Latest News and Comment from Education

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Frequently Asked Questions - SACS - Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS) (CA Dept of Education)

Frequently Asked Questions - SACS - Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS) (CA Dept of Education):


Frequently Asked Questions - SACS

Frequently asked questions regarding standardized account code structure (SACS) financial reporting.


Education Protection Account
  1. Have unique account codes been established for the Proposition 30 Education Protection Account (EPA) entitlement?
  2. When will the EPA code combinations be available in the SACS tables of valid code combinations?
  3. How should the adjustment of the EPA entitlement from P-2 to Annual be recorded?
  4. How should LEAs record EPA expenditures? Since the EPA entitlement merely replaces state aid funds that have always been reported in Resource 0000, is it appropriate to accumulate the costs in Resource 0000 and then make a direct cost transfer from Resource 0000 to Resource 1400?  
  5. Must expenditures of EPA funds be charged directly to the EPA resource at the time of expenditure, or may periodic or annual adjusting entries be made between another resource and Resource 1400?
  6. Can EPA funds be transferred to other resources?
  7. Can contributions from other resources (funding sources) be made to Resource 1400?
  8. Can EPA funds be carried over into the following year?
  9. Must the EPA entitlement be allocated proportionately to the programs whose ADA generates the LEA’s revenue limit funding?
  10. Proposition 30 specifies that LEAs may not use EPA funds for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs. What is the definition of administrative costs?
  11. Specifically, for what types of activities may EPA funds be used?
  12. May EPA funds be used for indirect costs?
  13. Will the CDE provide a template that LEAs can use for reporting EPA revenues and expenditures?
  14. Proposition 30 requires that the use of EPA funds be determined by the governing board at an open public meeting. Does this meeting need to be a separate meeting only for the discussion of EPA funding?
  15. When should the open public meeting for discussing the use of 2012–13 EPA Funding be held?
  16. What are some example journal entries?

  1. Have unique account codes been established for the Proposition 30 Education Protection Account (EPA) entitlement?
    Yes, standardized account code structure (SACS) Resource 1400, Education Protection Account, and revenue Object 8012, Education Protection Account Entitlement, have been established. These codes are required to be used by all local educational agencies, including charter schools, receiving EPA funds.
    Charter schools reporting financial data via the Alternative Form, which does not contain resource codes, should use Object 8012 to record the EPA entitlement. 
  2. When will the EPA code combinations be available in the SACS tables of valid code combinations?
    The EPA code combinations will be available the beginning of April 2013, which is after the second interim reporting due date. This is because in the SACS software for fiscal year 2012–13, there is no line in the interim reporting fund forms into which the amount reported in Object 8012 could extract.
    As a workaround, LEAs that wish to report EPA revenue for second interim can include EPA revenue temporarily in Object 8011, Revenue Limit State Aid – Current Year, and then reclassify the EPA revenue to Resource 1400, Object 8012 during year-end closing. 
  3. How should the adjustment of the EPA entitlement from P-2 to Annual be recorded?
    Any amount received in the current year that was not accrued in the prior year should be recorded to Resource 1400 using Object 8019, Revenue Limit State Aid – Prior Years.
    Charter schools reporting financial data via the Alternative Form should use Object 8019.
  4. How should LEAs record EPA expenditures? Since the EPA entitlement merely replaces state aid funds that have always been reported in Resource 0000, is it appropriate to accumulate the costs in Resource 0000 and then make a direct cost transfer from Resource 0000 to Resource 1400?  

    EPA expenditures should be reported in Resource 1400 using the actual expenditure account lines where feasible, and not lump-sum transferred using Object 5710, Transfers of Direct Costs. The intention of the EPA reporting requirement is transparency. Reporting actual expenditure items achieves this better than a lump-sum transfer. The use of a unique resource code facilitates this transparency in the LEA’s accounting records. 
  5. Must expenditures of EPA funds be charged directly to the EPA resource at the time of expenditure, or may periodic or annual adjusting entries be made between another resource and Resource 1400?

    It is appropriate to record periodic adjusting entries between another resource and Resource 1400. However, as mentioned previously, the entries should be made using the actual expenditure account lines and not as a lump-sum direct cost transfer. 
  1. Can EPA funds be transferred to other resources?

    Allowable expenditures should be recorded directly to EPA Resource 1400 to the extent possible. The CDE expects that school districts and charter schools incur sufficient unrestricted educational expenditures that should allow for easily identifying amounts to be reported in Resource 1400.

    However, due to the unique characteristics of county offices of education (COEs) in that their principal instructional programs are typically reported as restricted and they may operate many other programs on a fee for service model, it may be necessary for COEs to transfer EPA funds to other resources in order to keep program accounting intact. 

    One example is a COE whose only instructional program is a community school that is reported using Resource 2400, Juvenile Court/County Community Schools. In order to avoid splitting community school expenditures between two resource codes, especially when the program revenue has historically been a revenue limit transfer from Resource 0000 and where now reporting the related EPA revenues and expenditures separately would be inconsistent with past practice, this COE might transfer EPA funds to this revenue limit funded program using Object 8091, Revenue Limit Transfers – Current Year. 

    Another example is an excess tax COE that historically has operated a program on behalf of school districts on a fee for service basis. This COE may decide to use its new minimum $200 per ADA EPA entitlement towards the cost of running the program, thus enabling them to charge less to participating school districts. Although the program is partially funded with unrestricted revenues, the COE may want to keep expenditures together in order to determine the charges for services. 
  2.  Can contributions from other resources (funding sources) be made to Resource 1400?

    No. Because LEAs have a legal requirement to report the receipt and use of EPA funds, contributions to Resource 1400 from other resources would distort EPA expenditures and not result in the intended reporting transparency. Also note that the EPA is not a “program,” in the sense that it is not “a group of related activities that operate together to accomplish specific purposes or objectives.” The normal reason for recording a contribution to a program is to keep program expenditures together, which does not apply in this context. Therefore, contributions from other funding sources should not be made to Resource 1400.
  3. Can EPA funds be carried over into the following year? 

    Proposition 30 does not restrict the amount of EPA funds that may be carried over. As a practical matter, though, most EPA funds probably will be expended each year. 
  4. Must the EPA entitlement be allocated proportionately to the programs whose ADA generates the LEA’s revenue limit funding?
    No. LEAs may allocate the EPA entitlement entirely to one program for expenditure. For example, a school district may allocate it entirely to the regular education program, and county offices of education may allocate it entirely to the Juvenile Court School program.
  1. Proposition 30 specifies that LEAs may not use EPA funds for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs. What is the definition of administrative costs?

    The CDE has interpreted that administrative costs, as used in Proposition 30, means anything defined as administration in the California School Accounting Manual. Administrative costs include general administration, school administration, and instructional administration:
    • General administration refers to agency-wide administrative activities including governing board, superintendent, and district-level fiscal, personnel, and central support services.
    • School administration refers to activities concerned with directing and managing the operation of a particular school.
    • Instructional administration refers to activities for assisting instructional staff in planning, developing, and evaluating the process of providing learning experiences for students.
    The CDE has determined that expenditures by county offices of education for certain administrative activities they are required to perform on behalf of the school districts within the county are not administrative costs for purposes of Proposition 30. These expenditures are separately identifiable within the county office's financial reports.
    The CDE believes that defining administration at the functional level, rather than by specific items of expenditure, will make it easier for LEAs to identify costs that may be charged to EPA. Furthermore, the CDE is confident that LEAs incur a sufficient level of non-administrative costs, e.g., instruction and pupil services, to easily meet the intent of Proposition 30 to not use EPA funding for administrative costs.
  1. Specifically, for what types of activities may EPA funds be used?

    Except as provided below for COEs, the following tables of SACS functions show the activities for which EPA funds may and may not be used:

    1000–1999    INSTRUCTION 
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    1000   Instruction
    Yes
    1110   Special Education: Separate Classes
    Yes
    1120   Special Education: Resource Specialist Instruction
    Yes
    1130   Special Education: Supplemental Aids and Services in Regular Classrooms
    Yes
    1180   Special Education: Nonpublic Agencies/Schools
    Yes
    1190   Special Education: Other Specialized Instructional Services
    Yes

    2000–2999    INSTRUCTION-RELATED SERVICES 
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    2100   Instructional Supervision and Administration
    No
    2110   Instructional Supervision (optional)
    No
    2120   Instructional Research (optional)
    No
    2130   Curriculum Development (optional)
    No
    2140   In-house Instructional Staff Development (optional)
    No
    2150   Instructional Administration of Special Projects (optional)
    No
    2200   Administrative Unit (AU) of a Multidistrict SELPA
    No
    2420   Instructional Library, Media, and Technology
    Yes
    2490   Other Instructional Resources
    Yes
    2495   Parent Participation (optional)
    Yes
    2700   School Administration
    No

    3000–3999    PUPIL SERVICES 
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    3110   Guidance and Counseling Services
    Yes
    3120   Psychological Services
    Yes
    3130   Attendance and Social Work Services
    Yes
    3140   Health Services
    Yes
    3150   Speech Pathology and Audiology Services
    Yes
    3160   Pupil Testing Services
    Yes
    3600   Pupil Transportation
    Yes
    3700   Food Services
    Yes
    3900   Other Pupil Services
    Yes

    4000–4999   ANCILLARY SERVICES
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    4000   Ancillary Services
    Yes
    4100   School-Sponsored Co-curricular (optional)
    Yes
    4200   School-Sponsored Athletics (optional)
    Yes
    4900   Other Ancillary Services (optional)
    Yes

    5000–5999   COMMUNITY SERVICES
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    5000   Community Services
    Yes
    5100   Community Recreation (optional)
    Yes
    5400   Civic Services (optional)
    Yes
    5900   Other Community Services (optional)
    Yes

    6000–6999    ENTERPRISE
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    6000   Enterprise
    No

    7000–7999    GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    7100   Board and Superintendent
    No
    7110   Board
    No
    7120   Staff Relations and Negotiations (optional)
    No
    7150   Superintendent (optional)
    No
    7180   Public Information (optional)
    No
    7190   External Financial Audit—Single Audit
    No
    7191   External Financial Audit—Other
    No
    7200   Other General Administration
    No
    7210   Indirect Cost Transfers
    No
    7300   Fiscal Services (optional)
    No
    7310   Budgeting (optional)
    No
    7320   Accounts Receivable (optional)
    No
    7330   Accounts Payable (optional)
    No
    7340   Payroll (optional)
    No
    7350   Financial Accounting (optional)
    No
    7360   Project-Specific Accounting (optional)
    No
    7370   Internal Auditing (optional)
    No
    7380   Property Accounting (optional)
    No
    7390   Other Fiscal Services (optional)
    No
    7400   Personnel/Human Resources Services (optional)
    No
    7410   Staff Development (optional)
    No
    7430   Credentials (optional)
    No
    7490   Other Personnel/Human Resources Services (optional)
    No
    7500   Central Support (optional)
    No
    7510   Planning, Research, Development, and Evaluation (optional)
    No
    7530   Purchasing (optional)
    No
    7540   Warehousing and Distribution (optional)
    No
    7550   Printing, Publishing, and Duplicating (optional)
    No
    7600   All Other General Administration (optional)
    No
    7700   Centralized Data Processing
    No

    8000–8999    PLANT SERVICES 
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    8100   Plant Maintenance and Operations
    Yes
    8110   Maintenance (optional)
    Yes
    8200   Operations (optional)
    Yes
    8300   Security (optional)
    Yes
    8400   Other Plant Maintenance and Operations (optional)
    Yes
    8500   Facilities Acquisition and Construction
    Yes
    8700   Facilities Rents and Leases
    Yes

    9000–9999    OTHER OUTGO
    SACS Function
    Chargeable to EPA?
    9100   Debt Service
    Yes
    9200   Transfers Between Agencies
    Yes

    County Office of Education only
    SACS GoalChargeable to EPA?
    8600 County Services to Districts (without regard to function)
    Yes
  1. May EPA funds be used for indirect costs?

    Indirect costs are not an allowable use of EPA funds because they are primarily administrative costs.
  2. Will the CDE provide a template that LEAs can use for reporting EPA revenues and expenditures?

    Proposition 30 did not prescribe a format for LEAs to report their receipt and expenditure of EPA funds, nor did it require the CDE to develop a format. Therefore, the CDE will not be providing a template. It will be at an LEA’s discretion to determine the format for reporting its EPA revenue and expenditures on its Web site.
  3. Proposition 30 requires that the use of EPA funds be determined by the governing board at an open public meeting. Does this meeting need to be a separate meeting only for the discussion of EPA funding?

    Proposition 30 language does not specify that the open public meeting has to be a separately held meeting. Therefore, this requirement may be satisfied at a regularly scheduled meeting, which the CDE believes could be the annual budget adoption meeting. 
  4. When should the open public meeting for discussing the use of 2012–13 EPA Funding be held? 
    Most likely this will be the meeting at which the second interim report is presented, although it could be at any open public meeting before expenditures are recorded for 2012–13.
  1. What are some example journal entries?

    a. The local educational agency (LEA) records receipt of its 2012-13 EPA entitlement in June 2013.
    Debit (Dr)/ Credit (Cr)
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Cr
    01
    1400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8012
    $10,000

    b. For 2012-13, the school district reclassifies $10,000 of instructional expenditures (teacher salaries and benefits) originally accumulated in Resource 0000 to Resource 1400, according to the spending determination made by the governing board.
    Dr/CrFundResourceProject YearGoalFunctionObjectAmount
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    1100
    $7,000
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3101
    $1,000
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3401
    $   700
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3501
    $   600
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3601
    $   400
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3801
    $   300
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    1100
    $7,000
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3101
    $1,000
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3401
    $   700
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3501
    $   600
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3601
    $   400
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3801
    $   300

    c. The LEA records receipt of its 2013-14 EPA entitlement.
    Dr/Cr
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Cr
    01
    1400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8012
    $9,000


    d. The LEA records receipt of its 2012-13 EPA entitlement adjustment, based on 2012-13 Annual apportionment (assumes the amount was not accrued in 2012-13).
    Dr/Cr
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Cr
    01
    1400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8019
    $2,000

    e. For 2013-14, the school district reclassifies $11,000 of instructional expenditures (teacher salaries and benefits) originally accumulated in Resource 0000 to Resource 1400, according to the spending determination made by the governing board. (Note that an LEA could instead charge expenditures directly to EPA from the beginning.)
    Dr/Cr
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    1100
    $7,000
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3101
    $1,000
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3401
    $   700
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3501
    $   600
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3601
    $   400
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    1110
    1000
    3801
    $   300
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    1100
    $7,000
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3101
    $1,000
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3401
    $   700
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3501
    $   600
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3601
    $   400
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    1110
    1000
    3801
    $   300

    Examples specific to county offices of education (COEs)

    f. The COE determines that it will use its EPA entitlement for the instructional expenditures of its community schools program. EPA funds are transferred to the Juvenile Court/County Community Schools resource.  
    Dr/Cr
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8091
    $15,000
    Cr
    01
    2400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8091
    $15,000

    g. An excess tax COE determines that it will use its EPA entitlement to fund some of the costs of a program that it operates on a fee-for-service basis on behalf of school districts. The program incurs costs that are allowed to be charged to EPA. In this case, the program is funded with unrestricted revenues. Therefore, EPA funds are transferred to the unrestricted resource. 
    Dr/Cr
    Fund
    Resource
    Project Year
    Goal
    Function
    Object
    Amount
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0
    0000
    0000
    8091
    $15,000
    Cr
    01
    0000
    0
    0000
    0000
    8091
    $15,000

    NOTE: If EPA funds are transferred out of Resource 1400 then the LEA should keep local accounting records to document that the EPA funds have been spent for non-administrative costs for purposes of the reporting requirement and the annual audit.

SxSWEdu 2013 | My Island View

SxSWEdu 2013 | My Island View:


SxSWEdu 2013

Whenever I attend an education conference, which I am doing with great frequency these days, I do so as an educator with an educator’s eye, and an educator’s attitude. It is through that lens that I view education conferences either as a conference for the education profession or the education industry. Sometimes conferences are a combination of both. An easy distinction is that the industry side is made up of the business side of education, while the profession side is composed of classroom educators. Of course the most effective conferences are a balanced blend of both. It is that balance that eludes so many conferences.
This balance in education conferences is also what we should seek in professional development. Instead of making it about the bells and whistles of the applications, we should ask the educators about their goals and methods and then see if that can be enhanced by technology. If the educator has an established a goal and an established method that can be made easier and more efficient, and more effective with technology, most educators will move toward that technology addition. The alternative way to do this is to have an administrative commitment to the technology and then to tell teachers to work it into what they do in order to make curriculum better. If teacher acceptance and cooperation is required for success, I think one method might work better than the other.
SxSWEdu 2013 was different from many other education conferences. There was no vendor floor. There were no 

UPDATE: Advanced Learning Policy Seattle Schools Community Forum: Washington State Funding of Public Schools

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Washington State Funding of Public Schools:



Advanced Learning Policy

The District last adopted a policy about Advanced Learning in September of 1993. That policy, D12.00, Highly Capable Student Programs, is not in force. It is still the Board policy, but it was suspended on January 29, 2009. In the same motion in which the Board voted to suspend the policy they also voted to direct the superintendent to review it and recommend revisions. She did not do that. This failure to follow a direction given to her with by a majority vote of the board was, by itself, grounds for dismissal. The Board was aware of the situation and refused to act. The interim superintendent who followed also failed to follow the Board's direction. Again, the Board was aware of the situation and refused to act. When the Board scheduled their policy review they gave this policy no 


Washington State Funding of Public Schools

The Lowdown on School Funding - How Can We Fully Support our Public Schools?

Our schools are continually asked to do more with less dollars. Join us on March 20th and learn what we can do to secure the funding needed to support our public schools.

Guest Speaker:
Heidi Bennett, WSPTA Region 6 Legislative Chair

We will discuss:

How public funding of our schools works.

How much the state needs to provide in order to meet its obligation under the McCleary decision.


Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 7:00pm until 8:30pm at Sacajawea Elementary School, 


Tuesday Open Thread

Like pouring over test data?  You're in luck because the Public Data Ferret just released data on Washington State achievement test scores.  The headline reads, "WA Achievement Test Pass Rates Mostly Stagnant since 2006."

New petition to tell Senator Rodney Tom to fund our schools and reduce class sizes.

Classified School Employee Week posterBig shout-out to our classified school employees, thanks for your hard work!










Chief Sealth kicks off its annual World Water Week next week starting on the 19th.

Beacon Hill International School Principal Kelly Aramaki was named this year’s Washington State Elementary School Principal of the Year by a panel of principals representing the Elementary School Principals Association of Washington (ESPAW), a component of the Association of Washington School Principals (AWSP).  Congrats Mr. Aramaki!

Musical groups from Roosevelt rose to the top in three divisions at the 40th Annual Northwest Orchestra 

Oklahoma Governor & Speaker of the House Stonewall Common Core Bill | Truth in American Education

Oklahoma Governor & Speaker of the House Stonewall Common Core Bill | Truth in American Education:


Oklahoma Governor & Speaker of the House Stonewall Common Core Bill

oklahoma state capitolFrom Jenni White of Restoring Oklahoma Public Education (ROPE) via email:
So here’s the deal, the governor and the superintendent had a meeting with legislators this morning and apparently told them not to pass anything against her education “reforms” including the common core!
Our author of the task force bill, hb1907, Gus Blackwell, was told by speaker T.W. Shannon this morning, “we don’t need to re-hash this now” to which Gus said, “we never hashed it in the first place”, but it didn’t matter…Shannon is saying he won’t release the bill to the calendar committee for even a vote to go to the floor!!!
We’re trying to rally the troops right now, but I’m not sure what we can do. Our state is redder than 

Real consequences of ‘school choice’

Real consequences of ‘school choice’:


Real consequences of ‘school choice’


FCMAT » Cali Education Headlines Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Adult education’s unclear future





Education Headlines

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Desert Mirage High School administrators fired

Two administrators at a Coachella Valley high school were fired last week, prompting about 100 students to walk out of class on Monday, the district’s union president said.

Twin Rivers board to look again at early pink slips

A special meeting is set for 7 p.m. tonight for the Twin Rivers Unified school board to reconsider sending preliminary pink slips to teachers and support staff before the state-mandated deadline on Friday. The school board failed to vote March 5 on a staff recommendation to send warning notices to 74 teachers and counselors, as well as 23 support workers.

Group of Escondido charter schools outgrowing space

Popular charter schools run by Dennis “Coach” Snyder on the northeast side of the city are experiencing growing pains. “Our K-8 program is growing and in another year, I’ll be out of room,” Snyder said. “Our Heritage Digital Academy exploded.”

Charter School Conference opens in San Diego

Educators from across the state are in San Diego this week for the 20th annual California Charter School Conference. The four-day event runs through Thursday at the San Diego Convention Center and includes a keynote address from Michelle Rhee, CEO and founder of StudentsFirst and former chancellor of District of Columbia Public Schools, and Geoffrey Canada, founder and CEO of Harlem Children’s Zone.

Adult education’s unclear future

Gov. Jerry Brown’s plan to change funding for adult education has left school districts statewide unsure of how their programs will be affected, prompting precautionary layoff notices to teachers in Vista and South County.

Modesto schools pares layoff notices to 10, to revamp libraries

Modesto City Schools board members Monday night approved reducing 36 jobs, but layoff warnings will be sent to only 10 teachers, school nurses and counselors, said head of human resources Craig Rydquist.

Report: $542 billion needed to update US schools

America's schools are in such disrepair that it would cost more than 270 billion dollars just to get elementary and secondary buildings back to their original conditions and twice that to get them up to date, a report released Tuesday estimated.

Frey: Districts struggle with governor’s adult education proposal

Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget proposal to give the state’s community colleges $300 million to run adult education is leaving K-12 districts in a quandary. Should they assume Brown’s idea will become law, plan to close their adult schools and hope that their local community college will be able to pick up those programs?
Monday, March 11, 2013

School merger talks on

A group of Tuolumne County voters plans to collect thousands of signatures and put the question of school district unification on the 2014 ballot, with the goal of creating a “Tuolumne County Unified School District.”

Monterey County school districts plunge into Common Core testing challenge

A select group of seventh-graders from Carmel Middle School recently took part in a test trial to help debug exams to be used when new California educational standards are in place.

Tamalpais school district, staffers hit impasse in negotiations

After more than a year of negotiations and a failed attempt at state-led mediation, the Tamalpais Union High School District and a key employee union remain deadlocked on salaries and benefits and have called in a state fact finder.

Long Beach's Jordan High prepares for campus overhaul

In early 2014, the Long Beach Unified School District will break ground on its major $135.6 million renovation project at Jordan.

Chicago Students Teach Through Their Walkout for School Safety - Living in Dialogue - Education Week Teacher

Chicago Students Teach Through Their Walkout for School Safety - Living in Dialogue - Education Week Teacher: