Latest News and Comment from Education

Saturday, December 1, 2018

Review and Preview Thurmond v Tuck | tultican

Review and Preview Thurmond v Tuck | tultican

Review and Preview Thurmond v Tuck




This year’s biggest election win in California was for the down-ballot office, Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI). Tony Thurmond defeated Marshall Tuck in a proxy battle between billionaires supporting public school privatization and teachers’ unions fighting for democratically run neighborhood schools. More than $61,000,000 was spent on the SPI office doubling the previous $30,000,000 spending record set in 2014 when Tuck lost to Tom Torlakson.
Director of research at California Target Book, Rob Pyers, reported this year’s total election spending in California realized a new level. Target Book publisher Darry Sragow commented, “If blowing through the billion-dollar campaign spending ceiling in California doesn’t give pause to everyone in politics, I don’t know what will.”

Of the eight state-wide constitutional offices on the ballot, the governor’s race topped spending at $108,221,028 and the SPI race came in second totaling $61,170,451. Spending in the governor’s race was also heavily impacted by billionaires supporting the charter school industry. California has an open primary in which the top two vote getters reach the general election ballot regardless of party. Before June’s voting, billionaires lavished Anthony Villaraigosa’s campaign unprecedented independent expenditure money trying to get him to the November ballot.
Billionaires for Villaraigosa
Spending By Eight Billionaires for Villaraigosa over Newsom in 2018 Primary Election
When Villaraigosa lost badly in the June 6 primary, many of the same Continue reading: Review and Preview Thurmond v Tuck | tultican