Thursday, August 8, 2013

New school performance ratings announced by Texas Education Agency | Education Blog

New school performance ratings announced by Texas Education Agency | Education Blog:


New school performance ratings announced by Texas Education Agency


2
2
0
Texas schools received performance marks from the state for the first time since 2011 on Thursday as a new rating system debuted based largely on the two-year-old STAAR testing program. The new system is more comprehensive than what it replaced and addresses many of the complaints of school administrators about the old system that had been in place since the 1990s.
But it also includes a new emphasis on closing long-standing achievement gaps between white and minority students – a tough task for many schools. “Closing the performance gap is the most significant (feature) of the new system,” state Education Commissioner Michael Williams said this week. Districts and campuses received one of two ratings: “met standard” or “improvement required.” Schools also could earn distinctions in math and reading, and for ranking in the top 25 percent in student progress on the STAAR.
The 2013 school performance ratings were just released by the Texas Education Agency at this link


Read the letter Dallas County Schools sent to Dallas ISD teachers who also drive buses
WFAA (Channel 8) reported earlier this week that 37 Dallas ISD teachers who also drive buses for Dallas County Schools must decide by today which jobs they want to keep. Dallas ISD operations chief Wanda Paul ordered that the teacher cannot continue to do both jobs because some people were actually driving buses while they supposed to be on their DISD job. This afternoon, one of these teachers, F
Nearly 9 percent of Texas schools fail to meet state standards
Texas schools returned to the performance stage after a two-year absence Thursday under a new pass-fail rating system that found most districts and campuses up to par. But a sizable number of schools are struggling to close long-standing achievement gaps between white and minority students – now a key factor in the performance ratings. School districts and campuses were graded with one of two rat


By Texas accountability standards, most schools are doing pretty well
Much more coverage of the TEA’s release of the school and district accountability standards to come. But here are a few quick, depending on your point of view, highlights or not. To review: Four “indexes.” Districts can either get “met standard” or “improvement required.” Schools also get those, and can earn up to three different “distinction” awards. Without doing into detail about what any of
Dallas ISD has ‘met standard’ under new Texas school accountability ratings
The Texas Education Agency announced the new school performance ratings Thursday afternoon, and Dallas ISD has “met standard.” Districts and schools receive either that  grade or “improvement required.” In total, all but 41 of Dallas ISD schools also received “met standard,” meaning they surpassed the states goals in student achievement, student progress, closing performance gaps and postsecondar

Diane in the Evening 8-8-13 Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all

Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:






Why Should Parents Raise Money to Pay for Common Core Testing?
This comes from Jennifer Croslin Smith, a Tennessee parent and a founder of http://stoptntesting.com/. No more bake sales or raising money for school uniforms. Nope: “We were just told tonight at our Back to School night that our PTO is foregoing raising money for iPads this year so we can instead purchase computers for Common Core testing which will begin in 2014-2015. We are lucky if we raise $

Will Philadelphia Be Able to Afford to Open Schools This Year?
This letter was sent today by Superintendent William Hite to staff members in Philadelphia. The only conclusion to be drawn is that the leadership of Pennsylvania and Philadelphia don’t care about children and whether they get an education. What are they thinking? My child is okay, tough for yours. Shameful!   Here is the letter:   Dear Colleagues, For weeks, the District has been awaiting additio

Arthur Goldstein: Who Failed in New York?
Arthur Goldstein, a New York City high school teacher, has a great article in today’s Daily News lambasting the Common Core and the tests based on the Common Core. Goldstein writes that if he gave a test and 70% of his kids failed it, his principal would be outraged at him. He wonders why state officials predicted high failing rates and then–voila!–the failing rates were as high as they predicted.
Arne Duncan: Will He Resign?
In his comments at a press conference about the collapse of the New York test scores, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said, “Too many school systems lied to children, families and communities,” Mr. Duncan said. “Finally, we are holding ourselves accountable as educators.” Since he used the term “we,” it means that he too is accountable for the lying and debacle in New York, where it was reveale
Sue Peters Says Thank You and Outlines Her Vision for Seattle Education
Seattle just held its local elections, and Sue Peters won a spot in a run=off election for the Seattle school board. She won 41% of the vote, despite being vastly outspent, and her opponent won 47%. Sue wrote the following letter, thanking the Network for Public Education for providing its endorsement, which identified her as the real education supporter. Please send her support if you can. Her we
LISTEN TO DIANE RAVITCH 8-8-13 Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all
Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all: In Plain English: Why “Reform” is the Problem, Not the SolutionAlan Brown, a professor in North Carolina, wrote this open letter to State Senator Berger, who has sponsored a series of destructive bills that were passed into law. It was published here. It is clear, informed, and coherent. The tone is friendly and non-confrontational

STAR Results for 2013 - Year 2013 (CA Dept of Education)

STAR Results for 2013 - Year 2013 (CA Dept of Education):

State Schools Chief Tom Torlakson Releases 2013 STAR Results



Statewide scores slip slightly amid budget cuts, transition to Common Core
SACRAMENTO—Scores on the annual Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) assessments slipped by a fraction of a percentage point this year as schools dealt with ongoing budget reductions and the transition to the Common Core State Standards, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson announced today.
Students managed to hold on to the vast majority of gains posted over the last 11 years, with a majority of students statewide continuing to achieve at the proficient or advanced level in mathematics and English-language arts. Only one student in three achieved proficiency in 2003, the year that the STAR tests became fully aligned to the former state content standards.
"As you would expect for a school system in transition, results varied from grade to grade, subject to subject, and school to school, but the big picture is one of remarkable resilience despite the challenges," Torlakson said. "While we all want to see California's progress continue, these results show that in the midst of change and uncertainty, teachers and schools kept their focus on students and learning. That's a testament to the depth of their commitment to their students and the future of our state."
Torlakson also noted that schools across the state continued to deal with the effects of years of budget cuts and financial uncertainties throughout the 2012-13 school year. Led by Governor Brown, voter approval of Proposition 30 in 2012 averted $6 billion in further cuts to education budgets.
The California Standards Tests, the major component of the STAR program, were given to approximately 4.7 million students in grades two through eleven in 2013.  Students attain one of five levels of performance for each subject tested: advanced, proficient, basic, below basic, and far below basic.
The State Board of Education has established the "proficient" level as the desired achievement goal for all students. That level represents a point at which students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by the assessment at a particular grade, in a particular content area. This achievement goal is consistent with school growth targets for state accountability and requirements of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
The 2013 STAR results show that a significant achievement gap continues to exist for African American, Hispanic/Latino, low-income, and English-learner students, compared to their peers.
"The long-standing achievement gap among student groups remains a matter of great concern and considerable challenge," Torlakson said. "We must move forward now so that all children—no matter where they come from or where they live—receive a world-class education that is consistent from school to school, and graduate ready to contribute to the future of our state."
Statewide, 51.2 percent of students posted a score of proficient and above in mathematics (Table 1), which was 0.3 of a percentage point lower than last year. In English-language arts, 56.4 percent of students scored proficient and above, 0.8 of a percentage point lower than in 2012. In science, 59.1 percent scored proficient and above, 0.4 of a percentage point lower than the 59.5 percent achieved in 2012. Students showed gains in history-social science, with 49.4 percent scoring at least proficient, an increase of 0.6 of a percentage point over last year's 48.8.
Looking at statewide mathematics results by grade level (Table 2), the percentage of proficient and above students rose slightly for second and fourth graders, and students taking Algebra I. There were declines among third graders, seventh graders, and high school students taking Geometry, Algebra II, and Integrated Mathematics 1. The percentage of proficient and above students was unchanged from the prior year among fifth and sixth graders as well as for students taking General Mathematics or the Summative High School Mathematics assessment.
There were similar results in English-language arts (Table 8), with gains in the percentage of students scoring proficient and above in grades nine and ten. Declines were seen among students in grades two through five, seven, and eight. Results were unchanged among sixth and eleventh grade students.
In mathematics, the percentage of Asian students scoring proficient and above increased by 1 percentage point (Table 5). African American, Filipino, and white students were unchanged from last year, while Hispanic/Latino students or those of two or more races lost a percentage point. Scores of economically disadvantaged and not economically disadvantaged students were unchanged as they were for English-only students. Scores of English learners declined by 1 percentage point.
In English-language arts (Table 10), proficient and above scores for Asian students and students who were economically disadvantaged were unchanged. For other subgroups, there were decreases of 1 to 2 percentage points.
Torlakson noted that with large-scale field testing of new computer-based assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards proposed for the coming school year, this year's results likely mark the last use of the STAR program statewide.
"As valuable as STAR has been, we're getting ready to raise the bar in California's schools," Torlakson said. "This coming year, many students will have their first chance to try tests that measure their preparation for college and the world of work. That's a huge challenge for every part of our education system—but one we have to tackle to give every student the opportunity to prepare for a bright future."
Full results can be found on the California Department of Education (CDE) Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Results Web page.

Background

The 2013 STAR Program consists of four components that assess California's former state content standards for English–language arts and mathematics adopted in 1997 and state content standards for science and history-social science adopted in 1998:
  • The California Standards Tests (CSTs) are standards-based tests that measure the achievement of California's former state content standards for English–language arts (ELA) and mathematics and content standards in science and history–social science.
  • The California Modified Assessment (CMA) is designed for students with disabilities whose individualized education program (IEP) team determines that the CMA is appropriate and who meet State Board of Education (SBE)-adopted eligibility criteria. The CMA is designed to provide students an accessible assessment of their achievement of California's former state content standards for English–language arts and mathematics, and content standards for science.
  • The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) is for students who have significant cognitive disabilities, assesses them in California's former state content standards for English–language arts and mathematics, and content standards for science.
  • The Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS) is for Spanish-speaking, English learners (ELs) who either receive instruction in Spanish or have been enrolled in a school in the United States for less than 12 months. The STS assesses these students in California's former state content standards for reading/language arts and mathematics. Students who take the STS are also required to take the CSTs and/or CMA appropriate to their grade level.
In spring 2013, the following CSTs were required for all students:
  • English–language arts for grades two through eleven;
  • Mathematics for grades two through nine;
  • Science for grades five, eight, and ten (life science);
  • History–social science for grades eight and eleven (U.S. history).
Students may have also taken end-of-course tests in mathematics (grades seven through eleven), science (grades nine through eleven), and history–social science grades nine through eleven) if they were scheduled to complete the corresponding courses by the end of the school year.
In 2013, students who had an IEP and met the SBE-adopted eligibility criteria were able to take the CMA for ELA in grades three through eleven, the CMA for mathematics in grades three through seven, the CMA for Algebra I, the CMA for Geometry, and the CMA for science in grades five, eight, and ten (life science) instead of the corresponding grade-level and content-area CSTs. Students in grade eight who took the CMA for ELA and/or science were also required to take the CST for history–social science.
Students with disabilities who were unable to take the CSTs with accommodations or modifications or were unable to take the CMA with accommodations took the CAPA in ELA, mathematics, and science (approximately 1 percent of the tested population).
Spanish-speaking ELs who either received instruction in Spanish or were enrolled in a school in the United States for less than 12 months were required to take the STS in addition to the CSTs and/or CMA.

Reporting STAR Program Results

Five performance levels are used for reporting the results for all assessments in the STAR Program: advanced, proficient, basic, below basic, and far below basic. The state target is for all students to score at the proficient level or above (advanced). The percentage of students scoring at each performance level is reported by grade level and subject for all students and for student subgroups.

Summary of California Standards Test Results

A summary of statewide student performance on the CSTs follows, organized by content area.
Mathematics
In 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above in mathematics declined 0.3 of a percentage point compared to last year (Table 1). (Rounded in Table 2). From 2003 to 2013, the overall percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above increased by 16 percentage points (Table 2).
From 2012 to 2013, there was a 1 percentage point increase in the number of students scoring at the proficient level and above in grade two, grade four, and Algebra I. This is an increase from 64 percent to 65 percent, from 71 percent to 72 percent, and from 35 percent to 36 percent, respectively (Table 2). Between 2003 and 2013, the largest increase in the percentage of students achieving the proficient level and above was 30 percentage points in grade five, increasing from 35 percent to 65 percent, followed by a 27 percentage point increase in grade four, increasing from 45 percent to 72 percent (Table 2).
In 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the below basic and far below basic levels in mathematics remained the same compared to 2012 at 26 percent. The overall percentage of students scoring below basic and far below basic between 2003 and 2013, decreased by 12 percentage points (Table 3).
The number of students taking the CST for Algebra I showed, continuing last three year's trend but in a lesser degree, a decrease of 27,535 between 2012 and 2013, compared to a decrease of 31,514 between 2011 and 2012. The numbers of students taking the CSTs for Algebra II and Summative High School Mathematics continued the upward trend, with an increase of 7,856 and 10,821, respectively (Table 4).
The subgroups of students showing the greatest 11-year improvement between 2003 and 2013 in achieving the proficient level and above were Filipino, Hispanic or Latino, and economically disadvantaged students, with an increase of 19 percentage points each. Similarly, though English language learners show a 1 percentage point decline between 2012 and 2013, they show a 17 percent improvement between 2003 and 2013. Though showing no growth between 2012 and 2013, students receiving special education services showed a 16 percentage point gain from 2003 and 2013 (Table 5).
For 2013, the percentage of not economically disadvantaged Black or African American students achieving the proficient level and above (42 percent) is 6 percentage points lower than economically disadvantaged white students. The percentage of not economically disadvantaged Hispanic or Latino students achieving the proficient level and above (47 percent) is one point below that of the economically disadvantaged white students (Tables 6 and 7).
English–Language Arts
In 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above in English-language arts declined 0.8 of a percentage point compared to last year (Table 1) (Rounded in Table 8). From 2003 to 2013, the overall percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above increased by 21 percentage points (Table 8).
Since 2003, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above in grades four and eight has increased by 26 percentage points; in grades five, six, and nine by 24 percentage points; in grade seven by 23 percentage points, and in grade two by 20 percentage points. In 2013, grade nine showed a one-year increase of 5 percentage points and grade ten increased by 1 percentage point. Grades two, seven and eight showed a one-year decrease of 3 percentage points. Grades three, four, and five each showed a decrease of 2 percentage points (Table 8).
The percentage of students in grades two through eleven scoring at the below basic and far below basic levels decreased approximately 15 percentage points between 2003 and 2013. This percentage of students remains steady from 2012 at 17 percent. In 2013, grade ten showed a one-year decrease of 3 percentage points in the students scoring at the below and far below basic levels. Grade nine showed a one-year decrease of 2 percentage points (Table 9).
The percentage of students scoring at the below basic and far below basic levels in grade eight has decreased by 20 percentage points since 2003. Grades seven and ten showed the next greatest reduction with a decrease of 18 percentage points in each of those grades (Table 9).
Hispanic or Latino students showed the greatest improvement since 2003 in achieving the proficient level and above (an increase of 25 percentage points). Filipino students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 24 percentage points. Asian students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 23 percentage points. Black or African American students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 21 percentage points. Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 20 percentage points, and white students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 19 percentage points. American Indian or Alaskan Native students increased their achievement of the proficient level and above by 16 percentage points. Though English language learners show a 2 percentage point decline from 2012 and 2013, they also show a 13 percent improvement between 2003 and 2013 (Table 10). 
Economically disadvantaged students had no increase from 2012 and 2013, but showed a 25 percentage point gain from 2003 and 2013 (Table 10). For 2013, the percentage of not economically disadvantaged black or African American students achieving the proficient level and above (55 percent) is equal to that of economically disadvantaged white students. The percentage of not economically disadvantaged Hispanic or Latino students achieving the proficient level and above (58 percent) is 3 percentage points above that of the economically disadvantaged white students (Tables 11 and 12).
History–Social Science
In 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above in History-Social Science increased 0.6 of a percentage point compared to last year (Table 1) (Rounded to 0 in Table 13). The number of students who scored at the proficient level and above on the grade-eight CST for History–Social Science did not increase between 2012 and 2013 but did increase by 25 percentage points between the years of 2003 and 2013 (Table 13).
In 2013, the number of students achieving the proficient level and above on the grade-eleven CST for U.S. History increased by 1 percentage point and a gain of 16 percentage points between the years of 2003 and 2013 (Table 13).
The percentage of students in grades nine, ten, and eleven achieving the proficient level and above on the end-of-course CST for World History did not increase between 2012 and 2013, but has increased 19 percentage points between the years 2003 and 2012 (Table 13).
Science
In 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above in science declined 0.4 of a percentage point compared to last year (Table 1) (Rounded to -1 in Table 14). Grade five showed a decrease of two percentage points. Grade eight and grade ten each showed an increase of 1 percentage point. Notable gains were seen in all grade levels since the assessments were first administered (Table 14).
From 2012 to 2013, Physics and Integrated Science 1 end-of-course results showed an increase in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above on the science CSTs. The largest one-year increase was 4 percentage points in Integrated Science 1, increasing from 20 percent to 24 percent of students. Integrated Science 2 showed a decrease of 3 percentage points, decreasing from 25 percent to 22 percent. Earth Science, Biology and Chemistry each showed a one-year decrease of 1, 2 and 3 percentage points respectively (Table 15).
The percentage of students achieving at the proficient level and above has increased on all end-of-course tests since 2003, with the greatest increase on the CST for Physics, at 24 percentage points during that time period. A total one-year decrease of 2 percentage points for all of the end-of-course tests was seen between 2012 and 2013, while those same tests showed gains of approximately 15 percentage points between 2003 and 2013 (Table 15).
In 2013, approximately 1.2 million students in grades nine through eleven took science end-of-course CSTs. Between 2012 and 2013, the number of students taking the CST for Earth Science decreased by 7,611, the number of students taking the CST for Biology decreased by 3,318, and the number of students taking the CST for Integrated Science 1 decreased by 6,623. From 2012 to 2013, the number of students taking Chemistry increased by 10,077 and the number of students taking Physics increased by 4,601. Since 2003, the number of students taking the CST for Biology has increased by 219,570, the greatest increase among the science end-of-course CSTs. Though the number of test takers is decreasing over the past three years for Earth Science, there is an increase of 109,704 students taking that test since 2003. Within the same period, notably, the number of students taking the CST for Chemistry increased by 132,047 (Table 16).

Summary of California Modified Assessment Results

The CMA in ELA was first administered in grades three through five in 2008, grades six through eight in 2009, grade nine in 2011, and grades ten and eleven in 2012. The CMA for mathematics was first administered in grades three through five in 2008, grades six and seven in 2009, and end-of-course tests in Algebra I in 2010 and Geometry in 2011.
From 2012 to 2013, the percentage of students scoring at the proficient or above level on the CMA for ELA increased by 4 percentage points in grade seven, by 3 percentage points in grade five, and by two percentage points in grade 10 and grade three. In grade four, the students scoring at proficient or above decreased by 7 percentage points and by 5 percentage points in grade 6 (Table 17).
Since 2008, the percentage of students scoring proficient and above on the CMA for ELA in grade five increased a total of 8 percentage points, from 28 in 2008 to 36 in 2013.  Since 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient and above on the CMA for ELA in grade seven increased a total of 10 percentage points, from 25 in 2009 to 35 in 2013 (Table 17).
From 2012 to 2013, the largest one-year increase in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above was 3 percentage points on the CMA for Grade Three Mathematics, increasing from 32 percent to 35 percent (Table 18).
The percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above for the CMA in grade five mathematics has decreased by 5 percentage points between 2012 and 2013; though an increase of 12 percentage points is observed between 2008 and 2013 (Table 18).
There was a 5 percentage point gain in CMA for grade eight Science between 2012 and 2013 with a 14 percentage point gain between 2009 and 2013 (Table 19).

Summary of Standards-based Tests in Spanish Results

From 2012 to 2013, most grade levels receiving STS results for reading/language arts (RLA) showed a decrease in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above. There was no change in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above from 2012 to 2013 in RLA for grades six and seven (Table 20).
From 2008 to 2013, the largest increase in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above for RLA was 5 percentage points in grade four, from 30 to 35 followed by grade three with 3 percentage points, from 34 to 37 (Table 20).
From 2008 to 2013, the largest increase in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient level and above for mathematics was 5 percentage points in grade four. Grades three and five showed an increase of 2 percentage points respectively (Table 21).
# # # #
Tom Torlakson — State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Communications Division, Room 5206, 916-319-0818, Fax 916-319-0100

That’s your major? Have Fun Flipping Burgers! Student Voice

Student Voice:

That’s your major? Have Fun Flipping Burgers!


Forget that, and study what you love.
For the first half of my academic career I was a history major. I chose history because I love it- I’m an avowed and unabashed history buff and I’ve never regretted my scholastic path. I took some incredible classes, had a blast, I can give my wife context and background info when we watch movies or TV shows about history (she jokingly refers to it as “boring her to tears”) and I’ve been consistently employed since I graduated. Admittedly, I went into education post-grad, which led me to guidance counseling, but history gave me a broad base of perspective regarding how people work in society and how they’ve always worked, which was a huge benefit for both school and work. That understanding has been at least as important to me in my professional life as the ed courses were.
When I was in school and answered the unavoidable “What are you studying?” query from my parents and their friends, relatives and anyone else over 35, at least half of the time I’d get the token grown-up response. That inevitable response was a variation of, “So you’ll be flipping burgers then!” *Hearty guffaw* “Why don’t you… study electrical engineering/engineering/business/MBA/IT/software/hardware/accounting” etc. If there’s one lesson that my history major has stamped indelibly into my understanding of the world it’s that human nature in its essence doesn’t change.
I’d bet that during Greek’s Golden Age of philosophical enlightenment Aristotle was implored by his father to abandon this “philosophy” foolishness with Socrates and Plato and focus on a real career, like medicine.
- See more at: http://www.stuvoice.org/2013/08/08/thats-your-major-have-fun-flipping-burgers/?utm_source=feedly#sthash.H0poRieX.dpuf

Are education reforms harming poor kids? Study finds testing is pushing out play for young kids | Pass / Fail | 89.3 KPCC

Are education reforms harming poor kids? Study finds testing is pushing out play for young kids | Pass / Fail | 89.3 KPCC:

Are education reforms harming poor kids? Study finds testing is pushing out play for young kids

California Children's Academy Budget Cuts Preschool Education

Mae Ryan/KPCC

A teacher at Jardรญn de Niรฑos plays with kids at the school in Lincoln Heights, which receives funding from the California Department of Education.
A new survey by a nonprofit to find out how current education reforms are affecting early education teaching and learning, has found that poor children are receiving a developmentally inappropriate education in their earliest years while their more wealthy peers are likely to get more appropriate lessons.
It's not a scientific study - it wasn't randomized or controlled. Defending the Early Years posted the survey on its website and invited teachers and administrators to answer questions about education in the classroom for preschool to third grade. DEY's mission is to mobilize educators to take action around public policy issues that affect early education. 
The group said 185 teachers from Pre-K to third grade took the surver. And their 

AFT - A Union of Professionals - AFT, AFT Indiana File Request for All Communications Between Tony Bennett, Jeb Bush’s Foundation, ALEC

AFT - A Union of Professionals - AFT, AFT Indiana File Request for All Communications Between Tony Bennett, Jeb Bush’s Foundation, ALEC:

AFT, AFT Indiana File Request for All Communications Between Tony Bennett, Jeb Bush's Foundation, ALEC

Coincides with Bennett-Backer Jeb Bush's Keynote at ALEC Meeting in Chicago


WASHINGTON— In a call for increased transparency and accountability, the AFT and AFT Indiana today filed public information requests for all communications between former Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett and Jeb Bush's Foundation for Excellence in Education, ALEC and others since 2009. The request also includes for-profit education companies that fund Bush's foundation and ALEC, including Charter Schools USA, the for-profit charter provider that employs Bennett's wife.
The action comes on the heels of Bennett's resignation as Florida education commissioner, after news broke that he manipulated the ALEC model school grading system for donors in Indiana. And it coincides with Bennett-backer Jeb Bush's keynote address at ALEC's annual meeting in Chicago. Bennett was a founding member of Bush's Chiefs for Change, which promotes ALEC model legislation to privatize and profit off of public schools.
"Tony Bennett put backroom deals and favors for political donors ahead of the children of Indiana," said AFT President Randi Weingarten. "The people of Indiana deserve to know how deep this cronyism went and the real connections between Bennett, Jeb Bush and ALEC. Public education should be about helping children, not donors."
Rick Muir, president of AFT Indiana, added, "We now know that Tony Bennett used his position to rig the game for his donors while punishing and sanctioning public school children and teachers. He not only undermined the public's trust in our schools, he betrayed his duty to help all children succeed. We need full transparency and accountability so that we can move forward and give Indiana's children the education they deserve."

EduShyster’s Goin’ to the EdReformies… | EduShyster

EduShyster’s Goin’ to the EdReformies… | EduShyster:

EduShyster’s Goin’ to the EdReformies…

When I heard about the education reform event of the year, I knew I had to go. With leading reform luminariesgathering to mark the 20th anniversary of the Center for Education Reform, it’s guaranteed to be a star-studded night of innovation, disruption and excellence that also puts students first. But there was a problem. Scoring a high-performing seat at this year’s special Rat Pack tribute by the all-star band, the Reformers, was going to set me back a cool $250. Then a generous benefactor stepped forward and offered to make my dreams come true. Reader: EduShyster is headed to the EdReformies!
Naturally you are on the edge of your own low-performing seat with questions, like: ‘Which EdReformie recipient are you most excited to see?’ ‘Is there really a band called the 

STAR test scores decline for first time in a decade | EdSource Today

STAR test scores decline for first time in a decade | EdSource Today:

TestStudent scores fell for the first time in more than a decade on the state’s standards tests.
The decline in last spring’s STAR test results was slight, an average of less than one percentage point for all tests in all grades, but is noteworthy because there have been gains every year since 2003.
The posted results are also the last the state will see on this assessment: Most of the California standards tests are being phased out starting this year due to the switch to Common Core State Standards. The new common core tests will begin in 2014-15.
Only those standardized tests required under the federal No Child Left Behind law will be given to California students this coming year.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson downplayed the downward turn saying the scores show “remarkable resilience” following years of budget cuts that are finally ending with voter approval of Proposition 30 in last November’s election. The initiative will raise millions for schools through temporary increases in sales and income taxes.
“While we all want to see California’s process continue, these results show that in the midst of 

Thomas publishes book about SF genre

Thomas publishes book about SF genre:

Thomas publishes book about SF genre

Furman University education professor Paul Thomas has published another book in the series titled Critical Literacy Teaching Series: Challenging Authors and Genres (P.L. Thomas, Ed.).
The third book in the series, Science Fiction and Speculative Fiction: Challenging Genres is published by Sense Publishers. Thomas authored the first book in the series, Challenging Genres: Comics and Graphic Novels, published by Sense in 2010.
In Science Fiction and Speculative Fiction, Thomas explores the broad category of SF as a genre that challenges readers, viewers, teachers, and scholars, and then as one that is often itself challenged. The collected chapters include work from teachers, scholars, artists, and a wide range of SF fans. It offers a unique blend of voices to scholarship about SF as well as examinations of the place for SF in the classroom.
Among the authors contributing chapters are Furman faculty members Aaron Passell (sociology), Michael Svec (education), Mike Winiski (associate director for Furman’s Center for Teaching and Learning), and Thomas.
- See more at: http://newspress.furman.edu/?p=7549#sthash.gWeV1MbP.dpuf