DianeRavitch
Larryferlazzo
TheJLV
DianeRavitch
alexanderruss
“The school was the only one in the Green Dot network that offered classes in English as a Second Language”
Dec 13, 2010 - LOS ANGELES—California leads the nation in charter school growth this year, according to a report released last month by The Center for Education Reform.
With 912 charter schools in the state, up 114 from the 2009-2010 academic year, charter administrators are being praised for developing what many believe is one of the most effective models for educating low-income students.
But far less attention has been paid to the closure rate of charter schools. According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, over
Last week's big news came from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is investing $335 million to overhaul the personnel departments of several big school systems. A large portion of the Gates's investment will finance research by dozens of social scientists and thousands of teachers to develop a better system for evaluating classroom instruction.
Educators and researchers will analyze thousands of hours of videotaped lessons to identify attributes of good teaching and possible correlations between certain teaching practices and high student achievement, as measured by value-added scores, the New York Times reports. The effort aims not just to evaluate teachers on multiple measures of
A few comments on the Gates/Kane Value-added study
(My apologies in advance for an excessively technical, research geeky post, but I felt it necessary in this case)
Take home points
1) As I read it, the new Gates/Kane value-added findings are NOT by any stretch of the imagination an endorsement of using value-added measures of teacher effectiveness for rating individual teachers as effective or not or for making high-stakes employment decisions. In this regard, the Gates/Kane findings are consistent with previous findings regarding stability, precision and accuracy of rating individual teachers.
2) Even in the best of cases, measures used in value-added added models remain insufficiently crude to account
The new group Billionaires for Education Reform follows in the long tradition of the Pastafarian movement and
Wednesday 01 December 2010
by: Dan DiMaggio | Monthly Review | Report
(Photo: Eastenhuh)
Standardized testing has become central to education policy in the United States. After dramatically expanding in the wake of the No Child Left Behind Act, testing has been further enshrined by the Obama administration’s $3.4 billion “Race to the Top” grants. Given the ongoing debate over these policies, it might be useful to hear about the experiences of a hidden sector of the education workforce: those of us who make our living scoring these tests. Our viewpoint is instructive, as it reveals the many contradictions and absurdities built into a test-scoring system run by for-profit companies and beholden to school administrators and government officials with a stake in producing inflated numbers. Our experiences also provide insight into how the
Teachers in high-poverty schools are only slightly less effective than teachers in low-poverty schools, concludes a study conducted in Florida and North Carolina. But the least-effective teachers in high-poverty schools are worse than the least-effective teachers in affluent schools, according to a new analysis (pdf) from the National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, or CALDER. That means low-income students are more likely to be taught be a very bad teacher.
“Teaching experience seem to improve a teacher’s effectiveness in a low-poverty school, but less so in a high-poverty school,” writes Stephen Sawchuk on Teacher Beat. After awhile, teachers in tough working
I read that NY Congressman Anthony Weiner complained that Obama wasn’t acting like a Commander-in-Chief, but as a Negotiator-inChief. I thought, “Not really.”
Weiner was speaking as part of the rebellion by Democrats to the deal Obama was pushing to extend the Bush tax cuts for billionaires.
The tax-cuts-for-the-rich is a bad idea. And I agree with Senator Sanders, who spoke from the Senate floor for almost nine hours on Friday, calling it part of the war on working people.
But as someone with some negotiation experience, I’m not impressed with Obama as a chief negotiator. He sure
The clock is ticking. The House has passed the most compassionate and just piece of legislation we’ve seen for children in decades. They overwhelmingly said yes to giving the children of undocumented immigrants, who were brought here years ago by their parents, a path to citizenship.
Now, the Senate must act. Because of the special rules the Senate set for itself, they require 60 out of their 100 votes to allow the Dream Act to even be debated. A minority of Senators can stand in the way of a good thing happening to children who made no decision to come here.
These are our children. Many of them don’t remember their old country. We’ve invested in their education. We know them from Scouts and soccer teams and Sunday school. The kids who can take advantage of the Dream Act are kids
I have a strong feeling this post will need to be expanded and expounded upon as time goes on.
I was reading Sabrina’s recent response post to yet another advocate for mayoral control, this time in Denver. The mayoral control proponents never cease to amaze me. Mayoral control as a governance system has been debated, researched, and attempted in several cities throughout the country. However, there’s still a lot of uncertainty in policy and research circles, which mayoral control proponents don’t seem to want to acknowledge.
Cost-cutting is all the rage in education policy. This makes a lot of sense during a recession (the next few yearswill be brutal), and even during good times we all want money to be well-spent. But much of the discussion on this topic is less about weathering the storm than about a long-term effort to stop the growth of spending on public education. The underlying assumption, hardly unique to education policy, is that people are tired of increasing school costs, and want to start cutting back.
So, I wanted to take a quick look at what Americans think of education spending, now and over time, using data from the General Social Survey (1972-2008), a nationally representative sample of U.S. opinions and other characteristics (run by the National Opinion Research Center). The question queries whether respondents
Black and Latino teachers are leaving the profession “in droves,” says Betty Achinstein, a researcher at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the co-author of Change(d) Agents: New Teachers of Color in Urban Schools.
“Teachers of color” make up only 17 percent of the teaching force, despite the rising percentage of minority students, reports Miller-McCune. Schools are hiring more minority teachers, but also losing more, says Richard
The Department of Education’s annual hearing before the Joint Budget Committee drew a big crowd of lobbyists, bureaucrats and others last Friday afternoon – not to mention a phalanx of CDE staffers – but they didn’t get much of a show.
Past hearings (the event is held every December) have provided lively discussions on testing, school finance and other big issues. But the 2010 version of the event didn’t provide any big policy discussions as CDE leaders worked their way through a 204-page document containing answers to 47 questions that had been posed earlier by JBC members. (See this story about the prior committee briefing on K-12 spending.)
The department’s document did provide one interest factoid – it would cost $3.2 million a year to add social
TOOLBOX |
Michelle Rhee is going national.
Running the D.C. schools didn't give the superstar a big enough platform. So, with the U.S. education secretary's job already filled, she's on to her next act, heading a new organization, created around her, that has as its aim nothing short of transforming public education in America.
Just to make sure nobody missed the launch of Students First, at StudentsFirst.org, Rhee arranged to have it announced by - who else? - Oprah Winfrey, who this year anointed Rhee "a warrior woman." And in what is surely a journalistic coincidence, there was a cover story in Newsweek magazine on Rhee, written by - who else? - Rhee.
When you go to the Students First Web site, the first large image you see is not of Rhee with students, who are supposed to be first, but of Rhee with Oprah, celebrity to celebrity.
What Rhee wants to do is raise $1 billion - yes, BILLION- to lobby for the reforms she started in the District. Considering all of the billionaire philanthropists who love her
I am currently reading a book by Parker Palmer, which while not specifically on education contains some interesting observations thereupon. First published in 1980, The Promise of Paradox: A celebration of the Contradictions in the Christian Life has an introduction by Henri Nouwen, who was a close personal friend of Palmer. In the portions I will share below the fold, among other things you will see reflections on the idea of multiple intelligences 5 years before the publication of Howard Gardner's seminal Frames of Mind, and remarks
The dominant standard used by most policymakers, media editors, and administrators to judge success iseffectiveness: Have you done what you said you were going to do and can you prove it? In a society where “bottom lines,” Dow Jones averages, sports statistics, and vote-counts matter, quantifiable results determine success.
Even before No Child Left Behind, policymakers have relied on the effectiveness standard to examine what students have learned by using proxy measures such as student test scores, college attendance, and other indicators. For example, in the late-1970s policymakers concluded that public schools had declined because scholastic aptitudes test (SAT) scores had plunged downward. Even though test-makers and researchers repeatedly stated that such claims were false—falling SAT scores fueled public support for states raising
It’s another milestone for InterACT! Last month, we passed 25,000 page views. Then, we were nominated in the 2010 Edublog Awards, in the categories of Best Group Blog, and Best New Blog. And now, I’m pleased to offer you the 100th blog posting at InterACT. It’s been an interesting ride so far for Kelly, Martha, and me. I’d like to think that the three of us, along with a few guest bloggers, have made a pretty good start of it here in the blogosphere.
Kelly Kovacic holds the title of California Teacher of the Year for 2010, and in that capacity, she’s had the opportunity to speak to many audiences, travel to Japan with her fellow 2010 California Teachers of the Year, and meet the President of the United States. Her blogging on InterACT has helped us see the educational landscape