Refresher: What's in the House ESEA Bill? - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Refresher: What's in the House ESEA Bill? - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Refresher: What's in the House ESEA Bill?

 House Republicans are hoping to resurrect debate this week on a bill that would overhaul the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which was yanked from the floor in February after it unexpectedly began losing support from GOP members.

The measure was not on the Majority Leader's weekly schedule, but sources said it could get called to the floor as early as Wednesday under a new rule that allows members to vote on three new amendments in addition to final passage of the bill.

Sounds like it's time for a bill review ...

The Republican-backed measure, authored by Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., the chairman of the education committee, would:

• Keep in place the testing schedule of the No Child Left Behind Act, the current version of the ESEA;
• Eliminate the current accountability system, known as "adequate yearly progress";
• Maintain the requirement that states disaggregate achievement data to show how subgroup students are doing compared to the student population as a whole;
• Require states to intervene in Title I schools that aren't performing well, but not tell states how to do so or how many schools to try to fix at a time;
• Require states to come up with their own challenging academic standards in language arts, math, and science;
• Prohibit the U.S. Secretary of Education from requiring states to adopt the Common Core State Standards, or any other set of standards;
• Bar the secretary from putting "additional burdens" on states through the regulatory process when it comes to standards;
• Eliminate NCLB's "highly qualified" teacher requirements and consolidate other teacher quality programs.

During the two-day floor debate that occurred back in February, lawmakers added some additional provisions through the amendment process. Here are some of the highlights:

• An amendment was adopted that would allow school districts to use locally designed tests in lieu of state tests;
• An amendment was adopted that would allow states to use federal funds to audit the number and quality of tests they use, and eliminate any deemed repetitive or of low-quality;
• An amendment was adopted that would ensure that American Indian children do not attend school in buildings that are dilapidated or deteriorating;
• An amendment was adopted that would allow funds to be used for programs and activities that are designed to enhance school safety.

Notably, the White House issued a veto threat on the House bill, arguing that the measure represents a big step on back on accountability, particularly for the poor and minority students that the federal K-12 law was designed to help.

Also, if you want a little refresher on the entire reauthorization process thus far, check out thistimeline of congressional action.Refresher: What's in the House ESEA Bill? - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Somebody wants to stop charter schools from having to open their records. - Hartford Courant

Somebody wants to stop charter schools from having to open their records. - Hartford Courant:

Stop Sneak Provision To Derail Charter Openness

The day before the General Assembly's session adjourned, lawmakers voted in overwhelming numbers to make it clear that charter schools and their management companies are subject to the state's Freedom of Information Act — just like traditional public schools.

Alarmingly, the bill, not yet signed by the governor, appears to be under threat by countervailing language said to be ensconced in a budget implementer bill that will be voted on in the coming special session.

The language should be stricken from the budget implementer. Gov. Dannel P. Malloy should sign the charter school-FOI bill.

Those nearly unanimous votes last week spoke forcefully. They said clearly that public agencies and those that act as the functional equivalent of public agencies — as do charter schools and the companies that manage them — should have to disclose vital information.

Information that, for example, shows how they spend their money.

Charter school management companies are not presumed in law to be public agencies, but should be. The scandal-plagued Family Urban Schools of Excellence that manages Jumoke Academy in Hartford is an embarrassing local example of the need for public oversight.

After all, charter schools, while different in some respects from traditional public schools, serve a public purpose and depend upon public funds.

Good charter schools and their management companies ought to be pleased to share their information.

The bill passed 142-3 in the House and 35-1 in the Senate. Yet it was put in jeopardy behind closed doors without notice or a hearing or debate, as happens far too often near the end of legislative sessions when the pace is too hectic for many lawmakers to keep up.

This was just a discussion, apparently, between legislative leaders or their designees and representatives of the Malloy administration about how to neuter the charter school-FOI legislation.

That shouldn't happen.Somebody wants to stop charter schools from having to open their records. - Hartford Courant:

Principal: ‘I cannot be part of reforms that eat away at the moral fabric of our schools’ - The Washington Post

Principal: ‘I cannot be part of reforms that eat away at the moral fabric of our schools’ - The Washington Post:

Principal: ‘I cannot be part of reforms that eat away at the moral fabric of our schools’

K. Butler, right of Benton, Miss., and Lynn Wagner of Hickory, second from right, speak to students as they are guided past their Opponents of Common Core table in the rotunda of the Mississippi State Capitol in Jackson, Miss., Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2015. . (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)

This is the ninth in a continuing series of letters between two award-winning school principals, one who likes the Common Core State Standards and the other who doesn’t. The debate over the Common Core State Standards has become so polarized that it is hard to get people who disagree to have reasonable conversations about it. The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news Web site focused on inequality and innovation in education, is hosting a conversation between Carol Burris of New York and Jayne Ellspermann of Florida (in a format that Education Week once used with Diane Ravitch and Deborah Meier as the authors).  The Report’s editors as well as both principals have given me permission to republish each letter.

Burris has served as principal of South Side High School in the Rockville Centre School District in New York since 2000. In 2010, she was recognized by the School Administrators Association of New York State as their Outstanding Educator of the Year, and in 2013, she was recognized as the New York State High School Principal of the Year. Ellspermann is principal of West Port High School in Ocala, Florida.  She has served as a principal in elementary, middle, and high schools for the past 24 years and is the 2015 Principal of the Year for the National Association of Secondary School Principals. 

The first letter was written by Burris, a Core opponent, to Ellspermann, a Core supporter. Burris explained why she once liked the Core but changed her mind after New York State schools began to implement them several years ago. You can read her letter to Ellspermann here. Ellspermann’s reply letter,which you can read here, explained why she thinks the schools in her district benefit from the Common Core. In the third letter, Burris explains why she thinks Core testing hurts disadvantaged students. The fourth, by Ellspermann, says that critics should not blame the Common Core standards for bad implementation and she writes why she likes the English Language Arts emphasis on reading text rather than allowing students to rely on personal experience. In the fifth letter, Burris asked Ellspermann why she thinks she needs the Core. In the sixth letter, Ellspermann responds by discussing why she opposes the opt-out movement and how the Core is working in her school. Burris came back, in a seventh letter, explaining why she doesn’t think the Core will do for students what supporters say it will. The eighth letter, from Ellspermann, (which you can read in the post below this one) talks about why she believes all students should have the same standards. This is Burris’ reply, originally posted on the Hechinger Report on June 4.

Dear Jayne,

I appreciate your belief that all states should have the same or very similar standards. I also believed in national standards before the implementation of the Common Core. Now I believe that variation among states is a strength, not a weakness. If there are different models used by different states, we can evaluate the quality and impact of standards, with an eye to improving them.

You wrote that you are concerned that we have “inconsistencies throughout the country, within our states, in our school districts and even within our schools.” Jayne, the Common Core will not fix inconsistencies among schools and districts within the same state. The large NAEP gaps among schools inthe same state indicate that factors beyond state standards are influencing student performance. The state standards did not create within-state performance gaps.

I am equally baffled that you believe it took the Common Core to move your teachers away from 50-minute lectures. “Talk and chalk” has not been the primary mode of instruction at my school since I became principal 15 years ago. Strategies such as cooperative learning, requiring students to justify their answer with text or reason and other active learning techniques have been known and practiced in good schools for decades. There was nothing in any state’s standards that forced teachers to lecture; and regardless of standards, bad pedagogical practices that do not promote learning, should have been Principal: ‘I cannot be part of reforms that eat away at the moral fabric of our schools’ - The Washington Post:

D.C. Council considers steps to restrict public access to teacher evaluations - The Washington Post

D.C. Council considers steps to restrict public access to teacher evaluations - The Washington Post:

D.C. Council considers steps to restrict public access to teacher evaluations

The Washington Teachers Union and open-government advocates are urging the D.C. Council to slow down a vote that would curb access to information related to teacher evaluations, one of the most controversial aspects of education reform efforts in the District.

A proposed amendment, included in the Budget Support Act that the council is scheduled to vote on Tuesday, would block public record requests for individual education evaluations, “effectiveness ratings,” observations, and other assessments. Summary or aggregate-level data would not be exempted from public release.

Elizabeth Davis, president of the Washington Teachers Union, said the wording of the measure is confusing and could potentially have broad effects, including limiting the union’s ability to represent its members.

She called it a “secrecy provision” that the public should have more time to weigh in on.

“Without access to this data, there’s no way for the public or our union to tell whether the strategies DCPS uses —l ike mayoral control — are helping students or simply creating school closures and high teacher turnover,” she wrote last week in a letter to Phil Mendelson, chairman of the D.C. Council.

Many states have recently passed or amended laws to protect teacher evaluations from being made public. Unions frequently advocate to keep such information private.

In 2010, the Los Angeles Times sparked a national debate when it published teachers names alongside value-added scores that attempt to measure a teacher’s effectiveness based largely on standardized tests. Many educators consider the scores misleading and their publication unfair.

[Virginia pushed into debate of teacher privacy vs. transparency for parents]

District officials said individual-level records are already exempt from public records requests from D.C. Public Schools because they are considered D.C. Council considers steps to restrict public access to teacher evaluations - The Washington Post:

Why ‘I believe all students should have the same standards’ — principal who backs Common Core - The Washington Post

Why ‘I believe all students should have the same standards’ — principal who backs Common Core - The Washington Post:

Why ‘I believe all students should have the same standards’ — principal who backs Common Core

In this photo taken Feb. 12, 2015, students in Carrie Young’s sixth grade class work through an exercise on their laptops during a practice session to prepare for the the Common Core State Standards test at Morgan Elementary School South in Stockport, Ohio. (AP Photo/Ty Wright)

This is the eighth in a continuing series of letters between two award-winning school principals, one who likes the Common Core State Standards and the other who doesn’t. The debate over the Common Core State Standards has become so polarized that it is hard to get people who disagree to have reasonable conversations about it. The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news Web site focused on inequality and innovation in education, is hosting a conversation between Carol Burris of New York and Jayne Ellspermann of Florida (in a format that Education Week once used with Diane Ravitch and Deborah Meier as the authors).  The Report’s editors as well as both principals have given me permission to republish each letter.

Burris has served as principal of South Side High School in the Rockville Centre School District in New York since 2000. In 2010, she was recognized by the School Administrators Association of New York State as their Outstanding Educator of the Year, and in 2013, she was recognized as the New York State High School Principal of the Year. Ellspermann is principal of West Port High School in Ocala, Florida.  She has served as a principal in elementary, middle, and high schools for the past 24 years and is the 2015 Principal of the Year for the National Association of Secondary School Principals. 

The first letter was written by Burris, a Core opponent, to Ellspermann, a Core supporter. Burris explained why she once liked the Core but changed her mind after New York State schools began to implement them several years ago. You can read her letter to Ellspermann here. Ellspermann’s reply letter,which you can read here, explained why she thinks the schools in her district benefit from the Common Core. In the third letter, Burris explains why she thinks Core testing hurts disadvantaged students. The fourth, by Ellspermann, says that critics should not blame the Common Core standards for bad implementation and she writes why she likes the English Language Arts emphasis on reading text rather than allowing students to rely on personal experience. In the fifth letter, Burris asked Ellspermann why she thinks she needs the Core. In the sixth letter, Ellspermann responds by discussing why she opposes the opt-out movement and how the Core is working in her school. Burris came back, in a seventh letter, explaining why she doesn’t think the Core will do for students what supporters say it will. Here’s the eighth letter, from Ellspermann, originally posted on May 21 on the Hechinger Report. Burris’ reply is in the post above this one.

Dear Carol,

In your last letter you asked if I support the Common Core because I “believe that all states should have the same standards?” Actually Carol, I believe all students should have the same standards. Where a student lives should not determine educational expectations. As educational leaders, we need to assure the public that we understand the challenges students face after graduation and that we are preparing them for college and the work place. College and career ready standards must be a part of K-12 education. Whether Why ‘I believe all students should have the same standards’ — principal who backs Common Core - The Washington Post:

Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding | Adequate and Equitable Educational Opportunity for PreK-12 Students and Their Communities

Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding | Adequate and Equitable Educational Opportunity for PreK-12 Students and Their Communities:

CCJEF is fighting to ensure that all CT public school children have equal opportunity to a quality education.

CCJEF is a broad-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that seeks to achieve an adequately and equitably funded PreK-12 public education system that is based on the learning needs of students and the real costs of delivering high-quality education in every community.



In 2005, CCJEF and several named school children and their parents filed suit against the State of Connecticut (CCJEF v. Rell) for its failure to meet its constitutional obligation to adequately and equitably fund the public schools. In a 2010 pretrial ruling, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the State’s constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs’ adequacy and equity claims. That trial is expected to commence sometime in 2015.

 

Is this how we need to pay for education?

• Home
 
• About CCJEF
 
• Issues & Research
 
• Advocacy & Outreach
 
• Litigation
 
• Contact CCJEF
• Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding | Adequate and Equitable Educational Opportunity for PreK-12 Students and Their Communities:

From Around the Web: Rumblings in WI - Living in Dialogue

From Around the Web: Rumblings in WI - Living in Dialogue:

From Around the Web: Rumblings in WI

---

In this trenchant look into the battle for Milwaukee schools, teacher/journalist Jay Bullock asks whether City Alderman Tony Zielinski’s recent proposal to reel in charter authorization is an act of principle or politics. Whatever it is, charters, like Rocketship, don’t like it. Is that why his fellow aldermen quicklytabled the proposal?

From Around the Web: Rumblings in WI - Living in Dialogue:

Low-Income School Districts Need More, But Many Are Starved Instead

Low-Income School Districts Need More, But Many Are Starved Instead:

Low-Income School Districts Need More, But Many Are Starved Instead

Fairness in school funding is “the sleeper civil rights issue of our time,” says Leadership Conference on Civil Rights president Wade Henderson. But it’s clear from a new report by the Education Law Center that this issue comes with a loud alarm: In many states around the country, the children who need the most support in order to succeed in school are actually getting the least.

Not only have states been generally slow to restore the cuts to public school funding that they made during the 2007-2008 economic downturn, but there are often extreme disparities between the per pupil spending in wealthy school districts and low-income districts.

“In Vermont, Wyoming, and North Dakota, high-poverty districts receive only about 80 cents for every dollar in low-poverty districts, while in Nevada high-poverty districts receive a startling 48 cents to the dollar,” the report said. Eleven other states had “regressive” funding patterns, 10 states had no significant difference in funding between low-income and high-income districts, and 15 states had “progressive” funding practices that resulted in low-income districts receiving more per pupil than higher-income districts.

“The four most progressive states — South Dakota, Delaware, Minnesota, and New Jersey — provide their highest-poverty districts, on average, with between 30% and 38% more funding per student than their lowest-poverty districts,” the report said.

Why does this matter? Because a child born into poverty needs more public support than a child born into a financially well-off family. Study after study has drawn a direct correlation between student achievement and poverty. When a child is less likely to have educational resources at home, is less likely to have a well-educated parent with the time to help the child learn, and is more likely to come to school malnourished, it makes sense that public school funding steps up to compensate.

Or so one would think.

The reality is that the way school systems are funded – primarily through local property taxes – guarantees that wealthy districts will have more to spend on their children than districts with concentrated poverty, unless states intervene to require that money from wealthy districts be used to help elevate children who don’t have the same advantages.

For those who think there is a red state-blue state contrast on this issue, the reality is mixed. Among the states that get an “F” in school funding fairness includes the blue state of Maryland as well as deep-red Texas and swing states Iowa and Pennsylvania. The states with an “A” rating include Louisiana, but that is no doubt the result of vigorous fights between school activists and Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal, who is a leading proponent of “school choice” and critic of public schools.

It’s also important to note that some states – Florida is a good example – appear to be more fair in distributing school funding only because their across-the-board cuts in public school Low-Income School Districts Need More, But Many Are Starved Instead:

Opinion: Torlakson green-lights teacher pay raises for union allies | The Sacramento Bee

Opinion: Torlakson green-lights teacher pay raises for union allies | The Sacramento Bee:

Opinion: Torlakson green-lights teacher pay raises for union allies

BY DAN WALTERS

dwalters@sacbee.com

From its inception, the most worrisome aspect of Gov. Jerry Brown’s overhaul of public school finances was his insistence on “subsidiarity.”

As he defined it, it meant that the state would pump more money into school districts with high numbers of poor and/or English-learner students, remove restrictions on existing pots of state aid and trust local officials to spend it wisely.

Education reform groups worried aloud that without strong direction from Sacramento, unions, particularly the California Teachers Association, would exert their influence on local school boards to claim much of the new money for salary increases.

The battle was joined in the Legislature and in the Brown-appointed state Board of Education, which was to write rules governing the Local Control Funding Formula.

In the main, Brown’s hands-off attitude has prevailed. Local implementation plans are being drafted in hundreds of school districts, and the unions are pressing for salary increases, saying they are needed to make up for years of austerity and to combat a looming teacher shortage.

That raised a question: Could money meant for high-needs students be legally used for broad salary increases?

In February, Jim Yovino, the Fresno County superintendent of schools, posed the question directly to the state Department of Education.

Two months later, department official Jeff Breshears told Yovino – and by extension, everyone else – that the “supplemental and concentration funds” meant to help the high-needs students could be used for salary increases only under “some limited circumstances.”

If all teachers in a district were granted a raise without any demonstrable benefit to high-needs students, Breshears wrote, “it would not be appropriate.”

Education reformers saw it as a minor victory in their quest to have the new money concentrated on specific students, but it also generated a backlash among those who saw the billions of dollars in new aid as a potential salary bonanza.

Last week, state schools Superintendent Tom Torlakson sent a letter to superintendents that skinned back on Breshears’ relatively strict interpretation of the LCFF rules, saying it “supersedes that letter.”

The money could be used for general salary increases, Torlakson declared, if they furtheredOpinion: Torlakson green-lights teacher pay raises for union allies | The Sacramento Bee:

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/dan-walters/article24273334.html#storylink=cpy

The CTU rallies for a contract and a lot more | SocialistWorker.org

The CTU rallies for a contract and a lot more | SocialistWorker.org:

The CTU rallies for a contract and a lot more

Gala M. Pierce reports from a rally called by the Chicago Teachers Union to prove that teachers and their supporters are ready for another fight against Rahm Emanuel.

Chicago teachers and their supporters rally for a fair contract and a just Chicago

 NO SUPERMAN will swoop down to save the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). But thousands of spirited, red-shirted Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) members and their supporters were in the streets to make their defense of public education at the CTU's Rally for a Fair Contract and a Just Chicago June 9.

Educator and organizer Tara Stamps, who forced a runoff election in the 37th Ward aldermanic race in city elections earlier this year, said the community has to stand up and fight not just for teachers, who are facing demands for a pay cut of as much as 10 percent in their looming contract battle, but for all public-sector jobs and services.

"You might as well put on your cape," Stamps said in a passionate speech near the close of the rally, after a march from the James R. Thompson Center down the LaSalle Street financial corridor to the Chicago Board of Trade building. "This is not a CTU fight, this is a public employees' fight...This is bigger than a contract: This means war!"

Stamps asked the crowd to repeat her words, and each time, a loud "I declare war!" echoed down the canyon of buildings.

And what was the demonstrators' answer to the city's claim of a $1.1 billion deficit in the CPS budget--which the union has been describing as "broke on purpose"? From CTU President Karen Lewis to the picket signs of individual marchers, the refrain was the same: Tax the rich.

"Make the rich pay their fair share, and if you don't, we'll be back on the streets," said Rhoda Rae Gutierrez, a member of Parents 4 Teachers.

Gutierrez lambasted Mayor Rahm Emanuel and School Board President David Vitale for suggesting a casino to fix the city's fiscal crisis when they constantly gamble away public money through toxic interest-rate swap deals made through Wall Street investment firms--and siphon money out of public funds for tax-increment financing districts.

Instead, Gutierrez advocated for a financial transaction tax for LaSalle Street and a graduated income tax.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE RALLY was organized after the Board of Education rebuffed the following CTU demands: a librarian and nurse in every school, limits on standardized testing, enforced class size limits and restorative justice measures to ensure racial justice in a system where the students are overwhelmingly Black and Brown.

The board countered instead by asking that the union pay for pension costs, which would amount to a 7 percent pay cut--plus more for health care costs, which would take another 3 percent bite out of pay.

Ilhan Avcioglu, who teaches history to upperclassmen at Kenwood Academy, agreed that something has to give, and the rich to need pay their fair share. He was most concerned about teachers keeping their jobs, class sizes ballooning and pensions being stolen. "Teachers are doing the best they can under these conditions," Avcioglu said. "The cuts The CTU rallies for a contract and a lot more | SocialistWorker.org:

The Washington Teacher: No Teacher Left Behind: The Story of Ballou Senior High Reconstitution

The Washington Teacher: No Teacher Left Behind: The Story of Ballou Senior High Reconstitution:

No Teacher Left Behind: The Story of Ballou Senior High Reconstitution

By Candi Peterson, WTU General Vice President

Ballou teachers stage a sit-in in the cafeteria with their students in protest of their schoolsreconstitution on Monday-June 15th. Follow
updates @TheWashTeacher - hashtag #TeachersMatter

In a letter to Ballou Senior High staff, dated May 21, 2015, DC Public Schools Deputy Chief of Human Resources, Crystal Jefferson announced the restructuring of the high school.

The Deputy Chief cited poor performance and the desire for the district to improve student outcomes as the reason to begin restructuring the school.

Staff were called into the school's auditorium at the end of the school day with only a day's prior notice. A "Frequently Asked Questions" fact sheet on Reconstitution was distributed. Instructional Superintendent (IS), Daniel Shea cited No Child Left Behind Act as the authority under which restructuring process will begin.

While NCLB allows any school district multiple options for restructuring, IS Shea and Ballou's principal, Yetunde Reeves said that all staff will have to re-apply for their jobs and only 50% would be selected to remain. Of course the schools principal will not be among those heading for the exit door.

Principal Reeves shared a PowerPoint presentation of her new vision for the next school year. Much like other principals before her, you couldn't help but think - here we go again!

Among the 65 teachers currently at the school, Latisha Chisolm, teacher and WTU Building Representative said only twenty-two teachers were chosen to remain next year. Chisolm says she was not selected to remain at Ballou.

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was enacted to improve education through a system of accountability for schools and school districts. Schools who fail to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for five years in a row must undergo a series of five restructuring options.

These options include: [1] reopening the school as a public charter; [2] replacing all or most school staff relevant to AYP failure; [3] collaborating with an external partner; [4] submitting to a State takeover; or [5] developing another major restructuring effort.

This is the second time Ballou has been reconstituted in five years. The last time was 2010. At that time Ballou had a 30 percent proficiency rating in reading and 26 percent in math for high school sophomores on the 2010 D.C. CAS. Three years prior (in 2008), Ballou's test scores were in the single digits.

Despite a reconstitution in 2010, Ballou's scores have declined even further to a 16 percent proficiency rating in reading and a 15 percent in math.

200920102011201220132014

0255075100

24

30

21

20

14

15

Reading

200920102011201220132014

0255075100

22

26

19

23

19

16

Math

The bottom line: this NCLB strategy doesn’t work.

Ballou, also commonly referred to as a "drop out factory' has a 63 percent attendance rate with a 50 per cent The Washington Teacher: No Teacher Left Behind: The Story of Ballou Senior High Reconstitution: