Sunday, October 11, 2015

Louisiana Educator: Who Really Failed the Honesty Test about PARCC?

Louisiana Educator: Who Really Failed the Honesty Test about PARCC?:

Who Really Failed the Honesty Test about PARCC?






Barry Irwin of the big business lobbying group, Council for a Better Louisiana (CABL), has written an opinion editorial in the Lafayette Advertiser where he assumes that some BESE members and some school groups want to hide the truth about Louisiana student performance from the public. The title of the article isWill We Pass the Honesty Test When Scores are Revealed. Actually, as this blog has demonstrated, it was John White who really wanted to hide the truth from Louisiana parents by withholding the raw scores of the PARCC test.

It was a public records request by a group of parents, 4 BESE members, 5 legislators and other citizens that forced the true test scores to be released. Those are reported on the blog post below. It was never necessary to use the PARCC consortium's confusing point system to know how our students did on the test. The ugly truth is in the raw scores given below. That particular post according to my stat-counter has been read by over 20,000 Louisiana citizens and educators to date. We can handle the truth! even though White and his friends at CABL wanted to keep us in the dark.

The action before BESE next Tuesday is not just the approval of White's phony scale cut scores. The action being recommended to BESE would usurp all the power of BESE to set testing standards and hand over all decision making relative to scores and even test construction to John White  and his testing companies. The action recommended removes all the old safeguards to require tests to meet certain criteria for grading. Once that is approved, White controls all the test construction and the grading and the 
Louisiana Educator: Who Really Failed the Honesty Test about PARCC?:

Ed Notes Online: Teachers Rate Eva Moskowitz/ Success Academy Charters as "Toxic" and "Miserable Place to Work"

Ed Notes Online: Teachers Rate Eva Moskowitz/ Success Academy Charters as "Toxic" and "Miserable Place to Work":

Teachers Rate Eva Moskowitz/ Success Academy Charters as "Toxic" and "Miserable Place to Work"




Don't even both applying. You might as well quit teaching...
They could barely get enough trolls...
http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Success-Academy-Charter-Schools/reviews

Success Academy Charter Schools

21 reviews

SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE REVIEWS

  • Job Work/Life Balance
  • Compensation/Benefits
  • Job Security/Advancement
  • Management
  • Job CultureProductive and comfortable work place
Miserable place to work
Teaching Assistant (Former Employee), Harlem – August 1, 2015
Pros: None
Cons: Bad hours, absurd discipline policies, awful culture
The modus operandi of Success Academy is to hire college kids right out of school. Hardly any of the "teachers" have any real experience or have any idea what they are getting into. The majority wash out within a year or two -- or get fired.

The atmosphere can best be described as Kafka-esque. The hours are long, and the kids are held to quasi-abusive standard of discipline. My 5th graders, for instance, were only allowed to go to the bathroom twice a day at predetermined times and are accompanied into the bathroom by a teacher. The students must remain silent during lunch. Special Ed students are quietly purged. Teachers are constantly being fired or quitting midway through the year, so expect co-workers to be mysteriously disappear, never to be heard from again.

Most of the year, the children do nothing but practice taking standardized tests. Unsurprisingly, when at the end of the year the kids score well on standardized exams, Moskowitz points to this as evidence that the kids are being given fantastic educations. Unfortunately, the truth is that most of these kids can't 
Ed Notes Online: Teachers Rate Eva Moskowitz/ Success Academy Charters as "Toxic" and "Miserable Place to Work":

This Week's Charter School Disaster It's A Crying Shame


This Week's Charter School Disaster
 It's A Crying Shame

Paramount Charter School: A Chaotic “Free for All” That Cannot be Immediately Shut Down | deutsch29 http://bit.ly/1Qju81M

Big Education Ape: Sunrise charter school had warning signs before teachers were fired, resigned | News - Home http://bit.ly/1G6CYja

CURMUDGUCATION: FL: Another Charter Scam http://bit.ly/1Qju7ei

Big Education Ape: Nearly all teachers abruptly fired at Sunrise charter school | News - Home http://bit.ly/1MZu1YA

Big Education Ape: Charter School Operator With Four Fs Gets Cash to Open More | NBC 6 South Florida http://bit.ly/1QjukOC

Big Education Ape: The ugly charter school scandal Arne Duncan is leaving behind - Salon.com http://bit.ly/1QjuVjt




HOW TO SUCCEED IN CHARTING THE DIFFICULT COURSE AWAY FROM CHARTER SCHOOLS - Perdaily.com

HOW TO SUCCEED IN CHARTING THE DIFFICULT COURSE AWAY FROM CHARTER SCHOOLS - Perdaily.com:

HOW TO SUCCEED IN CHARTING THE DIFFICULT COURSE AWAY FROM CHARTER SCHOOLS



(Mensaje se repite en Español)

Let me attempt to educate liberals and conservatives about the reality of the American political system of government and the economics it controls as opposed to their respective dillusions as to what this country is about. The liberal believes that government and the economic system should reflect the needs and will of the majority of people, something it has never done. While conservatives generally share this view, they take exception when it comes to the role of government in accomplishing this goal and believe that less government and more free enterprise will do the trick.

What neither liberal nor conservative understands is that government has never reflected the will of the people, but rather the will of that small and now corporate organized segment of our society that really calls the shots, while using the media that it owns lock, stock, and barrel to continue diluding the people- Left, Right, and in between- in this country into believing they have any say in how things are run, when clearly they don't.

While I don't much like this reality, given the power arrayed against me, I have no desire to waste the waning years of my life by expending my rapidly diminishing energy in fighting a monster that I can only beat in fairy tales. I somehow can make peace with a well-organized corporate big brother that must get its pound of flesh on every commercial transaction that takes place in this country and abroad.

What I still have difficult with is when this incredible fallible monolithic corporate owner of our society makes bad decisions, but continues to double down on these decisions, when it is clear that they don't work. The problem is that since corporate think only rewards conformity, it seems unable to pragmatically examine a policy or decision it has made and choose an alternate course, no made how clearly failed the iniitial course of action is.

The reason it gets away with it is that in a world with the Citizens United decision being the law of the land that gives unlimited "free speech" to the uber rich, there is no effective way to make corporations change course in Iraq or Afghanistan or in their decision to privatize public education to get their hands on the 40% of the close to $2 trillion we now spend every year on public education, once the corporation has made a decision to go in that direction. The HOW TO SUCCEED IN CHARTING THE DIFFICULT COURSE AWAY FROM CHARTER SCHOOLS - Perdaily.com:


CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Some Edubloggery Highlights

CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Some Edubloggery Highlights:

ICYMI: Some Edubloggery Highlights






The Common Core Can't Speed up Child Development

The Baltimore Sun ran this piece last summer, but it's a good reminder now that we're entering test results season. Students are not getting dumber. 

NEA PAC vote breakdown

If you're still cranky about the Clinton endorsement, here's the breakdown of who voted which way-- and why the abstentions from the two biggest states made a difference,

Five Questions To Ask a CEO Before a District Take Over

The always-reasonable Peter DeWitt takes a look at Undercover Boss, the Youngstown Schools takeover, and the questions that should be on a school CEO interview. 

Bill Gates Education Speech Detached from Reality

There were plenty of reactions to the Bill Gates State of the Education Speech, but this was one of my favorites, looking at some of the specific areas in which Gates was a bit off the mark

Jersey Jazzman Trifecta

If you aren't following Jersey Jazzman, then what's wrong with you? Get to it. His work is always indispensable and, unlike certain other bloggists, based on actual facts and data and stuff. This week he had three must-reads--

John King Is the King of Suspension

Many folks scratched their heads over the anointing of failed New York Ed Head John King as Sort-of-Secretary of Education, but the Jazzman had a very thorough explanation of just what in King's record suggests he's not the man for the job (and why his touted charter "success" is just baloney).

Who Tanked Campbell Brown's Forum?

A look at how Brown failed to set herself up as an arbiter of education stuff.

Chris Cerf Sees the Light

How do you get a reformster to stop saying, "Money doesn't make any difference and school districts shouldn't get any more." You put him in charge of a school district, where he can discover he doesn't have enough money to do his job.


CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Some Edubloggery Highlights:

CURMUDGUCATION: The Social Justice Argument

CURMUDGUCATION: The Social Justice Argument:

The Social Justice Argument






Charter and choice fans continue to refine their argument about charters as a tool of social justice, as exemplified by an exchange with charter fan Dmitri Melhorn that quickly expanded to a conversation still puttering along this morning. Melhorn started in the reformster biz at McKinsey and Co, and moved on to co-found StudentsFirst, but his day job is venture capitalist. Nevertheless, it would be a mistake to simply dismiss this argument (shared by many reformy folks) out of hand. Tne first part of their argument is solid; the second part is shot full of holes.

The First Part 

The linkage between real estate and schools has resulted in public schools that are crippled by the effects of racism and poverty. We can talk about patterns of forced settlement as in Chicago, where blacks coming north during the Great Migration were herded into certain neighborhoods. We can talk about white flight in the 50s and 60s, and we can talk about the negative and segregating effects of public housing. In Our Children, Robert Putnam notes that the sorting of America has continued until today, pushing the non-wealthy and the non-white into neighborhoods that are mired in poverty and its effects, while the rich escape to gated communities, where the poor literally cannot follow them.

Housing costs, available jobs, patterns of open and subtle racism-- there's a whole lifetime of research there, but the end results is a highly heterogeneous pattern of settling in America, and since we have tied school attendance and funding to geography, schools are doomed reflect the socio-economic reality of the neighborhoods to which they are tied.

The argument says that we have school choice, but it is choice that is directly linked to wealth-- if you are rich enough to buy whatever house you like in whatever neighborhood you like, then you can, by choosing a house, choose a school. Put another way, escaping a bad school is often synonymous with escaping a bad neighborhood.

The Second Part

Reformsters start here with the premise that non-wealthy non-white students must be rescued from 
CURMUDGUCATION: The Social Justice Argument:


Ben Carson flunks middle school history - The Washington Post

Ben Carson flunks middle school history - The Washington Post:

Ben Carson flunks middle school history




If only Anne Frank had a gun. Then, according to the logic of Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon who is running for the Republican presidential nomination, she would have been able to better fight against the Nazis.
Carson has come under criticism for this astonishing statement in his new book, “A More Perfect Union: What We the People Can Do to Reclaim Our Constitutional Liberties.” On CNN recently, host Wolf Blitzer read this excerpt:
“German citizens were disarmed by their government in the late 1930s and by the late 1940s Hitler’s regime had mercilessly slaughtered 6 million Jews and numerous others whom they considered inferior. Through a combination of removing guns and disseminating deceitful propaganda, the Nazis were able to carry out their evil intentions with relatively little resistance.”
Carson defended the statement during the interview, expressing a view about gun control and Nazi Germany that is embraced by some gun rights advocates — all of whom apparently didn’t learn, or forgot, what kids learn as early as middle school about the Nazi war machine.
As has been noted by many in recent days, Jews were not allowed to carry guns under Nazi law, so the notion that disarmament helped increase the victim totals is nonsensical. Jews resisted as best as their circumstances allowed. Middle school kids learn this. Take for example, the start of this lesson plan for middle school teachers with material largely from the Holocaust Memorial Resource and Education Center of Florida’s Middle School Teaching Trunk:
Unit Four: Jewish Resistance Background Information for Teachers:
When studying about the Holocaust, students frequently ask, “Why didn’t the Jews fight back?” It may appear at first glance that Jews didn’t resist, but this is not true. They resisted as much as any other group under Nazi occupation. Most often, they had to act under circumstances that could hardly have been less suited for such activities. They used the methods available to them according to local situations and individual circumstances. Resistance was usually carried out against great odds and with incomplete information about the overall situation. They had little or no outside help and often had to contend with the anti-Semitism of others who were also under occupation.
Most Jewish armed resistance took place after 1942, as a desperate effort, after it became clear to those who resisted that the Nazis had murdered most of their families and their coreligionists. Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments and training, conducting operations in a hostile zone, reluctance 
Ben Carson flunks middle school history - The Washington Post:

Marcos Breton: So, are you running, Mr. Mayor? | The Sacramento Bee

Marcos Breton: So, are you running, Mr. Mayor? | The Sacramento Bee:

Marcos Breton: So, are you running, Mr. Mayor?




 In the 165-year history of Sacramento, the city’s never had a three-term mayor.

Kevin Johnson would be the first, should he decide to run and prevail. Some of his allies are pressing for such an announcement, and soon. A local business group has started a mini-version of “Run, Joe, Run,” the campaign urging Vice President Joe Biden to seek the presidency in 2016.
“Mayor Johnson is the most accomplished leader our city has ever had, which is why we need him to keep working for the people who call Sacramento home,” exhorted Mike Kimmel, co-chair of Region Builders Political Action Committee.
Run, KJ, Run? Is four more years of Kevin Johnson in Sacramento’s best interest?
No question involving Johnson is ever that simple.
Johnson, at 49, already achieved the distinction of becoming the first African American mayor of the state capital. He sealed his legacy as the mayor who prevented the Kings from relocating to another city. He led the talks that resulted in construction of a new downtown arena after a decade of failed attempts.
The powerful aftereffects from that achievement are radiating outward: Downtown property values have tripled. Vacant buildings are suddenly hot commodities. The city’s profile is on a tangible upward trajectory.
None of this would have happened without the former All-Star point guard of the Phoenix Suns, whose NBA connections, business acumen and celebrity helped seal the Kings deal. And yet Johnson remains a polarizing figure in his hometown. Idolized, even feared, by allies. Despised and distrusted by detractors, more so now than when he was first elected.
Johnson-hate took root when he took over Sacramento High School and transformed it into a non-union charter school. Well more than a decade later, the people who opposed that move have hardened into a core group of opponents who read greed or corruption into every Johnson stance.
Separate from that, and troubling to a wider audience, are the allegations of sexual misconduct that Johnson never quite shakes. The story that surfaced during his first run for mayor, in 2008, about his $230,000 settlement a decade before with a Phoenix teenager who said he had fondled her during his playing days with the Suns. An allegation that in 2007 he fondled a 17-year-old student at Sacramento High.
In both cases, Johnson staunchly denied wrongdoing. After reviewing the evidence, prosecutors declined to press charges in the Phoenix case; the Sacramento High student recanted her accusation, and police found no merit to the allegation.
Then came the claim filed in April with the City Clerk’s Office, in which a former aide to the city manager alleged Johnson had sexually harassed her over seven months, making repeated unwanted advances. Again, Johnson said it didn’t happen, and the city, after an investigation, said the accusations were unsubstantiated and denied the claim.
The Phoenix episode has found new life on the Internet in recent weeks, as the website Deadspin has revisited the allegations. Taken together, is it enough to make Johnson walk away from a third term to avoid the scrutiny of public office?
If anything, those close to Johnson say his detractors may be propelling him toward another run. Johnson is nothing if not combative, and some believe he may seek a third term because he refuses to surrender to his foes.
Johnson is not talking, and some close to him say he may not know what he wants to do. But the reality is, until Johnson announces that he’s not running for mayor again, then he is running for mayor again.
And if Johnson is running, at least two serious candidates will have difficult decisions to make. Former state Senate leader Darrell Steinberg and Councilwoman Angelique Ashby are definitely interested in the job – so long as Johnson decides not to run. If he seeks a third term, it’s a far more intricate equation. Do they challenge Johnson and risk destroying their close ties with him?
Steinberg is quite possibly the most accomplished politician Sacramento has produced in half a century. He led the state Senate through the worst economic period since the Great Depression and still managed to score major legislative victories. He championed initiatives that are making a difference in the lives of people with mental health issues. He also played a critical role in saving the Kings by pushing through a bill that prevented nuisance lawsuits from delaying construction of the Golden 1 Center.
He would bring a breadth and depth of policy understanding. He is amiable and approachable. Where Johnson divides, he unites – a master at building consensus in ways Johnson is not.
Ashby, 40, brings strengths of her own. She is hugely popular in her Natomas district, where she has helped secure critical flood-control support. She has been an ardent supporter of law enforcement, and would have the backing of police and fire unions. She is currently the only woman on the council, and represents a new generation of leaders in Sacramento.
Johnson’s failure to declare his intentions is particularly damaging to Ashby, who would have to introduce herself to broader Sacramento should she decide to run. Thanksgiving is a heartbeat away. By all rights, emerging candidates should have been pounding the pavement weeks ago.
If Johnson waits much longer, the question is whether Ashby will grow impatient and run against him. That face-off would pose some fascinating dynamics: Would police and fire unions campaign against Johnson after supporting him so strongly for years? Would developers loyal to Johnson dare cross Ashby when Natomas is about to open up to huge development?
An Ashby-Steinberg matchup also offers intriguing elements: Steinberg is beloved and likely could outspend Ashby by a wide margin. But his ties to labor make business leaders nervous, and Sacramento’s business community is flexing its muscles like never before.
A hard-fought campaign among any of these players could be healthy for Sacramento. It’s time to move on from recent successes and confront the complex issues ahead. Violent crime has spiked. The American River Parkway is overrun with homeless campers. The city lags behind West Sacramento in developing its riverfront. What about more after-school programs and job training for the youth of Johnson’s native Oak Park?
The danger with Johnson running unopposed is that these issues don’t get aired. He slides back into office buoyed solely by the cult of personality that has taken shape around his enigmatic image. Sacramento needs a mayor who will attack crime, homelessness and economic development with the same fervor that infused Johnson’s efforts to save the Kings and land the Golden 1 Center. Does he have the desire to do that? The passion? He’s not saying, and it’s time to decide.

The Latest: Brown rejects ban on for-profit charter schools - SFGate

The Latest: Brown rejects ban on for-profit charter schools - SFGate:

The Latest: Brown rejects ban on for-profit charter schools






SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Latest on California legislation acted upon by Gov. Jerry Brown ahead of a Sunday deadline (All times local):
5:31 p.m.
Gov. Jerry Brown is rejecting legislation that would have blocked for-profit companies from operating charter schools in California.
Brown says in a veto message Saturday that he doesn't believe lawmakers have made the case to stop for-profit companies from operating charter schools in the state.
He declined to sign AB 787 by Democratic Assemblyman Roger Hernández of West Covina. He says the bill also contains ambiguous language that could restrict nonprofit charter schools from even using for-profit vendors.
Brown helped launch two Oakland charter schools, but teachers unions and many of his fellow Democrats oppose them because most employees are not unionized.
Jerry Brown Raised $12 Million for His Two Oakland Schools | Politics & Government | Oakland, Berkeley, Bay Area & ... http://bit.ly/1Nzm6Ev
THE PERIMETER PRIMATE: Jerry Brown’s Two Pet Charter Schools: Part One http://bit.ly/1NzmaE9

Seattle Schools Community Forum: If SPS Thinks All Parents are Good for is Fundraising...

Seattle Schools Community Forum: If SPS Thinks All Parents are Good for is Fundraising...:

If SPS Thinks All Parents are Good for is Fundraising...





Join Teacher Retention Advocate Parents for a "bake sale" to highlight the inadequacy of local parent groups to fund raise for major staffing cuts. We will call on SPS to make alternate budget cuts and our state legislature to fully fund McCleary.

Tuesday, October 13th from 11 am - 1pm at JSCEE 

BustED Pencils Trending News: Must Win; Profit not CHILD; Suspension King | BustED Pencils

BustED Pencils Trending News: Must Win; Profit not CHILD; Suspension King | BustED Pencils:

Trending News: Must Win; Profit not CHILD; Suspension King



newsboy_bustedpencils-logo_full colorBustEDstretch
Go Michigan Department of ED! Critical thinking and creativity over memorizing facts and filling in bubbles!  Way to BUST SOME PENCILS!!  (Confetti shower please)

In teaching versus testing, teaching must win

BustEDstretch
Melinda Gates said “Parents rightfully said, ‘Oh my gosh, a new test,” – Really Melinda?!!  I believe it was more like “What the hell??  This standardized testing is child abuse!”  When you read this article by Lyndsey Layton make sure to “read between the lines” of what Bill Gates is saying.  Gates says he never anticipated the political pushback to the Common Core from tea party conservatives on the right and progressives on the left.  Gates lack of anticipation on the pushback was due to the fact that he was focused on profit not CHILD.
Keep pushing back on the standardized testing movement, we are winning!!!

Improving U.S. schools tougher than global health, Gates says


BustEDstretch
King of student suspensions, (slap my forehead), quite a contradiction to the US DOE policies which he is about to lead.
John King, New SecEd, Is The King of Student Suspensions UPDATED

Get BustED Pencils Trending News to come right to your in-box!
Enter your email under “SUBSCRIBE” on our Home or Trending News atbustedpencils.com

Jersey Jazzman: America's Biggest Hypocrite: @GovChristie

Jersey Jazzman: America's Biggest Hypocrite: @GovChristie:

America's Biggest Hypocrite: @GovChristie






A challenge for Governor Chris Christie's defenders: try to reconcile the following news stories (all emphases mine).


Gov. Chris Christie and First Lady Mary Pat last year made the most money since the governor first took office, according to tax returns the governor's office released on Friday. 
The Christies reported earning $912,460 in salaries, about $25,500 in royalties, nearly $13,000 in capital gains and some $7,800 in dividends in 2014, according to tax returns the governor's office released Friday afternoon. 
Here's a year-by year breakdown of how much the Christies have reported since he took office:  
2014: $970,161 
The bulk of the income was earned by Mary Pat, who resigned from her job at the Wall Street specialty investment firm Angelo, Gordon & Co. in April. She stepped down shortly before the governor formally entered the 2016 presidential race. 
Mary Pat reported earning $720,000 from Angelo, Gordon & Co. and $34,698 from Cantor Fitzgerald, another former employer. The governor reported earning $157,063 in taxable income from his job.  
2013: $698,838  
Tax returns released by the governor's office showed Mary Pat Christie earned $475,854 for her job as a director at Angelo,
- See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2015/10/americas-biggest-hypocrite-govchristie.html#sthash.m5e6YPAR.dpuf

Why is Columbus Day still a U.S. federal holiday? - The Washington Post

Why is Columbus Day still a U.S. federal holiday? - The Washington Post:

Why is Columbus Day still a U.S. federal holiday?



You may have learned in school that Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492 in the Niña, the Pinta and the Santa Maria and proved for the first time in history that the Earth wasn’t flat. Actually, he didn’t — discover America or prove that th Earth was flat, and there is some question as to the names of his ships.
His four trips from Spain across the Atlantic — in 1492, 1493, 1498 and 1502 — did, however, change human history forever, ushering in what is known as the Columbian Exchange — the historic exchange of plants, animals, disease, culture, technology and people between the Old and New Worlds. The Old World, for example, got chocolate (and many other things) and the New World got wheat, along with bubonic plague, chicken pox, cholera, malaria, measles, typhoid, etc., which decimated the populations of indigenous peoples Columbus found living on the islands he “discovered.”
As for Columbus himself, he mapped the coasts of Central and South America but never set foot on North America, and died thinking he had discovered Asia. He ruled the Caribbean islands as viceroy and governor so brutally that, according to US-History.com: “Even his most ardent admirers acknowledge that Columbus was self-centered, ruthless, avaricious, and a racist.”
Columbus has long been believed to have been born in Genoa, Italy, though some historians think he was born in Spain’s Catalonia region. He sailed for the Spanish crown, and his remains are in Spain. Italians in the United States have taken great pride in him and sponsor many of the celebrations held in his name each year to honor Italian-American heritage.
So how did we got a U.S. federal holiday in his name?
The first Columbus Day celebration recorded in the United States was held in New York in 1792 to honor Italian-American heritage and to mark Oct. 12, 1492, the day that Columbus and his ships first made landfall  on an island in the Caribbean Sea.
In 1892, according to History.com, President Benjamin Harrison issued a proclamation encouraging Americans to mark the 400th anniversary of Columbus’s voyage with patriotic festivities.
In 1937, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Congress, bowing to lobbying by the Knights of Columbus, an influential Catholic group that wanted a Catholic hero to be honored, proclaimed Oct. 12 to be Columbus Day, a national holiday. In 1971, the holiday date was changed to the second Monday in October.
Over recent decades, the holiday has been the target of protests at Columbus Day celebrations, and some places have changed the name and focus of the holiday. For example, Berkeley, Calif., replaced Columbus Day withIndigenous Peoples Day in 1992 to honor the original inhabitants of the Caribbean islands where Columbus made landfall and ruled. In 1989, South Dakota started calling the holiday Native American Day, and Alabama celebrates a combination of Columbus Day and American Indian Heritage Day. Hawaii calls it Discovery Day. In the Bahamas, it is called Discovery Day, and as Dia de la Hispanidad and Fiesta Nacional in Spain.
Here are some things to know about Columbus:
*He didn’t prove that the Earth is round.
Kids in school have long been taught that when Columbus set sail in 1492 to Why is Columbus Day still a U.S. federal holiday? - The Washington Post:

Kindergartens That Prize Play and Academics–In That Order | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Kindergartens That Prize Play and Academics–In That Order | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:

Kindergartens That Prize Play and Academics–In That Order





“Is Kindergarten the New First Grade?” asked a group of researcherswho looked at U.S. kindergartens in 1998 and then again in 2010. Their answer, based on surveys and direct observation is “yes.” The struggle over play vs. academics that has consumed early childhood educators for the past two decades shows that the academic-driven kindergarten has  triumphed in the U.S. especially after No Child Left Behind (2001) and now implementing Common Core standards (2010). Applied to kindergarten, there are now literacy targets and tests that  five year-olds are supposed to meet and take during the school year.
There are, however, many other kindergartens that prize  the play and discovery approach to early learning that also includes reading and math. Here is one instance of such a kindergarten described by a veteran teacher. I have changed names and places to protect the school and individuals.
Approaching the school’s playground that morning, I watched as an army of 5- and 6-year-old boys patrolled a zigzagging stream behind … preschool in the city of  ____, unfazed by the warm August drizzle. When I clumsily unhinged the steel gate to the school’s playground, the young children didn’t even lift their eyes from the ground; they  just kept dragging and pushing their tiny shovels through the mud.
At 9:30 a.m., the boys were called to line up for a daily activity called Morning Circle. (The girls were already inside—having chosen to play board games indoors.) They trudged across the yard in their rubber boots, pleading with their teachers to play longer—even though they had already been outside for an hour. As they stood in file, I asked them to describe what they’d been doing on the playground.
“Making dams,” sang a chorus of three boys.
“Nothing else?” one of their teachers prodded.
“Nothing else,” they confirmed.
“[Children] learn so well through play,” Anna , one of the preschool’s Kindergartens That Prize Play and Academics–In That Order | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice: