Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

U.S. Lags Far Behind Other Countries in Access to Early Childhood Ed

U.S. Lags Far Behind Other Countries in Access to Early Childhood Ed:

U.S. Lags Far Behind Other Countries in Access to Early Childhood Education

access to early childhood education U.S. OECD

Strong bipartisan support tends to allude more education issues, but expanding access to early childhood education is one of the few. Study after study has outlined the cogitive and social benefits of these programs and a 2016 survey by the First Five Years Fund found that 73% of the electorate – 54% of Republicans, 70% of Independents, and 91% of Democrats – support a federal plan that helps states and local communities provide better access to quality early education. According to theAmerican Institutes for Research,  36 states have 220 bills related to early childhood education on their legislative agendas.
Still, despite all the attention, not much has been done in the United States to move the needle on universal access. Over the past few years, the campaign to expand early education has been global and most other industrialized nations are  forgeing ahead.
According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),enrollment rates in early childhood or primary education programs rose across OECD member countries  –  from 54% in 2004 to 69% in 2014 for 3-year-olds and from 73% to 85% for 4-year-olds. This statistic is just one of many that can be found in the new 2016 Education At a Glance, OECD’s annual compendium of facts and figures comparing education systems around the world.
The United States, according to the data, has one of the lowest enrollment rates U.S. Lags Far Behind Other Countries in Access to Early Childhood Ed:


Schools Matter: The Unbearable Costs of "Unity"

Schools Matter: The Unbearable Costs of "Unity":

The Unbearable Costs of "Unity"

Get 20% Off w/code: RLEGEN16

The other day after I posted my communique to the Ravitch forces that reiterated my conclusion that we are NOT allied but, rather, that her actions have made me the enemy, Norm Scott spent some of his valuable time to send me a comment to say that too much time had been devoted to the debate about who is an ally and who is an enemy.  Here is part of his comment:

. . . . I think the amount of time and energy going into this debate pushes this to the ledge. What is the point when there are so many horrible forces on the attack? She is an incrementalist - I don't think that works but I don't have to spend my time addressing that issue because I would rather go after Randi and crew and ed deformers. I would rather have the new Ravitch than the old one. . . .Why not let ESSA come apart?
Here is my response to Norm.  

If too much time has been devoted to this issue, then I am wondering why you are helping to keep it alive by suggesting I let Diane and NPE go their merry way, all the while pretending to be against all the policies that their enthused endorsement of ESSA has enabled. Your preferred solution, it seems, is to "let ESSA come apart." I suppose like NCLB's coming apart, which took almost a decade and a half, and time enough to entirely unhinge the public school system and to waste money on 7,000 charter schools where children and teachers are regularly abused. 

Sorry, I don't have that kind of time. Besides, how can ESSA "come apart" when Diane and the corporate unions are hellbent to get it implemented. The Ravitch books and blogs are very effective in maintaining the pretense that she is leading a network of resistance, and it's even fun to read sometimes, but it keeps the impetus to organize and fight contained. It's all talk and 
Schools Matter: The Unbearable Costs of "Unity":


New school improvement agency plans first public events | EdSource

New school improvement agency plans first public events | EdSource:

New school improvement agency plans first public events


The new state agency charged with overseeing school improvement in the era of local control will hold its first public events — all-day workshops in eight across the state — in early November.
The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence will focus on how school districts can use the data from the state’s new school accountability system to guide school and district improvement, said Joshua Daniels, director of outreach and communications for the agency and a school board member from the Berkeley Unified School District.
The State Board of Education passed the system earlier this month, and early next year, schools and districts will get their first look at their new data-filled report cards, with results of multiple indicators of school climate and student achievement, including measures of career and college readiness, test scores and suspension rates. The question for districts will be: “What then?”


Districts are already required to consult with parents and teachers to create and annually update a plan for how they will use state funding to improve student performance. It’s called a Local Control and Accountability Plan, and districts will write their second version, which will cover three years, in the spring of 2017. The goal should be to use the results of the report cards to set improvement goals and make spending decisions in the LCAP, particularly as they affect low-performing student subgroups, Daniels said.
The new report cards, technically called evaluation rubrics, will have links to best practices statewide. So, for example, if statewide data flag a district’s or specific school’s high suspension rate for Latino middle school students or a high percentage of low-income students with poor test results on Common Core math, parents and district board members can use the suggestions as guides for targeting resources and interventions in their LCAPs.

CCEE’S MISSION

The Legislature created the agency in 2013, creating as law the Local Control Funding Formula. Daniels is one of a handful of employees reporting to a five-member board of directors, appointed by the governor, the superintendent of public instruction, the state board and leaders of the Legislature.
The agency, which has been waiting for the passage of the accountability system to begin its work, received $24 million in state funding this year. One of its New school improvement agency plans first public events | EdSource:

MARK WEBER : If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Stay Out of the Classroom - NJ Spotlight

Opinion: If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Stay Out of the Classroom - NJ Spotlight:

OPINION: IF YOU CAN’T STAND THE HEAT, STAY OUT OF THE CLASSROOM

The sweltering weather has made it all too clear that New Jersey’s politicians have no real interest in giving teachers safe, comfortable working conditions


mark weber (use)
Mark Weber
When New Jersey’s teachers returned to their classrooms earlier this month, they found an unpleasant surprise waiting for them:
Overheated classrooms.
Actually, for many teachers, it wasn’t a surprise at all. As John Abeigon, president of the Newark Teachers Union, tells me: “Depending on the weather, heat’s been an issue forever in these schools.“
The leaders of local teachers unions in the state’s largest cities have been especially vocal about the oppressive conditions teachers endured during the first week of school. John McEntee, president of the Paterson Education Association, says the issue was made worse in his district because of the lack of drinking water.
“We had several frantic calls from pregnant teachers,” says McEntee. “They called and told me: ‘I’m pregnant, principals are conducting walkthrough evaluations, and I can’t even stand being in my room.’ The kids are completely drenched, and in some schools, bags are over the water fountains.”
The lack of potable water in schools has been a problem in Newark since last year, when, in response to the Flint, MI, water crisis, Newark school water was tested andfound to contain lead in several buildings.
“There’s been no proper investment in HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning) upgrades or on getting the lead out of the water,” says Abeigon. “We’re like a third-world country getting donations of bottled water.”
Teachers union presidents have to work with their superintendents to determine whether their schools are safe for staff and students. In urban schools, the problem is compounded by an aging infrastructure.
“We have people with asthma — not just staff, students as well,” says Naomi Lafleur, president of the Trenton Education Association. “There’s no money for new construction, and when you look at the old infrastructure, it seems like the costs are out control.”
But here’s the thing: inadequate HVAC, water, and other building essentials aren’t confined to urban districts with older buildings. During the sweltering early days of September, many suburban districts were also dealing with overheated schools.
Teachers from Deptford and Bridgewater-Raritan posted pictures on social media of their thermometers, showing temperatures climbing over 90 degrees. Staff in South Brunswick and Parsippany reported stifling heat in their classrooms. Mold was foundin Hillsborough High School, undoubtedly made worse by the lack of proper ventilation and air conditioning.
Time and again, I’ve heard this same story from teachers all over the state, working in districts with both affluent and disadvantaged student populations: many of our classroom are uncomfortably — and at times, dangerously — hot.
So what has been the response from our governor? A renewed commitment to making all of our classrooms places where learning can occur in all kinds of weather? An infusion of capital to make all of our schools comfortable and safe?
Incredibly, no; Chris Christie, instead, wants to throw away collective bargaining agreements in the 31 SDA (Schools Development Authority) districts, so he can lengthen the school day and year without any negotiations with teachers unions.
It’s bad enough that Christie has apparently decided that teachers should be forced to work more hours without an increase in pay. But he wants those teachers to work in schools that are already ovens in September and June. What happens when students fill up those hot classrooms in July and August?
Given the current state of our school buildings, local union leaders are flat out rejecting Christie’s proposal. “We work 185 days a year,” says McEntee. “That’s already 5 days beyond the state’s mandate. Paterson already has turnaround schools where the superintendent can lengthen the day and the year.
“But if the governor is somehow suggesting all schools needs to go beyond June 30, my reaction is this: what conversation would he have with a parent whose child had a heat stroke in a 100-degree classroom? We’re talking a humane issue. This is every parent’s worst nightmare.”
McEntee is correct, but, in my view, this goes beyond safety concerns. It speaks to whether we, as a state, are truly committed to bringing the best people we can find into the teaching profession.
What does it say about how we value teachers when we can’t even give them comfortable, let alone safe, buildings in which to work? Do law firms think they can attract the best legal talent if their offices are like saunas? Do hospitals believe they’ll get the best medical professionals if their buildings are routinely in the high 80s all summer?
Overheated classrooms are yet another sign of how politicians really value teachers. Sure, they’re happy to tell us we’re important, but when it comes time to make certain we have decent working conditions — and students have decent learning conditions — too many are back in their air-conditioned offices, making excuses for not raising the revenues needed to upgrade our schools.
The true gauge of how Chris Christie — or any other politician — values teachers will be the thermometer readings from our classrooms this coming June. As the mercury rises, we’re reminded of just how little regard the current administration has for us, let alone our students.
Mark Weber is a public school music teacher in Warren Township; a doctoral student at Rutgers University in Education Theory, Organization, and Policy; an NJEA member; and a former New Jersey public school parent. He blogs at Jersey Jazzman. His opinions are his own and are not necessarily those of his employers, Rutgers, the NJEA, or NJ Spotlight.


 Opinion: If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Stay Out of the Classroom - NJ Spotlight:

Rubber Meets the Road and AFT Civil Rights Summit on Education Town Hall BUS – Education Town Hall Forum

Rubber Meets the Road and AFT Civil Rights Summit on Education Town Hall BUS – Education Town Hall Forum:

Rubber Meets the Road and AFT Civil Rights Summit on Education Town Hall BUS

platform-image-960-revised


The September 22 Education Town Hall BUS program focuses on “Rubber Meets the Road,” a Journey for Justice election-focused event, scheduled for Sept. 26, and the AFT Civil Rights summit Oct. 14-15. Listen Live on We Act Radio at 11 a.m. Eastern or check back for recording posted shortly after air-time.
In the first segment, national educator-activists Ruth Rodriguez-Fay and Denisha Jones discuss the Civil Rights Summit, Oct. 14-15, at the Houston American Federation of Teachers gathering, as well as the future of the Opt Out movement. In the second segment, Brother Jitu Brown, Director of Journey for Justice Alliance, and national education leader Jesse Turner discuss “Rubber Meets the Road,” a program on equity in public education and the presidential election, September 26th.
The Education Town Hall broadcasts from Historic Anacostia
in Washington, DC, Thursdays at 11:00 a.m. Eastern
on We Act Radio.
Listen live via TuneIn.
Shows are archived for convenient listening shortly after broadcast.
The Education Town Hall BUS is a monthly program
organized by BadAss TeachersUnited Opt Out, and SOS March.
The program regularly airs on the 4th Thursday of each month.
Ruth Rodriguez-Fay is a classroom teacher and family and community involvement coordinator who sits on the Advisory Board of Citizens for Public Schools in Boston, MA. She serves as administrator for both United Opt Out and Save Our Schools. More about the Houston AFT event.
Brother Jitu Brown is an organizer with Kenwood Oakland Community Organization (KOCO) in Chicago and the national director of the Journey for Justice Alliance. More about Rubber Meets the Road.
Denisha Jones is Assistant Professor at Trinity Washington University. Her blog,”Changing the Narrative,” for more on Opt Out. Jesse Turner is professor of reading and language at Connecticut Central State University. Both are active with all three BUS organizations and regulars on the Education Town Hall.Rubber Meets the Road and AFT Civil Rights Summit on Education Town Hall BUS – Education Town Hall Forum:

Hooray - CT Taxpayers to cough up $220 million for Lockheed Martin Corporation - Wait What?

Hooray - CT Taxpayers to cough up $220 million for Lockheed Martin Corporation - Wait What?:

Hooray – CT Taxpayers to cough up $220 million for Lockheed Martin Corporation

Image result for big education ape Governor Dannel Malloy

With annual sales in excess of $50 billion a year, the gigantic Lockheed Martin Corporation purchased Sikorsky Aircraft from United Technologies Corporation last year.  Then, just last month, the mega-defense contractor announced that it would be laying off at least 150 workers at the Sikorsky Aircraft plant in order to ensure that it would, “remain competitive in the marketplace.”
Now comes word that Governor Dannel Malloy and the corporate behemoth have reached a reached a “tentative deal” in which Connecticut taxpayers will give Lockheed Martin more than $220 million dollars in return for the defense contractor’s commitment to keep Sikorsky headed-quartered in Connecticut and create up to 550 jobs over the next 16 years.  The company is also promising to increase total payments to Connecticut based subcontractors between now and 2032.
While Malloy has been a huge fan of using corporate welfare to buy the loyalty of successful corporations, this particular deal will be one of the largest in Malloy’s career.
While details are a bit scarce, it appears that of the $220 million being given to Lockheed Martin, Connecticut will borrow about two-thirds of the money and reduce the company’s tax liabilities by the remainder.
Considering taxpayers will then be liable for the principal and interest associated with the borrowing scheme, the total cost to taxpayers will exceed a quarter of a billion dollars meaning the subsidy from Connecticut taxpayers to Lockheed Martin will be in the range of $500,000 to $600,000 per promised job.
The CT Mirror is reporting that the Connecticut deal includes the following elements;

Gov. Rick Snyder takes Michigan Down a Hole on 3rd grade reading bill that could hold back struggling students | MLive.com

Compromise reached on 3rd grade reading bill that could hold back struggling students | MLive.com:

Compromise reached on 3rd grade reading bill that could hold back struggling students



A bill aimed at improving childhood literacy is moving forward in the Michigan Legislature after a committee reached a compromise Tuesday on controversial provisions that would hold back students who fail to read proficiently by third grade.
The comprise – approved by a six-member conference committee comprised of members of the Michigan House and Senate – allows third-graders who can't read at grade-level to advance to fourth-grade if they receive remedial reading instruction and demonstrate proficiency in other subjects through the state assessment or work samples.
"The overarching goal here is that we increase proficiency in reading," said House Speaker Kevin Cotter, R-Mt. Pleasant, who chaired the committee, which hashed out the differences between competing versions of the legislation approved by the House and Senate. "I think our numbers right now are something that we all agree are not acceptable."
Michigan Senate OKs 3rd grade reading bill that could hold some students back
The Senate on Wednesday put its own spin on a House-passed bill that aims to improve third grade reading, possibly by holding students back.


The compromise was approved 5-1, with Rep. Adam Zemke, D-Ann Arbor, casting the lone no vote. The legislation – a goal of Gov. Rick Snyder's since 2015 – could go before the House for final approval as soon as Wednesday, Cotter said.
If approved, the bill's retention provisions would go into effect in 2019-20.
To show they're reading at grade level, students must demonstrate proficiency in one of three ways: Through Michigan's state standardized test, an alternative assessment, or multiple work samples that show competency on all third-grade English language art standards.
Results from 2016 M-STEP – Michigan's state standardized test – showed that 46 percent of third-graders were proficient or above in English language arts.
Experts say it's important for students to be able to read proficiently by third-Compromise reached on 3rd grade reading bill that could hold back struggling students | MLive.com:
 When Florida Went Down this Road






Big Education Ape: Justice for opt-out movement | Bradenton Herald - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2016/09/justice-for-opt-out-movement-bradenton.html



Big Education Ape: Parent to Broward School Board: “I will not go quietly into the night…” | THE OPT OUT FLORIDA NETWORK - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2016/09/parent-to-broward-school-board-i-will.html



Big Education Ape: Movement to Opt-Out of Standardized Testing Bolstered By Judge's Ruling | FlaglerLive - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2016/08/movement-to-opt-out-of-standardized_28.html












CURMUDGUCATION: Grade Inflation?

CURMUDGUCATION: Grade Inflation?:

Grade Inflation?

Image result for Grade Inflation animated gif

Mike Petrilli (Fordham) is concerned about grade inflation.

His concern, as expressed in a recent piece at Education Next, is hung on the hook of a recent-ish survey by Learning Heroes, a new group sponsored by the same old folks (Gates Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Helmsley) that has partnered with some other outfits funded by the same people, like Great Schools (funded by Gates, Bloomberg, Helmsley, Walton) to help sell the notion that Big Standardized Testing is Really Important and we should care about it.



The Learning Heroes survey found that 90 percent of parents believe their child is performing at grade level or better. As you might expect, I don't put a lot of stock in what Learning Heroes have to say, but I can believe that their finding on this point is not far off the mark. Setting aside the construct of "grade level" (as Petrilli also does), I'm not sure that this finding doesn't say more about parental love than parental academic acumen. Sometimes we lose sight of how a poll actually works, but I ask you to imagine for a minute-- a stranger calls you on the phone and asks you to say how smart and accomplished your child is. What do you say? "Yeah, my kids kind of slow and behind," probably isn't it.

But for Petrilli, this feeds into a narrative that reformsters have been pushing for over a decade-- the public schools are lying to parents about what is being accomplished.

Providing a more honest assessment of student performance was one of the goals of the Common 
CURMUDGUCATION: Grade Inflation?:





Please Read this Penetrating Indictment of the Every Student Succeeds Act | janresseger

Please Read this Penetrating Indictment of the Every Student Succeeds Act | janresseger:

Please Read this Penetrating Indictment of the Every Student Succeeds Act

Participating earlier this week in one of the Ohio Department of Education’s stakeholder meetings about the plan Ohio will be developing to submit to the U.S. Department of Education to comply with the new Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), I watched as many people tried valiantly to frame their objections to the test-and-punish policies that have dominated federal and state education policy for more than a generation. Most people have a clear sense that something is very wrong, but framing their objections in specific policy terms is much harder. On Monday, Valerie Strauss published among the most lucid explanations I have read of what’s wrong, how the new law reproduces much of the same policy as the old No Child Left Behind, and what those of us who value our nation’s system of public education ought to be saying as we respond to these policies.
In Monday’s column, Bill Mathis and Tina Trujillo are promoting the new book they have editedLearning from the Federal Market-Based Reforms: Lessons for the Every Student Succeeds Act. (This blog has covered that book here and here.) The book was published by the National Education Policy Center, where Mathis is the managing director. Please read Mathis and Trujillo’s column carefully and then plan to consult the academic research collected in this important book.
In this week’s column, Mathis and Trujillo set the context for the new Every Student Succeeds Act: “Washington was euphoric. In a barren time for bi-partisan cooperation late in 2015, both Democrats and Republicans were happy to get rid of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The K-12 education law was almost universally excoriated as being a failure—particularly in that most important goal of closing the achievement gap. Looking at long-term trends from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, gains were seen in some areas but the achievement gap was stuck. NCLB provided no upward blips on the charts. Thus, it is stunning that the successor law, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) passed by Congress last December, is basically an extension of NCLB. Fundamentally, ESSA maintains the same philosophy and direction. It is still a standardized test-driven system that is punitive in nature. The main difference is that states are now responsible for designing the enforcement systems—which must be approved by the federal government. But states will not likely make many fundamental changes. They have invested heavily in their systems, as have local schools and districts. Test-based accountability has been the law of the land for the past 30 years—which means that it is the only system that many educators have experienced. Furthermore, vendors, textbook manufacturers, testing companies, consultants and the like have a strong bias toward protecting their investment—even while acknowledging that it didn’t work.”
What are the specific problems with No Child Left Behind-style school policy?  “First, children who are hungry, suffering from malnutrition and live in substandard conditions are highly Please Read this Penetrating Indictment of the Every Student Succeeds Act | janresseger:


 

Controlling schools through federal housing grants – Missouri Education Watchdog

Controlling schools through federal housing grants – Missouri Education Watchdog:

Controlling schools through federal housing grants

constitution

Here in Missouri the original and continued push against Common Core was based on the governance structure being put into place to enforce compliance with the standards. NGO’s owned the copyright for which they could demand licensing fees at any time. They disallowed any accountability for the standards in their license agreement which left the states on the hook for any poor outcomes. They could change the standards at any time and had no process for state input during that change. States essentially gave up all control of their education standards to the NGOs.  States were forced to join a testing consortium by a federal agency with no authority to make such demands. The feds then predictably tried to gain control of the teacher selection process by tying teacher evaluations to test scores.
The structure of governance is very important and the progressives will try any means possible to go around or recreate the structure of our representative government because it so often gets in the way of their plans for control. The following post by Jane Robbins in The Federalist demonstrates how the progressives to continue to push for structural changes through backdoor mechanisms that don’t require the approval of the people.
The broader point is this: The Obama/Gates scheme is the Left’s latest step to undermine the constitutional structure by making government responsive to the views of “experts” rather than to citizens. It’s a plan to negate local control of government, and to destroy the laboratories of democracy brought about by sovereign states and local decision-making. When their voices don’t count and their choices narrow, citizens become disengaged and society crumbles.

Obama Administration Wants To Kiss Your Local Schools Goodbye

If the Obama administration and its supporters have their way, the suburban neighborhood school could be headed for extinction. In a veritable symphony of bureaucratic coordination, the administration has figured out how to recruit three cabinet departments, liberal non-profits, and deep-pocketed foundations to this effort. It can be tough even to follow the sophisticated strategy for accomplishing this (and the president prefers it that way), but if we value our liberty, it’s worth a bit of effort to understand this scheme.
The administration is maneuvering to replace local control in education (and in other areas) with school systems that extend across entire metropolitan regions. This effort is bolstered by advocacy groups promoting “economic integration” to force suburban jurisdictions to either admit low-income students from outside their districts or redistribute the tax money that supports their schools to less affluent nearby districts. Lurking behind this plan—as with practically every nationwide education policy—is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The pincer created by Obama’s coercion from coordinated federal agencies on the one hand and Gates’s advocacy of supposedly social-justice taxing and redistribution on the other could squeeze the life out of the suburbs and suburban schools.

We Don’t Like Your Neighborhood

First, let’s have a look at the Obama coercion scheme. This ambitious plan is bound up with a new rule from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) called the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule. Stanley Kurtz has provided the definitive analysis of AFFH (see hereherehere, and here), showing how the rule advances Obama’s longtime dream of essentially abolishing suburbs. Cities swallowing suburbs is known as “regionalism,” and how the Left plans to achieve it is explained in Kurtz’s Controlling schools through federal housing grants – Missouri Education Watchdog:

Parent Coalition for Student Privacy relieved Daines/Blumenthal SAFE KIDS Act pulled

Parent Coalition for Student Privacy relieved Daines/Blumenthal SAFE KIDS Act pulled | Parent Coalition for Student Privacy:

PARENT COALITION FOR STUDENT PRIVACY RELIEVED DAINES/BLUMENTHAL SAFE KIDS ACT PULLED

Image result for PARENT COALITION FOR STUDENT PRIVACY
Parent Coalition for Student Privacy relieved Daines/Blumenthal SAFE KIDS Act pulled Coalition members feared the bill would open up the floodgates of commercialism
 Image result for PARENT COALITION FOR STUDENT PRIVACY
The Parent Coalition for Student Privacy, composed of parents, advocates and educators throughout the nation, and whose members led the fight against inBloom, are relieved that the SAFE KIDS Act, co-sponsored by Senators Daine and Blumenthal, scheduled to be marked up in the Commerce Committee today was pulled at the last minute.
Rachael Stickland, co-chair of the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy said, “While we appreciate the sincere motivation of these Senators to put controls on how personal student information is used by companies and organizations, we believe that this bill would have inadvertently further eroded student privacy.  Right now, both the Student Privacy Pledge and FERPA, as well as other federal laws, actually ban the use of student data for non-educational purposes including behavioral advertising, while this bill would seem to have allowed for that possibility.  There is also much confusion and ambiguity in the bill’s language about how parents would be informed about how their children’s data was being used by companies, how to request its deletion, when this would occur, as well as what specific security protections would be required to protect against breaches.”
Josh Golin, Executive Director of Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood, said: “The bill, though well-intentioned, had far too many loopholes to give children the protection from commercial exploitation that they deserve. It allowed unlimited targeted ads to students through the use of apps assigned by schools, as long as these ads were based on personal information gained through an individual online session.  It also exempted some of the most frequently assigned websites and apps such as YouTube.  This is unacceptable, as advertising is harmful to children and detracts from any educational benefits the program might otherwise provide.”
Leonie Haimson, the Executive Director of Class Size Matters and the co-chair of the Parent Coalition concluded, “We would like to work with Senators Daine and Blumenthal and the other members of the Commerce Committee on improving this bill to ensure that student privacy is strengthened rather than further eroded, given the push from some sectors of the ed tech industry to exploit our children’s personal information and to treat them as consumers rather than as students.  Parents are increasingly concerned about the accelerated adoption of so-called educational apps in schools; we strongly believe their use must be approached with caution and regulated with a firm hand, to ensure that they do not violate children’s privacy and safety, or undermine the learning experience. We feared that this bill would further open up the floodgates of commercialism.”Parent Coalition for Student Privacy relieved Daines/Blumenthal SAFE KIDS Act pulled | Parent Coalition for Student Privacy:
 Contact: Rachael Stickland; rachael@studentprivacymatters.org,303-204-1272

Where Hillary Clinton-Donald Trump stands on education - CBS News

Where Hillary Clinton stands on education - CBS News:

Where Hillary Clinton stands on education

Image result for big education ape hillary


By the end of 2016, student loan debt will have skyrocketed to unprecedented levels. In fact, estimates report that approximately 43 million students in the United States will owe nearly $1.3 trillion. That means the average class of 2016 graduate has nearly $38,000 in debt--a six percent increase from last year.
Hillary Clinton, a longtime education advocate Hillary Clinton emphasizes education policy in her presidential agenda--pushing for early as well as higher education reform.
“The public school system has been, I believe, second to the Constitution, the most important institution in making America the great country that we have been over the last 200 plus years,” Clinton said in 2015.
Her original plan cost $350 billion over a decade, but she expanded the college affordability portion of the plan significantly in July. There has not been an updated cost estimate. The plan would be paid for by increasing taxes on the wealthy. 
Here are the key components to Clinton’s educational policy:

Early education:

  • Make preschool and quality childcare “available to every child in America” in the next decade
  • End the school-to-prison-pipeline by reforming harsh discipline standards in schools. “A classroom should be a safe place for our children, we shouldn’t even have to say that,” she said in a February speech. “This isn’t just an education issue, this is a civil rights issue and we can’t ignore it any longer.”

College affordability:

  • Enact policy that would allow families who make less than $125,000 attend public colleges for free--a leftward shift in Clinton’s education platform thanks to pressure from Sen. Bernie Sanders and his devout supporters who called for “free-tuition-for-all.” The plan has a five-year phase-in, but families making $85,000 or less would immediately be exempt from tuition at in-state public schools. 
  • Pell Grants for low-income students would be expanded
  • Her “New Compact Plan” would incentivize states to keep tuition rates down and provide grant money to those who demonstrate a commitment to college affordability

Student debt:







Broadly speaking, Donald Trump favors school vouchers and has denounced the involvement of the federal government in the nation’s schools. 
The GOP nominee and founder of the now-defunct Trump University-- tackled education reform in a recent September speech.
“As your president, I will be the biggest cheerleader for school choice you’ve ever seen,” he said, promising that in his White House “parents can home school their children.” Trump’s website does not appear to specifically address education, though in September, he unveiled a proposal on education vouchers. Here are the components of Trump’s educational platform so far:

School choice:

  • Like most Republicans, Trump supports education vouchers that allow students to attend private rather than public schools--arguing that they create healthy competition in the education market. “I will establish the national goal of providing school choice to every American child living in poverty,” Trump said in September. He recently unveiled plans to create a $20 billion block grant that would expand charter and private school options for low-income children. Trump would divert federal funding from schools to pay for the block grants.
  • He also has expressed an interest in eliminating the Department of Education because it has “been taken over by the bureaucrats in Washington.”
  • Trump has called Common Core a “disaster.” “Education has to be local,” he declared during his June 2015 presidential announcement.

College affordability:

  • “There’s no such thing as free education,” Trump said during a town hall with Chris Matthews. “You know, ultimately, somebody is going to be paying for that education, and it’s the taxpayers.” He acknowledged that students are “up to their neck in debt” and has suggested he would remove the federal government from the student loan system and privatize it, though doing this isn’t likely to reduce the cost of a degree, says John Wasik, author of “The Debt-Free Degree.”
  • Trump’s education policy surrogate, Sam Clovis, has suggested the colleges should screen their students more closely to accept those who are likely to graduate on time, which he seemed to suggest would effectively reduce the student debt burden.
John Wasik contributed to this article Where Donald Trump stands on education




School suspends N.C. teacher for stomping on American flag - CBS News

School suspends N.C. teacher for stomping on American flag - CBS News:

School suspends N.C. teacher for stomping on American flag

Image result for School suspends N.C. teacher for stomping on American flag

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- A North Carolina high school teacher says he has been placed on leave after students say he stepped on an American flag as part of a history lesson.



The Fayetteville Observer reported Massey Hill Classical High School teacher Lee Francis said he was informed of his status by the Cumberland County Schools human resources department. 
Francis said he’s scheduled to meet with system officials on Thursday to discuss the incident stemming from a lesson in his history class.



News media outlets quote students as saying Francis asked students for a lighter or scissors, and when no one produced them, he put the flag on the floor and stomped on it. Reports quote Francis as saying on his Facebook page that he was discussing a court case involving flag desecration.




“I put it on the ground and I used my right foot and I took two steps on it, and immediately two kids get out of the room,” Francis told CBS affiliate WNCN
A number of residents denounced Francis’ actions, calling them unpatriotic, WNCN reported. 
“I think it’s inappropriate to teach that in school,” said Fayetteville resident Grayson Chavonne. “If he wants to do that in his own home that’s his prerogative, but it doesn’t need to be taught to our kids.”
A top school system administrator also weighed in.
“Clearly, there are other ways to teach First Amendment rights without desecrating the flag,” said Cumberland County Schools Superintendent Frank Till said in a statement released Tuesday.
But Francis is defending himself.
“Just because I step on the flag doesn’t mean I step on their graves,” Francis told WNCN. “It doesn’t mean I step on their bodies as they return from overseas. It means I step on a piece of fabric.”  
On Tuesday night, Francis confirmed to WNCN that he has been placed on paid administrative leave.  
“We have a level of students that are mature and are expected to be mature,” he said. “So no, that was not the reaction I was expecting.”  School suspends N.C. teacher for stomping on American flag - CBS News: