Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Las Vegas: Betting On New Teachers But Coming Up Short : NPR Ed : NPR

Las Vegas: Betting On New Teachers But Coming Up Short : NPR Ed : NPR:

Las Vegas: Betting On New Teachers But Coming Up Short






 Beyond Sin City's casino strip, what happens in Vegas also includes an education system in crisis. Its schools are severely overcrowded, as we reported Wednesday onMorning Edition. And Nevada and Vegas' schools are ranked at or near the bottomnationally.

Amid these long-term problems is an immediate crisis: finding enough teachers to educate the fast-growing student population. That's led to frantic recruitment efforts and new strains on veteran educators.
"I feel like I'm being challenged, which is a definite change," says first-year teacher Jessica Adams. She used to work as a cocktail server at the Planet Hollywood casino and resort on the Vegas strip. Unfulfilled with that career, she joined a fast-track teacher training program to get into the classroom.
Server Jessica is now Ms. Adams, the fourth-grade teacher.
"I really enjoy being with the kids and making a difference instead of serving tables," she says with a chuckle.
The 26-year-old, who has a college degree in hospitality management, now works the floor in a temporary classroom trailer at Robert Forbuss Elementary, an overcrowded school in southwest Las Vegas.
The city wishes it had a lot more teachers like Adams.
It needs almost 3,000 more teachers, to be exact. Las Vegas and Clark County consistently top the lists of American cities most in need of new teachers. And the most pressing needs — 75 percent of vacancies — are in schools that are lower-performing and have a high percentage of children living in poverty.
Teacher turnover is a big challenge. Bucking a national trend, Vegas has a high first-year-teacher attrition rate. Studies show that high turnover in underperforming schools can hurt academic performance.
Some 600 classes in the district today are being taught by long-term substitute teachers.
"Those 600-plus classrooms are not getting full-time education in my opinion," says Tom Skancke, the CEO of the Las Vegas Global Economic Alliance, which is part of the state's economic-development arm. "Is that child being educated for the amount of money we're investing in the classroom? The answer is no."
Many veteran educators here say the shortage is undermining morale and student learning.
"It shouldn't necessarily all be put on the veteran teachers to help the new teachers," says fifth-grade teacher Rob Rosenblatt. The shortage and overcrowding issues, he says, mean more work and more stress for teachers.
The district increasingly relies on long-term substitutes and online classes to help plug the holes. And there is a critical shortage of qualified substitutes.
Sarah Sunnasy teaches fifth grade at Bertha Ronzone Elementary School. She has back trouble but says she almost never calls in sick.

"I've come to school on days where I cried trying to get out of bed," Sunnasy says. "Because I know if I try to call in a sub, there is not going to be anybody there. And I'm not gonna put that pressure on the people that I work with to split my class or cover my class."
Last school year in the district about 500 teachers quit without giving any reason. One of Rosenblatt's colleagues resigned a few weeks into the new school year. Rosenblatt says he and a colleague have had to pick up all the slack — lessons, report cards, grading and tests.
"Basically it was the two of us teaching not just our two classes but a third class on top of it. I even told my kids, 'I'm neglecting you guys.' "
He apologized to his regular class but told them he had to step in because the class next door "just wasn't getting the education they deserved."
Beneath the flash, glitz and dollars flowing into Vegas, the city's school woes trouble Skancke and some others in the business community. "We've got to act. We've been talking about fixing K-12 education in this state for 30 years! We have to stop talking and start doing."
The district is aggressively trying to tap into alternative teacher certification programs including the one Adams attends at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. It works to get teachers into the classroom fast, and they finish their degree work at night.
"It's very much a quick, down-and-dirty boot camp for students," says Brad Keating, who heads recruiting for the district's Alternate Route to Licensure, or ARL, program. The former political aide and casino executive says he took up teaching special education here to make a difference.
"We give them as much knowledge as humanly possible during a six-week program to learn the pedagogy, to learn about classroom management, learn about lesson plans," Keating says. "Being a teacher is very much on-the-job training. There's only so much we can teach you at a university level."
Most times the new teachers are paired with teacher mentors who help them adjust to classroom realities.
Shawn Paquette, the principal at Forbuss Elementary, says Adams is "swimming hard and she may be overwhelmed at times, but I'm dedicated to getting these teachers to where they need to be."
But he worries that the alternative certification pipeline may not be the long-term solution. "It concerns me because it now falls upon me to fill in some of the gaps that they don't have and that puts more work on myself and my staff to catch people up."
The district is also hitting up other alternative certification programs including Teach for America and Troops to Teachers.
The total number of teachers coming through those alternative pipelines is just over 450, and not all of them will want to live and work in Las Vegas.
That still leaves the city some 2,500 teachers in the red. And those teachers have less training and experience than do traditionally certified ones.
"They are an adequate Band-Aid with the appropriate level of support. But is it acceptable? Absolutely not," says Staci Vesneske, the chief human resources officer for the Clark County School District. "Do we have a national teacher pipeline issue? Absolutely we do. So we have to do everything to fill that gap."
Others see the alternative certification push as positive for the city. The students "tend to be older, they tend to be from more diverse backgrounds and they bring different life experiences to the classroom," says Joseph Morgan, a UNLV assistant professor of education. "I think they all end up being really good teachers — with the right preparation and supports."
Signing Bonus?
Pay is not a big draw helping to fill that gap. A starting teacher base salary here is $34,500. If you count tips — and Vegas' casino workers live on tips — card dealers and servers can make more than that in a state with no individual income tax.
"We would probably attract more teachers if we could offer them a signing bonus like they do in sports," says professor Linda Quinn, associate dean of UNLV's College of Education. "But we can't."
Part of the shortage problem here, veteran educators say, is that nationwide, teaching is now seen as a less attractive, less stable career choice. Quinn says a culture of testing has sucked some of the joy out of the K-12 profession: "We're doing way too much testing, way too many forced programs."
With pay not a huge draw, the district is trying to attract more teachers by touting other benefits, including sunshine and the wider community beyond tourism and casinos.
"It's a fabulous city to live in, not just to visit," says Vesneske. "So we're really selling Las Vegas as a community."
The district launched an ad campaign dubbed "Calling All Heroes" that it hopes will play to would-be teachers' sense of social responsibility.
"Breaking news: Turns out we are in crisis!" kids say in one school-made video spread via the Web and social media. "And with the hero shortage, who will teach us?"
But it's a tough sell in a city better known for betting and benders than community-building and which has to compete with that bigger budget effort — 11 years running — to sell Vegas' naughty side.
"You're unpredictable, reckless, and no one would ever let you date their sister," says one of many ads for the city's famous "What happens in Vegas" series.Las Vegas: Betting On New Teachers But Coming Up Short : NPR Ed : NPR:

Ed tech company folds after receiving millions in Race to the Top funds - The Washington Post

Ed tech company folds after receiving millions in Race to the Top funds - The Washington Post:

Ed tech company folds after receiving millions in Race to the Top funds





 An education technology company has folded after receiving millions of dollars in federal Race to the Top funds to provide online assessments and other services to school districts.

Charlotte-based Thinkgate LLC shut down last week, according to state education officials in Ohio and Massachusetts, two states that used Race to the Top money to contract with the company.
Their joint contract with Thinkgate does not expire until the end of the school year, leaving some schools scrambling to fill the void left by the company’s closure and some parents concerned about the security of student data in the company’s systems.
The company also had statewide contracts in North Carolina and Illinois, and altogether served more than 500 education agencies and 3 million students, according to its Web site.
Thinkgate chief executive and founder Eric Waynick did not respond to e-mail requests for comment Wednesday and calls to his office were sent to a voice mailbox that was full and not accepting messages.
The growing company had 70 employees last year when it moved from Atlanta to Charlotte, and it had been planning to hire another 120 people, according to the Charlotte Business Journal.
Ohio and Massachusetts teamed up to sign a joint contract with Thinkgate after each state promised, in their 2010 applications for Race to the Top grants, to create “instructional improvement systems”: Online platforms meant to give teachers a one-stop shop for accessing academic standards and curriculum; creating classroom tests aligned to state academic standards; and storing and analyzing student test scores and other data.
The joint contract covered two school years, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Education officials in both states said they hoped that at the conclusion of that period, school districts that liked the system would sign individual contracts with Thinkgate.
But last week the company went out of business, surprising educators in both states.
Ohio education officials were informed on April 28 that Thinkgate would be going out of business within two days, according to an e-mail from a state official to school district superintendents
“If you would like to keep and use any assessments that you have created, you will need to immediately print and save them before the system shuts down,” said the e-mail, obtained by The Washington Post.
Ohio, which received about $400 million in Race to the Top funds, has paid Thinkgate $9.8 million to date for its services, said John Charlton, a spokesman for the state education department. More than 300 school districts signed up to use the system in 2013, he said. In 2014-2015, fewer than 150 school districts were using the system.
Mark Neal, the superintendent of the Tri-Valley Local School District, criticized the state education department’s contract with Thinkgate as a waste of time and money, and he said the company’s sudden closure raised questions about the security of children’s private information.
The contract “was a dismal failure that ended exactly in the way that most parents and educators were most concerned about. Student data in the hands of for-profit corporations,” he wrote in a text message.
Charlton said that the Thinkgate contract includes safeguards regarding secure storage and destruction of data. Ohio’s student data has been transferred to a secure server in the state, he said.
Massachusetts education officials also said that student data would be destroyed in accordance with state standards. Approximately 60 of Massachusetts’s 400 school districts were using the Thinkgate system.
Officials could not immediately say how much Massachusetts has paid Thinkgate to date. The state received $250 million from Race to the Top.
Officials in both states said they could not immediately provide a copy of the Thinkgate contract.

Schools of Opportunity: the inaugural winners - The Washington Post

Schools of Opportunity: the inaugural winners - The Washington Post:

Schools of Opportunity: the inaugural winners





Last October I wrote about a pilot initiative to identify and recognize public high schools that seek to close opportunity gaps through practices “that build on students’ strengths” — not by inundating them with tests. Today the first winners are being announced, and in the coming days, the schools will be profiled on this blog.
The people behind the Schools of Opportunity project are Carol Burris, principal of South Side High School in the Rockville Centre School District in New York, and Kevin Welner, a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder’s School of Education who specializes in educational policy and law. Burris was named the 2010 Educator of the Year by the School Administrators Association of New York State, and in 2013, was named New York State High School Principal of the Year. She is taking early retirement at the end of the school year to advocate for public education. Welner is director of the National Education Policy Center at UC Boulder, which produces high-quality peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions.
Here are the winners from the pilot initiative in New York and Colorado.

By Kevin Welner and Carol Burris
We are delighted to announce, exclusively on The Washington Post’s Answer Sheet blog, the 17 recognized Schools of Opportunity for 2015. During this pilot year, all schools are in New York and Colorado, with five singled out for Gold-level recognition. These high schools use research-based practices to ensure that all students have rich opportunities to succeed. Some are working against great odds. All put students, not scores, first.
In the upcoming weeks in the Answer Sheet, we will describe these remarkable schools and what we can learn from them.
The Schools of Opportunity project, designed as a way to highlight schools that actively and equitably promote the success of all students, was piloted this school year in Colorado and New York, with plans to expand next year to include high schools nationwide. It is a project of the National Education Policy Center (NEPC), housed in the CU-Boulder School of Education. The Ford Foundation and the NEA Foundation have both generously provided funding assistance for the Schools of Opportunity project.
The Gold Schools of Opportunity in 2015 are, in alphabetical order:

The Silver Schools of Opportunity in 2015 are, again in alphabetical order:

The recognized schools illustrate practices designed to close gaps in opportunity between students who come from advantaged and disadvantaged circumstances. They model what true reform is all about. Each and every one keeps the welfare of students at the center of their reforms.
We invite you to click in the link embedded in each school’s name to learn about some of the outstanding practices that expand opportunity for their students. Some of these schools are large, and some are small. Some are located in rural communities, some in the suburbs and others in urban cities. Some are traditional high schools, while others are small schools that serve at-risk students. What they all have in common is a fierce commitment to provide excellent opportunities designed to reach all their students.
The recognition of these schools is based on 11 specific principles identified by experts in the 2013 book, Closing the Opportunity Gap published by Oxford University Press, which Welner edited along with Stanford University Schools of Opportunity: the inaugural winners - The Washington Post:


Louisiana Educator: Paranoid Grigsby Wants LABI to Drive a Spear Through the Hearts of the Teacher Unions!

Louisiana Educator: Paranoid Grigsby Wants LABI to Drive a Spear Through the Hearts of the Teacher Unions!:



Paranoid Grigsby Wants LABI to Drive a Spear Through the Hearts of the Teacher Unions!


This is almost unbelievable! Bob Mann reveals here why delusional Lane Grigsby wants LABI to make the passage of HB 418 denying payroll dues deduction to teachers, the number one priority of LABI! He believes that this denial of a basic benefit to teachers will finally kill the evil teacher unions! Please watch the video in this article in nola.com by Bob Mann. Grigsby who is a key board member of LABI has somehow convinced himself that if big business could somehow cripple the teacher unions, that finally the ill advised reforms of education pushed by LABI would fix our education system.

This whole fantasy by big business bosses that only the teacher unions prevent the success of their  experiments with education reform is both delusional and paranoid! 

LABI leaders believe that the main reason public education is not producing college ready, work ready, "human capitol" is that thousands of lazy and incompetent teachers are just not teaching hard enough and well enough to get all kids ready for the workforce! No matter that some parents do not send their children to school regularly, and that no one at home sees to it that kids do homework and study for tests, or even pay attention in class. It never occurs to LABI leaders that kids who get kicked out of their homes regularly, don't know where their next meal will be coming from, and have almost no good role models that instill in them a solid work ethic, are just not going to do well in school no matter how hard teachers work.

LABI is convinced that if the Louisiana Department of Education could just require that large numbers of teachers be fired based on VAM scores, and if those teachers had no due process rights, and no organizational support to allow them to challenge unfounded dismissals, the remaining teachers and the new TFA replacements would finally get through to the kids. Good luck with that one!

My opinion is this: If more teachers were active, involved members of their teacher unions, LABI, CABL, John White, Arne Duncan, and Bill Gates would not be using our students as lab rats for their unscientific reform ideas.  HB 418 will be going to the House Floor for a vote of all Representatives (not Senators yet) sometime next week. If you care about the teaching profession, please ask your Representative to vote no on this bill.

Click on this link at the Louisiana Legislature web site to plug in your address so that you can get the contact information for your state representative. You can then send and email or telephone his/her office and leave a message to oppose HB 418.

Jersey Jazzman: A Decade of Testing -- But Nothing's Changed

Jersey Jazzman: A Decade of Testing -- But Nothing's Changed:

A Decade of Testing -- But Nothing's Changed




 There are two things in eduction policy on which we should all agree:


- Poverty matters. The correlation between poverty and outcomes is indisputable, but that's only the beginning. We have more and more evidence of a causal link between economic disadvantage and student achievement. Children living in poverty are far less likely to have their developmental needs met, which affects their school work. There is even emerging evidence that poverty affects the development of the brain, and that the environmental stresses caused by poverty lead to hormonal changes that may affect academic outcomes.

- School funding matters. In the words of Bruce Baker:
On balance, it is safe to say that a sizeable and growing body of rigorous empirical literature validates that state school finance reforms can have substantive, positive effects on student outcomes, including reductions in outcome disparities or increases in overall outcome levels.[xi]
While some would like to put up a smokescreen and pretend that school funding is a secondary concern, the plain truth is that money does matter. You can't expect schools and teachers to be held accountable for their students' academic progress unless and until you provide those schools with the resources they need to realize that progress.

Now I understand that there are plenty of folks out there who will try to push back on these rather simple truths. But only the most intransigent won't admit that poverty doesn't have a profound affect on the lives of children, and that schools need adequate resources to do their jobs.

Are we all together on this? OK...

The latest argument for expanding our already expensive, intrusive, curriculum-narrowing testing regime is that somehow it is a civil right for children in disadvantage to take tests. Because without the vital data these tests provide, we'll never see the changes our society needs to make on behalf of children:

Our commitment to fair, unbiased, and accurate data collection and reporting resonates greatest in our work to improve education. The educational outcomes for the children we represent are unacceptable by almost every measurement. And we rely on the consistent, accurate, and reliable data provided by annual statewide assessments to advocate for better lives and outcomes for our children. These data are critical for understanding whether and where there is equal opportunity. [emphasis mine]
That's from the Leadership Conference's statement on behalf of eleven civil rights groups calling for the continuing use of standardized tests. I'd urge you to read the response to this statement from the Network for Public Education, including a ink to an extended essay by Jesse Hagopian. But let me add my own thoughts:

As these civil rights groups are no doubt aware, we have now had over a decade of - See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2015/05/a-decade-of-testing-but-nothings-changed.html

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Is Rauner threatening secession? Says Chicago gets too big a share of school funds.

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Is Rauner threatening secession? Says Chicago gets too big a share of school funds.:



Is Rauner threatening secession? Says Chicago gets too big a share of school funds.

Old Napa Valley Winery pals greet each other at Council meeting. 


I listened to Gov. Rauner's speech before the City Council yesterday and came away wondering why he even bothered. He had nothing of import to say and came off like an ignorant boob. With protesting unionists gathering outside the council chambers, Rauner skipped even a mention of his so-called right-to-work (for less) zones.



Well actually, he did make a couple of points. The first was laughable. He's pitting down-staters against Chicagoans and threatening secession (?) unless Chicago accepts his turn-around agenda and austerity program (massive cuts in education and social services).

"When I'm south of I-80 and I ask an audience what we need to do to turn Illinois around, you know what the number-one answer I get? The most frequent response is, 'secede from Chicago.' I'm not making that up. I'm not making that up."
Whenever a politician keeps repeating that he's "not making that up", I always suspect that he's making it up. But if he's not, it says more about Rauner's tiny base of Dixie-whistling, neo-confederates than anything else.



The second -- not so laughable -- was that Chicago schools are receiving much too big a share of state school funding. Yes, he's pitting downstate against Chicago on school funding too all while he's screwing school districts statewide.



Illinois consistently gets an "F"in evaluations of the fairness of its funding distribution between low- and high-poverty school districts. The state usually ranks third from last compared to other states, in its share of school funding . Most school funding comes from local Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Is Rauner threatening secession? Says Chicago gets too big a share of school funds.:



Memorizers are the lowest achievers and other Common Core math surprises - The Hechinger Report

Memorizers are the lowest achievers and other Common Core math surprises - The Hechinger Report:

Memorizers are the lowest achievers and other Common Core math surprises



In this Feb. 12, 2015 photo, Yamarko Brown, age 12, works on math problems as part of a trial run of a new state assessment test at Annapolis Middle School in Annapolis, Md. The new test, which is scheduled to go into use March 2, 2015, is linked to the Common Core standards, which Maryland adopted in 2010 under the federal No Child Left Behind law, and serves as criteria for students in math and reading.
In this Feb. 12, 2015 photo, Yamarko Brown, age 12, works on math problems as part of a trial run of a new state assessment test at Annapolis Middle School in Annapolis, Md. The new test, which is scheduled to go into use March 2, 2015, is linked to the Common Core standards, which Maryland adopted in 2010 under the federal No Child Left Behind law, and serves as criteria for students in math and reading. AP Photo/Patrick Semansky


It ’s time to debunk the myths about who is good in math, and Common Core state standards move us toward this worthy goal. Mathematics and technology leaders support the standards because they are rooted in the new brain and learning sciences.

All children are different in their thinking, strength and interests. Mathematics classes of the past decade have valued one type of math learner, one who can memorize well and calculate fast.
Yet data from the 13 million students who took PISA tests showed that the lowest achieving students worldwide were those who used a memorization strategy – those who thought of math as a set of methods to remember and who approached math by trying to memorize steps. The highest achieving students were those who thought of math as a set of connected, big ideas.
The U.S. has more memorizers than most other countries in the world. Perhaps not surprisingly as math teachers, driven by narrow state standards and tests, have valued those students over all others, communicating to many other students along the way – often girls – that they do not belong in math class.
The fact that we have valued one type of learner and given others the idea they cannot do math is part of the reason for the widespread math failure and dislike in the U.S.
Brain science tells us that the students who are better memorizers do not have more math “ability” or potential but we continue to value the faster memorizers over those who think slowly, deeply and creatively – the students we need for our scientific and technological future. The past decade has produced a generation of students who are procedurally competent but cannot think their way out of a box. This is a problem.




Mathematics is a broad and multidimensional subject. Real mathematics is about inquiry, communication, connections, and visual ideas. We don’t need students to calculate quickly in math. We need students who can ask good questions, map out pathways, reason about complex solutions, set up models and communicate in different forms. All of these ways of working are encouraged by the Common Core.
Technology leaders are publically arguing that calculation is not math, and that math is a much broader subject. Conrad Wolfram, one of the leaders of one of the world’s most important mathematics companies, Wolfram-Alpha, urges schools to stop emphasizing calculating and focus instead on problem solving, modeling, thinking, and reasoning as these are the mathematical abilities that students need in the workplace and their high tech lives. This broad, multidimensional mathematics is the math that engages many more learners and puts them on a pathway to life long success.
Part of the problem in the U.S. is the desperation of many parents to advance their children in math, pushing them to higher levels of math faster and sooner, somehow believing that a resume packed with advanced math courses will guarantee their future. Bill Jacob, a mathematics professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, speaks openly about the dangers of students being pushed to higher levels of mathematics too soon. “I know it is hard to persuade parents that their students shouldn’t race to get calculus, but I really wish they wouldn’t. Too much content and depth is left out when they do.” said Jacob, who is not alone in saying that he would rather have students in his university mathematics courses that have breadth in their mathematical experiences than any additional Advanced Placement courses. Experts in England are giving the same advice to parents of high achieving students. Geoff Smith, chairman of the British and International Math Olympiads warns that accelerating children through the system is a “disaster” and a “mistake”. He, like me, recommends that high achieving students explore the mathematics they are learning in depth, instead of rushing forward.
Mathematics is not a subject that requires fast thinking. Award winning mathematicians talk about their slow, deep thinking in math. Fields Medal winning mathematician Laurent Schwartz wrote in his autobiography that he felt stupid in school because he was one of the slowest thinkers in math. Eventually he realized that speed was not important – “What is important is to deeply understand things and their relations to each other.  This is where intelligence lies. The fact of being quick or slow isn’t really relevant.”
Some school districts, such as San Francisco Unified, are trying to slow down the math experience, requiring that advanced students go deeper rather than faster. Students still reach calculus but the pathway to calculus consists of deep understanding rather than procedures and memorization. This is an important move. There is no harm in students being introduced to higher-level mathematics earlier, as long as the mathematics is enjoyable and ideas can be explored deeply. Third graders can be fascinated by the notion of infinity, or the fourth dimension, but they do not need a race through procedural presentations of mathematics.
New brain science tells us that no one is born with a math gift or a math brain and that all students can achieve in math with the right teaching and messages. The classrooms that produce high achieving students are those in which students work on deep, rich mathematics through tasks that they can take to any level they want. No one is told what level they can reach and no one is held back by narrow questions that limit students’ mathematical development and creativity.
Many people across the U.S. have gross misconceptions about mathematics learning, thinking that mathematics is a narrow subject of memorization and speed and that people who do not calculate fast or memorize well are not ‘math people’. We need to change the conversations about mathematics, communicating to all children that they can learn. We also need to change the way math is taught, valuing the different ways of thinking that are so important to the subject. Mathematics, itself, needs this and although change is hard, it should be embraced.
We need to broaden mathematics and open the doors of mathematics to all students. When we do this we will see many more creative, energized young people equipped to think quantitatively about our ever-changing world. We all need this.
Jo Boaler is a professor of mathematics education at Stanford University, co-founder of www.youcubed.org, and author of What’s Math Got To Do With It: How Teachers and Parents can Transform Mathematics Learning and Inspire Success. (Penguin, 2015)
This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Read more about Common Core.

There's an Unexpected Downside to More Kids Getting Free Meals at School - Yahoo News

There's an Unexpected Downside to More Kids Getting Free Meals at School - Yahoo News:

There's an Unexpected Downside to More Kids Getting Free Meals at School




 At a time when more impoverished kids than ever are attending public schools, the idea seemed like a no-brainer: Eliminate the stigma those kids might feel when receiving government-subsidized breakfasts and lunches by offering free meals to all students, including their better-off peers.  

But like other well-intentioned policy shifts, “free meals for all” programs some districts have adopted are having unintended consequences that could hurt the very children the idea was designed to help.  
The blurred lines between economic classes in the cafeteria have made it harder to determine the number of students who receive free or reduced-priced meals—the primary statistic used to determine the level of poverty in a school or a district. Without that number, federal officials allocating billions of dollars in Title I funds, as well as education policy analysts and philanthropic foundations that want to help needy kids learn, won’t have accurate information to determine if a school needs the help.  
Jill Barshay, a columnist for education analysis website The Hechinger Report, wrote that “more than 2,000 school districts and more than 13,000 schools are serving more than 6.4 million students participating in the free-lunch-for-all program,” roughly 13 percent of the entire U.S. public school population. Yet because of the new guidelines, she wrote, “We don’t know how many of them are actually poor, and how many non-poor kids are now getting swept in with them.” 
The lack of an accurate gauge of a school’s poverty rate, she added, could skew federal Title I funding, typically used to provide classroom services and support for poor or struggling students. The U.S. Department of Education uses a formula based on the number of needy students to determine a school’s or a district’s eligibility; already, Barshay wrote, a number of school districts are scrambling to come up with a more accurate method for head counts, and the state of New York opted out of free-lunch-for-all programs to avoid the problem altogether.
 “Free and reduced-price lunch figures are an imprecise measure of poverty, but at least they capture children who are being raised in families that earn no more than 85 percent above the federal poverty line,” she wrote.  
Yet education analysts who study the link between poverty and classroom achievement say the free-lunch count should have been a guide at best, and impoverished students are usually undercounted.  
“When we work with schools, districts, states, and others, we’re always real careful” when calculating the poverty rate, says Kathleen Budge, an education professor at Boise State University and an author at the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, a Washington, D.C.–based education policy center.
“The number of kids who qualify [for free meals]—those are floor numbers,” says Budge, a veteran teacher and former principal who, with William Parrett, coauthored the book Turning High-Poverty Schools Into High-Performing Schools. 
Even before free-for-all meals, she says, some low-income parents refused to apply for help because of a no-handouts cultural philosophy—or, in the case of undocumented immigrants, because they didn’t want to risk getting caught. 
That’s despite the fact that Title I resources “come with the expectation they will be spent” to help the kids who most need it, says Parrett, director of Boise State’s Center for School Improvement & Policy Studies and a specialist in teaching at-risk and underserved children. “When carefully spent, [those dollars] can make a difference for kids,” adds Parrett. 
If the numbers are underreported, however, it could mean less money for programs that can address chronic classroom issues needy kids face: tutoring to close achievement gaps in reading and math, anti-truancy programs, speech or language therapists for special-needs students, college-readiness classes, and STEM extracurricular activities such as an after-school robot team. In some states, data gleaned from students enrolled in free or reduced meals programs help districts determine school boundaries; in others, it can have an impact on state and federal funding formulas. 
And most experts agree money matters: the higher the per-pupil funding, the more likely a student or school can meet or exceed academic achievement goals. 
Ultimately, Budge says, the good intention of offering free meals to schoolchildren is a symptom of a larger problem: There are more poor kids than ever before in American classrooms, which means they’re starting further behind and have more challenges than their wealthier peers. Fold in the general expectation that all kids can and will achieve if given a level playing field, and the problem becomes even more complex. 
“We’re a nation that uses the word—and you’ll probably find that word in the mission statements of [many] schools—we talk about ‘all kids,’ ” she says. “We have an expectation in this country that’s pretty resolute, that when we talk about kids we’re talking about all kids. But all kids are not equal in terms of their lives.” 
To level the playing field and give poor kids a good education, “we’ve gone from access to opportunity to outcomes," Budge adds. "I think that we’ve raised the ante on public schools; I’m not sure we’ve raised the support to achieve what we’re really asking them.”
Education leaders may talk a good game but, Budge says, “I don’t know if we’ll ever reach consensus on playing a good game.”There's an Unexpected Downside to More Kids Getting Free Meals at School - Yahoo News: