Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, December 8, 2025

THE KENNEDY CENTER COUP: WHEN CULTURE MEETS NARCISSISM

 

THE KENNEDY CENTER COUP

WHEN CULTURE MEETS NARCISSISM

When ego meets government, democracy gets rebranded

In the annals of American presidential history, we've witnessed many things: wartime leaders, visionary reformers, and yes, even the occasional scandal. But never before have we seen a commander-in-chief so utterly infatuated with his own moniker that he treats the federal government like his personal branding empire. Enter Donald Trump, the "Brander in Chief," who has turned the sacred halls of American democracy into his own personal merchandise catalog.

The Kennedy Center Coup: When Culture Meets Narcissism

Trump's hostile takeover of the Kennedy Center reads like a corporate raider's playbook applied to cultural institutions. After announcing his intention to fire the existing board of trustees and install himself as chairman, Trump has systematically dismantled decades of bipartisan cultural stewardship . The billionaire philanthropist David Rubenstein, who had served as the Kennedy Center's largest donor and chairman, was unceremoniously booted to make way for Trump's ego project .

But here's where it gets truly Orwellian: Trump didn't just want to run the Kennedy Center—he wanted to become it. Proposals have emerged to rename both the Kennedy Center and its opera house after Trump and Melania, a move that has drawn fierce opposition from John F. Kennedy's own grandson . Because apparently, honoring a martyred president's legacy is less important than stroking the current president's ego.

During the 2025 Kennedy Center Honors, Trump couldn't resist his trademark gracelessness, calling some audience members "miserable, horrible people" while simultaneously celebrating artistic excellence . It's the kind of cognitive dissonance that would make George Orwell weep—praising art while denigrating the very people who appreciate it.

The Peace Prize Pretender: Irony Dies a Thousand Deaths

If Trump's Kennedy Center antics were merely embarrassing, his renaming of the U.S. Institute of Peace represents something far more sinister: the weaponization of irony itself. The Trump administration has slapped the president's name on the Institute of Peace building, creating the "Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace"—a move so tone-deaf it borders on satire .

This is the same Donald Trump whose administration has been marked by human rights violations, warmongering, and a general disdain for diplomatic solutions. The State Department justified the renaming by calling Trump "the greatest dealmaker," apparently forgetting that actual peace requires more than just slapping your name on a building .

The institute, originally created by Congress in 1984 to resolve international conflicts, has been essentially gutted under Trump's watch, with former staffers challenging the government's takeover in ongoing legal battles . It's like renaming a hospital after someone who's allergic to medicine—technically possible, but morally bankrupt.

The Branding Blitzkrieg: Democracy for Sale

Trump's federal branding campaign extends far beyond these two institutions. Tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars have been spent hanging portraits of Trump atop federal buildings in Washington, D.C., turning government architecture into campaign billboards . There's TrumpRx for prescription drugs, the Trump Gold Card for high-dollar citizenship, and even proposals for Trump fighter jets—because apparently, nothing says "public service" like personal branding.

The most audacious proposal yet? A commemorative coin featuring Trump's face for the U.S. 250th anniversary, despite federal law prohibiting living individuals from appearing on currency . It's the kind of move that would make banana republic dictators blush with envy.

The Historical Perspective: Benedict Arnold's Revenge

Never in American history has a president been so obsessed with personal glorification that he treats the federal government like his personal branding laboratory. We don't have monuments to Benedict Arnold for good reason—traitors don't get their names on buildings. Yet Trump seems determined to plaster his moniker on everything from peace institutes to cultural centers, as if quantity of branding could somehow compensate for quality of leadership.

One critic perfectly captured the absurdity: "This is pathetic, like a little boy running around putting 'Property of Donald' stickers on everything in the house" . The comparison is apt—Trump's behavior resembles nothing so much as a child's desperate need for attention, scaled up to the level of federal governance.

The Final Irony: A Legacy Written in Fool's Gold

Perhaps the most delicious irony in Trump's branding obsession is that it may ultimately backfire spectacularly. Predictions are already circulating that Americans will petition to remove Trump's name from everything except, perhaps, the prison where he might spend his final days. After all, when you brand everything, you own nothing—especially when that branding is built on a foundation of narcissism rather than genuine achievement.

Trump's transformation of government into a personal branding exercise represents more than just poor taste—it's a fundamental assault on the very concept of public service. When presidents start treating federal institutions like their personal merchandise catalog, democracy itself becomes just another product to be marketed and sold.

In the end, all that glitters isn't gold—sometimes it's just fool's gold, wrapped in red ties and spray-on tan, desperately seeking validation through the very institutions it seeks to destroy. And that, perhaps, is the most fitting epitaph for the Trump presidency: a cautionary tale about what happens when ego meets governance, and narcissism masquerades as patriotism.

The American people deserve better than a president who treats their government like his personal branding empire. They deserve leaders who understand that true legacy isn't built with bronze nameplates and gaudy portraits, but with genuine service to the common good. Until then, we're left watching a reality TV show president turn American democracy into his final, most destructive season.