Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Parent to Broward School Board: “I will not go quietly into the night…” | THE OPT OUT FLORIDA NETWORK

Parent to Broward School Board: “I will not go quietly into the night…” | THE OPT OUT FLORIDA NETWORK:

Parent to Broward School Board: “I will not go quietly into the night…”

Image result for I will not go quietly into the night…”


 Brandy Paternoster is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit to make #180DaysCount in school.  Her compelling address at the Broward County Public Schools’ Board meeting yesterday, is an indictment of the district’s position and their appeal of Judge Karen Giever’s Court ruling on August 26.

Watch as she holds the Broward County School Board accountable for their failure to do what is right for students (beginning at 0:50):

____________________
Retired educator and Opt Out Broward administrator, Dr. Trudy Jermanovich strengthened Brandy’s position with her own address. Watch, as she schools Broward School Board on an authentic portfolio for third grade promotion:
“This board must learn to start trusting teachers. Give them guidelines and set them free to teach. You have the ability to stop playing games with children’s lives. I urge you to stop supporting the DOE in its endless attempts at stalling the Third Grade lawsuit.”

____________________
Here is a transcript of Brandy’ Paternoster’s address:
“Good afternoon. My name is Brandy Paternoster and these are my 4th grade twins, Dylan and Jadyn. They have attended Manatee Bay Elementary in Weston since the first grade. They passed the 3rd grade last year …according to their teachers and according to their report cards, but the district says they must be retained.
My children met test participation requirement by signing the FSA test booklet and breaking the seal. At no time was I ever notified that either child has a reading deficiency. Two days before school ended, the principal advised us that without a test score, both children did not meet criteria to be promoted to 4th grade. I requested that a portfolio of their school work be compiled to prove proficiency as outlined in state Administrative Code and was told that such a thing does not exist. I demanded that my children be promoted based on their report cards per Florida Statute 1008.25 (6)(b)7.c)1.which clearly states:
“Requests for good cause exemptions for students from the mandatory retention requirement… …shall consist only of the existing PMP, IEP, report card, or student portfolio.”
I was ignored. The principal stated that it was coming down from the district and that without a test score, her hands were tied.
“Let’s get them to 4th grade” she said. “That’s where they should be! Just have them take the SAT-10 test and this can all be resolved!”
I refused any additional testing because test participation requirement had already been met and our children are more than a test score!
As part of the school board’s case against us in the “3rd Grade Retention Lawsuit” the principal filed an affidavit. Here is a quote:
“18. Based on the above information and my numerous years as an educator, I do not believe either student has the reading ability to complete 4th grade material.”
-Heather Hedman-DeVaughn, Principal – Manatee Bay Elementary
This is a direct quote from the principal’s sworn statement. Let that sink in. Back in June, all they needed was a test score to promote. Now, all of a sudden, they are not even proficient? You see, in addition to providing the facts and dates and emails and documents as required of her in her affidavit, this “educator” made a choice. Her statement could have read, “Because they did not meet the state requirement…” or “Because they don’t have a test score…” and though I don’t agree with either statement, they would still have supported the districts stance without crossing any lines. But she didn’t. She made a choice. For a test score.
“I do not believe either student has the reading ability to complete 4th grade material.”
She chose to lie. I don’t know if her statement was influenced by her supervisors (I suspect that it was) or if she chose those words all by herself. We may never know, but make no mistake, she made a choice.
Mrs. DeVaughn made a choice to NOT stand up for children who were present in the classroom for 180 days of work, who do not have a reading deficiency and who clearly are on grade level. She chose not to support her teachers, whom she hired, or their ability to teach and grade students effectively and accurately. She chose not to trust in their teaching certificates or their degrees or their most basic moral character. She chose not to back her own school or the systems she has put in place to ensure her wards navigate the education system successfully.
Mrs. DeVaughn chose to support a testing system that is broken and in doing so betrayed it all. Her statement says that her school failed to catch, not one, but two students who supposedly can’t keep up but passed all subjects. It says that her hiring practices failed. It says that two good teachers are incompetent liars. It says that two amazing children are failures.
For a test score.
Mrs. DeVaughn chose to sacrifice 2 children to the gods of “The Test” presumably to garner some unimaginable favor. She chose wrong. And you, as school board members, chose wrong when you decided to appeal Judge Gievers’ ruling. Her ruling untied your hands and gave you the opportunity to say, “Ya know what, we screwed up, but we’re gonna fix it now,” but you didn’t.
I leave you with one final thought.
My tax dollars, your tax dollars are paying for lawyers to fight against children who are clearly proficient, as defined by the letter of the law – to punish me for standing up and saying “NO” to a flawed testing system. Our tax dollars are being used to appeal the judge’s ruling, that was in our favor, that said, “Yes, the FDOE and the Broward County School Board did indeed act unlawfully”; to make an example of us for daring to have a voice and to ensure that no one else will ever be brave enough to do the same.
Let me be clear. I will not go quietly into the night.”
I stand here for our teachers.
I stand here for our children.
They are more than a test score!
Thank you.”
____________________Sincere thanks to the members of the Broward Teachers Union, who supported Brandy and Trudy by yielding their time so that they could properly address these issues with the Broward Board.
____________________
The plaintiff families are fighting to hold the FLDOE and school districts accountable to the PUBLIC.  They are fighting for all children in Florida public schools.
Support their efforts by donating to gofundme.com/StopGr3Retention

