Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, December 13, 2015

A Look Back - Wait, What? Blogs of the past Week - Wait What?

A Look Back - Wait, What? Blogs of the past Week - Wait What?:

A Look Back – Wait, What? Blogs of the past Week



Charter schools and journalistic ethics | Bob Braun's Ledger

Charter schools and journalistic ethics | Bob Braun's Ledger:

Charter schools and journalistic ethics

Natasha Levant, from her Facebook entry
Natasha Levant, from her Facebook entry

Today The Star-Ledger published an op-ed column by a woman identified as Natasha Levant in which she credited the school her son attends, the North Star Academy Charter School in Newark, for “changing” her son’s life and “saving” him.  The newspaper described her only as “a resident of Newark and mother of five.”
What the newspaper did not do is identify her as anemployee of the same charter school chain. She is paid to promote the very school she is using the pages of The Star-Ledger to promote. Levant also is  employed by the Prudential Insurance Company as an assistant to the media director. Prudential is a financial supporter of North Star and its chief investment officer, Scott Sleyster, sits on the school’s trustee board.
The Society of Professional Journalists has published an ethics code in which it states:
“Identify sources clearly. The public is entitled to as much information as possible to judge the reliability and motivations of sources.”
The Star-Ledger did not clearly identify the source of the article it published Sunday under Levant’s byline.
The Star-Ledger repeatedly publishes editorials supporting charter schools, privately-operated but publicly-funded schools that, even according to  supporters, drain money away from the traditional public schools in Newark. In October, it specifically editorialized against legislation that would impose a moratorium on the growth of charter schools until a study could be made of their impact on traditional public schools; that is the same position taken by Levant in her article.
Tomorrow, The Star-Ledger undoubtedly will be covering the pro-charter lobbying Charter schools and journalistic ethics | Bob Braun's Ledger:

Schooling in the Ownership Society: The real force behind D.C. school 'reform'

Schooling in the Ownership Society: The real force behind D.C. school 'reform':

The real force behind D.C. school 'reform'

She's the wife of a media mogul, a friend of the Washington Post’s Graham family. She’s a philanthropist, adviser to public officials, and conduit to private foundations and investors in what has become her life’s work. In D.C., likely no private citizen is more involved in public education than Katherine Bradley.

City Paper's Jeffrey Anderson has written a feature story on D.C. socialite Bradley, calling her a "force multiplier" when it comes to the district's corporate-style school reform.

To me, she sounds a lot like D.C.'s version of New York's charter maven Eva Moskowitz who uses her clout to build her personal charter school empire and assail public schools and teacher unions.

Bradley’s primary advocacy vehicle is CityBridge Foundation, a nonprofit that distributed nearly $25 million in grants, scholarships, and donations from 2004 to 2013—mostly to charter schools and groups like Teach for America, which received Schooling in the Ownership Society: The real force behind D.C. school 'reform':


Hundreds of Parents Pull Students Out of San Lorenzo Schools, Demand Raise for Teachers | NBC Bay Area

Hundreds of Parents Pull Students Out of San Lorenzo Schools, Demand Raise for Teachers | NBC Bay Area:

Hundreds of Parents Pull Students Out of San Lorenzo Schools, Demand Raise for Teachers







Problems with video? go here Hundreds of Parents Pull Students Out of San Lorenzo Schools, Demand Raise for Teachers http://bit.ly/1NqHCGA
Hundreds of parents pulled their kids out of school Monday in the San Lorenzo Unified School District and are calling on others to do the same thing on Tuesday.
The move was the latest effort to get the district to increase pay for teachers. In addition, about 150 parents and students shouting "pay our teachers!" protested Monday in front  of the school district office.
"My whole point is to make an impression to the district so that they negotiate and the teachers do not go on strike," said Renee Ybarra, who pulled her 10-year-old daughter out of school on Monday to take a stand. "I don't think substitutes are qualified to teach my daughter for any length of time."
More than 1,200 absences were reported in the district on Monday, including 650 at San Lorenzo High School. The absences amounted to a $44,000 loss for the San Lorenzo Unified School District in attendance funding.

San Lorenzo Teachers May Strike Over Salary Negotiations

[BAY] San Lorenzo Teachers May Strike Over Salary Negotiations
San Lorenzo teachers are considering a possible strike over failed contract negotiations. Pete Suratos reports. (Published Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015)
Many parents said they are worried the teachers will strike if they do not get a decent raise.
The San Lorenzo Education Association said a strike could happen soon.
"I think a strike is definitely a possibility," said Donna Pinkey, teachers union president. "We want a 6.2 percent increase and they are offering 1.5 percent, so there is quite a bit of distance between us."
Superintendent Fred Brill said the district is already operating in the red and said pulling kids out of school will only hurt the district's efforts to increase pay for Hundreds of Parents Pull Students Out of San Lorenzo Schools, Demand Raise for Teachers | NBC Bay Area:

BustED Pencils Trending News: Grit; Segregation; Gold | BustED Pencils

BustED Pencils Trending News: Grit; Segregation; Gold | BustED Pencils:

BustED Pencils Trending News: Grit; Segregation; Gold

newsboy_bustedpencils-logo_full color


“the exposure to trauma has a profound impact…” , writes AISHA SULTAN

The Limitations of Teaching ‘Grit’ in the Classroom

BustEDstretch

High-achievers segregated.

The New ‘Education Segregation’ Hurting the U.S.


BustEDstretch

Gold for corporations!

TS Gold – A Child’s Report Card

Get BustED Pencils Trending News to come right to your in-box!
Enter your email under “SUBSCRIBE” on our Home or Trending News page at bustedpencils.com
BustED Pencils Trending News: Grit; Segregation; Gold | BustED Pencils:

With A Brooklyn Accent: Fordham, Gentrification and the University's Role in the Bronx

With A Brooklyn Accent: Fordham, Gentrification and the University's Role in the Bronx:

Racial Tensions at Fordham are a Harbinger of What Gentrification Might Mean for the Bronx

Fordham used to have a great reputation in the Bronx because it helped save the neighborhoods of the Northwest Bronx from the arson and disinvestment that swept through the Southern sections of the borough. But as the danger of disinvestment faded, in large part because of the heroic efforts of the community groups Fordham helped, the University gradually shifted its target recruitment area from the New York metropolitan area to the entire nation, bringing in a more affluent student population than it had traditionally targeted. This helped raise the university's academic profile and US News and World Report ranking, but in the process increased the gap, in race and class and culture, between Fordham's student population and the population of the Bronx, a gap symbolized by the gates surrounding the campus and the University's increasingly large and vigilant security force.
Now, the Fordham is at a crossroads. With Gentrification and Displacement, rather than Disinvestment, becoming the major danger facing the Bronx, which way will Fordham go? Will it change course by recruiting more low and moderate income students, embrace the culture of Bronx communities, and make Bronx residents feel more welcome on the Fordham campus or will it continue to bring large number of people who have little respect for the Bronx into the campus and surrounding neighborhoods while doing little to sensitize them to their surroundings?
The economic interests and academic ambitions of the 

Fordham, Gentrification and the University's Role in the Bronx

Fordham used to have a great reputation in the Bronx because it helped save the neighborhoods of the Northwest Bronx from the arson and disinvestment that swept through the Southern sections of the borough. But as the danger of disinvestment faded, in large part because of the heroic efforts of the community groups Fordham helped, the University gradually shifted its target recruitment area from the New York metropolitan area to the entire nation, bringing in a more affluent student population than it had traditionally targeted. This helped raise the university's academic profile and US News and World Report ranking, but in the process increased the gap, in race and class and culture, between Fordham's student population and the population of the Bronx, a gap symbolized by the gates surrounding the campus and the University's increasingly large and vigilant security force.
Now, the Fordham is at a crossroads. With Gentrification and Displacement, rather than Disinvestment, becoming the major danger facing the Bronx, which way will Fordham go? Will it change course by recruiting more low and moderate income students, embrace the culture of Bronx communities, and make Bronx residents feel more welcome on the Fordham campus or will it continue to bring large number of people who have little respect for the Bronx into the campus and surrounding neighborhoods while doing little to sensitize them to their surroundings?
The economic interests and academic ambitions of the University, not the racism of university administrators- who for the most part are genuinely horrified by recent racist acts- have put it add odds with the interests of surrounding communities. Getting Fordham to change course and truly embrace the people and culture of the Bronx will take heroic efforts over the course of many years
The time to start that effort is now  


“Good” and “Successful” Teaching: Where Does the Student Enter the Picture? | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

“Good” and “Successful” Teaching: Where Does the Student Enter the Picture? | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:

“Good” and “Successful” Teaching: Where Does the Student Enter the Picture?



The singular and important role of the classroom teacher in getting students to learn is well established in the research literature (see here and here). I have no quarrel with that frequent finding (whatever the metrics) to confirm that teachers are instrumental to student learning.  What is far less clear is what part do five to 18 year-old students play in the chemistry of learning.
It is a question that I have puzzled over in my many years teaching high school and graduate courses. And I have no certainty in answering it.
For some teachers, as one told me after I observed his mediocre lesson, “I was selling but the students weren’t buying,” students bear the lion’s share of the responsibility. They are expected to come to class, obey the rules, do the homework, participate in discussions, and do well on tests. Those are students’ responsibilities. Other teachers (and policymakers) see it differently, that is, teachers bear full responsibility for motivating students, insuring that they have the classroom resources to succeed, and hammering home what has to be learned. Teachers, researchers, policymakers, and parents would quibble if one were to allocate percentages, for example, for the teacher is–to pick arbitrarily a number–70 percent and the student is, say again, 30 percent responsible. The uncertainty over percentages occurs because of different meanings attached to such phrases as “good” and “successful” teaching and learning.
Consider that “good” and ” successful” teaching are necessary to reach the threshold of what observers call “quality” teaching. To lead us through the “Good” and “Successful” Teaching: Where Does the Student Enter the Picture? | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:

Ed Notes Online: Wonderful Video - Seen Them Opting Out on Broadway - Alan Schwartz - The Bald Piano Man

Ed Notes Online: Wonderful Video - Seen Them Opting Out on Broadway - Alan Schwartz - The Bald Piano Man:

Wonderful Video - Seen Them Opting Out on Broadway - Alan Schwartz - The Bald Piano Man



-- Or how teachers' asses are being saved by the parent opt out movement.
"The unions didn't accomplish this. Parental anger at an arrogant state executive forced the change. To the power of parents everywhere." 


Brilliant lyrics and performance by Alan C. Schwartz, The Bald Piano Man, December 11, 2015, https://www.facebook.com/alan.c.schwartz.3/videos/10153748881142889/





American Education 2017

A Billy Joel parody reboot to celebrate Andrew's Cuomo's humbling about face on high-stakes testing. The unions didn't accomplish this. Parental anger at an arrogant state executive forced the change. To the power of parents everywhere...

Posted by Alan C. Schwartz on Friday, December 11, 2015






Some of my high school friends tell me that teachers in their schools couldn't care less about the opt out movement because most high school students don't opt out of regents and other tests. But high school teachers have been swept up in the outcomes of the existential threat opt out presents to the ed deformers. Witness Cuomo's (temporary) retreat in an effort to cut the legs out of opt-out. Don't be fooled. Every teacher should do what they can (without getting into trouble with their admins) to spread news of opt out. Ie. contact Change the Stakes to have someone stand outside your school with leaflets at dismissal.


Russ on Reading: Teaching as Meaningful Work

Russ on Reading: Teaching as Meaningful Work:

Teaching as Meaningful Work

In his terrific 2009 book on the complexity of success, Outliers,Malcolm Gladwell identifies “meaningful work” as one necessary component of a fully successful life. Gladwell defines meaningful work as work that provides a person with autonomy, complexity and rewards that equal the effort put forth. Gladwell identifies teaching (and medicine and entrepreneurship) as meaningful work.

I went into teaching because, even as wide-eyed, idealistic, eighteen year-old entering college, I had a sense that teaching was meaningful work. In my years as a human resources director for a school district, I encountered literally dozens of adults who were in the midst of a career change from the business world into teaching because they were looking for more meaningful work. I believe the vast majority of us who are teachers chose teaching as a career because we wanted meaningful work.

And yet today as I talk to teachers and prospective teachers, I hear a great deal of frustration. Many are leaving the profession by either retiring early or seeking jobs out of the field. Prospective teachers I work with at Rider University are wondering aloud if they have made a good career choice. As Education Week has reported, enrollment in schools of education at colleges around the country is plummeting.

What’s going on? Clearly, nearly two decades of education reform policies, from No Child Left Behind to Race to the Top and from the Common Core to the Common Core aligned standardized tests, have taken their toll. I believe there is a general sense that teaching is somehow less “meaningful” than it once was. A look at Gladwell’s components of meaningful work might help us understand why.

Autonomy

For teachers autonomy means the ability to make critical curricular and instructional decisions based on our content knowledge, our professional judgement and our unique knowledge of the students in front of us. Education reform has undermined this autonomy unnecessarily through Russ on Reading: Teaching as Meaningful Work:

Consolidating Power: Urban and Neighborhood Based Organization Matters - Online University of the Left

Consolidating Power: Urban and Neighborhood Based Organization Matters - Online University of the Left:

Consolidating Power: Urban and Neighborhood Based Organization Matters

David Harvey: ‘The Left Has to Rethink Its Theoretical and Tactical Apparatus.’
FROM ROAR MAGAZINE. David Harvey, one of the leading Marxist thinkers of our times, sits down with the activist collective AK Malabocas to discuss the transformations in the mode of capital accumulation, the centrality of the urban terrain in contemporary class struggles, and the implications of all this for anti-capitalist organizing.
AK Malabocas: In the last forty years, the mode of capital accumulation has changed globally. What do these changes mean for the struggle against capitalism?
David Harvey: From a macro-perspective, any mode of production tends to generate a very distinctive kind of opposition, which is a curious mirrored image of itself. If you look back to the 1960s or 1970s, when capital was organized in big corporatist, hierarchical forms, you had oppositional structures that were corporatist, unionist kinds of political apparatuses. In other words, a Fordist system generated a Fordist kind of opposition.
With the breakdown of this form of industrial organization, particularly in the advanced capitalist countries, you ended up with a much more decentralized configuration of capital: more fluid over space and time than previously thought. At the same time we saw the emergence of an opposition that is about networking and decentralization and that doesn’t like hierarchy and the previous Fordist forms of opposition.
So, in a funny sort of way, the leftists reorganize themselves in the same way capital accumulation is reorganized. If we understand that the left is a mirror image of what we are criticizing, then maybe what we should do is to break the mirror and get out of this symbiotic relationship with what we are criticizing.

In the Fordist era, the factory was the main site of resistance. Where can we find it now that capital has moved away from the factory floor towards the urban terrain?
First of all, the factory-form has not disappeared—you still find factories in Bangladesh or in China. What is interesting is how the mode of production in the core cities changed. For example, the logistics sector has undergone a huge expansion: UPS, DHL and all of these delivery workers are producing enormous values nowadays.
In the last decades, a huge shift has occurred in the service sector as well: the biggest employers of labor in the 1970s in the US were General Motors, Ford and US Steel. The biggest employers of labor today are McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Walmart. Back then, the factory was the center of the working class, but today we find the working class mainly in the service sector. And why would we say that producing cars is more important than producing hamburgers?
Unfortunately the left is not comfortable with the idea of organizing fast-food workers. Its picture of the classical working class doesn’t fit with value production of the service workers, the delivery workers, the restaurant workers, the supermarket workers.
The proletariat did not disappear, but there is a new proletariat which has very different characteristics from the traditional one the left used to identify as the vanguard of the working class. In this sense, the McDonalds workers became the steel workers of the twenty-first century
If this is what the new proletariat is about, where are the places to organize resistance now?
It’s very difficult to organize in the workplaces. For example, delivery drivers are moving all over the place. So this population could maybe be better organized outside the working place, meaning in their neighborhood structures.
There is already an interesting phrase in Gramsci’s work from 1919 saying that organizing in the workplace and having workplace councils is all well, but we should have neighborhood councils, too. And the neighborhood councils, he said, have a better understanding of what the conditions of the whole working class are compared to the sectoral understanding of workplace organizing.
Workplace organizers used to know very well what a steelworker was, but they didn’t understand what the proletariat was about as a whole. The neighborhood organization would then include for example the street cleaners, the house Consolidating Power: Urban and Neighborhood Based Organization Matters - Online University of the Left:

Ohio charter schools that misspent money still owe state $6 million | The Columbus Dispatch

Ohio charter schools that misspent money still owe state $6 million | The Columbus Dispatch:

Ohio charter schools that misspent money still owe state $6 million



Dozens of Ohio charter schools collectively have failed to repay more than $6 million in misspent tax dollars, a first-time compilation of state audits reveals.
The improper spending involved about 40 of the tax-funded, privately operated schools and was uncovered by audits conducted between 2008 and 2014.
“A majority of the unresolved findings for recovery are against individuals who operated or worked at the schools, and many of these schools are now closed,” according to the report that Ohio Superintendent Richard A. Ross recently submitted to federal officials.
The biggest offender: former school treasurer Carl W. Shye Jr. of New Albany, who misspent a reported $2.1 million while handling finances for more than a dozen former charter schools in Columbus, Dayton and Youngstown, according to state Auditor Dave Yost.
Shye served a two-year prison sentence after pleading guilty in 2012 to embezzling nearly $500,000 from four charter schools, including the former George Washington Carver Preparatory Academy in Columbus, between 2005 and 2011.
The charter-school audit findings were compiled by the Ohio Department of Education at the request of federal regulators, who in November placed a hold on a $71 million grant awarded to the state.
The funds were to be used to open new charter schools in Ohio. But officials with the U.S. Department of Education said they were concerned about the state agency’s rigging of charter-school evaluations and wanted assurances that the grant money would be spent properly.
The federal review is ongoing, officials said on Friday.
The Dispatch reported in September that Ohio’s grant application had inaccuracies and questionable claims, including that the state had no “ poor-performing” charters in the 2012-13 school year, even though about a third failed to meet a single standard on state report cards that year.
The application also promised that only the “best-rated” charter-school sponsors would receive grant money for new schools. But former school-choice chief David Hansen, who drafted the state’s application, failed to mention he had left off grades of failing online schools from sponsor evaluations to boost their ratings.
Ohio currently spends about $1 billion a year to educate more than Ohio charter schools that misspent money still owe state $6 million | The Columbus Dispatch:

Report: Most states providing less K-12 funding than before Great Recession - The Washington Post

Report: Most states providing less K-12 funding than before Great Recession - The Washington Post:

Report: Most states providing less K-12 funding than before Great Recession

A new report on public school funding across the country finds that most states are now providing less support per K-12 student than before the 2007-2009 Great Recession — and that some states continue to cut funding.
The report, published by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonprofit research and policy institute, cites what it says is the most current available data on state and local funding and finds that, after adjusting for inflation:
  • At least 31 states provided less state funding per student in the 2014 school year (that is, the school year ending in 2014) than in the 2008 school year, before the recession took hold. In at least 15 states, the cuts exceeded 10 percent.
  • In at least 18 states, local government funding per student fell over the same period. In at least 27 states, local funding rose, but those increases rarely made up for cuts in state support. Total local funding nationally ― for the states where comparable data exist ― declined between 2008 and 2014, adding to the damage from state funding cuts.
  • While data on total school funding in the current school year (2016) is not available, at least 25 states are still providing less “general” or “formula” funding ― the primary form of state funding for schools ― per student than in 2008.  In seven states, the cuts exceed 10 percent.
  • Most states raised “general” funding per student slightly this year, but 12 states imposed new cuts, even as the national economy continues to improve. Some of these states, including Oklahoma, Arizona and Wisconsin, already were among the deepest-cutting states since the recession hit.
Here’s a state-by-state chart (with a handful of states not included because of lack of data; see footnote to chart):
Among the consequences of K-12 state-level spending are, the report says:

  • Weakening a key funding source for school districts. About 46 percent of K-12 spending nationally comes from state funds (the share varies by state). Cuts at the state level force local school districts to scale back educational services, raise more local revenue to cover the gap, or both. And because property values fell sharply after the recession hit, it has been particularly difficult for local school districts to raise significant additional revenue through local property taxes without raising tax rates, a politically challenging task even in good times.
  • Slowing the economy’s recovery from the recession. School districts began cutting teachers and other employees in mid-2008 when the first round of budget cuts took effect, federal employment data show. By mid-2012, local school districts had cut 351,000 jobs. Since then, they have restored some of the jobs but are still down 297,000 jobs compared with 2008. These job losses reduced the purchasing power of workers’ Report: Most states providing less K-12 funding than before Great Recession - The Washington Post:

AP: Florida gave charter schools millions before they closed - Washington Times

AP: Florida gave charter schools millions before they closed - Washington Times:

AP: Florida gave charter schools millions before they closed

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) - Less than a mile from the state Capitol, a former steakhouse shows little evidence that it was once part of a movement to change Florida’s schools.
It was on this location nearly two decades ago that the leader of a prominent Tallahassee church put together one of the state’s first charter schools. The space where customers grazed the salad bar became student desks. The parking lot became home to two portables used for classrooms.
The only trace of C.K. Steele/LeRoy Collins Community Charter Middle School is a sign in the parking lot. It closed in 2014.
But over the course of the preceding decade, the school received nearly $540,000 to help with capital purchases under a program enacted by the Republican-controlled Legislature and supported by the last three governors. Bethel Missionary Baptist Church owned the building when the school opened and it still does.
So what did get taxpayers get back? Not much. Some televisions, computers and other surplus supplies deemed unusable by the Leon County school district.
The story is repeated across the state: Charter schools, which are public schools run by private groups, have received more than $760 million from state taxpayers since 2000 according to an Associated Press analysis of state Department of Education records. Schools can use the money for construction costs, rent payments, buses and even property insurance.
Yet charter schools in 30 districts have wound up closing after receiving as much as $70 million combined in such funding, the AP’s analysis showed.
Taxpayers usually can’t recover the capital money invested in those schools because most of it has been spent on rent or leasing costs. The Department of Education reported it has taken back just $133,000 in the last three years from schools that closed.
“Even if it’s the Taj Mahal, if you lease it and it closes there’s no way for the district to recoup that,” said Jenna Hodgens, who is in charge of dealing with charter schools for Hillsborough County schools.
Democratic lawmakers have criticized the expenditures, especially since Florida legislators have curtailed construction money for traditional public schools in recent years.
The AP’s analysis was derived from department data that lists charter schools that received money set aside in the annual state budget. That data was compared with schools that the state listed as closed. The state listed as closed some schools that had merged with others; the AP did not count money that went to those schools in tallying the total spent on now-defunct schools.
The list of schools that got money includes Miami’s Liberty City Charter, set up with great fanfare by Jeb Bush shortly before he ran for governor in 1998. Liberty City closed after eight years because of severe financial problems, but not before receiving $1.1 million in state capital funds.
Bush, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, has remained a champion of charter school schools and vouchers. His campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
Charter schools, which proponents see as a way for some families to move their children into schools better suited to their needs, have grown in popularity since they were authorized in the ‘90s. There are currently more than 650 charter schools statewide, teaching more than 250,000 students. These schools receive money from school districts to pay for day-to-day expenses like salaries.
But the growth of charter schools has trigged a tug-of-war in the Legislature over how much money should also be given them to pay for capital needs such as classrooms and transportation. The capital money directed to charter schools reached a high of $90 million two years ago but dropped to just under $48 million for the current budget year.
AP: Florida gave charter schools millions before they closed - Washington Times:





Educators wondering if John Bel Edwards plans rollback in public school ‘reforms’ | The New Orleans Advocate

Educators wondering if John Bel Edwards plans rollback in public school ‘reforms’ | The New Orleans Advocate — New Orleans, Louisiana:

Educators wondering if John Bel Edwards plans rollback in public school ‘reforms’







Whether Gov.-elect John Bel Edwards’ alliance with the state’s teacher unions means a push is brewing to undo the sweeping changes in public schools promoted by Gov. Bobby Jindal is a hot topic in the education community.
Edwards has long advocated curbs on charter schools, criticized vouchers and opposed public school letter grades — all hallmarks of Jindal’s education “reform” package, especially in 2012.
The incoming governor also is firmly aligned with Louisiana’s two teacher unions, the Louisiana Federation of Teachers and the Louisiana Association of Educators, which have long blasted charter schools, vouchers, letter grades for public schools and a wide range of other public school changes enacted in recent years.
Both groups were early backers of Edwards’ candidacy, and former officials of both organizations played key roles in his campaign.
But the incoming Democrat bristles at the notion that LFT and LAE support will dictate his efforts to improve public schools.
“This idea that I am controlled or beholden to unions is ridiculous,” Edwards said in an interview. “But I am not going to disavow that they support me and that I support teachers.”
He added, “The fact of the matter is I have tremendous support from superintendents. They are management.”
A 53-member education transition panel, including the presidents of the LFT and LAE, has already met four times behind closed doors and is set to meet for the final time next week.
But there is disagreement about the impact of its recommendations and how much Edwards will be aligned with teacher unions when it comes to pushing bills, especially because of potential conflicts with New Orleans Democrats.
In addition, state budget problems may delay any big push on the education front, officials say.
Scott Richard, chairman of the transition panel and executive director of the Louisiana Schools Boards Association, noted that Edwards has vowed to govern from the center.
“I think there are a lot of good things that have come out of the recent wave of reform,” Richard said of school changes. “But I think we are at a point where we need to assess what is really effective and meaningful, and what are areas we can improve on.”
The committee is supposed to focus on six topics: accountability, choice, local control, pre-kindergarten, state aid for public schools and school standards.
Richard said the meetings have been productive and include diverse voices.
The plan, he said, is to provide “broad suggestions” on education changes in a report to the incoming governor.
Others said the gatherings are mostly sound-off sessions that may or may not translate into substantive proposals.
The panel includes current and former teachers, two former members of Louisiana’s top school board, superintendents and other educators.
Edwards, who served in the state House for eight years, has long pushed legislation that would ban the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education from overriding local school boards on charter school applications.
He said the issue is about local control, not putting curbs on charter schools, which are public schools with an emphasis on innovation and run by nongovernmental boards.
Edwards also wants to ban BESE from authorizing new charter schools in districts rated A or B.
“I believe school systems that perform well under our accountability system ought to have a final decision on whether a Educators wondering if John Bel Edwards plans rollback in public school ‘reforms’ | The New Orleans Advocate — New Orleans, Louisiana:

Saturday, December 12, 2015

New TNTP President Among the First to Have Her NYC School’s Charter Revoked | deutsch29

New TNTP President Among the First to Have Her NYC School’s Charter Revoked | deutsch29:

New TNTP President Among the First to Have Her NYC School’s Charter Revoked


In February 2015, TNTP (used to be The New Teacher Project, but now is just the letters TNTP) announced that effective summer 2015, TNTP will be making some executive-level changes (euphemistically named a “long-term growth strategy”) by dumping its previous CEO and president in favor of two other TNTP faithful:
BROOKLYN, NY – TNTP, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving educational quality, today announced plans for CEO Ariela Rozman and President Timothy Daly to step down as part of a long-term growth strategy. Two widely respected TNTP veterans, Daniel Weisberg and Karolyn Belcher, will become the organization’s new leaders by summer 2015.
Rozman and Daly have both served at TNTP for 14 years. They assumed their current leadership roles in 2007, after the departure of Michelle Rhee….
Two senior TNTP executives, Daniel Weisberg and Karolyn Belcher, will lead TNTP going forward. Weisberg will become the organization’s CEO, overseeing its executive team. Belcher will report to Weisberg as President, overseeing TNTP’s projects and programs.
TNTP is a Teach for America (TFA) spinoff-type of corporate ed reform organization, and one that is often associated with TFA. (For example, in Louisiana’s TFA contracts, TNTP is included to offer TFA’s temp teachers a sort of professional development.)
TNTP was established as a nonprofit in September 1995 by TFA alum, Michelle Rhee. According to TNTP’ s 2000 tax filing, the TNTP’s “statement of program accomplishments” is that it exists to “improve the methods by which teachers in the New TNTP President Among the First to Have Her NYC School’s Charter Revoked | deutsch29: