Monday, August 11, 2014

Manipulating test score release: “First, you’ve got to get mad!” | Bob Braun's Ledger

Manipulating test score release: “First, you’ve got to get mad!” | Bob Braun's Ledger:



Manipulating test score release: “First, you’ve got to get mad!”

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Had enough?
Had enough?
Why is it important to write about Cami Anderson’s decision to manipulate the release of the latest results of state test scores? Here is why:
Imagine your life, your livelihood, is based on a set of numbers over which you have no or, at best, very little control.  Depending on how those numbers go, you will or will not have a job. Will or will not be able to pay your mortgage, your kids’ tuition, your car payments, your utility bills, your grocery tab.
Imagine these same numbers are important to a group of strangers who have a very different agenda than yours. Strangers who don’t care what happens to you or your life but they do very much care about their own ambitions.  One of them, for example, wants to be, of all things, the president of the United States. Another is a woman who, from a distance, would appear to mental health specialists as, at best, a narcissist and megalomaniac who thinks—for no good reason—she’s got the answers to persistent questions about the best way to educate children. There are others involved as well—unelected political bosses whose fortunes depend on how you are treated, legislators without spines, union leaders who are empowered to calculate risks for you but who may be factoring in their own chances of keeping their jobs.
Imagine, also, that, because your jobs are supported with public funds, legions of twits believe—without the least bit of informed evidence—that a national history that includes slavery, suppression, Jim Crow laws, economic inequality, and grinding racism, has less to do with whether children learn than your own personal Manipulating test score release: “First, you’ve got to get mad!” | Bob Braun's Ledger:

The Vermont “No Child Left Behind” Letter that Tells the Truth | janresseger

The Vermont “No Child Left Behind” Letter that Tells the Truth | janresseger:



The Vermont “No Child Left Behind” Letter that Tells the Truth

The federal testing law, No Child Left Behind (NCLB), requires that states inform parents when—by the standardized tests required by NCLB—their child’s school has been identified as a “failing” school.  The problem is that, because NCLB required states to raise the “cut score” for student proficiency higher every year at the same time NCLB mandated that all schools make all their students be proficient by 2014, virtually all schools across America are now failing schools—by the ill-conceived mechanism of NCLB.
All but a hand-full of states have applied for and received NCLB waivers that the U.S. Department of Education has made available to states to release them from the ridiculous requirement that all schools be labeled failures and other penalties embedded in NCLB that have proven ill-advised or unworkable. To qualify for a NCLB waiver, however, states must meet the conditions Arne Duncan’s Department has established.  The primary requirement is that states agree to evaluate and rate teachers based on the statewide standardized test the state created to test all students as required by NCLB.  Washington state wanted to let school districts choose what test to use to evaluate and rate teachers, and Washington state was punished in April 2014, when the U.S. Department of Education rescinded its NCLB waiver.
A few states, however, do not have NCLB waivers. Last week Vermont’s Secretary of Education, Rebecca Holcombe explained why her state has never sought a waiver.  Holcombesent out a letter to all the parents of Vermont, as required by NCLB—to tell them that their The Vermont “No Child Left Behind” Letter that Tells the Truth | janresseger:

YOUR VOTE MATTERS ON TUESDAY: Just Say No To Carpetbagging In LAUSD1 – redqueeninla

YOUR VOTE MATTERS ON TUESDAY: Just Say No To Carpetbagging In LAUSD1 – redqueeninla:



YOUR VOTE MATTERS ON TUESDAY: Just Say No To Carpetbagging In LAUSD1

Written by redqueeninla in Education





We’ve endured another nail-biter of a weekend suffused with an oxymoronic army of paid “volunteers” deployed to Get Out their paymaster’s Vote and in the process consume mountains of cash toward the mortification of our democratic process.
What, you say – you didn’t know there was an election, even? Well then you must not be living in LAUSD’s first district, the one left bereft of representation last winter when its octogenarian stalwart, Marguerite LaMotte, discourteously died at a conference in San Diego [her passing is a deep sorrow to Angelenos]. Because political fliers of fabricated filth have been flying through mail slots there like Harry’s invitations materializing at Hut-on-the-Rock. You would have to be off the mail-grid to be unaware of this election … or not a resident of LAUSD1.
The void left by Ms LaMotte’s passing has attracted a furor of political attendants from far, far beyond the boundaries of this Angeleno megalopolis. Like the preceding schoolboard races of Bennett Kayser, Steve Zimmer and Mónica Ratliff, this race marks a steady escalation in the intensity of carpetbagger’s focus. What we have here is not just a local schoolboard election of parochial impact. In our very own LAUSD district #1 we are the incumbent hosts of a saltating national battle to privatize public funds.
Note well that these public education funds amount to a veritable treasure trove; the education sector is estimated to be one tenth of USA’s GDP. That is second only to the healthcare industry, and we all know well the muscle of that industrial complex. Note in passing the largely unrealized, underestimated one-billion dollar ipad purchase of suspicious provenance and at least as questionable utility. It is hardly a secret that those who benefit most from these purchases and decisions, have a broad and deep agenda that addresses children’s essentially only insofar as it augments their own mendacious one.
So who is this cabal of predators intent on denying our children books and teachers in the name of “civil rights”? Who is drawn to our little clutch of LAUSD1 kids? Have a look at the roster of financial boosters ginning up the pecuniary playing field. This list of “Independent Expenditures”, or “IE”s is a roster of groups maintained by the Los Angeles Ethics commission, and it is a work in progress with no requirement to report all activity until long after this election is history. The finances, agenda and supporters of these groups are not only incomplete, but are technically not part of any campaign, so in practice this setup provides plausible deniability to any entity they might support. Any tricks, dirty or otherwise, are divorced from their candidate’s oversight … and responsibility. And Alex Johnson is denying culpability for any of their mailers, roving bands of paid staff (the search for and salaries of whom have recently been removed from the campaign’s website) or community-dividing, truth-twisting antics.
But you can view your very own pdf of many of those mailers through that liston the Ethic Commission’s website yourself; you don’t have to reside in LAUSD1. As of Friday, Alex Johnson had amassed $769K worth of “Independent Expenditures” to George McKenna’s $114K. For good measure there is a special $25K IE fund just for the purpose of opposing Dr McKenna; there is no such uncivil counterpart from McKenna’s supporters.  The financial imbalance between campaigns is nearly an order-of-magnitude, accounting for the unregulated flurry of scurrilous claims that appall even Johnson’s highest-profile endorsers.
Follow this money yourself. The 6 IEs are as follows; let google be your friend:
  • Mark Ridley-Thomas’ pet “African American Voter Registration, Education & Participation Project”: $410K.
  • CA Charter Schools Association: $169K.
  • Eva Moskowitz of NYC’s “Great Public Schools” PAC: $46K.
  • CA Charter Association’s “CA Black PAC”: $37K.
  • SEIUW PAC for Alex Johnson: $22K.
  • “Saving Local Jobs”: $3K.
Ask yourself why, for example, does it appear that Eva Moskowitz is spending forty six thousand dollars on a school board race in Los Angeles? Or who is behind the “Great Public Schools PAC”? Follow the money yourself and decide whose private agenda you want representing your interests.
The bottom line is that this influx of cash is anti-democratic and corrupting. Dr George McKenna is an honorable, courtly educator with a real CV of educational accomplishments. While his politics in relation to the current LAUSD board is yet to be tested in real life, his passion and experience and competence as a professional educator is incontrovertible; his life-long dedication in service of Children unassailable. See for yourself the primary evidence of the defamatory mailings via the Ethics Commission’s catalog.
Such deceit never really could have managed to sway your vote against the exemplary Dr. McKenna, but the mailings are intended simply to instill sufficient confusion and doubt as to keep you from the voting polls. Don’t Fall For It!!!!Don’t repeat last June’s scandalous election turnout of just 13%. It only takes a handful of lock-step charter school conscripts in matching tshirts to turn out and turn this election. Don’t let a slovenly turnout decide this election in the favor of interests that are not our children’s. Let Dr. George McKenna do his lifelong work, fighting for the real civil rights of real children: overseeing their proper education. And let we the people do OUR work by turning out to vote our voice.
VOTE TUESDAY!
Follow this money yourself. The 6 IEs are as follows; let google be your friend:
  • Mark Ridley-Thomas’ pet “African American Voter Registration, Education & Participation Project”: $410K.
  • CA Charter Schools Association: $169K.
  • Eva Moskowitz of NYC’s “Great Public Schools” PAC: $46K.
  • CA Charter Association’s “CA Black PAC”: $37K.






Putting the PR in Student Power | EduShyster

Putting the PR in Student Power | EduShyster:



Putting the PR in Student Power

 A student group with some unusual connections *schools* reporter Sarah Lahm.

student powerBy Sarah Lahm,
EduShyster Academy
I don’t know about you, but when I was in college (#darkages), being part of a *student-led* group meant sitting around in someone’s dank dorm room, plotting how to get to the nearest town to buy beer. Oh, and one time, some of us wild and crazy know-it-alls actually wrote an editorial about a certain professor, who insisted on grading us according to a rigid numerical scale. 
Now, of course, we would recognize him as a data-driven genius, but back then, assigning numbers to students was considered reductive and demeaning. But I digress. Today’s young go-getters would never stand for such meek and minimal *student-led* activities. No, no, no. Today’s social-justice infused future transformational leaders have recognized that no one gets anywhere without a whole lotta spin control, and I’m not talking about the laundry. Here’s how I got schooled…
PR-buttonBehold the People’s Forum
My schooling began with the announcement of a *People’s Forum* for school board candidates was being held in Minneapolis. Mysteriously, no one’s name—person, group, or corporation—Putting the PR in Student Power | EduShyster:

NYC Educator: Mulgrew's Paws (to the tune of Santa Claus Is Coming to Town)

NYC Educator: Mulgrew's Paws (to the tune of Santa Claus Is Coming to Town):



Mulgrew's Paws (to the tune of Santa Claus Is Coming to Town)

You'd better sell out
You'd better not think,
You better watch out,
Which Kool Aid you drink,
Mulgrew's Paws are punching your face.

He's making a list,
He's checking it twice;
He's gonna find out who's loyal or nice.
Mulgrew's Paws are punching your face.

He sees you when you're voting,
He checks if it's Unity,
He knows if you've defied that oath
That you won't travel for free.

The patronage gig, the matching t-shirts,
The fist that will smash your face till it hurts,
Mulgrew's Paws are punching your face.


You'd better support mayoral control
And ratings designed
To fire you all,
Mulgrew's Paws are punching your face.

He sees you when you're teaching
He knows if you talk to MORE,
He knows if you've been bad or good
So support that Common Core.

You'd better pay up
Your Unity Dues
You better shut up
When new contract screws
Members or he's punching your face.

He knows when you are aching
For a second pension job,
He knows you'll vote for contracts
Sight unseen or remain a slob,

When Bloomberg denies
A contract six years,
Sit down and shut up,
He'll buy you all beers.
Or those Paws are punching your face.NYC Educator: Mulgrew's Paws (to the tune of Santa Claus Is Coming to Town):

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: WEEKEND QUOTABLES

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: WEEKEND QUOTABLES:



WEEKEND QUOTABLES

NEA Pres.-Elect Lily Eskelsen García
As educators, we believe in good testing. Almost every student in America will confirm that most teachers are neither strangers to, nor enemies of, tests. But great teachers know the difference between tests that help students and tests that harm students. -- AJC
President Obama
The United States is not going to be the air force of Iraqi Shiites or any other faction... And because Israel is so capable militarily, I don’t worry about Israel’s survival... I think the question really is how does Israel survive. And how can you create a State of Israel that maintains its democratic and civic traditions... And, in order to do that, it has consistently been my belief that you have to find a way to live side by side in peace with Palestinians. ... You have to recognize that they have legitimate claims, and this is their land and neighborhood as well.” -- Interview with Thomas Friedman
Helen Gym
Helen Gym, Philadelphia parent leader
But choice is just a sorry substitute when government gives up on equity. -- Interview in The Notebook
Bruce Rauner on indictment of his top execs
“You know what? Behavior inside large Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: WEEKEND QUOTABLES:

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Alex Johnson, who ducked my interview and at least six candidate forums, asks why Dr. McKenna won’t respond to the Deasy School Report?

Alex Johnson, who ducked my interview and at least six candidate forums, asks why Dr. McKenna won’t respond to the Deasy School Report?:



Alex Johnson, who ducked my interview and at least six candidate forums, asks why Dr. McKenna won’t respond to the Deasy School Report?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail
He has dodged multiple requests for policy positions, undoubtably because he is a hand puppet for the neoliberal corporate education reformers. — Robert D. Skeels
Neoliberal corporate education reform candidate for Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Alex Johnson holds a Juris Doctor, while I am merely a first year law student. That said, I’ve already learned that one doesn’t response to factual evidence with spurious rumors and outright lies. Johnson somehow never learned that lesson. To wit, in response to my carefully documented list of his recent donors, Johnson made the mendaciousness and shameless claim that the Reverend Jesse Jackson took money to endorse Dr. George McKenna.
Learning nothing from that experience, Johnson responded to the viral article calling him out on his Jackson lie by implying that Dr. McKenna refuses to go on record with his stances on issues:
Absurd on its face, Johnson’s latest statement is problematic in several regards. First, Johnson is not really in a position to talk. I spent roughly ninety days calling, emailing, and tweeting to Johnson, pleading for an opportunity to interview him on his policy positions. The opening quote in this essay is the result of those efforts. Moreover, Johnson missed no less than six community forums during the primary election, including:
April 14, New Frontier Democratic Club
DWP Community Room
April 19, Committee For New South LA
West Adams Church
May 8, Black Parent Union
Betty Hill Senior Center
May 12, California Community of Elders, reparations United, council of Black Political Organizations and ACCE Alliance of Californians for 
Alex Johnson, who ducked my interview and at least six candidate forums, asks why Dr. McKenna won’t respond to the Deasy School Report?:

NEA president-elect: Teachers are neither strangers to, nor... | Get Schooled | www.ajc.com

NEA president-elect: Teachers are neither strangers to, nor... | Get Schooled | www.ajc.com:



NEA president-elect: Teachers are neither strangers to, nor enemies of, tests. 


Here is an essay on testing by National Education Association President-Elect and former (Utah) Teacher of the Year Lily Eskelsen García.
A bit about García from her official bio: She began her career in education as a school lunch lady, became a kindergarten aide and was encouraged by the teacher to go to college and become a teacher herself. She worked her way through the University of Utah on scholarships, student loans, and as a starving folk singer, graduating magna cum laude in elementary education and later earning her master’s degree in instructional technology.
After teaching only nine years, Lily was named Utah Teacher of the Year for her work as an elementary teacher. She worked with homeless children and gifted children; as a mentor for student teachers; and as a peer assistance team leader in the suburbs of Salt Lake City where she taught at Orchard Elementary School.
By Lily Eskelsen García
As educators, we believe in good testing.   Almost every student in America will confirm that most teachers are neither strangers to, nor enemies of, tests.  But great teachers know the difference between tests that help students and tests that harm students.  While some of my former sixth graders might argue with this point, tests are not meant to be implements to torture and punish students.  Instead, tests should be designed to help teachers evaluate individual student needs and tailor lessons to meet their learning needs.
 This is an important point, because what is happening in our schools today with high stakes standardized tests flies in the face of what is best for our students.  This is what I call “toxic testing.”  Too often and in too many places, we have turned the time-tested practice of teach, NEA president-elect: Teachers are neither strangers to, nor... | Get Schooled | www.ajc.com:


Get Schooled: At long last, APS cheating trial begins
The long-awaited APS cheating trial begins tomorrow. As AJC court reporter Bill Rankin reported in the Sunday MyAJC.com:  The Atlanta Public Schools test cheating case goes to trial on Monday --- an extraordinary prosecution of 12 defendants, ranging from administrators to classroom teachers, all in the same courtroom ...

Why is Cami blocking access to test scores? | Bob Braun's Ledger

Why is Cami blocking access to test scores? | Bob Braun's Ledger:



Why is Cami blocking access to test scores?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Christie and Anderson
Christie and Anderson
Results of this year’s administration of the state NJ Assessment of Schools and Knowledge (ASK) tests have been delivered to the central Newark administration–but Cami Anderson, the state-appointed schools superintendent, has blocked school principals and other building administrators from seeing and analyzing them.
While building administrators in other school districts–including those in Essex County–have had access to the school scores since last week, Newark school officials have been unable to log on to the site where the scores are kept.
Passwords have been changed.
“The state is telling us we should be able to see the scores and begin developing analyses of them,” said one school administrator in Newark who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retribution from Anderson. “But, when we tried to get on the site, we were blocked.”
According to documents posted by the state Department of Education and Measurement, Inc., the private testing company hired by the state, districts should have received school-based NJ ASK scores no later than August 8, although the Why is Cami blocking access to test scores? | Bob Braun's Ledger:

My Interview and Discussion With Shaun Johnson.southbronxschool

http://www.southbronxschool.com:



My Interview and Discussion With Shaun Johnson

My first real encounter with Shaun Johnson, aka The Chalk Face, came about 2 1/2 years ago in one of those classic Twitter mash-ups.

I started getting into it with the commandant, Kyle Olson, of the über Right Wing, paranoid, and meshuga, education "advocacy" news aggregator, Education Action Group News. EAG News staff like to call themselves reporters or journalists, but really a bunch of hacks that troll the Internet for bad stories about teachers or liberal leanings of schools and in their best FOX News method make the story worse than it is.

But it was a few fun days batting around Kyle as would a cat do to a mouse before it goes in for the kill. I think at one point I had a producer at FOX News agree to have Shaun and myself on against Kyle, but Kyle demurred and wouldn't agree to do the show. Eventually he blocked us both. Oh well.

Shaun and I have stayed in touch off and on through the years. I have always had a great deal of respect for him and feel bad I got him involved in a little of my Twitter tiffs this summer.

I have a lot of respect for Shaun. He is very smart, very aware, and most of all, quite low key, but brutal when he sees a wrong.

So today I was on his Blogtalk radio show and we spoke for 45 minutes. We touched on many things, tenure, my lawsuit, and everything that is tied into both.

The full 51 minutes is here. Enjoy it.http://www.southbronxschool.com: