Latest News and Comment from Education

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Alan J. Borsuk - Charter Schools 101: The basics behind a hot education topic

Alan J. Borsuk - Charter Schools 101: The basics behind a hot education topic:

Charter Schools 101: The basics behind a hot education topic






Amid the many education issues now in flux, the future of charter schools seems to attract a high degree of heat and, frequently, misunderstanding. So I thought it might be good to offer a Charter Schools 101 primer.
Q.Just what is a charter school?
A. Launched in Minnesota about 25 years ago, the idea was to offer kids independent, publicly funded schools with creative, different programs. The movement grew rapidly. More than 2.5 million students nationwide were in charter schools in 2013-'14.
Q.Why are they called "charter" schools?
A. Let's say you and I have an idea for a school. We go to a government body (usually a school board, but, around here, a few other bodies, such as Milwaukee city government), and say, hey, give us permission to open this school, give us money and we'll give you something different with good results. (At least, that's the ideal.) Down the road — usually after five years — you can either give us a green light to continue or you can cut off our money, based on our record. If the government body says OK, then we formalize an agreement that is called our charter.
Generally, I'm describing what we'll call an independent charter. There are quite a few charters created within school districts as alternatives to their traditional programs. Most of the charter schools in Wisconsin fit this description.
A significant difference between school district charters and independent charters is whether the teachers are employees of the district or whether they are hired (and potentially fired) by the individual school. Almost all of the controversy around charter schools involves independent schools.
Q.What's the difference between a charter school and a voucher school?
A. Around here, a simple answer is: Voucher schools can be (and almost all are) religious. Charter schools cannot be religious. Overall, both involve public funding of schools outside of the traditional system.
Q.Are independent charter schools intended only for poor kids?
A. No, but that's pretty much what's developed, both in Wisconsin and nationwide. There's a bunch of reasons why — a subject for another time. Charters have emerged as one of the most prominent (and controversial) strategies for trying to improve education outcomes in high-needs urban areas. Large charter operators have arisen, some running dozens of schools, most of them offering programs with high expectations, step-on-the-gas styles of education, a lot of structure, strong emphasis on behavior, and longer school days and years.
Q.Are kids ever assigned to go to charter schools?
A. No.
Q.Do charters charge tuition?
A. No.
Q.How much money do they get?
A. The current public payment in Wisconsin is about $8,000 per student per year. That's less than public schools get. Most high-quality charters also benefit from quite a bit of private donations.
Q.Do charter schools enroll any student or do they attract better students?
A. A controversial question. Charters aren't allowed to be choosy about who gets admitted. And good ones work hard to help any child. But, as reality plays out, there is some truth to saying that a lot of kids who don't fit into the program don't stay. Charter critics say one outcome is that charters overall have fewer students with special-education needs and big behavior issues than conventional schools.
Q.Are charter schools getting better results?
A. Yes, no and maybe so. Frankly, your answer often depends on your politics. Setting that aside as best as I can, I'd say some of the best schools in Milwaukee, both in results and school culture, are charters. There is data to back up saying that, although critics disagree. Overall, locally and nationwide, charters aren't a panacea and the outcomes aren't that much different than traditional public schools.
In Milwaukee, there were — and still are — charter schools with bad results and bad operating practices. Some of those are gone, which is how the system is supposed to work. Some are improving.
I watched a Milwaukee Common Council committee wrestle on Thursday with what to do about King's Academy, a northwest side charter with a poor record but evidence of improvement. The discussion focused on data, serious talk about how to improve, and what's best for kids. The committee backed a two-year extension of the school's charter, rather than the five years the school wanted. The school will remain under pressure to show further improvement. It struck me as a good example of how the idea is supposed to work.
Q.Is the charter movement going to expand in Wisconsin?
A. In the last four years, while voucher school advocates were scoring big victories in the state Capitol, charter advocates got pretty much nowhere. But as the new state budget is shaping up, charter people have scored some victories.
It's a mess to describe, but it seems likely there will be at least a few more charter schools in Milwaukee in the next several years. There might be independent charters for the first time in Madison, Waukesha County and possibly some other places. But there will be no green light for independent charters statewide, while private school vouchers are getting a green light.
Opposition to charters is strong. In short, the more kids who go to schools outside of the traditional system, the more problems there are for the system. This applies to Milwaukee, but it also applies out state, where opposition to independent charters has succeeded in stopping independent charters. The vast majority of Wisconsin kids will continue to be educated through public school systems.
My guess overall is that with funding capped around $8,000 per kid, and with an atmosphere that is so contentious, there won't be a big surge of new charters. I'd go with a forecast of some growth, with reason to hope it will generally be connected to an upward movement in the quality of the schools involved.
Alan J. Borsuk is senior fellow in law and public policy at Marquette University Law School. Reach him atalan.borsuk@marquette.eduAlan J. Borsuk - Charter Schools 101: The basics behind a hot education topic:

Heavy emphasis on “hard skills” leaves children unprepared for the real “tests” in life. | WagTheDog

Heavy emphasis on “hard skills” leaves children unprepared for the real “tests” in life. | WagTheDog:

Heavy emphasis on “hard skills” leaves children unprepared for the real “tests” in life.



Image


The appropriate and skillful application of hard skills is soft skills dependent.
~ Corporate Learning World Blog
Working with grade 7-12 students in a public school for more than a quarter century, and as a summer youth employment counselor for more than a decade, it has been my experience that a lack of soft skills (perseverance, ambition, self-confidence, self-discipline, patience, initiative, integrity, empathy, courage, cooperative, resilient…) has directly contributed to declining student achievement and performance in the classroom and on the job.
While mastery of content and literacy skills are important for career and college readiness, these performance standards are too often trumped or canceled out when a student or employee lacks a work ethic, emotional intelligence, and has not developed a personal code of conduct.
One of the underlying premises of CCSS appears to be that students who cannot read and write on an advanced college level are destined to be unsuccessful in life. Not everyone can be an advanced reader, no matter how hard they try. Do proponents of CCSS really believe that the 15 to 20% (NICHD) of our population with language-based disabilities are doomed to failure in life?
Considering the diversity of student skills and abilities represented in our classrooms It is foolish and inherently unfair to define and predict student success in life based on a narrow and shallow set of testable math and reading skills.
Testing and training students to meet common math and ELA standards does not prepare them for the social and emotional challenges of uncommon careers.
The “power” and critical importance of soft skills is evidenced by the highly successful careers of Richard Branson, Steve Jobs, Henry Ford, Tom Cruise, Erin Brockovich, Magic Johnson, Anderson Cooper, Winston Churchill and many other dyslexics.
These individuals and many others learners like them have not allowed limited reading and literacy skills or a low score on a standardized test to define them and curtail their goals and achievements in life. Instead, they relied upon their special talents and abilities to overcome obstacles in life and compensate for any cognitive deficiencies.
Emotional intelligence often “levels the playing field” and helps adults to lead productive and very successful lives in spite of weaker reading or writing skills…
“…But what has become obvious—as evidenced by the sheer number of dyslexic World Economic Forum attendees in Davos and by plenty of 
Heavy emphasis on “hard skills” leaves children unprepared for the real “tests” in life. | WagTheDog:

Madeline Dietrich | Bullying: An Open Letter to the Superintendent of Milwaukee Public Schools

Madeline Dietrich | Bullying: An Open Letter to the Superintendent of Milwaukee Public Schools:



Bullying: An Open Letter to the Superintendent of Milwaukee Public Schools



I wrote the following letter to call attention to the tragic suicide of one of Milwaukee's brightest teachers. The incident went unnoticed by the public, occurring over the Thanksgiving holiday. While a large component underscores the plight of many transgender people who simply try to exist in our society, my message is about bullying and the critical importance of recognizing when it occurs and intervening when possible.

Karis Anne Ross




Madeline Dietrich

6/10/15

Dr. Darienne Driver, Superintendent of Milwaukee Public Schools
Milwaukee Public Schools
5225 W. Vliet Street
Milwaukee, WI  53208

OPEN LETTER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Dear Dr. Driver,

As the spring semester draws to a close and another class prepares for graduation, I wish to call to your attention to an oversight, a failure to act, by Milwaukee Public School administrators, which undoubtedly contributed to the suicide death of one of Milwaukee Public Schools' best and brightest teachers this past school year. While the blame for her death cannot be fully placed on the Milwaukee Public School District, it is my opinion that if key personnel had responded appropriately, this teacher may have chosen to continue living.

Karis Anne Ross, who taught at MPS's prestigious Milwaukee German Immersion School, took her own life over the Thanksgiving holiday last November. She was thirty-seven years old. Ms. Ross was the schools' lead Special Education teacher, a stressful job by any account, but made unnecessarily more stressful by a hostile work environment fraught with tension, disrespect and bullying, not from her students, but from the teacher’s aides assigned to assist her.

There were four professionals working in Ms. Ross' classroom, a lead teacher and three teacher's aids. Each were human beings, and each were women. But three were cisgender, while only one was transgender. Three were black, while only one was white. Three were paraprofessionals charged with supporting the lead teacher's direction, while only one held a master’s degree and professional teaching certificate. The differences in race, education status and gender identity fostered an environment where Ms. Ross was regularly subjected to intimidation and resistance by the majority group.

Ms. Ross repeatedly informed the building principal, Dr. Albert J. Brugger. It had gone on for years, but in the weeks leading to the moment Ms. Ross chose to end her life, numerous emails were exchanged between Ms. Ross, school officials and the medical community, all pointing to a crisis which went largely ignored by Dr. Brugger, who rather than mediating or intervening in the conflict, chose to play down the situation and avoided any direct involvement with Ms. Ross and her aids. It is clear by the timing of the suicide, which took place the Saturday afternoon before Ms. Ross knew she must again face the hostility of her support staff and the indifference of her principal the following Monday morning. Each aide was named in Ms. Ross’ suicide letter, along with Dr. Brugger, as the primary cause of her grief. Transgender people are too often rejected by friends, employers, landlords, and family, and are forty percent more likely to attempt suicide than the mean population. Ms. Ross was rejected by the very MPS employees whose job it was to assist her in caring for profoundly disabled children.

Adding insult to injury, MPS made no attempt to contact Ms. Ross' family for nearly two weeks. Dr. Brugger sent flowers and a card, butMadeline Dietrich | Bullying: An Open Letter to the Superintendent of Milwaukee Public Schools:





Our Dirty Little Secret Education Lessons From A Sparkly District

Education Lessons From A Sparkly District:

Our Dirty Little Secret


I want to share with all of you an example of what parents of children with disabilities go through in New Jersey. Sadly, this is not new, nor is it likely to change anytime in the near future. There needs to be a fundamental shift in how NJDOE/OSEP view these students, how individual districts view them, and how communities value them (or don’t).

This happened in my home K-8 district in Bergen County. This is a beautiful, close knit community. We take care of each other, we have very active civic organizations, and we even have two small, well-embraced, adult disability housing facilities. What we don’t have is that kind of support for the families who happen to have children with disabilities. It’s our dirty little secret.

Parents struggle to get evaluations. Scratch that, they struggle to get anyone to take their concerns seriously. Their teachers generally do, but are afraid to speak up. Parents struggle to get classifications and appropriate services. The district is adept at dragging the process out as long as possible (sometimes years), many times by simply not explaining the process to parents who have no idea how any of this works.

As you read this statement, made by a father, please remember that as parents, part of our job is to raise children who can make their way in the world as independently as possible and to become functioning members of society. I am absolutely sick of districts getting in the way.


It’s difficult to stand here and speak about the state of and the attitude towards Special Services in this district knowing it falls on deaf ears and has no apparent effect on the continuance of the treatment of the families in this town. The fact is that [Sparkly District] has an awful reputation with regard to their treatment and programming for special needs children and their families and it is evident that this works just fine for you all -- if it didn’t, things would be changing.

Maybe you are blinded by your personal feelings towards specific members of the community who fight for this population’s rights. Maybe you have grown too familiar with one another and cannot separate or comfortably voice your own personal opinions, experience, or agendas if they differ. You are professionals and our children are counting on you. To continuously ignore, deliberately avoid, and create a divide within the educational Education Lessons From A Sparkly District:

Is the Common Core killing kindergarten? - Ideas - The Boston Globe

Is the Common Core killing kindergarten? - Ideas - The Boston Globe:

Is the Common Core killing kindergarten?





LAST SPRING, Susan Sluyter quit teaching kindergarten in the Cambridge Public Schools. She’d spent nearly two decades in the classroom, and her departure wasn’t a happy one. In a resignation letter, Sluyter railed against a “disturbing era of testing and data” that had trickled down from the upper grades and was now assaulting kindergartners with a barrage of new academic demands that “smack of 1st or 2nd grade.” The school district did not respond to a request for comment.
But Sluyter’s complaints touched a national nerve. Her letter went viral, prompting scores of sympathetic comments by other frustrated teachers and parents. Sluyter’s letter was fresh evidence for groups of early-childhood educators who oppose the kindergarten expectations for math and English Language Arts, or ELA, set by the new Common Core, the academic benchmarks for K-12 that most states have adopted to replace the historic patchwork of standards.
The thrust of the opposition is that many of the standards are too high and not developmentally appropriate for kindergartners. Opponents say teaching some academic skills too early can be counterproductive. They cite research suggesting that reading and math advantages in kindergarten are fleeting. Furthermore, they say, the pressure to meet academic standards will lead to lecture and work sheet style teaching, foster rote memorization, and snuff out the inquiry and play-based instruction that can instill a love of learning.
The impetus for developing the Common Core standards for kindergarten through 12th grade was the worry that American education was losing its edge in a globalized economy fueled by innovation.
“The United States is falling behind other countries in the resource that matters most in the new global economy: human capital,” declared a 2008 report from the National Governors Association. Creating a common set of “internationally benchmarked” standards was seen as the best way to close the persistent achievement gaps between students of different races and between rich and poor school districts.
The Common Core’s defenders say critics are misreading the kindergarten standards, which are meant to be goals, not dictates. What’s more, standards alone don’t tell teachers how to teach. What standards actually do, backers contend, is level the playing field and help keep students from falling behind early, which they say is the real and lasting danger for our youngest learners.
THE COMMON CORE K-12 standards debuted in June 2010, following a year-long initiative spearheaded by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Since then, 43 states have adopted the standards, with the stated aim of getting students college and career ready when they graduate from high school.
In two reports published earlier this year, the Boston-based nonprofit Defending the Early Years took aim at the kindergarten standards in ELA (focused on literacy at this age) and math. The first report singled out the expectation that kindergartners should be able to “read emergent-reader texts with purpose and understanding.”


Emergent-reader texts include repetitive lines like, “Brown bear. Brown bear. What do you see?” or, “The fat cat Is the Common Core killing kindergarten? - Ideas - The Boston Globe:

CURMUDGUCATION: I'm Defending Teach for America

CURMUDGUCATION: I'm Defending Teach for America:

I'm Defending Teach for America


I'm about a week behind on this, mostly because I don't usually pay any attention to conservative rantist Michelle Malkin. Yes, she often rants against Common Core and corporate commandeering of public education, but when I first started picking apart the odd alliances, congruence, and alignments of the education debates, one thing became clear to me-- in these debates, as in other aspects of life, the enemy of my enemy might well be my enemy. Or at the very least, a trellis asshat.

Malkin made her recent stink in the New York Post, where she accused Teach for America of harboring dangerous radicals.

But those concerns pale in comparison to the divisive, grievance-mongering activities of the group’s increasingly radicalized officials and alumni.

TFA’s most infamous public faces don’t even pretend to be interested in students’ academic achievement. It’s all about race, tweets and marching on the streets.

She goes on to give accounts of recent civil rights activism by TFA members and alums, including popularizing and promoting the #BlackLivesMatter movement. She links this to TFA's recent initiative to include more men and women of color. She stops just short of saying that TFA has been taken over by a bunch of uppity black folks who don't know how to stay in place-- but only just short of that.

Look-- nobody is ever going to mistake me for a TFA supporter. I've explained numerous times why the organization, which has morphed into one more corporate-stoogery corporation, is bad for CURMUDGUCATION: I'm Defending Teach for America:

Flying First Class

Traveling always gives me time to think, and I spent yesterday making my way to the West Coast, where my wife and I are spending some time in LA hanging out with my son and daughter, their partners, and my grandson (my in-laws are tending to the house and the dog, who cannot even successfully manage a car trip across town).

On one leg of the journey yesterday, we ended up sitting just behind the bulkhead that separated we Mere Mortals from the folks in First Class.

I've never traveled first class, in fact have never traveled sitting far enough forward to see the wonders that occur there.

I marveled at how those twenty-four travelers, of all of us cattle-jammed into the plane, had essentially their own personal staff of attendants to provide them with a steady stream of amenities, from taking their lunch orders to delivering via tongs some nicely warmed towels. One business traveler's seat would not recline, and after contortions worthy of Godzilla's chiropractor, the flight attendant promised a financial compensation for the travelers emotional pain and suffering from being forced to do without his six degrees of inclination.

I reflected that it made a certain amount of sense-- those folks had likely forked over (sans tongs) a ton of money to sit in airplane nirvana, and so had personally generated a great deal of the plane's 

Flying First Class

When the School Becomes the Graduation Sheriff - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher

When the School Becomes the Graduation Sheriff - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher:

When the School Becomes the Graduation Sheriff





 Several years ago, I was traveling across the state with then-President of the MI Education Association, Julius Maddox, and our conversation wandered into territory where I had some strong opinions: the overuse of praise, awards and celebrations in schools.

I thought that kindergarten "graduations" with tiny mortarboards and grandma snapping pictures were overkill--and endless middle school Award Nights where making the B+ honor roll was worthy of a certificate and applause were just not necessary. High school graduation? Sure. A real accomplishment. But I had seen enough calligraphy-scribed honor certificates dumped into the trash by heedless 8th graders to have developed a cynical perspective on celebrating each and every minor milepost.
Maddox soundly but thoughtfully disagreed: For kids whose future is assured by vigilant parenting and adequate resources--those whose expectations automatically include high school, college and career--perhaps an end-of-kindergarten ceremony is meaningless, he remarked. But for other children, the future is a crapshoot.
In his district, parties marking the successful end of middle school were part of the culture. Gifts were welcomed--a card from Auntie Mae with five dollars could go into a college fund. It was reason to gather family, celebrate and push a youngster into the next level, buoyed by plenty of recognition, praise and encouragement. We applaud at every level, he said. There's no worry about too much joy or pride.
I remembered our discussion when the story emerged, last week, about the superintendent in Senatobia, Mississippi pressing charges against family members who cheered for high school graduates. The charges were quickly dropped--but the superintendent made his point: We don't like the way you choose to celebrate. And we're in charge.
I've been to more school commencement exercises than I care to remember--usually directing the When the School Becomes the Graduation Sheriff - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher:

A gifted Newark teacher asks: Why are we not good enough to educate our children? | Bob Braun's Ledger

A gifted Newark teacher asks: Why are we not good enough to educate our children? | Bob Braun's Ledger:

A gifted Newark teacher asks: Why are we not good enough to educate our children?

Jonathan Alston
Jonathan Alston


EDITOR’S NOTE: I am proud to present this guest blog by Jonathan Alston, an English teacher and debate coach at Newark’s Science Park High School. Alston, born and raised in Newark and educated at Science and Yale, recently guided his debaters to a national championship. He has coached seven national debate champions.  Alston also is co-host of “All Politics Are Local,” the Hip-Hop Political Radio Show. He publishes the blog Newark Teacher where this essay first appeared. It was written before Lamont Thomas, Science Park’s principal, resigned. I must caution readers it contains offensive language that I would not use but, coming from the heart, mind and soul of a gifted African-American teacher and writer, it adds raw and essential truth and  power to his profound analysis of what is wrong with Newark–and New Jersey. And, yes, in fact, the State Board of Education has the legal power to remove Cami Anderson and restore local control of the schools.
By JONATHAN ALSTON

To the NJ State Board of Education: Remove Cami Anderson and Establish a System of Local Control – What is Going On in Newark is a Democracy Movement
“As Washington has increased its control over our students’ education, our children have fallen further and further behind their peers around the world. When Washington, DC took over Common Core in the Obama administration, it pulled education away from our neighborhoods. That is not what is best for the investment New Jersey is making in our children’s education. This should not come as a big surprise. Whenever this federal government has crowded out local control, things have only gotten worse.”
- NJ Governor Chris Christie, May 28, 2015, Burlington Community College”It’s really shocking to me that students walked out in a protest on a sunny Friday afternoon. When they start walking out on a rainy Tuesday, maybe I’ll take it more seriously. They can walk out and protest as much as they want…No, I’m not changing my opinion on this.”
- NJ Governor Chris Christie, May 29, 2015, when a reporter asked if his A gifted Newark teacher asks: Why are we not good enough to educate our children? | Bob Braun's Ledger:

Oregon passes Student Assessment Bill of Rights | Seattle Education

Oregon passes Student Assessment Bill of Rights | Seattle Education:

Oregon passes Student Assessment Bill of Rights

success.13100536_std
On June 11, the Oregon Senate passed HB 2655, the Student Assessment Bill of Rights. The Bill recognizes students and their parents as important stakeholders in the assessment process and improves transparency around the assessment process for students and educators. This bill also establishes one of the most parent friendly opt-out bills in the nation, ensuring that every parent has access to information about the statewide assessments and how to exercise the right to determine if sitting for the statewide standardized assessment is in the best interest of their child. More importantly, the legislation brings us one step closer to our ultimate goal–a system where parents, students and teachers are “all-in” instead of wanting to “opt-out.”
To recognize this important victory for our students and parents, OEA President Hanna Vaandering issued the following statement:
“As educators, we know the consequence of over-testing—put simply, it takes the love of learning out of our schools.  We are proud that the Oregon legislature took one of the strongest steps in the nation toward protecting students and students’ rights as they relate to statewide standardized assessments.  But this is just one step on our path toward a better way.
“Assessments should inspire learning. Our ultimate goal is to work with state leaders to create a system of assessment that works for all students, parents and educators—one that accurately measures student learning and growth without creating undo anxiety and stress.  When all is said and done, we want parents and students to be all-in, not opt-out.  That’s what we’re striving for, and I know we will get there soon. 
“In the meantime, this legislation is an important step.  OEA members—in partnership with parents and students—reached out to lawmakers, and lawmakers listened.  This is how the process is supposed to work. Today I’m proud to be an educator and an Oregonian.”
Oregon passes Student Assessment Bill of Rights | Seattle Education:

Jersey Jazzman: America, Meet @GovChristie: Teacher Bashing Hypocrite

Jersey Jazzman: America, Meet @GovChristie: Teacher Bashing Hypocrite:

America, Meet @GovChristie: Teacher Bashing Hypocrite 



 The Reading Zone points us to a video of Chris Christie out on the campaign trail doing what he does best: bashing teachers.


Q: Which do you regard as a bigger threat to the nation: ISIS, or our K-12 education system. 
CHRISTIE: (Laughs) Both.

America, meet Chris Christie: a man who will merrily compare public schools to terrorist groups.

We Jersey folks have become used to this: after all, Christie has compared teachers to drug dealers, told students their teachers don't care about their learning, and excoriated teachers for using pronouns to describe their students. No, I am not making this up.

There are three reasons Christie engages in the juvenile, unpresidential behavior. First, he has a personal beef with the New Jersey Education Association, the state's largest teacher union. The NJEA  has not backed down to his bullying, and that pisses him off to no end.

Second, Christie needs a scapegoat for his many, many failures as governor. He has a terrible job creation record, a terrible tax record, a terrible record of management, a terrible environmental record, a terrible public health record, and a terrible disaster recovery record. Plus Bridgegate. And the ARC tunnel. And our tanking credit rating. And housing. And his personal greed....

Chris Christie's record is quite clear: he is a truly horrible governor. I'll admit - See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2015/06/america-meet-govchristie-teacher-basing.html