Why Destroying Public Schools is a BAD IDEA!

School House to White House:

Why Destroying Public Schools is a BAD IDEA!


School House to White House: The Education of the Presidents

First-grader Richard Nixon sits at the end of the first row. (Nixon Library)
Our modern Presidents received educations and participated in school activities in ways as diverse as their backgrounds and their political philosophies.
Some of the Presidents attended neighborhood public schools, and some of them learned in rural classrooms; others studied under tutors and attended prestigious private schools. Many of the Presidents participated in extracurricular activities and organized sports while they attended school.
The challenges of studying various subjects, completing homework, forming new ideas, participating in extracurricular activities, and making friends are part of the common heritage of an American education shared by everyone—including our Presidents. This is the premise of a new exhibit opening at the National Archives Building in Washington, D.C., called "School House to White House: The Education of the Presidents." It charts the educational experiences of our Presidents from Herbert Hoover to William J. Clinton and includes several items from President George W. Bush's childhood.
Bill Clinton (far left) at Miss Mary's Kindergarten in Hope, Arkansas. (Clinton Library)
Through the records of the presidential libraries—archival material, museum objects, and photographs as well as audio and visual material—"School House to White House" gives the public a new perspective on the presidency. It allows visitors to make connections and comparisons between their own education and the variety of educational experiences of our leaders.
Developed jointly by the museum and archival staffs of the presidential libraries and the museum staff of the National Archives Experience in Washington, D.C., the exhibit explores these future Presidents' activities in grade school, high school, college, and after graduation. Other sections of the exhibit focus on the importance of home life in their education and describe participation in extracurricular activities and sports as well as each President's reflections later in life on his education.
Young Herbert Hoover (center) with his siblings in West Branch, Iowa. (Hoover Library)
After premiering at the National Archives Building, "School House to White House" will travel to several of the presidential libraries around the country—allowing more of the public an opportunity to experience the exhibit.
The following brief descriptions of stories from our Presidents' childhoods and highlights from the exhibit illustrate the variety of backgrounds and experiences our leaders lived when they were in school.
* * *
Herbert Hoover with the Stanford Surveying Squad, 1893. (Hoover Library)
Herbert Hoover spent his first years of education at a small public school in West Branch, Iowa. He was sent to live with an uncle and aunt in Oregon when he was 11, after his mother's death left him an orphan. He would later say, "Iowa, in those years as in these, was filled with days of school—and who does not remember with a glow some gentle woman who with infinite patience and kindness drilled into us those foundations we know today." Later, Hoover became the youngest member of the first class at Stanford University, where he studied geology and met his future wife, Lou Henry. The exhibit features images from Hoover's childhood and young adulthood, including a picture of the Stanford University surveying squad, of which Hoover was a member.
Roosevelt (back row, third from right) stands with the Groton baseball team. (Roosevelt Library)
Franklin Roosevelt's political economy exam from the Groton School. (Roosevelt Library)
Franklin D. Roosevelt's mother, Sara Delano Roosevelt, closely supervised his education, arranging for tutors and educational trips abroad. She also read a variety of children's books to FDR, includingThe Great Panjandrum Himself by Samuel Foote. He later inscribed in a companion volume, "My mother read these to me before I could read, but I took keen joy in them for many later years." FDR attended the Groton School, where he did well in class and participated in sports and other extracurricular activities. He went on to Harvard, where he was secretary of the freshman Glee Club and manager of the baseball team, among many other student activities. The exhibit will feature documents and photographs of FDR's time in school, including a photograph of FDR with his fellow glee club members at Harvard.
Harry Truman's sheet music of Chopin waltzes for piano. (Truman Library)
Harry Truman and members of his family in a farm wagon at Grandview, Missouri. (Truman Library)
Harry Truman learned to read at home from his mother and attended several grade schools and high school in Independence, Missouri. "School House to White House" displays an example of Truman's eighth-grade writing. At the beginning of an essay titled "Courage," the future President, who would later be admired for his principled and honest approach to serving in the White House, quoted Emerson: "Behavior is the mirror in which each man shows his image." Outside the classroom, Truman was also a talented pianist and briefly considered a musical career. At age 39, Truman attended Kansas City Law School for two years while pursuing a career in public service.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (front row, second from left) with his fifth-grade class, Lincoln Elementary School, Abilene, Kansas. (Eisenhower Library)
Eisenhower kicks the football at West Point. (Eisenhower Library)
After attending public schools in Abilene, Kansas, Dwight D. Eisenhower entered the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York, beginning a long and distinguished military career. Later in life, Eisenhower remembered his family's emphasis on education: "From the beginning of our schooling, Mother and Father encouraged us [Eisenhower boys] to go to college. They said constantly, 'Anyone who really wants an education can get it.' But my father, remembering that he didn't become a farmer as his father had hoped, scrupulously refrained from suggesting courses of study." Eisenhower was a talented athlete in high school and at West Point before injuring his knee. "School House to White House" will include a photograph of Eisenhower on the Abilene High School football team.
Kennedy (back row, third from left) was on the swim team while at Harvard. (Kennedy Library)
Rose Kennedy wrote out a health card for her son John. (Kennedy Library)
As a child, John F. Kennedy attended several schools, finishing his secondary school studies at the Choate School in Connecticut. At Harvard he played several sports and concentrated on his studies. His senior thesis, "Appeasement at Munich," was later published as the book Why England Slept,which was a critical and financial success. In "School House to White House" visitors will see a report card from 1930, a health card written by his mother, Rose, and various class and team photographs from his youth.
Lyndon Johnson's third-grade report card. (Johnson City Foundation)
Lyndon Johnson plays catcher in this 1923 baseball game. (Johnson Library)
Lyndon Johnson's mother, Rebekah, taught the future President to read by the age of four. He attended public school in Johnson City, Texas. He enjoyed playing baseball as a child, and he participated in a two-person debate team that won the county title during his senior year at Johnson City High School. After working for several years in California after high school, Johnson returned home and attended Southwest Texas State Teachers College. In addition to various photographs from his childhood, the exhibit will display reproductions of Lyndon Johnson's third- and ninth-grade report cards as well as an invitation to his graduation from college.
Richard Nixon loved music at an early age and played the violin. (Nixon Library)
Richard Nixon grew up in Yorba Linda, California, and attended schools in Whittier, California. At two high schools he excelled in his studies as well as in debate. Upon graduation, he enrolled at Whittier College, where he continued excellent performance in academics, debate, and acting. Nixon went on to Duke University, where he was a successful law student. "School House to White House" contains examples of Nixon's writing from grade school and college as well as photographs documenting various stages of his youth and young adulthood. A highlight of the exhibit is the violin he used as a child. From his early years, he had a love of music and also played clarinet, saxophone, piano, and accordion.
Gerald Ford poses with other members of the University of Michigan football team in 1933. (Ford Library)
While at the University of Michigan, Ford joined Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity. (Ford Library)
Gerald R. Ford attended public school in Grand Rapids, Michigan, where he did especially well in history and government. A talented athlete, Ford was selected as part of the all-city football squad. He attended the University of Michigan and played center for the Wolverine football team. Although he was offered professional contracts to play football, Ford instead went to Yale University, where he worked as an assistant football coach and head boxing coach and later attended Yale Law School. The exhibit includes his 1935 University of Michigan yearbook, Michiganensian, and a written offer to play professional football for the Green Bay Packers.
Young Jimmy Carter with his pony, Lady Lee. (Carter Library)
Carter's sixth-grade report card demonstrates his good grades. (Carter Library)
Jimmy Carter was educated in the public schools of Plains, Georgia, where he was a good student who liked to read. His extracurricular activities included basketball and Future Farmers of America. One of Carter's high school teachers, Julia Coleman, had a positive impact on his life, encouraging him to participate in debate and to read books. Carter once said: "She encouraged all of her students to seek cultural knowledge beyond the requirements of a normal rural school classroom." "School House to White House" will display a reproduction of Carter's "Readers Make Leaders" certificate, which recognized his participation in a program begun by Coleman that kept the school library open during the summer. Carter attended Georgia Southwestern College and the Georgia Institute of Technology before being admitted to and graduating from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. The exhibit also features a reproduction of a letter Midshipman Carter sent to his mother, Lillian.
Ronald Reagan's high school story "Hallowe'en." (Reagan Library)
Like many of the modern Presidents, Ronald Reagan learned to read from his mother, Nelle. He attended public school and was a member of the 1928 class of Dixon High School in Dixon, Illinois. The exhibit features a reproduction of a handwritten story about Halloween that Reagan wrote in high school. In "Hallowe'en," Reagan wrote, "'Twas the nite of Hallowe'en, but nothing was still.' The good people went to sleep that memor[able] Saturday night, with the sounds of laughter, running feet, and muffled shouts ringing in their ears." Reagan attended Eureka College in Illinois, where he played on the football, track, and swim teams and was a reporter for the school newspaper.
George H.W. Bush played baseball while at the Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts. (Bush Library)
George H.W. Bush was accepted into Phi Beta Kappa while at Yale University. (Bush Library)
George H. W. Bush attended a small day school in Connecticut before he was enrolled, at age 13, in the Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts. While there, Bush was a popular student who participated in many extracurricular activities including organizing local charity drives and serving as the editor of the school newspaper. After Phillips, he was accepted at Yale University before leaving to serve in World War II. Bush returned to Yale after the war in an accelerated program that allowed him to graduate in two and a half years. His Yale baseball team played in the first two College World Series, and as the team captain, Bush was able to meet Babe Ruth before a game during his senior year. He was also accepted into Phi Beta Kappa while at Yale. The exhibit contains numerous photographs from Bush's time at Phillips Academy and Yale, including images of his wife, Barbara, and his son George W. Bush.
Bill Clinton (with saxophone) plays with his high school band. (Clinton Library)
William J. Clinton attended both private and public schools growing up in Arkansas and graduated from Hot Springs High School in 1964. He exhibited great interest in elected office, winning positions on the student council and as junior class president. He enjoyed music, playing saxophone in the school band and serving as band major. Later in life Clinton said, "I don't think I would have become President if it hadn't been for school music." "School House to White House" features a music stand used by Clinton as a member of the "Stardust" Jazz Band at Hot Springs High School. After high school, Clinton attended Georgetown University, received a Rhodes scholarship to study at Oxford University, and earned a law degree from Yale University.
* * *
As it is for most of us, education in school and related activities were influential to future Presidents and provided a foundation on which they built the rest of their lives. Whether in private school or public, whether growing up in a small town or a large city, each of our modern Presidents experienced a unique education that prepared him for leadership in the highest elected office in the land. Yet each of these exceptional Americans was, like many of us, a child working on homework, a teenager trying to make new friends, and a young adult choosing a career path. Like many Americans, Presidents once competed on teams, participated in their school's band, or worked on their school newspaper.
Ronald Reagan (second row, far left, with hand on chin) with his fourth-grade class in Tampico, Illinois, May 12, 1920. (Reagan Library)
President Ronald Reagan once described the National Archives presidential libraries as "classrooms of democracy." In "School House to White House: The Education of the Presidents," the holdings of these rich historical resources illustrate what our leaders accomplished in the classrooms of their youth.

This article summarizes information presented in the "School House to White House" exhibit and is based on the exhibit script developed as part of a collaboration among the professional staff of the Presidential Library System and the Center for the National Archives Experience.
School House to White House:

All the risk, none of the rewards for Michigan cities

All the risk, none of the rewards for Michigan cities:

All the risk, none of the rewards for Michigan cities


Lincoln Park’s financial emergency, declared in 2014, inspired some serious rewrites of employee contracts and outsourcing of some city services. Retirees had their health coverage yanked.
Now, the budget is balanced, if spare, and the city is poised to exit emergency management.
But what are the prospects for smoother financial sailing going forward?
Thanks to a triple threat of constitutional restrictions on tax revenue growth in Michigan, the answer is: Not great.
And so it goes for cities across the state.
I’ve been writing for the past month about the extent to which misplaced priorities in local and state government fetishize “low-cost” at the expense of important value considerations. And after the last piece, which focused on the way state law hamstrings cities with draconian limits on revenue growth and a miserly approach to revenue sharing, I heard from three people on the front lines of that battle.
All described, in explicit terms, the difficult choices they’ve had to make — about services, employee staffing levels, pay, retirement packages and more — since the recession.
But nothing they do is really sufficient, because the bounce-back in depressed property values doesn’t translate to revenue growth. Michigan has a general constitutional restraint on the growth in assessments, as well as two others — the Headlee Amendment and Proposal A — that ensure city coffers won’t benefit much from a rebound. The rate is chained to inflation.
In October, the Department of Treasury sent a letter to assessors statewide that the rate for 2016 would be .3%, commensurate with the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ inflation calculations for the year.
Good for homeowners, in dollar-and-cents. But bad for cities, which are left out of whatever recovery is taking place.
That’s the worst kind of false economy. Cities exist to provide services to the people who live in them. Services should keep residents safe, at minimum. Ideally, services create the kind of place people want to live. And from a pragmatic standpoint, services protect homeowners’ investment. Bad services make people move. When that happens, revenue drops further, services get worse. And more people move, in an endless cycle of decline.
I’m not sure how it makes sense to make local governments scrimp and scramble, even in the face of economic growth, while services languish. And I’m even more uncertain why our lawmakers won’t seriously take up the idea of changes, why we continue to employ a system that loves low-cost but doesn’t demand high value.
Homes in Lincoln Park have lost 34% of their taxable value since 2009, meaning millions in revenue has disappeared. That, together with the loss of nearly 20% of the money the city gets in revenue sharing from the state — that’s taxes collected by the state on the behalf of cities, and distributed according to two formulae — is what caused the financial crisis and sunk the city into emergency management.
City officials estimate the worst is over, and property values are projected to grow 1-2% over the next year. But state law will stop the city from reassessing property at anything higher than .3% next year — a fraction of the actual expected growth in Lincoln Park.
In Michigan, cities share in the pain wrought by economic downturns. They are prohibited from sharing in the bounty of growth.
Cities like Lincoln Park, which make tough choices to rebound from financial crisis, are further hamstrung by state policies that keep taxes artificially low in a way that sacrifices the value of effectively delivered services.
“Cost is not the issue,” Brad Coulter, the city’s emergency manager, told a local newspaper in September. “We have a need for revenue.”
Lingering effects of EM
In Lincoln Park, the state’s misplaced policy priorities mean emergency management and the recession may be over, but their devastating effects linger.
The city’s property valuation dropped from about $800 million in 2008 to $524 million in 2015, which meant a 27% drop in property tax revenue.
The city also lost about $1 million in revenue sharing over that time.
That has meant a nearly 40% reduction in full-time staff in a city that hasn’t suffered anywhere near that kind of population loss.
Government is now a bare-bones operation, “tight,” as Coulter describes. The property valuation growth is the result of a marketing campaign that attracted some new residents — but even that growth is subject to the cap. At the current rate of growth, Lincoln Park’s taxable value won’t fully recover until 2036; but tax revenue won’t catch up until much later in this century. Yes — you have to measure that recovery in centennial terms.
The city twice asked residents this year to approve a police and fire millage to stop further reductions. It failed both times.
“The residents have clearly spoken and they are willing to live with poor roads and All the risk, none of the rewards for Michigan cities: