Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, September 5, 2011

Labor Day Ruminations | Dissident Voice

Labor Day Ruminations | Dissident Voice:

Labor Day Ruminations

Whenever Labor Day rolls around I get filled with subversive thoughts about the unfairness of it all. Consider: While it’s the workers who keep the operation going, it’s management who gets the credit. It’s management who gets the credit, the glory, the promotions, and, ultimately, the compensation. Put another way: Management crawls up the corporate ladder on the backs of the workers.

Admittedly, this economic arrangement has been in existence, more or less, since the pharaohs had the pyramids built, so we’re not trying to rediscover America here. Still, given how skewed and topsy-turvy and fundamentally unjust the arrangement is, it’s amazing that people continue to work so hard.

We’re a country of workers. Instead of raising the black flag and setting out looking for throats to slit, people


Corporate America Sends a Labor Day Message

For most Americans, the only significance of Labor Day is that it concludes a three day weekend.

For Kirk Artley, it means he has about six weeks left of employment.

On Aug. 24, RR Donnelley, a Chicago-based megacorporation that claims to be “the world’s premier full-service provider of print and related services,” told Artley and the other 283 workers at the Bloomsburg, Pa., plant that “economic conditions” forced the closing of the book printing facility. The workers said they would take significant pay cuts if that would save the plant. RR Donnelley rejected the offer.

Most of the workers live in Columbia County, a small rural county of about 65,000, with unemployment about 8 percent, slightly less than the national rate. Adding 284 persons would significantly increase that rate.

Under the termination agreement, the workers, both management and labor, wouldn’t have priority rights to bid for jobs at any other plant. “We were told we could apply for open jobs just like anyone else,” says Artley, a bindery technician and president of Local 732C of the Graphic Communications Conference, a Teamsters division. Apparently, there was no way to integrate a couple of hundred workers into a corporation that employs


A Labor Day Tale of Three Cities: Pittsburgh, Birmingham, and New Orleans

As Hurricane Irene made her way up the Eastern Seaboard, my wife and I packed a few changes of clothes and trundled westward out of her path to spend the storm’s duration in Pittsburgh, PA.

The excursion did us some good, in particular, leaving insular Manhattan, and facing the faded, crumbling Industrial Age grandeur of Pittsburgh. Walking, once again, among the plaintive rasps of the ghosts of the devastated laboring class (the social setting of our youth) provided us with a humanizing contrast to our present day circumstances stranded amid the manic chattering of the preening demons of banal self-regard possessing Manhattan careerists.

Nowadays, the island of Manhattan is tediously bright and shiny — a sterile, oligarchic controlled dystopia. Accordingly, any sign of redemptive decay and hint of shabby ass human glory has been banished by official



4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit: THE STAKES OF LAUSD’s SCHOOL CHOICE

4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit: THE STAKES OF LAUSD’s SCHOOL CHOICE:

THE STAKES OF LAUSD’s SCHOOL CHOICE

EDITORIAL IN THE DAILY BREEZE HTTP://WWW.DAILYBREEZE.COM/CI_18827178

9/04/2011 - The leaders of Los Angeles' schools are gambling with the district's future. Hopefully, they are playing the odds, because there's a lot at stake for the future of education reform in Los Angeles.

The district's chips are its new schools. The payoff is a significant rewriting of the district's contract with teachers that includes a number of reforms in the methods used for evaluating, paying and firing teachers. The game ends two months from now.

Last week, the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education agreed to a plan that will give district educators first crack at bidding to operate new schools.

Currently, both new and underperforming schools are part of the district's groundbreaking School Choice. Under this program, a number of schools each year are opened up for bidders to compete to operate those schools. In the first years of bidding, schools have

Education’s Ruling “Plutocracy” of Billionaires | Scathing Purple Musings

Education’s Ruling “Plutocracy” of Billionaires | Scathing Purple Musings:

Education’s Ruling “Plutocracy” of Billionaires

Quickly emerging as one of the nation’s most important education writers, Walt Gardner cautions that America should be concerned that billionaires are investing so much in education policy. Referencing the recent donation of NYC mayor Mike Bloomberg and others to save the state’s Regent Exam, Gardner writes:

I’m glad that the Regents exam was reinstated, but I’m concerned that it took the efforts of billionaires to do so. Whenever money is handed out to schools, it comes with strings attached. These aren’t always obvious. But it is naive to believe that a tacit quid pro quo is not established. It’s more than mere coincidence that over the past decade during which time some $4.4 billion annually was poured into school reform by the Big Three foundations (Gates, Broad, and Walton), the tools of the boardroom were adopted.

This kind of giving buys influence. The Broad Foundation has already received a nice return on its investment by virtue of two training programs it underwrites. The Broad Superintendents Academy

Jersey Jazzman: Sparring With Tyson

Jersey Jazzman: Sparring With Tyson:

Sparring With Tyson

And, no, I'm not Tyson...

Bruce Baker has an important but somewhat technical post up about the methods that are used to analyze test scores so they can be used for either high-stakes or low-stakes decisions. The reason for the post is that Bruce has seen some corporate "reformers" make the case that Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) are better at estimating teacher effectiveness than Value-Added Modeling (VAM).

A very short and incomplete summary of the issue is that VAM at least tries to account for student characteristics (and does a miserable job), while SGP doesn't even make the attempt. OK, pretty knotty stuff, but I encourage you to read the post.

I've not seen anyone make this argument myself, although you could say some of the wording

"If a man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar."

Remarks of Senator John F. Kennedy at Weyerhaeuser Lumber Company, Eugene, Oregon, May 17, 1960 - John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum:

For as Abraham Lincoln said of labor:

"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason to America. No line can be drawn between these two.

"If a man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar.

"If a man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor, he is a fool.

"There is no America without labor, and to fleece the one is to rob the other."


This is a transcription of this speech made for the convenience of readers and researchers. One draft of the speech exists in the John F. Kennedy Pre-Presidential Papers here at the John F. Kennedy Library. Page images of the press release and thefirst and second reading copies are available.

I come to you today as a friend of labor.

I have worked with the leaders and members of organized labor for fourteen years as a member of the House and Senate Labor Committees. My credentials are written in the record of that fourteen years. On the basis of that record, I hope I can - in the words of the old-time orators - claim kinship here and have it allowed.

The cause of the friends of labor has not been an easy one in the past few years. Unfortunately the headlines, the speeches, the attention has been largely focused on the few hoodlums and racketeers who have insinuated their way into the labor movement - plundering its members, destroying the hard won gains of the workers, and harming the reputation of the entire, great brotherhood of organized labor.

But these men are just the few parasites on the body of a great, vital group of men and women - a group that has contributed more to the economic health, the well-being and the strength of this country than any other organized group, in any other country, in any other period of human history.

And it has been this same labor movement - not Congress or its Committees - which has been the most ardent and effective champion of clean, honest unions in America. I know of no parallel instance in American history when a large and important part of our society so frankly recognized its own internal problems and set out to correct them - even though it meant expelling a large portion of its dues-paying members.

I know of no business organizations which have disciplined their members the way labor has - even though some of those members have been engaged in activities which deserve the just condemnation of a law-abiding society. And I know of no voluntary organization which has set any higher standards of discipline than the Ethical Practices Codes adopted by the AFL-CIO - even though our hearings showed that higher standards of ethics are often badly needed in these other groups. Labor is cleaning its own house - let business do the same.

There are those in America today who say that labor is too big - that it has grown too strong. But I say that the size of organized labor is a blessing - and its strength is a powerful force for the good of all America.

Throughout its history, the labor movement has used its growing strength to eliminate industrial terror, sweatshops and inhuman working conditions, to give to the worker - for the first time - a voice in his own economic destiny.

And equally important is the way in which labor has served the entire nation.

George Meany has truly said that the record shows beyond contradiction that the trade union movement "has consistently used whatever power it has to raise the American standard of living, to promote the interests of all the American people, and to enhance the power and prestige of the nation as a whole."

That record can be seen in every city and town - every household and factory in America. We can see it in the thousands of hospitals which organized labor has built. We can see it in the new schools and roads which the unremitting work of labor - on every level of government - has helped to bring about.

Labor has also played a vital and a constructive role on the world scene - resisting Communist expansion - helping the underdeveloped nations - encouraging the struggle for freedom wherever it is waged - and, at home as well as abroad, constantly demonstrating its dedication to the cause for which it will continue to fight until the last oppressed group is guaranteed that equality which is his right as a member of the human race.

But despite these great achievements of organized labor - labor has not solved all its problems or won all the battles. It must summon all its resources of strength and mind and vision if it is to meet the new problems and the new challenges of the sixties.

First on the agenda is a vast new program of social welfare legislation - increased minimum wage, adequate unemployment compensation, medical care for the aged - and all the other many extensions and expansions of New Deal programs which are no longer adequate to meet the needs of the sixties.

Second, we must end the interminable and unjustified delay in the handling of certification proceedings and unfair labor practice charges by the National Labor Relations Board. As a result of these delays the controversy is often over, labor is defeated, and the worker has suffered - long before the Board acts. We must have an NLRB which understands the problems of labor and is not merely an instrument of management.

Third, we must act - and act soon - to meet the growing challenge of automation. We cannot - and we would not - halt the steady advance of technology with its promise of economic growth and increased productivity for the future. At the same time, government, industry and labor must collaborate in planning for the important social and economic changes which automation is certain to bring. Workers must be retrained - factories must be relocated - and, above all, we must be certain that the worker himself shares in the fruits of his increased productivity - in terms of greater leisure and higher income.

Fourth, we must halt the growing deterioration of the basic natural resources on which the welfare of labor ultimately depends - our vast resources of land, water, power and timber. Here in Eugene the prosperity of much of your industry - and your own prosperity depends upon the development and preservation of our great natural forests. Yet valuable timber is going uncut, reforestation has virtually come to a halt, and vital access roads are not being built. And despite these immediate and pressing needs this administration has requested less than half of the amount which its own Secretary of Agriculture has said is absolutely essential to the preservation of our forests. A Democratic Administration - acting in the great conservation tradition of Franklin Roosevelt - will rebuild the resources on which the strength of labor - and of all America - depends.

Fifth, we must work to defeat legislation designed to repress labor - to destroy its power - and render the worker helpless to advance his own welfare. Let me make it clear once again, as I have in the past, that - whatever office I shall hold - I shall always be unalterably opposed to so- called "right-to-work" laws at any level, Federal or State. And I shall oppose, as I have for 14 years, any and all other such devices which are sure to spring from the fertile minds of labor’s powerful foes.

Guided by these principles - and with a plan of action based on its magnificent heritage of the past - and its hopes for the future - American labor can advance into the sixties unafraid, and with full confidence in its strength and in the righteousness of its cause. For as Abraham Lincoln said of labor:

"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason to America. No line can be drawn between these two.

"If a man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar.

"If a man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor, he is a fool.

"There is no America without labor, and to fleece the one is to rob the other."

Happy Labor Day: For Far Fewer of Us

Happy Labor Day: For Far Fewer of Us:

Happy Labor Day: For Far Fewer of Us

We greet this Labor Day with anxiety about the possibility of a double-dip recession, persistently high unemployment that never significantly ebbed after the depths of the 2008 downturn, and austerity budgets at the local, state, and federal levels. While many observers have drawn parallels to the Great Depression, one key difference stands out for American workers: Labor is not on the march.In a perverse irony, the current economic crisis has been cruel to Labor. Rather than rallying workers to the union cause even though Labor did much to

Your Teacher Said WHAT? - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher

Your Teacher Said WHAT? - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher:

Your Teacher Said WHAT?

If I were a betting woman, I'd put serious money on the Common Core Everything--not just standards, but assessments and a curriculum package that can be delivered on-line--soon becoming the mandated norm fornearly all public schools in America. In the politicized process of making the tools of schooling "common," the nation will be continuously subjected to a lot of blah-blah about the absolute necessity of all states having identical "goalposts," the scientific accuracy of value-added / student growth profile measurement and the vital importance of "rigorous" curricula.

In the end, not much will have changed. Good schools will still be good schools, terrible schools in poor neighborhoods will still be failing--and "delivering content" via technology will still be promoted as the Next Big Thing, an exciting option to make education for the masses more "personalized" and "efficient" (read: cost-

NYC Educator: It's Good to be King

NYC Educator: It's Good to be King:

It's Good to be King

Mayor Bloomberg has no problem covering up for thebehavior of his Deputy Mayor. Why make things public? You don't want to complicate things or embarrass anyone.

The mayor denied that he had misled the public when he issued a news release Aug. 4 saying that Mr. Goldsmith was “leaving to pursue private-sector opportunities in infrastructure finance.”

Of course. The fact that he was leaving for a completely unrelated reason is neither here nor there. But why embarrass the guy? It's not like he's a teacher or anything. I mean, if he were, you'd need to reveal his

Shanker Blog » What Makes A Union Successful?

Shanker Blog » What Makes A Union Successful?:

What Makes A Union Successful?

On Labor Day, we reprint the following passage from Al Shanker’s “State of the Union” speech at the August 1992 AFT convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Years ago when I was sitting around sort of having a bull session, people raised the question, “What makes a union successful?” Somebody said, “Well, I know what makes a union successful. Look at…” and he named a few unions. He said, “You know what makes a union successful? It’s a union that can really deliver lots of stuff for its members.” Then he mentioned some union that had just gotten a big salary raise and pension benefits and all sorts of other things.

Somebody else who was sitting there said, “You know, I think you’re wrong. It’s really good if the union can

President John F Kennedy speaking in 1962 on Labor Movement

JFK Labor Day Speech-Sept 5th,1960 And Doonesbury Cartoon

Maybe There Is A Dog: JFK Labor Day Speech-Sept 5th,1960 And Doonesbury Cartoon:

when America faces challenges and perils greater than ever before, I say to all Americans who want to build a better America - "Give us the job for we have the tools."






JFK Labor Day Speech-Sept 5th,1960 And Doonesbury Cartoon

I have come here today, on this day that belongs to all the people, to state my case and my cause to you * * * the American people. I am here to ask for a mandate - a mandate to achieve the promises of that stirring and historic document the 1960 Democratic platform. I am here to ask for men - the men who can translate that platform into action.


Give me your mandate. Give me the men. Give us more men in the Senate like Phil Hart and Pat McNamara. We only need a few more. A shift of only four votes would have given us a decent bill to provide medical care for the aged under the social security system. And next January we will have those votes. We will not be threatened with a Presidential veto. And we will not have to settle for a medical care program that is based on the pauper's oath.


Give me a Congress next January with more members like your Michigan Democratic Congressmen. We only need a few more. A shift of four or five votes in the House last June would have enacted a real minimum wage bill, with coverage for several million more families and a minimum of $1.25 an hour. Next January we will have those votes - and you will have a President who knows what a strong minimum wage law means to stop runaway shops and to raise living standards.


I ask you also to elect John Swainson as Governor of Michigan - a great Governor to succeed a great Governor. And I intend to work with both John Swainson and Mennen Williams to lead this State and Nation to a future of hope and promise.


I am taking my case to the American people because that is where it belongs - because that is where there will be no threat of veto or parliamentary obstruction - and because that is where we can always place our confidence. I take our case to you because I am confident that the American people want an enduring peace in which human dignity, truth, and justice under law are secured for all men everywhere. I take our case to you because I am confident that you are willing to do whatever has to be done to make us first in the world militarily, and thus first in the fight for peace.


I take our case to you because I am confident that all of us here, as descendants of immigrants, are ready to renew our hospitality to the homeless, the tired, and the poor, from other lands, without discrimination as to national origin. I take our case to you because I am confident that, as citizens of one world, we are willing to share our plenty with our brothers in the new states of Asia and Africa, and with those in Europe and Latin America, who need our help and our friendship.


I take my case to you because I am confident that the American people are not going to tolerate pockets of poverty and chronic unemployment in this land, the waste of idle men and women who are ready, willing, and able to work, or the decline of our farms. I take my case to you because I know you agree with me that racial discrimination must be eliminated everywhere in our society; in jobs, in housing, in voting, in lunch counters, and in schools.


And finally, I am here because I know we share a deep-seated belief in free collective bargaining, and in the growth and development of free and responsible unions - and unlike our opponents, we do not believe in this only on Labor Day.


I welcome the support of the working men and women of this country. I am proud of the fact that I was endorsed by the AFL-CIO. For I know that the American Labor movement wants for America what I want for America: the elimination of poverty and unemployment, the reestablishment of America's world leadership, the guarantee of full civil rights for all our citizens. I know the American labor movement opposes what I oppose: complacency, unemployment, economic stagnation, racial discrimination, and national insecurity.


Our labor unions are not narrow, self-seeking groups. They have raised wages, shortened hours, and provided supplemental benefits. Through collective bargaining and grievance procedures, they have brought justice and democracy to the shop floor. But their work goes beyond their own jobs, and even beyond our borders.


Our unions have fought for aid to education, for better housing, for development of our natural resources, and for saving the family-sized farms. They have contributed funds and talent to improve our oversea relations. They have spoken, not for narrow self-interest, but for the public interest and for the people.


For the labor movement is people. Our unions have brought millions of men and women together, made them members one of another, and given them common tools for common goals.


Their goals are goals for all America - and their enemies are the enemies of all progress.


The two cannot be separated. The man who opposes a decent increase in the minimum wage is not likely to be more generous toward a badly underpaid schoolteacher. The man who opposes proper medical care for the aged has no more compassion for the small farmer or the small businessman or the hungry families in this Nation and around the world. He likes things the way they are. He sees no need to change - no need to grow. His theme song is: "You never had it so good."


But let him try to tell that to the more than 4 million men and women who cannot find employment. Let him try to tell that to the 3 million men forced to work less than full time. Let him try to tell that to those who live on our hard-hit farms, in our depressed areas, in our deserted textile and coal mine towns. Let him try to tell that to 5 million men, women, and children trying to get by on an average of $20 worth of surplus food a month - or the millions of retired workers trying to get by on all average annual income of less than $2,000 a year.


This is the greatest country in the world. But we can be still greater. This is the most prosperous country in the world. But we can be still more prosperous . . . so that every American can share in that prosperity. We have the means to achieve our goals - to put our house in order - to regain our position of preeminence in the world. It all comes under the name of "economic growth" and today I want to talk with you about economic growth. There is nothing cold or dull about the meaning of economic growth. It means jobs and homes and schools for our children. Lack of growth means unemployment and pockets of poverty and a weak, declining nation.


Under Republican leadership, we have not been growing. The workers have noted it in unemployment and short workweeks. Businessmen have noted it in idle plant capacity and rising inventories. And Mr. Khrushchev noted it when he promised to "bury" us.


Three facts are indisputable:


Fact No.1: Between 1947 and 1953, under the administration of Harry Truman, our average annual rate of growth was 4 1/2 percent. Between 1953 and 1959, under a Republican administration, the rate was only 2 1/2 percent - less than half as much. And today our key industries such as auto and steel are operating at much less than full capacity.


Fact No.2: While our economy is crawling forward at an average rate of only 2 1/2 percent, the Russian gross national product is annually increasing 7 percent - three times as fast.


Fact No.3: Our rate of growth was surpassed by almost every major industrial nation during the past years of drift and indecision - including Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy, and Japan. These are the facts which we must face. This is the record which our opponents have described as a "healthy rate of growth." And I defy them to find anything healthy about it.


When this country, with all its potential, is growing at less than half the rate achieved by the Soviet Union, less than the rate of almost every major industrial nation on earth, then our health is obviously down and we had better call for a new doctor in Washington. These facts and figures are not remote. They affect the welfare of everyone. With a really healthy rate of growth, each family of four would have received, on the average, an additional $1,300 every year between 1953 and 1959 - a total of more than $7,000 - $7,000 you could have had for a rainy day, or to finance a college education, or to take a trip, or help buy a house - $7,000 that these restrictive policies have kept out of your pocket.


With a really healthy rate of growth, we can have full employment - and let me make clear right now my conviction that in this country we cannot afford to have any goal except genuine full employment.


With a really healthy rate of growth, we can end the gnawing doubts about our national defense. If we had maintained a healthy rate of growth, it would have paid many times over the cost of the vital defense programs which the administration has said we cannot afford - the cost of putting our Strategic Air Command on a continuous air alert, the cost of modernizing our Army and Navy, and the cost of building more Polaris and Minuteman missiles. These are steps which must be taken and, once this country starts moving again, these are steps that will be taken.


With a really healthy rate of growth, we can provide our children with the best in education and eliminate the shortage of classrooms and the scarcity of teachers which is depriving millions of young Americans of adequate school training. And finally, with a really healthy rate of growth, we will win the crusade for economic justice. Here we have no time to spare. For it is a shameful fact that 32 million people in this, the richest land on earth, are forced to live on a standard of living that is woefully inadequate - a standard below that which $2,600 a year would buy for a family of four. It is a shameful fact that 7 million of our fellow citizens are dependent upon charity for their existence - that 5 million city homes lack plumbing - that breeding places of juvenile crime abound in our cities - and that abject poverty characterizes too much of our farm community.


These are some of the reasons why I say economic growth is not simply a cold, remote statistic. And these are some of the reasons why it is not enough to merely talk about it. It is time to do something about it - and we are going to start on next November 8.


The first step we must take is to put into office an administration which has faith in a growing America. The Republican Party, since the departure of Theodore Roosevelt some 48 years ago, has not had this faith - and it does not have it today. For example, on August 10 the President said that automobile production may exceed 6 million - and this, he said, "is really a very fine year." But the facts of the matter are that we made 7.5 million cars a few years ago. The facts of the matter are that thousands of autoworkers are out of jobs today or working on short time. If this is "a very fine year," I don't want to see a very bad one.


While these men are idle - while these facilities are idle - we see critical needs on every side of us that could "consume and absorb" their output, if only given a chance. We see the need for schools - for highways - for dams and powerplants, homes and hospitals, stronger defenses, and a rebirth of our cities. These projects need busy plans and working men. And so our second step toward economic growth must be to put back to work our idle machines and men - to return to the Democratic policy of full employment which for 8 years has been shamefully neglected. We have the tools - the legislation and the programs to put men back to work - and in 1961 we are going to do it.


As a third step, we can help our Nation grow by unlocking the riches of our natural resources. From our forest must come the timber, from our rivers must come the water and power, and from our mines must come the fuels and metals to meet the needs of an expanding population. Franklin Roosevelt raised the economy of an entire region through unified development of the Tennessee Valley. The Bonneville and Grand Coulee Dams have repaid their cost a hundredfold. Yet the Republican policy is "no new starts."


Fourth, we must put to work the wonders of automation in a way which will be a blessing for all America - not merely a curse for the workers. In the coal beds of West Virginia automation means joblessness, poverty, and deprivation. But automation can also bring lighter work, lower prices, and better jobs under a Government which cares for people - a Government which is unwilling to have men thrown on the scrap heap like obsolete machines.


And fifth and finally, if we want to grow, let us put an end to scarce money and high interest. Those who collect the interest may have profited. But every American who has financed a home, an automobile, a refrigerator, or a television set has suffered. Those of you who buy a home with a $10,000, 30-year mortgage today will pay out $3,300 more in interest charges than you would have paid under the last Democratic administration - $3,300 that could have been put to better use for you and your family.


This is a sound workable program to stimulate the growth of our free enterprise economy - a program which will keep our economy healthy and free - a program which will bring growth without inflation or increased government controls. We have heard that this kind of growth is merely an idle dream. But this country was built by dreamers - not by those of weak hearts and little faith.


In 1776 there were those who said that national independence was an idle dream. In 1789 there were those who said that a sovereign union of equal states was an idle dream. In 1860 there were those who said that freeing the slaves was an idle dream. In 1932 there were those who said that a New Deal for the American people was an idle dream.


Now, in 1960, we face problems unlike any we have faced before. Never has the challenge been so great. Never have the stakes been so large. Never have the dreams and the ideals and the dedication of free men been so essential.


We have no time for complacency, timidity, or doubt. This is a time for courage and action. This is a time for strong leaders - leaders who are not afraid of New Frontiers - leaders who are not afraid of the facts - leaders who can turn our dreams into reality.


Give me your mandate. Give us the men. For I believe the job can be done.


During the dark days of World War II, Winston Churchill appealed to America for help, pleading "Give us the tools and we will finish the job." Today - in 1960 - when America faces challenges and perils greater than ever before, I say to all Americans who want to build a better America - "Give us the job for we have the tools."


[db070902.gif]

Labor Day: Why we celebrate - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post

Labor Day: Why we celebrate - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post:

Labor Day: Why we celebrate

If your kids are complaining about going back to school, Labor Day is the perfect time to explain just how much worse things could be for them — and, in fact, were.

Once kids were forced into back-breaking jobs day and night in mines, textiles, glass factories, canneries and other places where children don't belong. Labor activitists eventually ended child labor — and won better working conditions for adult workers, including the eight-hour work day.

Today, though, few schools teach in depth about the labor movement and many kids — and adults as well — have no idea what the holiday is intended to honor.

Read full article >>

Bloombito and our Bilingual Future | Being Latino Online Magazine

Bloombito and our Bilingual Future | Being Latino Online Magazine:

Bloombito and our Bilingual Future

by Ryan Almodovar

“Hola Newo Yorko! El stormo grande is mucho dangeroso!” tweeted Rachel Figueroa-Levin, a house wife that created the Twitter handle of ‘@MiguelBloombito’ – a fictional, Latinized version of New York City mayor, Michael Bloomberg.

During the onset of Hurricane Irene, the real Bloomberg took to the streets of his city, initiating an almost unheard of evacuation and preparedness plan. Throughout the run-up to the storm, Bloomberg did make an attempt to reach out to his Spanish speaking constituents – admittedly with much more competence than Rachel Figueroa gave him credit for. Bloomberg’s use of Spanish, even in a small way, during an emergency situation deserves credit, because it shows how the United States is transforming into a ‘bilingual’ country.

It’s no secret that Latinos are making an increased impact on the demographic distribution of our country. Current estimates place our country at having roughly a 16 percent share of the population, with that amount

Woodcutting: Draft of Unit 1: Identity & Media « Outside the Cave

Woodcutting: Draft of Unit 1: Identity & Media « Outside the Cave:

Woodcutting: Draft of Unit 1: Identity & Media

After hitting a stumbling block trying to plan my whole course, I dove into my first unit, and am very happy with what I have ready to go to start the year. The unit plan is based on Understanding by Design, with some adaptations for my new school.

As always, I would really appreciate feedback on any and all aspects of this. A huge shout out to those who have already given me feedback during the planning process, as it has really helped me clarify what I want my students to take away from this unit.

Unit: Identity & Media, September-October (~45 classes)

Essential Questions:

  1. Who am I? Why do I think this is who I am? How does identity influence what people think, desire, and

The Single Best idea For Reforming K-12 Education: Part 2 - Steve Denning - Radical Management - Forbes

The Single Best idea For Reforming K-12 Education: Part 2 - Steve Denning - Radical Management - Forbes:

The Single Best idea For Reforming K-12 Education: Part 2

Sep. 5 2011 - 8:23 am | 1 views | 0 recommendations | 0 comments

Thanks to all those who have read, tweeted or responded to my article,The Single Best Idea for Reforming K-12 Education. With over 10,000 pageviews and a vast response on Twitter and many long passionate comments on the Forbes site, the article evidently resonated with many. I am particularly grateful to Randal Hendee and Diane Ravitch for having flagged the article to the education community. Here are just a few of the highlights from the discussion that has ensued.

Today’s key problem nailed

There was wide agreement from those who responded that the article accurately described the central problem now faced by K-12 education.