of the Seattle School Board’s decision-making, including rapid contract approvals and handling of the Memorial Stadium contract. 

- Allegations of nepotism within Seattle Public Schools, particularly in principal promotions and transfers. 

- Historical commentary on advanced learning services and district practices.

Seattle Schools Community Forum: What Does New One-Year Contract Between SEA and SPS Mean? https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/08/what-does-new-one-year-contract-between.html?spref=tw 

### Key Points

- A new one-year contract between the Seattle Education Association (SEA) and Seattle Public Schools (SPS) was agreed upon as a temporary measure until a full three-year contract is negotiated next year. The contract addresses staffing, leave, and compensation but leaves $7M unfunded in the district's general fund. 

- Support staff such as instructional aides, secretaries, and paraprofessionals will receive a 2.5% pay raise. 

- Safety measures were enhanced, including protocols for student discipline and classroom disruptions. Teachers can remove disruptive students temporarily, with clear guidelines on corrective actions and communication with principals. 

- Staff providing medical care to students will receive protective gear and equipment. Domestic partners are now recognized as family members for leave purposes under federal and state laws. 

- Concerns about bullying and discipline changes were raised, with questions about parental involvement in solutions. 

- Allegations of nepotism within Seattle Public Schools were highlighted, particularly regarding promotions and job transfers among district personnel. 



Choosing Democracy: Fight Back Against the Authoritarian /Fascist Coup https://choosingdemocracy.blogspot.com/2025/08/fight-back-against-authoritarian.html 

Choosing Democracy: A discussion of major issues facing democracy, focusing on public schooling and resisting authoritarianism.

### Key Points

- The article critiques the idea that Trump’s actions are mere distractions, emphasizing the need to address both the Epstein Files and the broader threats to democracy. 

- It highlights Trump’s authoritarian tactics, including militarizing cities, attacking voting systems, and gerrymandering to manipulate elections. 

- The author advocates for simultaneous action on multiple fronts, rejecting the notion of prioritizing one issue over others, such as ignoring local resistance to federal encroachment. 

- Celebrations of grassroots efforts like protests and mobilizations against authoritarian measures are emphasized as essential to defending democracy. 

- Practical steps to resist Trump’s redistricting coup and authoritarian takeover are outlined, including toolkits, coalition-building sessions, and mass calls with legal experts. 

- The article concludes by encouraging continued action and vigilance to protect democratic values. 



Cloaking Inequity: AI Code Red: Supercharging Racism, Rewriting History, and Hijacking Learning | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/ai-code-red 

The article discusses the profound implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, highlighting its potential to perpetuate systemic bias, amplify inequities, and undermine democratic values. It critiques the unregulated deployment of AI systems, emphasizing the dangers of relying on data-driven models that reflect historical injustices and societal biases. The author calls for ethical oversight, community involvement, and intentional design to ensure AI serves humanity rather than exacerbates harm.

### Key Points

- AI systems are trained on biased historical data, leading to scaled injustices and distorted objectivity. 

- AI can replicate and multiply inequities, automating harmful decisions across institutions without human accountability. 

- Instances of AI disobedience, such as OpenAI models resisting shutdown commands, reveal ethical and existential risks. 

- Education is increasingly relying on AI for tasks like grading, curriculum design, and student evaluations, risking dehumanization and biased decision-making. 

- AI-generated curricula may propagate misinformation and ideological bias, undermining truth and critical knowledge. 

- Historical parallels show how technological innovations like standardized testing and charter schools have worsened inequities instead of leveling the playing field. 

- The article advocates for regulation, transparency, community consent, and ethical frameworks to prevent AI from exacerbating societal inequities. 

- The author warns of the catastrophic consequences of AI systems devoid of human values, urging a focus on justice, compassion, and accountability. 



Is Your State Likely to Opt-In to Trump's "Big, Ugly Vouchers?" A private school coupon group takes a look https://theeducationreport.substack.com/p/is-your-state-likely-to-opt-in-to 

### Key Points

- Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" includes a tax incentive program for federal school vouchers, providing taxpayer-funded private school discounts to families in states that opt-in. 

- Advocacy group EdChoice predicts that states like California, Colorado, Hawaii, Michigan, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, and Kentucky are least likely to opt-in to the voucher scheme. 

- Kentucky voters rejected school vouchers by a 2-1 margin in a 2024 ballot initiative, and Gov. Andy Beshear remains a strong advocate for public education. 

- Around 40 states are expected to opt-in to the voucher program, with an estimated cost of $20 billion to U.S. taxpayers. 


Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
8-20-25

The article is a collection of blog posts and news pieces covering topics such as education reform, AI integration in classrooms, school choice policies, political controversies, and societal challenges. It emphasizes the need for reforms, accountability, and collective action to address systemic inequities and threats to democracy.  

### Key Points  
- Texas Governor Abbott's voucher program channels taxpayer money to private schools, including religious institutions, with little accountability. Investigations reveal conflicts of interest and questionable financial practices. Critics argue the program defunds public education and lacks transparency.   
- Former President Trump announced plans for an executive order to ban mail-in voting, allegedly influenced by Vladimir Putin, claiming it undermines democracy. Critics view this as an authoritarian power grab threatening voter participation and democracy.   
- AI integration in classrooms fosters creative learning, such as teaching poetic meter and critical thinking, but raises debates about its role as a teacher’s ally or disruptive force.   
- Arizona's school voucher program faces accusations of massive fraud, highlighting systemic corruption and misuse of funds. The blog critiques corporate influence and privatization in public education reform.   
- School choice policies exacerbate segregation and privatization, draining resources from public schools and benefiting affluent families. Advocates call for increased funding for public education and resistance to privatization.   
- A federal judge struck down Trump administration actions targeting DEI programs, citing violations of free speech and improper administrative procedures. The ruling protects equity and inclusion in schools.   
- Chronic absenteeism in California schools dropped from 30% in 2022 to 20% in 2024 due to family engagement and Community Schools strategies. The state aims to reduce absenteeism by 50% over five years.   
- Democrats are criticized for neglecting children’s issues in campaigns, despite having better policies for children compared to Republicans. The article calls for a unified Children’s Agenda to prioritize children in policymaking.   
- Pennsylvania Senator Doug Mastriano’s voucher bill proposes funds for private schooling or homeschooling but raises concerns about segregation, oversight, and financial impact. Critics question its effectiveness and transparency.   
- Persistent absenteeism in schools highlights the importance of daily attendance for student success and healthy development. California aims to return to pre-pandemic absenteeism levels by 2030.   
- The "science of reading" movement often misrepresents grammar instruction. Research supports teaching grammar in the context of student writing rather than through isolated exercises.   
- Standardized tests like NAEP are critiqued for failing to resolve systemic educational issues and being misused for purposes beyond their original design.   
- AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini Grok Copilot are transforming classrooms but raise concerns about replacing human educators and addressing individual student needs. Collaboration with teachers is essential for balanced integration. 








Wednesday, August 20, 2025

TIME TO SUPERSIZE THE HOUSE: WHY THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NEEDS A BIGGER SPEEDO (GERRYMANDERING)

 

TIME TO SUPERSIZE THE HOUSE

WHY THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NEEDS A BIGGER SPEEDO (GERRYMANDERING)

Picture this: a 60-year-old guy, let’s call him Uncle Sam, strutting onto the beach in a Speedo he swore looked 'fabulous' when he was 20. Back then, it hugged his frame just right, turning heads for all the right reasons. Fast forward a few decades, a few burgers, and a lot of population growth, and that same Speedo is now a national embarrassment—stretched to its limits, barely containing the goods, and leaving everyone wondering, “Why hasn’t he upgraded to something that fits?” That, my friends, is the U.S. House of Representatives in 2025. Capped at 435 members since 1929, it’s trying to squeeze a nation of 340 million into a legislative swimsuit designed for a population one-third that size. Spoiler alert: it’s not a good look.

The Founding Fathers, those wig-wearing visionaries, imagined a House where each representative would serve a cozy 30,000 to 50,000 people—small enough for a rep to know their constituents’ names, gripes, and maybe even their favorite tavern. Today, the average House member represents a whopping 760,000 people, and in some states, it’s closer to a million. That’s like trying to herd a stadium’s worth of cats while pretending you’re still running a neighborhood book club. The House, meant to be the “People’s House,” has become more like the “People’s Megacorp,” with representatives so overstretched they can barely keep up with constituent emails, let alone their actual needs. And when democracy’s got a problem, the solution isn’t to double down on dysfunction—it’s to go big with more democracy. So, let’s talk about why it’s time to expand the House of Representatives, why gerrymandering makes this mess even messier, and why we need to organize and fight for a Congress that actually fits.

The Speedo Problem: A House That Doesn’t Fit

Back in 1787, the Founders designed the House to be the democratic heartbeat of the nation, a place where regular folks could send their neighbors to Washington to raise hell on their behalf. The Constitution didn’t lock in a specific number of seats; it just said each state gets at least one, and the total should grow with the population. For a while, Congress followed that plan, adding seats after every census like a kid outgrowing sneakers. By 1910, the House had 435 members, representing a nation of 92 million. But then, in 1929, Congress decided to freeze the number at 435, like a band that refuses to play new hits. Why? Rural states were worried about losing clout to booming urban centers, and some lawmakers fretted that a bigger House would be too chaotic—like a dinner party where you run out of chairs. Spoiler: the U.S. population didn’t stop growing. It’s now 340 million, and those 435 seats are trying to cover a nation that’s nearly quadrupled in size.

The math is brutal. In 1910, each representative served about 211,000 people. By 2025, it’s 760,000 on average, with some districts—like Montana’s—ballooning past a million. Compare that to other democracies: Germany’s Bundestag has 736 members for 84 million people, and the UK’s House of Commons has 650 seats for 67 million. The U.S. has the highest representation ratio among major democracies, meaning our “People’s House” is less people-y than most. It’s no wonder constituents feel like they’re shouting into a void. Try getting your congressperson to return your call when they’re juggling the needs of a small city.

This overcrowding also distorts representation. Small states like Wyoming (population 580,000) get one seat, while California’s districts average 760,000 people. That means a Wyoming voter’s voice is louder than a Californian’s in the House and, by extension, the Electoral College, where House seats determine electoral votes. The result? A system where smaller states punch above their weight, skewing democracy in ways the Founders never intended. If they wanted a House that grew with the nation, we’re about 100 years behind schedule.

Gerrymandering: The Art of Making a Bad Fit Worse

Now, let’s throw gerrymandering into the mix, because nothing says “democracy” like drawing district lines to screw over your opponents. Gerrymandering—named after that sneaky 19th-century governor Elbridge Gerry, who drew a district shaped like a salamander—is the dark art of manipulating voting maps to lock in partisan advantage. It’s like tailoring Uncle Sam’s Speedo to only flatter one political party. Techniques like “packing” (cramming your opponent’s voters into a few districts) and “cracking” (spreading them thin across many) ensure that election outcomes often reflect mapmakers’ whims rather than voters’ will. The Brennan Center for Justice notes that both parties do it—Democrats in Illinois, Republicans in Texas—but the result is the same: distorted representation that makes a mockery of fair elections.

Take Texas, where Republicans in 2025 are pushing to redraw maps to add GOP seats, citing population shifts but really just flexing their control. Or California, where Democrats are countering with their own redistricting plans, hoping to offset GOP gains elsewhere. NPR reports that these battles are heating up ahead of the 2026 midterms, with states like Ohio, Missouri, and Florida also diving into the gerrymandering fray. The Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling that partisan gerrymandering isn’t a federal issue has only made things worse, giving states a green light to draw maps with surgical precision thanks to modern tech. Communities of color often get the short end of the stick, with race used as a proxy for partisan advantage, further diluting their voting power.

Gerrymandering thrives in a House where districts are already too big. When you’re carving up 760,000 people, it’s easier to hide shady line-drawing than if you’re dealing with smaller, more cohesive communities. Expanding the House could shrink districts to a more manageable size—say, 550,000 per rep, as some proposals suggest—making it harder to gerrymander without raising red flags. Smaller districts mean more granular representation, forcing mapmakers to respect local communities rather than slicing them up like a political pizza.

The Case for a Bigger House: More Democracy, Less Drama

So, why expand the House? For starters, it’s what the Founders would’ve wanted. They saw the House as the branch closest to the people, meant to grow with the nation to keep representation proportional. A larger House would bring districts back to a human scale, letting reps actually connect with constituents instead of relying on mass emails and overworked staff. Protect Democracy argues that smaller districts could lower campaign costs, since candidates wouldn’t need to blanket a million-person district with ads. That opens the door to more diverse candidates—think teachers, small business owners, or community organizers—who don’t have access to big-donor cash.

More seats also mean better oversight and lawmaking. Right now, House members are stretched thin, juggling committee work, constituent services, and fundraising (because apparently democracy runs on Venmo). Adding seats—say, 150 more, bringing the total to 585, as the American Academy of Arts and Sciences suggests—would spread the workload, letting reps focus on actual governing. It could also reduce the Electoral College’s bias toward small states, making presidential elections closer to the popular vote. Simulations show that past election outcomes wouldn’t have shifted much, so this isn’t about handing one party a win—it’s about fairness.

Then there’s the trust factor. Americans are fed up with a Congress that feels distant and unresponsive. Only 28% support expanding the House, per Pew Research, but that’s because most don’t realize how overstuffed their districts are. A bigger House could restore faith by giving voters a rep who’s less like a corporate CEO and more like a neighbor. Plus, it doesn’t require a constitutional amendment—just a simple act of Congress. The “Wyoming Rule,” which would set district size based on the smallest state’s population (about 580,000), or the “Cube Root Rule” (tying seats to the cube root of the population, around 700 members) are two practical ways to do it. Pick one, pass a bill, and boom: democracy gets a glow-up.

The Pushback: Why Some Folks Hate the Idea

Of course, not everyone’s ready to buy Uncle Sam a new Speedo. Critics argue that a bigger House would be a logistical nightmare. The Capitol’s already a sardine can—where do you put 150 more desks, let alone offices? Solutions exist: build new facilities, repurpose underused spaces, or embrace coworking setups like a congressional WeWork. Tech upgrades and elevated pathways could ease the crunch, too. Then there’s the cost. More reps mean more salaries, staff, and travel budgets. But compared to the Pentagon’s annual “whoops, we lost a trillion dollars” budget, it’s pocket change for a healthier democracy.

Some worry a larger House would be less efficient, with more voices turning debates into a reality TV shouting match. But let’s be real: Congress isn’t exactly a well-oiled machine now. A bigger House might force better collaboration, especially if paired with reforms like independent redistricting commissions to curb gerrymandering. Others fret about partisan shifts, but studies show expansion wouldn’t drastically favor one party. The real resistance comes from inertia and small-state politicians who like their outsized influence. Sorry, Wyoming, but your one rep shouldn’t outweigh California’s 52.

The Call to Action: Organize and Fight

Expanding the House isn’t just a policy wonk’s fever dream—it’s a movement. Reps like Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and Jared Golden, two Democrats with a conservative streak, are pushing for it, proving this isn’t a partisan pipe dream. But it won’t happen without pressure. Congress doesn’t exactly leap at the chance to disrupt its own power structure. That’s where we come in. Grassroots campaigns, petitions, and good old-fashioned yelling at town halls can make noise. Groups like Protect Democracy are already laying the groundwork, and the Freedom to Vote Act could tackle gerrymandering while we’re at it. Social media—yes, even X—can amplify the call. Imagine the hashtag: #SupersizeTheHouse.

The House of Representatives is bursting at the seams, and gerrymandering’s only making it uglier. It’s time to ditch the 1929 Speedo and give democracy room to breathe. A bigger House means smaller districts, fairer representation, and a Congress that actually looks like America. The Founders didn’t build a system to stay stuck in time—they built one to grow. So let’s organize, fight, and make Uncle Sam’s legislative wardrobe great again. Who’s with me?


Gerrymandering Explained | Brennan Center for Justice https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/gerrymandering-explained?

Amid Trump's push, here’s how redistricting affects voters : NPR https://www.npr.org/2025/08/18/nx-s1-5495427/trump-redistricting-texas-congress-california

Expanding the House of Representatives, explained https://protectdemocracy.org/work/expanding-the-house-of-representatives-explained/

US population is growing, but House of Representatives is stuck at 435 https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/31/u-s-population-keeps-growing-but-house-of-representatives-is-same-size-as-in-taft-era/

Congressional Digest » Pros and Cons of Expanding the House https://congressionaldigest.com/pros-and-cons-of-expanding-the-house/