Larryferlazzo
tomwhitby
TheJLV
EDUCATIONCEO
Larryferlazz
Teacher performance. Standardized testing. Charter schools. Those are just some of the topics dominating the discussion on education reform. But what about something even more basic -- like how we talk about success and failure with children?
My holiday weekend reading included an early copy of "The Bee Eater," Richard Whitmire's biography of former D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee, due out next month. Full disclosure at the top: Whitmire, a former reporter and editorial writer for USA Today, interviewed me and devotes a few pages to The Post's coverage of Rhee, including mine. It's fair to say he was not a fan.
"The Bee Eater" (title refers to the oft-told tale of how as a young teacher she silenced a rowdy grade school class by killing and swallowing a bee) doesn't unload any real revelations about the D.C. schools story. But there are a few interesting new nuggets for Rheeologists. New to me, anyway.
One is the role Teach for America founder Wendy Kopp played in pushing Rhee for the chancellorship. Kopp had already been a key figure in Rhee's career, reaching out to her to run the New Teacher Project, a nonprofit that helps school districts recruit teachers. Whitmire reports that at the 2007 annual meeting of the NewSchools Venture
Ever wonder what’s being Tweeted about teachers? I never did. However, last night, I did a Twitter search for a site called “We Are Teachers.” That’s where the fun began. Instead of getting their Twitter page, tons of tweets came up with the words,” we are teachers” anywhere in the tweet. I found some of them very amusing, and wanted to share them with you, I left out the ones with profanity.:) I wrote them the way they were written. These are from students:
1. “I can’t learn history from a teacher who was born in the 70′s.”
2. “My PE teachers are retarded. They need to realize that if they let us run the mile WITH our Ipods we will be faster.”
3. “options,options,options, BLAH BLAH BLAH we all know wha
It was news enough that Gov. Chris Christie yesterday announced 23 new charter schools in New Jersey, the largest class yet of the semi-autonomous schools. Nine were approved for Newark alone, nearly doubling the total in that city.
But the breadth of his plans may be more profound in the legislation his office is preparing, essentially rewriting the state’s 15-year-old charter school law.
In a copy provided by the administration, the bill would open up the potential of dozens of entities that could approve (or authorize) charter schools -- including local school boards. It would clear the way for both private and public schools to convert to charters, while eliminating any number of existing restrictions on who can operate charter schools and for which students.
For example, among the charters announced yesterday was a school serving children with autism, and another that would have single-sex classrooms -- in a co-educational building.
But the scope of his plans do not stop there. Under
Colbert quoted Tedesco during the segment:
"If we had a school that was, like, 80 percent high-poverty, the public would see the challenges, the need to make is successful. ... Right now, we have diluted the problem, so we can ignore it."
Colbert responded with this sarcastic remark:
"See! Misguided government do-gooders foolishly diluted the problem by addressing it. We need
“If you were king or queen of Florida’s public schools, what would you offer up as an alternative ?
After posting a few crosswalk documents between the New York State math standards and The Common Core Standards on this site and at my place of employ, I’ve been very involved in understanding how these mandated national standards will transform our way of teaching students, and how we need to get parents and students involved in the education ecology. By all accounts, the new standards are pretty good; light on how much we need to cover, deeper in the things we should cover.
Yet, this transition phase, like most other reforms, can often feel like it’s being done unto teachers and not with
Posted on 1/19/11 • Categorized as Revenue and taxes
Ten school districts have acknowledged that they’re headed toward insolvency this year or next. An additional 91 districts say they won’t be able to make ends meet two years from now, based on current projections.
The combination represents about 10 percent of the state’s school districts. It’s preliminary and may rise after county offices of education review districts’ financials over the next month.
But the totals are considerably lower than the 174 districts that last spring said they were headed for fiscal trouble. That’s surprising to Joel Montero, CEO of Fiscal Crisis and Management Advisory Team (FCMAT), the state agency that straightens out districts’
In my last post, I reacted to news from San Francisco, where a number of “persistently low-performing” schools will receive a federal school improvement grants (SIG) as part of the government’s “turnaround” policy. There are only four approved models or methods for school turnarounds, and the rigidity of the policy based on so little research and prior success has generated considerable criticism. My fellow InterACT blogger, Martha Infante, recently set about answering a question about schools in California: “The Affluent, Failing, Public School: Does It Really Exist?” And to no one’s surprise, the answer is no. Those of us in the profession are well aware that the ends of the school rankings spectrum reflect differences in circumstances and resources much more than they reflect differences in educators and their practices. Yet, school turnaround models approved by the government
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The Word - Disintegration | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
The House of Representatives is going to vote onH.R. 2 and H. Res. 9, which would repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as “the Affordable Care Act”). These two laws are already providing critically important benefits and protections for individuals and families across the country. Turning back the clock by repealing these vitally important laws would harm millions of Americans, and would once again allow insurance companies to put profits first.
Repeal would allow unfair and discriminatory insurance practices to continue. Repeal would eliminate important measures that hold insurance companies accountable. Repeal would once again impose lifetime or annual dollar limits on covered services, or rescind insurance coverage when an individual gets sick. Repeal would allow insurers to deny women coverage if they’ve had a Cesarean section, breast or cervical cancer, or received medical treatment for domestic or sexual violence.
Repeal would allow insurance companies to continue to deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions. Members of Congress are guaranteed access to health coverage even if they or family members have a pre-existing
Earlier today, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie announced his plan to open 23 new charter schools in his state. Just hours before this announcement, the NJ education department issued an analysis of new data on the performance of charter schools in the state (during the 2009-10 school year). In an accompanying press release, the department claims that “the data affirms [sic] the need for Governor Christie’s reform proposals to grow the number of high-quality charter schools…”
The release also contains several other extremely bold assertions that the results support expanding the state’s charter sector. The title of the actual report, which contains only tables, is: “Living Up to Expectations: Charter Schools in New Jersey Outperforming District Schools.”
Unfortunately, however, the analysis could barely pass muster if submitted by a student in one of the state’s high school math classes (charter or regular public).
It seems that the department compared the overall proficiency rates of each of the state’s 70 or so charter schools with the rates of the district in which they are located, as well as with the overall state average (for the