Tuesday, May 19, 2020
SPECIAL CORONAVIRUS UPDATE Larry Ferlazzo's Websites of the Day... The latest news and resources in education since 2007
Monday, May 18, 2020
A Privatization Fever Dream for Post-Crisis Public Education | The New Republic
A Privatization Fever Dream for Post-Crisis Public Education
Millions of students are now learning from home, and pro-charter, anti-teacher forces are trying to seize the moment.
Meaningful education is built on connection, and fostering relationships requires proximity. This is what a classroom does. It’s a space for students to establish relationships while experimenting with being in public. And while we don’t yet know the details of Cuomo’s plan, there’s reason to be suspicious. The Gates Foundation’s top-down approach to education reform, along with Cuomo’s history of supporting charter schools, inconsistency around unions, and exclusion of New York City educators from the project’s council, suggest a deeply undemocratic push to defund and privatize the public school system.
American public schools—“all these buildings, all these physical classrooms”—are cultural spaces as much as they are physical locations. Cuomo’s reimagining threatens to flatten public education into informational transaction, turning teachers into tech support in the process.
We have long struggled, as a country, to use technology to provide public education at scale. In the first half of the nineteenth century, an English schemer named Joseph Lancaster sold a system of mechanized mass schooling across the continent. Replacing all but one teacher per thousand children with older student “monitors” and teaching reading and writing through drilling, dictation, surveillance, and repetition was cheap, but it made education hollow. The system relied on conformity and demonstration of short-term results through testing. (Sound familiar?) In New York City, a Lancasterian school was the first in the city to be funded by tax revenue, in part because the Public Education Society, the Department of Education’s predecessor, was won over by the idea of a clean, efficient system for the masses. But Lancasterian schools lacked soul and, in turn, integrity. They relied on strict adherence to rules, behaviors, and mannerisms; as public interest in funding education grew through the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Public Education Society’s dominion waned. In 1916, after the Lancasterian system fell out of favor, one critic wrote, “What this experiment did especially exemplify is the insufficiency of CONTINUE READING: A Privatization Fever Dream for Post-Crisis Public Education | The New Republic
Andrea Gabor: States Should Not Forsake the Neediest Children When Setting Budgets | Diane Ravitch's blog
Andrea Gabor: States Should Not Forsake the Neediest Children When Setting Budgets

Teaching Remotely During the Pandemic | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice



The Brothers Grim: Bill and Mike’s Pandemic Panopticon – Wrench in the Gears
The Brothers Grim: Bill and Mike’s Pandemic Panopticon

Teaching across an abyss of silence | Salon.com
Teaching across an abyss of silence
In the classroom that Zoom built
The Training Wheel Fallacy for Teaching Writing – radical eyes for equity
The Training Wheel Fallacy for Teaching Writing
The Lochner Era & "Substantive Due Process" (Part One and Part 2) | Blue Cereal Education
The Lochner Era & "Substantive Due Process" (Part One)
The Lochner Era (Introduction)
The 20th Century Begins
The Lochner Era & "Substantive Due Process" (Part Two)
“Economic Substantive Due Process” in the Lochner Era
YONG ZHAO: Can and Should Creativity be Assessed? Ep1 of Creativity in Crisis - Education in the Age of Globalization
Can and Should Creativity be Assessed? Ep1 of Creativity in Crisis
Toward getting past our own imagined fears and toward realizing our creative potential.
A Bi-weekly Live Conversation about Creativity and Education on YouTube.
11am-12pm first Fridays US Pacific Time (Each Month)
Hosts: Ron Beghetto and Yong Zhao
Introduction
Human creativity has gained heightened recognition in the 21st century as a means of helping us navigate the uncertainties of an increasingly complex and changing world. Despite decades of research, many fundamental issues about creativity remain unsettled. This is particularly true when it comes to cultivating creativity in educational settings. There is often a disconnection among the various stakeholders of creativity and education: creativity researchers, education researchers, policy makers, educators, parents, creative professionals, and the general public. Even though there is wide recognition that we are all capable of approaching teaching, learning and life more creatively, we often find it difficult to get past our own imaginations and fears of trying out new ideas and creative approaches in education.
Creativity in Crisis aims to build a bridge among the different stakeholders, to serve as a platform for the various groups of stakeholders to share and exchange ideas using a more commonly accessible medium rather than academic papers, conference presentations, or workshops, which are often attended to by separated communities of practices.
Creativity in Crisis is also intended to make public the disagreements, debates and different views that exist among researchers. Furthermore, the show aims to synthesize current perspectives from and beyond the field of creativity studies — highlighting what we know and what we don’t know so as to develop a deeper understanding of creativity in and beyond educational settings.
Design and Format
We envisioned the show as a curated exhibition of different, and even contradictory, perspectives on significant issues related to creativity and education.
Every 10 episodes make one thematic volume. Each volume follows a theme. Each episode focuses on a significant topic concerning creativity and education.
For each episode, the hosts present their propositions, assumptions, conjectures about the chosen focal question. The guests are invited to engage with and even refute them in spirited conversation aimed at leading us to deepening our understanding of creativity-related topics and provoke new insights and perspectives.
Creativity in Crisis guests are selected based on the following criteria.
Expertise: The guests have deep knowledge of the topic to be discussed.
Diversity of Perspectives: The guests represent different perspectives and professions.
Multi disciplinary: The guests are from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., psychology, education, creative industries, etc.)
Creativity in Crisis: Prisoners of Our Own Imagination
- What are the potential promises and pitfall of large scale creativity assessment of school-age children (e.g., PISA Creativity Assessment)?
- Even if we can assess creativity using international comparative assessments, should we?
What’s with Cuomo and Others Advocating for a “Shock Doctrine” Shift to Online Education? | janresseger
What’s with Cuomo and Others Advocating for a “Shock Doctrine” Shift to Online Education?
CURMUDGUCATION: AEI's Back To School "Blueprint"
AEI's Back To School "Blueprint"
The blueprint brought together a "task force" loaded with familiar names-- Chris Cerf, Sharif El-Mekki, Kaya Henderson, Candice McQueen, Nina Rees, Gerard Robinson, Andrew Rotherman, Hanna Skandera and John White, to name a few. But hey-- they aren't waving guns or yelling threats at people in masks, so that makes them part of the rational part of the right tilted world, so let's see what they've come up with.
Let me begin with a digression on the nature of thinky tanks
Rick Hess and John Bailey are the nominal authors of this, and I want to pause for a moment to note that they offer an actual explanation for why thinky tanks should even be messing with this kind of thing:
At times like this, think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute can play a constructive role. Because we are not burdened with the day-to-day responsibilities of serving students and families, we have the luxury to look further ahead. We can also bring together experts and veteran leaders who are versed in the particulars of what schools are facing and give them a platform to share their recommendations and guidance. Equally important, we can do all this with a degree of autonomy and independence, which can be more difficult for professional associations or partisan entities.
The "this is our only job" argument is indeed part of the thinky tank raison d'etre; not having CONTINUE READING: CURMUDGUCATION: AEI's Back To School "Blueprint"
What Happens to a Neighborhood When a School Closes? – Next City
Neighborhood When a School Closes?
Author and scholar Andre Perry digs into how one shuttered elementary school in a majority-Black neighborhood has maintained its community connections.









