Tuesday, February 9, 2016

ACLU unveils privacy fight in 16 states

ACLU unveils privacy fight in 16 states - Jan. 20, 2016:

ACLU unveils privacy fight in 16 states

states pushing privacy laws 2




Frustrated with increasing surveillance by the federal government and corporations, politicians in 16 states are pushing for sweeping privacy laws.

On Wednesday, officials proposed legislation to guard personal privacy and student data, and to make it harder for police to use high-tech spying tactics.
The measures, which vary in topic and scope, would protect the personal information of 100 million Americans, a third of the nation. They're being introduced in 16 states across the country, plus the local government in the District of Columbia.
Hawaii is considering a law that prevents a boss from demanding access to an employee's personal email or social media accounts. A measure in Missouri would offer that protection to students and workers.
New Hampshire proposed an "expectation of privacy" law that would limit how government agencies and corporations can access credit histories, DNA profiles and other personal information.
In all, 16 different bills strengthen student privacy. Three tackle concerns over Stingrays. Two bills limit automatic license plate readers.
Why the push for privacy?
We live in the Age of Data. Our movements, habits, purchases -- nearly everything is tracked. But there are few limits on how that information can be used.
Companies amass sensitive information to better target the sale of products. But they also use Big Data to determine individual insurance rates, borrowing fees and even airline prices.
The companies behind college entrance exams have been sued for selling sensitive student data.
Yet Congress hasn't passed broad reform restricting the use and access of data.
Instead, advocates have turned to state legislators. The American Civil Liberties Union is leading this massive effort, dubbed #TakeCTRL, with the broad support of local conservative and liberal politicians.
"There's growing recognition that our laws are inadequate in dealing with privacy rights of Americans," ACLU national executive director Anthony D. Romero said on Wednesday. "The federal government has been missing in action on these debates."
Michael Boldin is the executive director of the Tenth Amendment Center, which pushes for states to initiate national reforms. He said privacy is the only issue that's energizing "everyone from Tea Party patriots to Occupy activists."
"It's essential for states to draw a line in the sand and say your information will only be collected with ACLU unveils privacy fight in 16 states - Jan. 20, 2016:

What Happens to Students School-Lunch Bills Go Unpaid? - The Atlantic

What Happens to Students School-Lunch Bills Go Unpaid? - The Atlantic:

What Do Unpaid Lunch Tabs Mean for Schools?
Some schools are tossing out the lunches of those who don’t pay. Others provide free meals to all.





Like many parents of school-age children, Frances Frost tries to keep up with the papers sent home in her daughter Natalie’s backpack. Sifting through permission slips, picture day fliers, field-trip notices, and other forms seems like a daily occurrence, and often somewhere lost in the pile is a reminder to send money to her fifth-grader’s school cafeteria. As the mother of four, refilling school lunch accounts is second nature by now, but last week she was caught by surprise. When her youngest went through the cafeteria line to buy lunch, the cafeteria worker told Natalie she didn’t have enough money to pay for her food: Her mother had forgotten to make the last deposit.
The Silver Spring, Maryland, mom says the lunch server graciously let Natalie keep her selected hot lunch with a reminder to bring money for her meal account. Still, Frost says a process that subjects children to the embarrassment of returning their lunch—one that isn’t uncommon in schools across the country—just isn’t sound. “There should be a way to indicate before they get into line that they don’t have enough on their account to save [children] the distress of having to return their lunch,” she said.


A debate on school nutrition—trading pizza, fries, and cookies for whole grains, fruits and vegetables—has raged for years, while a parallel debate has gone somewhat unnoticed and unaddressed: What should be the consequence for children with delinquent school-meal accounts? While the most pressing issue in some school cafeterias is students tossing healthier school lunches in the trash, in others it is school employees dumping children’s lunches in the trash for nonpayment. And the result is hungry children, stunned parents, and increasing questions about how school districts handle overdue payments.

Last year in Bedford, Kentucky, parents complained and accused the local elementary school of “bullying” after a child’s lunch was confiscated and thrown away in front of her friends for running a negative balance. In Dowagiac, Michigan, Dominic Gant, a high-schooler, was left embarrassed and hungrywhen his lunch was taken and trashed for owing $4.95. A 12-year-old in Dickinson, Texas had his school breakfast dumped over a 30 cent debt. And two years ago in Utah, some 40 students had their lunches seized for unpaid meal debts in a case that caused a national uproar. A parent of one of the Utah childrentold the Salt Lake Tribune it was a “despicable” act, and questioned why children should be “punished or humiliated for something the parents obviously need to What Happens to Students School-Lunch Bills Go Unpaid? - The Atlantic:

Politics, the Super Bowl, and, of course, the Children – the becoming radical

Politics, the Super Bowl, and, of course, the Children – the becoming radical:

Politics, the Super Bowl, and, of course, the Children



This was supposed to be another post about good teachers because I was invited to speak to a class of 4th graders about writing public opinion pieces and that experience confirmed myrecent assertion that to know if a teacher is good just watch and listen to the students.
The short version of that blog: the students were vibrant and smart—reflecting just how wonderful their teacher is.
During that visit, however, the teacher asked if we could have a brief debate so the students could think about how to pose their arguments. When a student asked what I was thinking about writing next, I mentioned the Super Bowl halftime show, specifically Beyoncé’s performance.
For several minutes, I was confronted by a classroom of children adamant that Beyoncé and her backup dancers were inappropriate for the show; their clothing and dancing, the children argued, were not appropriate for children watching on TV and attending the game.
I asked them to consider how we have different standards for how women dress and behave, and I asked about whether it was appropriate for children to watch the NFL, considering the violence of the sport, and the commercials, such as those for beer.
The children never budged, noting that children, in fact, play football (boys are just violent, they argued) and rambling into a very casual acceptance of children having guns and knives (for hunting).
But Beyoncé? Not appropriate for prime time (and the children).
Of course, these students were mostly voicing the opinion of their parents and other adults, highlighting, I think, the influence of every child’s home on who they are and how they think.
These students’ arguments also reflect something that almost no one is addressing about the Super Bowl: everything about the Super Bowl is political. Everything.
Those who criticize Beyoncé for her political performance and chastise the hoodied Cam Newton for over-celebrating throughout the season and his sulking post-Super Bowl defeat are silent during the NFL’s ritualistic flag waving and hiding behind the U.S. military—some of  Politics, the Super Bowl, and, of course, the Children – the becoming radical:

State Takeover Failure: Financial Mismanagement & Student Harm – Cloaking Inequity

State Takeover Failure: Financial Mismanagement & Student Harm – Cloaking Inequity:

State Takeover Failure: Financial Mismanagement & Student Harm

Today the Center for Popular Democracy is releasing the report State Takeovers of Low-Performing Schools: A Record of Academic Failure, Financial Mismanagement & Student Harm. The report is an important compendium of information about hostile state takeovers of urban schools. The Center for Popular Democracy is,
a high-impact national organization that builds organizing power to transform the local and state policy landscape through deep, long-term partnerships with leading community-based organizing groups nationwide.
They work to,
create equity, opportunity and a dynamic democracy in partnership with high-impact base-building organizations, organizing alliances, and progressive unions. CPD strengthens our collective capacity to envision and win an innovative pro-worker, pro-immigrant, racial and economic justice agenda.
I was asked by the Center for Popular Democracy to write a forward for the report.


Politicians have recently focused on implementing policies to create achievement districts in cities across the country. These are districts populated by schools which are privately controlled, yet operated with public money. Achievement districts are a highly contentious, top-down down policy that essentially amounts to a hostile state takeover of local schools. In Detroit and Tennessee, achievement districts have initially impacted only a minority of schools. However, politicians are now trying to close entire districts and turn them over to State Takeover Failure: Financial Mismanagement & Student Harm – Cloaking Inequity:

ED needs primer on flexibility and local control :: SI&A Cabinet Report

ED needs primer on flexibility and local control :: SI&A Cabinet Report :: The Essential Resource for Superintendents and the Cabinet:

ED needs primer on flexibility and local control


Anyone looking for examples of compulsive micro-management by government officials need look no further than the latest advisories from the U.S. Department of Education on the implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
The White House proclaimed in a press release issued on the day President Barack Obama signed ESSA into law that it would “[e]mpower state and local decision-makers to develop their own strong systems for school improvement based upon evidence, rather than imposing cookie-cutter federal solutions like No Child Left Behind (NCLB) did.” But ED wasted no time (one week plus a day) in cautioning districts that certain provisions of NCLB must remain in place, regardless of the flexibility foundational to ESSA, through the upcoming summer months.
Less than two months later, the Department was at it again, insisting that other components must continue through next school year – again, in direct opposition to the intent of the new legislation. The directive is a remarkably curious development, given the fact that former Secretary of Education Arne Duncan was passing out waivers like so many candy Valentine’s Day hearts the last three years that NCLB remained in effect. On the other hand, maybe the behavior is not strange at all since the Education Department seems more concerned with advancing its own agenda (no matter what law is in effect) than allowing states to determine ways to improve their schools for themselves.
To justify its edicts ED is taking advantage of the portion of ESSA that gives the Secretary of Education authority to take steps to ensure an “orderly transition” from programs presently in place to the revised requirements specified in state plans (yet to be developed and approved). (ESSA §4(b))
It should be pointed out that the phrase does not translate into seizing total control in order to mandate regulations that are inconsistent with ESSA. This objection is especially pertinent given ED needs primer on flexibility and local control :: SI&A Cabinet Report :: The Essential Resource for Superintendents and the Cabinet:

Join the Feb. 9 #ToxicTakeovers Twitter Storm | Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools #ToxicTakeovers

Join the Feb. 9 #ToxicTakeovers Twitter Storm | Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools:

Join the Feb. 9 #ToxicTakeovers Twitter Storm

Join the #ToxicTakeovers Twitter Storm on Feb. 9 at 1 PM EST 
  Show Your Support as Detroit Kicks Off National Walk-Ins!
On February 9, parents, students and educators in Detroit will kick off the first-ever nationally coordinated Walk-Ins for the Schools All Our Children Deserve. Over the next two weeks, walk-ins will take place in more than 800 schools in 30 cities as communities across the country show a united front in the fight for public education.
On Tuesday, our allies in Detroit will host local walk-in events focused on demanding that the city and state fully fund Detroit's public schools and return the state-run district to the control of the local community.
Show your support for Detroit by joining a Twitter Storm on Feb. 9 at 1 pm EST! Use#ToxicTakeovers and share your stories of how students and communities are hurt when a state takes over public schools. We've created a social media toolkit with resources and sample tweets (download the PDF here), as well as some shareable graphics (herehere and here).
Detroit is the first city in a series of nationally coordinated walk-ins that will take place on or around Feb. 17. Click here for a full list of cities and dates to find an event near you.
It's also not too late to get your school or district involved! We put together a toolkit of materials to support walk-in organizers, including posters and shareable social media graphics. We'll be using#ReclaimOurSchools throughout the next two weeks to share updates and pictures on Twitter and Facebook.
We'll see you on Twitter this Tuesday – and we hope you'll join one of the nationwide actions near you!
Join the Feb. 9 #ToxicTakeovers Twitter Storm | Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools:






We Are Walking in. Join Us! - Lily's Blackboard

We Are Walking in. Join Us! - Lily's Blackboard:

We Are Walking in. Join Us!

reclaim


What do you get when you bring together on one day educators, parents, students, and community activists who believe that each and every student should have access to a great education?
You get advocates with an impossible-to-ignore voice for schools.
You get a “school walk-in,” and there will be hundreds of them across the nation on February 17.
The walk-ins are a project of  theAlliance to Reclaim Our Schools, of which NEA is a member. Although the 17th is the target date, a walk-in can happen anytime; it depends on what’s best for your school community. (And who says you have to stop at just one?)
Plenty of resources are available online to assist in planning a school walk-in, including a sample timeline of activities and program for the day, a list of tasks with which volunteers can help, and ideas for keeping the momentum going. Generally, the actions start with participants gathering outside to picket before the school day begins.
The beauty of the concept is that it can be tailored to suit local needs.
In some cities, walk-ins are an ongoing tool for drawing attention to specific challenges and threats to public schools. For instance, walk-ins have been held at more than 100 schools in Milwaukee to protest a new law that could result in struggling schools being taken over and turned into charters.
In San Diego, the focus has been on over-testing and giving students time to learn and educators time to teach. InSeattle, the emphasis is on better funding so that our committed members can provide students with the tools and resources they need, regardless of Zip code.
NEA Vice President Becky Pringle will be joining educators and activists in Paterson, N.J.
By walking in together, we make a powerful statement about the value of students and the value of what we do.We Are Walking in. Join Us! - Lily's Blackboard:

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Changing face of the city, schools and politics

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Changing face of the city, schools and politics:

Changing face of the city, schools and politics

Here's what has replaced public housing in Rahmville.  2 Bedrooms In Cabrini-Green's New High Rise Start At $3,200 A Month. The units boast such amenities as Nest Thermostats, floor-to-ceiling glass windows and exposed concrete ceilings. The building's shared spaces include a rooftop with a chef's kitchen and two dog runs.

Selective -enrollment high schools are ubiquitous in Lincoln Park and Rahm keeps trying to build more despite a shrinking population in that area. Many of Chicago's wealthiest neighborhoods are dramatically below their peak populations. Selective enrollment magnets, originally created as a result of a court-ordered desegregation mandate, are now used like charter schools,  to promote racial and class resegregation.

And now, a lifetime ban and possible heavy fines imposed on families who try and "cheat" their way in. That doesn't apply of course, to the clout-heavy or to wealthy suburbanites, like Bruce Rauner, whose kid didn't meet entrance requirements at Payton, but got in through the back door after Rauner made a phone call to Arne Duncan.

According to Chicagoist,

...a goldmine for developers who have planned new, luxury high rises for the Near North Side area not far from where the dilapidated public housing towers once stood.
With Chicago in the midst of a housing crisis we can't help but see the promises of these luxury developments coinciding with the displacement of Chicago's working class and the hastening demise of its affordability for anyone making less than $72,000 a year (that's how much you'd have to make to reasonably afford a studio apartment at $1,825 a month, based on this popular rental formula).
Change in Chicago's population
Former Cabrini residents got a housing voucher, amounting to a one-way ticket out of their neighborhood and in many cases out of town. Waiting lists for subsidized housing vouchers in Illinois are closed. Nearly 82,000 households use housing vouchers, commonly known Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: Changing face of the city, schools and politics:



Democrats Malloy and Wyman stab state employees in the back – again – and again. - Wait What?

Democrats Malloy and Wyman stab state employees in the back – again – and again. - Wait What?:
Democrats Malloy and Wyman stab state employees in the back – again – and again.


When they were running for re-election, Governor Dannel Malloy and Lt. Governor Nancy Wyman were all smiles as they accepted the political endorsements from Connecticut’s state employee unions and the Connecticut AFL-CIO.
When Malloy and Wyman wanted the unions to fork over money to help pay for their re-election campaign, union leaders stepped up big time.
Using hard-earned money collected from their members, AFSCME dumped $1.2 million into the Super PAC that was set up to support Malloy and Wyman’s effort to spend four more years in office.  The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) added $600,000 and SEIU donated $550,000 to the same political committee.
In addition, when Malloy and Wyman wanted campaign donations funneled into a special account run by the Democratic State Central Committee, the various unions came up with over $160,000.
And not a complaint was heard when unions’ political operation kicked into high gear, providing the votes that Malloy and Wyman needed to get the second term in office that they so desperately wanted.
Even after the 2014 election, Team Malloy/Wyman kept their proverbial hand out, looking to the unions to cough up even more of their members’ money.  According to the latest campaign finance reports, the state employee unions have donated in excess of $42,000 to Democrats Malloy and Wyman stab state employees in the back – again – and again. - Wait What?:

What Kids Need From Grown-Ups (But Aren't Getting) : NPR Ed : NPR

What Kids Need From Grown-Ups (But Aren't Getting) : NPR Ed : NPR:

What Kids Need From Grown-Ups (But Aren't Getting)

Student playing with paper and pencil instead of sitting in box like other children
Annelise Capossela for NPR
Erika Christakis' new book, The Importance Of Being Little, is an impassioned plea for educators and parents to put down the worksheets and flash cards. Ditch the tired craft projects (yes you, Thanksgiving Handprint Turkey) and exotic vocabulary lessons, and double-down on one, simple word:
Play.
That's because, she writes, "the distinction between early education and official school seems to be disappearing." If kindergarten is the new first grade, Christakis argues, preschool is quickly becoming the new kindergarten. And that is "a real threat to our society's future."
If the name sounds familiar, that's likely because Christakis made headlines last October, writing an email that stirred angry protests at Yale, where she is a lecturer at the Yale Child Study Center.
The Importance of Being Little
The Importance of Being Little
What Preschoolers Really Need from Grownups
Hardcover, 376 pages
purchase
When a campus committee sent students a memo urging restraint in choosing Halloween costumes and asking them to avoid anything that "disrespects, alienates or ridicules segments of our population based on race, nationality, religious belief or gender expression," Christakis wrote a memo of her own. She lauded the committee's goals of trying to encourage tolerance and foster community but wondered if the responsibility of deciding what is offensive should fall to students, not their administrators.
"Have we lost faith in young people's capacity – in your capacity – to exercise self-censure, through social norming, and also in your capacity to ignore or reject things that trouble you?" Christakis wrote.
Many Yale students accused Christakis of being racially insensitive and called for her ouster. In December, she stepped down from her teaching duties, telling The Washington Post, "I worry that the current climate at Yale is not, in my view, conducive to the civil dialogue and open inquiry required to solve our urgent societal problems."
What does Christakis' role in the heated debate over racial insensitivity and free speech on campus have to do with her views on preschool? Surprisingly, a lot. I spoke with Christakis about her new book and the turmoil at Yale. Here's an edited version of our conversation.
What is this phenomenon that you call "the preschool paradox?"
It is the reality that science is confirming on a daily basis: that children are hardwired to learn in many settings and are really very capable, very strong, very intelligent on What Kids Need From Grown-Ups (But Aren't Getting) : NPR Ed : NPR:

Here’s What College Cost 200 Years Ago - Yahoo Finance

Here’s What College Cost 200 Years Ago - Yahoo Finance:

Here’s What College Cost 200 Years Ago

If you were heading off to college in 1816, you wouldn’t have had to worry about buying extra-long sheets, renting a mini-fridge, or packing a spare iPhone charger. You would, however, need to load up on candles and oil—the electric light bulb still being some 60 years in the future.
Plus, if you planned to hire a servant or bring one from home, as some 19th century collegians apparently did, you’d have to budget for his or her wages too.
Such was the cost of college 200 years ago, based on published figures for Harvard.
The breakdown, as reported in Charles Franklin Thwing’s History of Higher of Education in America(1906), included:
ItemAnnual cost
in 1816-17
In 2016
dollars
Room and board$117$1,631
Instruction$57.50$802
Textbooks$15$209
Clothes$200$2,788
Laundress$24$335
Candles, oil$10$139
Servant$20$279
Pocket money$52$725
Vacations$60$836
Misc.$45$627
TOTALS$600.50$8,371
A year at Harvard runs a lot more than $8,371 these days, of course. The estimated cost of attendance for 2015-2016 is $64,400 to $69,600. On the other hand, because the university covers 100% of demonstrated need, it’s likely that a fair number of students and families pay considerably less than their fellow alumni of two centuries ago.
* Translation into today’s dollars is based on this formula published by the Federal Reserve Board of Minneapolis.
 Here’s What College Cost 200 Years Ago - Yahoo Finance:

Did a War on Teachers Lead to New Shortages? - Rick Hess Straight Up - Education Week

Did a War on Teachers Lead to New Shortages? - Rick Hess Straight Up - Education Week:

Did a War on Teachers Lead to New Shortages?



Note: Joshua Cowen is Associate Professor of Education Policy in the College of Education at Michigan State University and you can follow him on Twitter at @joshcowenMSU. Katharine Strunk is Associate Professor of Education and Policy in the Rossier School of Education and the Sol Price School of Public Policy at the University of Southern California.
Thanks for having me, Rick; long-time listener, first-time caller. I'm going to sound off this week about school choice and teacher quality. To kick things off today I've asked my friend and collaborator Katharine Strunk from the University of Southern California to help me think through some pressing questions on teacher-related reforms and teacher shortages. So, off we go:
After years of struggling with budget cuts, public school districts are finally emerging from recession-induced constraints on expenditures. Until very recently, news headlines from across the country bemoaned school districts being forced to resort to extensive teacher layoffs. But now we hear the happy news that districts are hiring again and we need teachers. WE NEED TEACHERS, except now there are none to be had! Suddenly, it seems we are in the midst of a massive teacher shortage. (See here to read the sounding of the alarm by The New York Times.) How can this be?
How can this be? This is a good question, and one that has a lot of folks speculating about potential causes. Today we want to think about just a few of them, and we want to start with the one getting the most press: Teachers are unhappy, they're leaving the classroom, and it's all because of all the reforms we've layered on public schools and teachers in the last decade or so. In fact, google the words "war on teachers," and the search results display news items, blog posts, speeches and other commentary on the high-profile policy reforms to the teaching profession taking place across the country. The line of thinking tying these changes to teacher shortages goes like this: the shortages "are resulting amid school reform initiatives that have evaluated teachers by standardized test scores, and/or reduced collective bargaining rights, and/or forced teachers to administer a mountain of standardized tests to students and teach to the test, and/or suffered inadequate funding."
Despite the fact that many reforms have only recently occurred, and continue to develop alongside other major changes to the education landscape—the federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), for example—stories abound of their impact on teachers and teaching. Many come from teachers themselves, some of whom have aired what amount to public resignation letters explaining why they no longer can work in public schools.
These are compelling individual testimonies, but on the whole can we really say that the teacher shortage is happening in large part because policymakers have made the teaching profession untenable?
The answer: we don't really know. To be sure, some teachers are leaving for these reasons, as the posts above show. But as policy analysts, we need to consider other possibilities at the same time. For example, one explanation is that the teaching workforce has grown steadily older over the last few years, in part because younger people may be finding other work, but also because the structure of teacher pay and compensation remains heavily back-loaded in favor of later-career teachers. Older teachers will retire sooner than their younger colleagues, perhaps at rates that exceed our ability to hire more.
The economy may also be to blame. Over the last five or more years, teachers experienced serious threats to their job stability due to increased numbers of Reductions in Force and layoffs during theGreat Recession. This likely makes teaching a less attractive profession to teachers who value stability.
It's also important to realize that the shortage has been percolating for a very long time and may have actually been mitigated by the economic downturn and reduced hiring rates. For instance, a recent report shows that in California, teacher preparation programs have been producing steadily fewer teachers since 2002, well before the current "anti-teacher" policies were introduced, and barely after the No Child Left Behind Act went into effect. Fewer people seem to be choosing a teaching career. Enrollment at teacher preparation programs has fallen... over at least the past decade.
Which leads to a more basic question: Is the teacher shortage even new? Today, it's the scale andlocation of the teacher shortages that are pressing. Until recently—over the past two decades, at least—teacher shortages have been most common in disadvantaged schools. Indeed, among the most consistent predictors of a teacher's exit have been the demographic characteristics of students in the school he or she teaches. Unfortunately, low-income, minority students and students with special needs tend to lose their teachers more frequently, with the most effective teachers who leave moving to more advantaged areas. These students have experienced teacher shortages for a long time. It just hasn't been front page news. Even today, there are real teacher shortages, but not everywhere, and not for every subject. The simple truth is that in many parts of the country, we don't have enough teachers to teach many of the kids who need them the most, and we haven't for a very long time.
But there is some sunshine through the clouds: more than a million-and-a-half new teachers are slated to enter the field in the next few years, and although some observers have worried about declining quality as much as quantity, it's possible that many of those new teachers are some of our best and brightest. A few months ago, a new study found that the academic ability of new teachers has steadily increased since 1999. And over the summer, another paper showed that teachers hired during the Great Recession were actually more effective than those hired earlier.
None of this is to suggest that teacher-related policy reforms have had no impact on individual teacher decisions to exit public schools or avoid the profession in the first place. The point is that we have yet to fully understand the extent to which this is true, much less what we can do about it. But we can use the data researchers, states and districts are gathering to help us uncover the causes of current trends in the teacher labor force and, importantly, to help design solutions. And then we can use evidence rather than anecdote in discussions of where to go next.

In Education "Reform" Nothing Means What You Think It Does

In Education "Reform" Nothing Means What You Think It Does:

In Education "Reform" Nothing Means What You Think It Does

In the world of Education reform, nothing means what you think it will. We learned that the hard way with No Child Left Behind. I mean, of course we don't want a child left behind! Why would we want a child left behind? Sign the bill! Stamp the approval! All kids succeed!
But it didn't really pan out that way. Instead it was more like, no school left unpunished. As the clock wound down to the point where ALL schools were supposedly passing ALL kids or else ALL would be failing, a feat that educational experts new from the beginning was impossible, we abandoned NCLB and moved to Race to the Top. Again, who doesn't want to be on top? Who wants their state, their kids, their neighborhood to be on a school that is losing? No one! Let's all Race to the Top.
Amidst the many demands states were expected to comply with in order to receive race to the top funding, was merit pay. When normal working Americans hear the words merit pay, they often equate it to bonuses. But at least in the state of Georgia, merit pay actually means you get to keep 100% of the paycheck you already get if you do really well. And accountability doesn't mean making sure everyone is doing what they are supposed to, it just means more testing. Accountability, in education reform world always and only means tests.
A few months back,President Obama killed NCLB forever by signing the "Every Student Succeeds Act" and again, who wouldn't want that? Of course we want every student to succeed. Especially teachers, no teacher goes into her job every day thinking "how can I get one more kid to fail." But like the other education reform speak, this will not bring us what it promises. Among many troubling aspects of this bill is the point that only 1 percent of students will be allowed to take an alternative to the mandated standardized tests. So, by definition of the bill every student will succeed by not allowing most students with protected accommodations use those accommodations in order to pass the class. This make no sense and is troublesome to most teachers, but especially those teaching special ed.
One big part of the Every Student Succeeds Act is a push for "personalized learning," in fact personalized learning is so hot right now billionaire Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to invest billions of dollars into the initiative. But much like No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, and Merit Pay didn't actually mean that. Personalized learning is simply not what you imagine.
You imagine a classroom full of students independently working on things that interest them. They feel special and noticed and cared for. They understand how what they are learning will apply to them later. That sounds awesome and that isn't personalized learning in education reform. Nope, not even close. When people talk about personalized learning, what they are actually talking about are pre-packaged, pre-scripted modules that a kid must get through. Perhaps, they test out of the first two, or do them in a different order but they all land on the same test and take it. Maybe they do it at a different pace, but that doesn't mean this is personalized.
Why would they do this? Well, we stopped buying textbooks. The textbook In Education "Reform" Nothing Means What You Think It Does: