Monday, March 17, 2014

Teachers union adds three firms to list of DB busters - Pensions & Investments

Teachers union adds three firms to list of DB busters - Pensions & Investments:




Teachers union adds three firms to list of DB busters

031714 weingarten

AFT President Randi Weingarten calls the list an exercise in disclosure and transparency.
The American Federation of Teachers added three firms to its list of money managers and others that the union claims are assisting or supporting the elimination of defined benefit plans despite accepting billions of dollars of business from them.
The three firms — Aon PLC, GTCR LLC and Highbridge Capital Management — join 26 others first listed in April 2013 in the report “Ranking Asset Managers: A Retirement Security Report on Money Managers for Pension Fund Trustees.”
It is the union's second such report featuring what it calls money managers with top executives who have “contributed to, or sit on the governing board of, an organization that advocates for the replacement of defined benefit plans with defined contribution or cash balance plans.”
The new report will be distributed to pension funds on March 18. Randi Weingarten, president of the Washington-based union, said the union is not suggesting action be taken by boards of trustees; the

Everyone Has a List

Every Child Matters | Randi Weingarten

Every Child Matters | Randi Weingarten:



Every Child Matters

Main Entry Image


 New Yorkers don't hold back. They took a strong stand in the last mayoral election on many things, particularly on education: They want a new direction in public schooling, one that helps all kids, not just some, from prekindergarten through college. And that's what they got--a mayor devoted to the educational needs of every child in the city, to turning around struggling schools, to valuing teaching and learning over testing, and to supporting high-quality schools in every neighborhood. But scorching tabloid stories and an expensive advertising campaign have painted a different picture in recent weeks, accusing Mayor Bill de Blasio of throwing students out on the street. What gives?

The blowup followed the Bloomberg administration's eleventh-hour decision to co-locate 45 more charter schools in New York City public schools. De Blasio has committed that his administration will conduct a comprehensive review of the contentious co-location policy. Nevertheless, he approved the vast majority of the co-locations, denying those that would place elementary schools in high schools, overwhelm already overcrowded schools, or displace students with disabilities and special needs.
That sounded reasonable to most people, including many charter school advocates.Parents who had worried their children would be displaced or lose programs and 

NYC Public School Parents: A St. Patrick's Day Wish for The Democratic Party

NYC Public School Parents: A St. Patrick's Day Wish for The Democratic Party:



A St. Patrick's Day Wish for The Democratic Party

Author Terry Golway has a new book out about Tammany Hall, the Irish-dominated political machine that ran the Democratic Party and NYC for the better part of a century.  While he doesn't ignore the corruption, he focuses on the machine as a great provider of services, especially to the city's rapidly growing immigrant populations.

Schools were central to Tammany's program.  When I sat on the Panel For Educational Policy, the Chancellor would typically introduce the capital budget by claiming no mayor had done anything like Mike Bloomberg had to fund school construction.  I would always correct them by reminding them of John Hylan, the Tammany pol and son of Irish immigrants.  Hylan built 500,000 public school seats in the 1920s. 

Golway's book explains how Democratic reformers like FDR and Francis Perkins learned from the Irish 

NYC Educator: Why Skedula Still Sucks but Online Grading May Not

NYC Educator: Why Skedula Still Sucks but Online Grading May Not:



Why Skedula Still Sucks but Online Grading May Not

I'm on a UFT committee to study online grading. Since we're supposed to discuss it, I figured I'd better start doing it. It's something I've thought about, but put off. A lot of my colleagues do it. Many favor other programs. Some use spreadsheets, but most people I know who love it use Engrade. However, my school is set up to use Skedula. I don't have a whole lot of lovefor Skedula, as it's awkward, unreliable, and counter-intuitive, but I have to evaluate what my school uses, so that's what I did.

Skedula is enormously popular with administrators because it plays nice with STARS, the DOE record-keeping program they use. I'm told there is a process that very quickly uploads info from STARS onto Skedula. It used to take maybe a minute, but the geniuses at DOE found some way to inhibit it, so now it takes maybe five minutes. That's a big advantage for administrators who don't feel like sitting around uploading files.

Everyone in my school has an iPad, and Skedula has an iPad app that most of us have deemed unusable. I have a keyboard case, so that helps me with the web app, but it places a nag screen for the iPad app every time I open it. And while my keyboard works with everything, sometimes it simply does not work with Skedula. Also, Skedula forgets who I am on an almost daily basis, despite the fact that I ask it to remember my 

The List: New Jersey's 'Edubloggers' Talk Policy, Politics -- and Technology - NJ Spotlight

The List: New Jersey's 'Edubloggers' Talk Policy, Politics -- and Technology - NJ Spotlight:



THE LIST: NEW JERSEY'S 'EDUBLOGGERS' TALK POLICY, POLITICS -- AND TECHNOLOGY

JOHN MOONEY | MARCH 17, 2014


Ten of the state's leading education bloggers make every aspect of learning and teaching (and administering) their business


list button
Never short of voices questioning and commenting on education policy and practice, New Jersey enjoys a robust roster of active bloggers on the issue.
This list of the top education blogs in the state is loosely organized in order of influence, as gauged by a combination of quality, quantity, buzz, and an informal survey of peers and others.
Unsurprisingly, this list of "edubloggers" is dominated by those focusing on policy, a cottage industry these days, especially among critics of the Christie administration’s education reforms. Some bloggers concentrate chiefly commentary; others do a considerable amount of independent research and reporting. This list favors the latter.
A few blogs dedicated to the practice of education, rather than just politics, are included as well -- drawn from the sizable collection of edubloggers across the state, some with a national audience.

1. Will Richardson

A South Hunterdon Regional High School teacher turned speaker, author, and consultant, Richardson is a pioneer among education bloggers. Starting in 2001, he was among the first to integrate the Internet into classroom instruction -- not just in New Jersey but nationwide. Ever insightful and provocative – his mantra: “Time to Rethink Education” -- Richardson’s blog has evolved over the years and remains a must-visit site for educators thinking about the future of their craft. Just ask his 47,000 Twitter followers.

2. schoolFinance101.com

The site is home to Bruce Baker, a professor of education policy at Rutgers University. Despite the title, Baker takes on all sorts of education policy issues, in New Jersey and elsewhere, and has proved a leading -- and incredibly prolific -- voice of dissent to the Christie administration’s math in its school funding and its charter school policies.

3. New Jersey Left Behind

The brainchild of Laura Waters, a policy wonk by hobby more than trade, and an unabashed defender of the school reform movement. She also serves on the Lawrenceville school board, adding to her perspective. (Full disclosure: Waters is a regular guest columnist for NJ Spotlight, as is another member of this list).

4. A Principal’s Reflections

New Milford High School Principal Eric Sheninger writes often and regularly about the issues of school leadership in New Jersey. And if you doubt his influence, Sheninger has more than 50,000 Twitter followers.

5. Jersey Jazzman

Another Christie antagonist (and NJ Spotlight columnist), Warren Township teacher Mark Weber is among the best-read in New Jersey’s anti-reform circles -- and national circles, too.

6. TeachIngenuity

The blog is written by David Janosz, a longtime leader in the state on the use of technology in education. His site is a little more tech-centered, but is accessible to anyone interested in its mission of “developing the power of creative imagination in young people.”

7. Mother Crusader

Blogger Darcie Cimarusti is one of the early organizers of Save Our Schools NJ, a grassroots group that has become a leading progressive voice in the state. Her blog is especially focused on holding accountable state’s ever-expanding charter school movement.

8. Bob Braun’s Ledger

Braun has more than 40 years as an education reporter and columnist in New Jersey with the Newark Star-Ledger. Since leaving the Ledger, his blog has become a must-read in the debates about Newark’s reform efforts under superintendent Cami Anderson.

9. JerseyCAN

This is one of the newer education blogs in the state, created by an organization chaired by former Gov. Tom Kean and more aligned with the reform movement than with its critics. The blog itself is a joint effort of the organization’s staff, led by Janellen Duffy, education advisor during the administration of former Gov. Jon Corzine.

10. Brad Currie Blog

Brad Currie is a vice principal and supervisor in Chester district schools and a pioneer in a movement of New Jersey school leaders going online to share their ideas on how teachers teach and children learn. Currie cofounded the popular #Satchat discussions that take place on Twitter every Saturday morning, and span the country. His blog was a finalist for an Edublog Award in 2013.


‘CALCULATOR’ HELPS NJ TEACHERS FIGURE WHETHER THEY’LL MAKE THE GRADE

JOHN MOONEY | MARCH 17, 2014

Online tool helps determine where they might fall within new ‘ineffective’ to ‘highly effective’ evaluation system

teacher calculator
Figuring out exactly how New Jersey’s public school teachers will be rated under the state’s new evaluation system has been a little vexing, so the state Department of Education has put out an online “calculator’ for teachers to figure out how they might fare.
The new calculator goes a long way to simplifying how the various ratings – from “ineffective” to “highly effective” -- will be determined for the teachers.
To be sure, the tool offers a range of interesting scenarios, depending on the teacher’s circumstances.
For teachers who will be gauged in part on state test scores, even good ratings from class observations may not save a teacher from at least a “partially effective” rating if their students haven’t shown above-average gains on the tests.
Yet for the vast majority of teachers who will not be gauged on test scores in the first years, the classroom observations will be almost the sole determinate. These teachers are still being required to set student performance goals based on other measures, but at 15 percent of the rating, the calculator shows how these goals’ impact is limited.
For example, even a teacher who does not meet any of those performance goals would still get an “effective” rating if he or she gets at least 3 out of a maximum of 4 points in the classroom-observation component.
The department said the calculator was only meant to help teachers test out different scenarios that will lead to their final grade, which is known as the “summative rating.” These final ratings will still be set by the districts and, ultimately, the state.
“Official summative ratings are calculated by an educator's district/the Department, but this tool can help educators get a sense of how the various components of an evaluation can affect a summative score,” said a memo to districts last week from assistant education commissioner Peter Shulman, in unveiling the new tool.

UPDATE: Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: The Man From ALEC takes union $$$ + WEEKEND QUOTABLES

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: WEEKEND QUOTABLES:



WEEKEND QUOTABLES

Hoboken Board of Education president Leon Gold
“We are creating separate but equal school systems." By capping property taxes and fueling charter expansion, Christie “is increasing the segregatory effect of charter schools, while raiding our budget.” -- Salon
John Hagedorn
UIC Criminology Prof. John Hagedorn
But the reasons for Chicago’s medium to high homicide rate are not what police do, but what the city has not done. The problem isn’t gangs so much as the desperation of young black men. We don’t need magic policing tricks but real jobs, decent education, adequate housing, fair police and other steps on the long, hard road of reducing inequality and violence. -- S-T Voices, "What's really driving down murder rate"
Billionaires With Big Ideas Are Privatizing American Science
“For better or worse,” said Steven A. Edwards, a policy analyst at the American 

Separate is Never Equal. A great kids book.
I get lots of great books in the mail. I wish I had time to read and review them all. Today I got one of the best. It's called Separate is Never Equal: Sylvia Mendez and Her Family's Fight for Desegregation (Abrams Books for Young Readers). It's actually a kid's book, beautifully written and illustrated by Duncan Tonatiuh.It tells the story of the Mendez family's move to the farm community of West


The Man From ALEC takes union $$$, then pledges to slash Chicago school funding
Punch 62Okay, so what did AFT & IFT leaders get in return for their support for Republican Kirk Dillard? The Man From ALEC is now calling for a billion-dollar cut in Chicago school funding and a "scrubbing of the rolls" for Medicaid, the state's healthcare program for the poor.In the bizarre world of Chicago politics, there's also lots of "liberal" money flowing into the wa

Sunday, March 16, 2014

My Review of Proposed Privacy Legislation for Louisiana | Crazy Crawfish's Blog

My Review of Proposed Privacy Legislation for Louisiana | Crazy Crawfish's Blog:



My Review of Proposed Privacy Legislation for Louisiana

Posted on March 16, 2014




My apologies for not getting to this topic (and many others I’ve neglected) sooner. I may have finally bitten off more than I can effectively chew in things I’ve agreed to do. I have the best of intentions, I promise you, but sometimes my eagerness to help everyone runs smack into the limiting reality of my available free time.
While I haven’t been writing as much I have been working with different groups and gathering their input, and researching various stories, laws, and debunking other’s false research and statements. Consider that statement the segue into today’s post.
The Louisiana House Education Committee will be hearing statements and reviewing bills on student privacy, Wednesday March 19th starting at 9am. From what I’ve been hearing this should be a packed house in House, with many parents and parent’s groups eager to attend and be heard.
My good friend and fellow education blogger, Michael Deshotels, has been keeping track of the various education bills and posting them to his website. His last update was on March 10th. A link to that posting follows:
A number of parent’s groups and bloggers I work with have been very supportive of Schroeder’s privacy bill, HB 946. To my eye the first 5 bills Mike lists are very similar in intent and some of the 

Gates and Duncan and Their Common Core “Freedom” Charade | deutsch29

Gates and Duncan and Their Common Core “Freedom” Charade | deutsch29:



Gates and Duncan and Their Common Core “Freedom” Charade

March 16, 2014







In his purchased keynote at the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) (I know, huh?), billionaire-with-zero-teaching-experience Bill Gates insisted that the feds are getting the bum rap when it comes to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). As Huffington Post’s Joy Resmovits notes,
Gates went on to address critiques that the Common Core represents a national curriculum, a federal takeover or the end of innovation. He said these claims are false and distract from teaching — and that teachers can provide the most effective response to critics. [Emphasis added.]
However, Resmovits continues with details that do indeed implicate US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and his USDOE in attempting to fashion “a national curriculum, a federal takeover, and an end to innovation”:
The creation of the Common Core started in 2009, and thanks in part to nudges from the federal government via the Race to the Top competition and the application process for waivers from the No Child Left Behind Act, most states have adopted them. 
“Nudges”?? Come now, Joy.
Robert Scott: CCSS-adoption Pressure Is Real
Consider Texas Education Commissioner Robert Scott’s account of of the “nudge”:
“We had just spent three to four years developing our own college and career 

Keeping Important Pinky Promises? | Gary Rubinstein's Blog

Keeping Important Pinky Promises? | Gary Rubinstein's Blog:



Keeping Important Pinky Promises?

On the subway yesterday, I saw this advertisement for KIPP:
The claim is that “Our K-12 public schools promise to see each child to and through college.”
One problem with this claim is that even in the most generous study possible, KIPP’s own, only a third of students who completed KIPPs middle schools eventually graduated college.  This, of course, ignores that up to 40% of students who begin a KIPP middle school in 5th grade do not eventually complete 8th grade there.
In trying to figure out how they can make this claim without being sued for false advertisement, one thing I thought of is that in the picture above the ad, notice that the fingers on the students appear to be crossed.  Perhaps this is part of the SLANT posture, or maybe this is something that 

3-16-14 Schools Matter

Schools Matter:









Call Your State Senator Tomorrow in Tennessee

Local TV news in Knoxville has typical coverage below of the move by the TN House last week, which voted overwhelmingly to delay implementation of Common Core testing. Note that Mike Edwards, who leads off the "fair and balanced coverage," is the President of Knoxville Chamber of Commerce, a Board of Director member of the Teneessee Business Roundtable, member of the U. S. Chamber of Hor


3-15-14 Schools Matter All Week
Schools Matter:  Schools Matter All WeekNonstop hi-tech testingSent to the Los Angeles Times, March 14, 2014Not mentioned in the Times' editorials  (March 13, 14) is the astonishing amount of testing required by the Common Core and the requirement that testing must be done online. No Child Left Behind "only" required tests at the end of year in reading and math in grades 3-8 and once in

Is High Stakes Testing the Best Way to Improve Educational Performance Badass Teachers Association

Badass Teachers Association:



 Is High Stakes Testing the Best Way to Improve Educational Performance Among  Students of Color and Students Living in Poverty?
By: Dr. Mark Naison


 
     Since the passage of No Child Left Behind, there has been a concerted effort to reduce gaps in educational  performance  by race and class by promoting regular testing in all grades and subjects and rating schools and teachers on the basis those tests.  As a consequence of such policies, thousands of  public schools in low income neighborhoods and communities of color have been closed, tens of thousands of teachers removed from their jobs, and charter schools promoted  as the best strategy to combat educational inequality.
 
   Given the failure of these policies to achieve their stated goal- namely, to  reduce the Black/White and Latino/White Test Achievement Gap as measured by test scores or college completion rates- and the many other consequences of such policies which have been largely negative, we would like to call for a reconsideration  of High Stakes Testing by elected officials and educators in Low Income Communities and Communities of Color, along with a search for alternative strategies which might produce better results.
 
   Before we provide a critical examination of some of the negative consequences of High Stakes Testing- we would like to call attention to another approach, put forward more than twenty years ago, which has been neglected in the years since No Child Left Behind- namely community schooling and culturally appropriate pedagogy. In the 1980’s and early 90’s, many educators of color were urging 

Colorado Parents: Push Back Guide for Bullying During Opt Out/Refusal | United Opt Out National

Colorado Parents: Push Back Guide for Bullying During Opt Out/Refusal | United Opt Out National:



COLORADO PARENTS: PUSH BACK GUIDE FOR BULLYING DURING OPT OUT/REFUSAL







 Colorado parents have received their share of bullying and intimidation tactics during the month of March. We have created this guide specific to the situations they have experienced which include armed security guards meeting them at the door and security guards escorting child/parent to car when they attempt to come to school after testing hours are done for the day.  Children have been “quarantined, sequestered, segregated”  (yes – these words are used by the folks doing the bullying) away from the students (sometimes for the whole day) if they return to school after testing hours, for fear they will hear answers and then decide to take the test – even though they have already submitted an opt out/refusal letter.

Parents have been told that if their child does not take the test the child may not attend field trips and/or end of year activities. Parents have been told that if the child does not take the test the child may not qualify for AP or honors classes and may NOT be exited from ELA (English Language Acquisition classes).
One child was followed by a monitor for the afternoon for fear that the child might hear something about the test answers and then decide to take the makeup test. A parent found a policeman at his door – sent by the Colorado Dept. of Education – after the parent called the CDE to explain his desire to opt  Colorado Parents: Push Back Guide for Bullying During Opt Out/Refusal | United Opt Out National:

A Primer for Engaging Teach For America Supporters | Cloaking Inequity

A Primer for Engaging Teach For America Supporters | Cloaking Inequity:



A Primer for Engaging Teach For America Supporters

Screen Shot 2014-03-16 at 6.55.45 PM
Have you ever found yourself trapped in the insufferable position of having to tolerate a Teach For America true believer relentlessly bombarding you with justifications for Teach For America’s placement atop the corporate org chart of educational excellence?
Teach for America is a $300 million “non-profit” organization that executes a highly sophisticated integrated marketing communications strategy that includes traditional and digital advertising, a wide range of experiential and special event initiatives, and plenty of public and media relations.
With millions spent on corporate communications, it’s to be expected that Teach For America has crafted a concise list of focus-group tested talking points. With discipline matched only by GOP pundits, Teach For America’s “brand evangelists” (from the corporate communications team all the way down to the on-campus recruitment interns) stay “on message” by relentlessly repeating the same lines. The only problem? Many are deceptive at best, while others are downright false.
Here are some suggested replies for eight of Teach For America’s most tried arguments.
1. When a Teach For America supporter says: ”Teach For America might not be the answer, but it’s a part of the solution.”
This is how you might respond: To overcome the challenges associated with educational inequity, Teach For America’s standard of training would require it to be vastly superior to any school of education or alternative route – 

NYC Public School Parents: Video of our student privacy panel at the NPE conference in Austin last month

NYC Public School Parents: Video of our student privacy panel at the NPE conference in Austin last month:



Video of our student privacy panel at the NPE conference in Austin last month







Check out our Network for Public Education panel presentations on student privacy, held in Austin on February 29, with a short slice of my powerpoint (the rest of it is here), along with some amazing parent advocates who beat back inBloom in their respective states and districts: Jason France of Louisiana (better known as Crazy Crawfish), Rachael Stickland of Colorado, and Julie Woestehoff of Parents United for Responsible Education in Chicago.



We wrap up with Barmak Nassirian of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, who explains why student privacy is so critical -- and so endangered -- with the weakening of FERPA by the federal government and because so many states, private organizations and vendors are eager to collect, share and data-mine your children's  information.

All of these activists still remain working on this issue, pro bono, including advocating for state legislation to protect privacy,  well aware of how defeating inBloom is only the beginning of a longer battle.

For more information about the 2014 NPE Conference, visit our website and Diane Ravitch's blog, with links to many accounts of the different panels; see also videos of  the terrific keynote speakers, including John Kuhn, Karen Lewis and Diane herself.



Many of the activists I met for the first time said it was the best conference they ever attended, as did and many with whom I was able to re-connect; and I agree.  Please become a member of NPE to support public education, be kept up to date on our activities and be invited to next year's conference. 



Thanks to Schoolhouse Live and Vincent Precht for the video.

LISTEN: Ed Reform Stories from the perspective of people most directly affected by education policy Full film on Vimeo

LISTEN - Full film on Vimeo:





On TV, we have Bill Gates, Michelle Rhee, Arne Duncan and “Waiting for ‘Superman’” talking about failing schools, low standards, and China, but rarely do they ever talk about students.
Who is going to tell the story of public education? Is it going to be the corporate-education reformers who haven’t spent a day teaching, or is it going to be the students, teachers, and parents who live the realities of these policies every day in the classroom?
LISTEN is a documentary, created by a student, that attempts to tell those stories from the perspective of people most directly affected by education policy--the students.
For more information on the film visit listenthefilm.net

To organize a screening of LISTEN email us at listenthefilm@gmail.com
facebook.com/listenthefilm

@Listenthefilm @ankrsingh