Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Geaux Teacher!: The Perils of using Disaster as a Catalyst for Change in Louisiana - Part 1

Geaux Teacher!: The Perils of using Disaster as a Catalyst for Change in Louisiana - Part 1:

The Perils of using Disaster as a Catalyst for Change in Louisiana - Part 1






Some very good editorials are being published as we approach the 10th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana.  I am going to re-post several of those that particularly strike a nerve with me because they cut through the rhetoric and defy political correctness.  They also provide context to the rape of our public school system in Louisiana which began with the takeover of the New Orleans Public Schools.



 An Announcement from Lt. General Russel Honore'
(U.S. Army Retired)
NEW ORLEANS (July1, 2015) - My fellow citizens of Louisiana, I come to you today as a humble son of this great state and servant of this great nation. I was fortunate enough to spend 37 years in the United States military, retiring in 2008 from the U.S. Army after my life's work as a soldier. Today I come to you with a heavy heart and request your understanding At the urging of many of my fellow citizens, I've spent the last few months thinking about running for governor of the State of Louisiana. I've been humbled by the support of so many, and it has laid heavy on my mind after observing the 2015 Louisiana legislature, which made it abundantly clear that we desperately need better political leadership in Louisiana.

As we look at the state of our State and its current affairs, I recall the stories the old folks used to tell on the front porch of our farmhouse. My family were subsistence farmers and they would gather on rainy days, talking about the promises of President Roosevelt and Governor Huey Long. Times were hard and the crops were thin. That conversation should have changed a long time ago. It has not. Times are still hard and the challenges -- maybe you could say disasters -- we have in Louisiana today are very much like they were in my youth.

Do a gut check: are we happy with the government we have? With who represents us? Think: Who has a record of working for us, and who promised to but actually went to work for their biggest donors? We must reshape our politics and reorder our priorities. We must get comfortable with speaking about the unspeakable, about how is it that we can be the nation's third largest energy producer and second poorest state.

We must demand that our politicians put a priority on working for citizens, not their donors. Yes, I know, money has always influenced American politics - so much and for so long we're not even very angry about it anymore. But if someone robbed your house, you would be angry. I'm telling you, big donors are robbing your house. For instance, donors were behind a law that allows hundreds of manufacturing facilities to enjoy a 5-year tax exemption, and then apply for a 5-year renewal, courtesy of our Legislature. Because of these tax exemptions, local governments are denied the tax revenue they need to provide essential services, including schools, police and fire, parks, roads and libraries, thereby increasing the tax burden on our working families. If that sounds too crazy to be true, please see the GreenARMY scorecard to learn how your legislator voted on that are important to you and your family.. Most of our professional political class put industry profits and their own over the safety of our citizens. That's you and your family I'm talking about.

The tax code they've shaped has looted our state. That's your money and your home. Your politicians argue and sign petitions and accuse the federal government of overreaching for trying to protect our air from being poisoned by coal plants, yet Louisiana can provide all the cheap natural gas our state needs. While we are champions of fossil fuels, we must understand that there is an expiration date on the Louisiana fossil fuel supply. Still, the Legislature and the Public Service Commission have all but gutted the solar industry in Louisiana -- that means fewer new companies and fewer jobs -- and last year our Governor signed a retroactive law that prevents our citizens from holding companies accountable for the destruction of our 
Geaux Teacher!: The Perils of using Disaster as a Catalyst for Change in Louisiana - Part 1:

Disaster as a Catalyst for Change - Part Two

Dr. Beverly Wright produced this Letter to the Editor weighing in on the so-called Plan for the Future of New Orleans that was hatched by the powers that be, most certainly prior to the storm.  A Plan, like the plan to take over the New Orleans Public Schools, with the mark of Disaster Capitalism prominently displayed.

Much righteous indignation has been voiced over commentary after the storm that Katrina was a blessing in disguise, but where is overwhelming indignation that Katrina was a catalyst for some of the changes NOT welcomed by many of the City's disenfranchised? 


The Color Change:  White Washing a City
It Started with those Green Dots

Commentary by Dr. Beverly Wright, PhD
   
Dr. Beverly Wright
Dr. Beverly Wright
Let's just be "real" about how Black people feel their quality of life has, or is changing, ten years after Katrina. I can tell you this; Black folks know that things are changing, but at their core, they do not believe these changes will benefit them. They basically see a "New" New Orleans that is whiter and richer, and they see this happening at their expense. They can identify a number of actions taken by local and state government that have dramatically affected their lives. These include: (1) the Plan for the Future or the infamous "green dot map"; (2) the takeover of the New Orleans Public Schools by the state forming the Recovery School District; (3) the hostile takeover of public schools by charter networks; (4) the firing of all New Orleans public school teachers and personnel; (5) the suspension of the federal Davis-Bacon Act; and (6) the awarding of billions of dollars in no-bid contracts to a handful of politically connected nationally-based contractors. In this blog, I will speak to one of them, the Plan for the Future.

In order to understand the real implications and the devastating results of these actions, we have to begin at the beginning. And for most African American and Vietnamese New Orleanians, it starts with 

Disaster as a Catalyst for Change - Part Two


How Disaster Changed the N.O. Education Landscape - Part III


Little did the rest of Louisiana know (and some still don't get it) how the "turnaround" of the New Orleans Public School System was only a prelude to the corporate reform agenda that has now infiltrated local school districts statewide.  Why should we care what happens in the city that care (literally) forgot?  When local democratic control is effectively removed from your local district you may begin to understand.  Don't let this happen on your watch!


A Perfect Storm Part 1: 17 Days in November

A Perfect Storm: The Takeover of New Orleans Public Schools is the first in a series of short videos, that reveals the real story behind the creation of the nation’s first all charter school district. These videos are made possible with the support of  The Schott Foundation and The New Orleans Education Equity Roundtable. They are produced in partnership with Bayou and Me Productions.
For the past seven years, state education officials and corporate school reformers have touted the dramatic turnaround of New Orleans public schools. National media outlets have published numerous articles and TV news stories of the miracle in New Orleans citing unprecedented academic achievement where parents finally had School Choice.
This first Perfect Storm video focuses on the illegal takeover and the academic failure of the Recovery School District. The film features interviews with leaders in the New Orleans education community who were faced with the daunting task of reopening schools immediately following Hurricane Katrina.

How Disaster Changed the N.O. Education Landscape - Part III






There’s one education reform proven to work on a national scale, so why aren’t we trying it? - The Hechinger Report

There’s one education reform proven to work on a national scale, so why aren’t we trying it? - The Hechinger Report:

There’s one education reform proven to work on a national scale, so why aren’t we trying it?






In the fight over how to close the racial achievement gap in education, you rarely hear about the only policy that’s ever worked on a national scale: desegregation.
Reformers push school choice and tougher teacher evaluations. Unions demand higher pay and more focus on out-of-school problems like poverty. But desegregation is perhaps the biggest success story in the history of American education.
During the 1980s, when desegregation was in full effect – with forced busing in some cities and less dramatic strategies elsewhere – the black-white achievement gap on the National Assessment for Educational Progress shrunk faster than it ever has before or since.
When black students went to schools with white ones, they were able to access good teachers, principals and guidance counselors, updated textbooks and more advanced classes. Desegregation broke up concentrated poverty in segregated schools that had been forced to educate the toughest kids with the fewest resources.
With these new opportunities – including access to the social and career networks white kids took for granted – research found that black students not only did better on tests, they earned higher degrees and got better jobs. White students, meanwhile, didn’t suffer any negative consequences from attending integrated schools – and studies found they became more open-minded and less prejudiced.
So, with New York City public school students returning Wednesday, the question is: Why isn’t more being done to bring students of different races together in the most racially and ethnically diverse city in the country, one where the public schools have had little success closing a huge racial achievement gap?

Schools Matter: Pence Funded by Oregon’s Charter School Libertarian

Schools Matter: Pence Funded by Oregon’s Charter School Libertarian:

Pence Funded by Oregon’s Charter School Libertarian





By Doug Martin, Author of Hoosier School Heist

(Doug Martin is up for the Best Local Political Activist of the Year Award.  Please go to NUVO and vote for him today and every day until August 21.) 

The school privatizers are tossing money at Mike Pence right and left.  The governor cashed in on a$25,000 contribution on June 4 from John D. Bryan in Lake Oswego, OR.

As I reveal in my book Hoosier School Heist, Bryan is the millionaire charter school/voucher champion who helped finance Walmart-Amway’s American Federation for Children in 2010 and 2011, a front-group which has funneled millions of dollars into Indiana and other states to buy Republicans to pass anti-public school laws.  Last year, Bryan gave $50,000 to the Walmart-Amway backed Hoosiers for Quality Education. 

Not only is Bryan pro-charter school, as former director of the Georgia Gulf Corporation, a plastics and petrochemical maker now operating under the name Axiall, he is also an anti-climate change promoter.  

A past leadership board member of the Koch Brothers-affiliated Club for Growth and a Scott Walker donor, Bryan has handed at least $201,000 to the Indiana Republican Campaign Committee since 2006.  Over the years, Bryan has gifted Pence $145,000.  
Koch Brothers group reveals Oregon fundraising connections | OregonLive.com http://bit.ly/1J9uF14

The Challenge Foundation has given money to at least 182 charter schools nationwide, as of my book’s writing. I have a whole section in Hoosier School Heist on Bryan’s Challenge Foundation and the Avondale Meadows School in Indianapolis, when it went by the name Challenge Foundation Academy.  Charter schools headed by the Challenge Foundation are rampant across the country, at least one with serious religious Right leanings.  

Bryan has brilliantly combined the Religious Right with the Corporate Right.  He has bought out African Americans and is fond of the national anthem.  He likes former Indianapolis’ Democratic mayor Bart Peterson, too, who first allowed him into Indiana in the first place.  

(Doug Martin is up for the Best Local Political Activist of the Year Award.  Please go to NUVO and vote for him today and every day until August 21.) Schools Matter: Pence Funded by Oregon’s Charter School Libertarian:


How States Rank on High-School Graduation Rates - The Atlantic

Nevada vs. Arizona: Despite an All-Time-High National Graduation Rate, Dropout Factories and Achievement Gaps Persist in Some States - The Atlantic:

How States Rank on High-School Graduation Rates

Nationwide, the percentage of students getting their diplomas is at an all-time high. But while some states have made incredible strides, others have struggled to keep up.



DoE_Grad_Data_Gap_550px


More students are graduating from high school than ever before, and that number could rise again with this year’s seniors.
The national graduation rate for the 2012-13 school year was 81 percent, which was up from 80 percent the year before and 79 percent the year before that, according to the U.S. Department of Education. This sort of growth is possible as a result of the huge improvements in the numbers of black and Latinos getting their diplomas. But it’s also due to specific state improvements.
If this trend continues, the national graduation rate could reach 90 percent by 2020, according to a report from Civic Enterprises and Johns Hopkins University, which is part of a coalition that’s spearheading the initiative to meet that goal. But stagnation in certain states could keep the national average down.
National Journal ranked and graded the states based on how their graduation rates changed between 2011 and 2013.
MOST IMPROVED STATES:

1) Nevada

2011: 62 percent

2013: 71 percent

Grade: A
Despite having a graduation rate well below the national average at 71 percent, the state has improved drastically from its 62-percent graduation rate in 2011. Part of that growth is due to the 11.4-point increase in Latino graduation rates over the three-year period.
2) Alabama

2011: 72 percent
2013: 80 percent
Grade: A-
Alabama is on track toward reaching a 90-percent graduation rate in the coming years, boosted by improvements among its large black enrollment. The gap between black and white graduation rates was narrowed by 5 percentage points between 2011 and 2013.​
3) New Mexico
2011: 63 percent
2013: 70 percent
Grade: A-
The graduation rate among Latinos in the state rose 9 percentage points over the three-year period. Considering that Latinos comprise 57 percent of enrollment, that gain was a boost for the state’s overall numbers. Poverty remains a difficult issue for the state. Around half of its students live in high-poverty areas, well above the national average of 20 percent. The overall graduation rate is still low, at 70 percent.
4) Utah
2011: 76 percent
2013: 83 percent
Grade: B+
Part of the growth in Utah is due to the 13.4 percentage-point rise in Latino graduation rates between 2011 and 2013. The state already has an above-Nevada vs. Arizona: Despite an All-Time-High National Graduation Rate, Dropout Factories and Achievement Gaps Persist in Some States - The Atlantic:

District riven by religious favoritism claims gets monitor - Yahoo News

District riven by religious favoritism claims gets monitor - Yahoo News:

District riven by religious favoritism claims gets monitor





SUFFERN, N.Y. (AP) — When his fifth-grade son struggled with a question on primary colors posed by the TV show "Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader," David Curry saw just how bad things have gotten in the troubled East Ramapo school district.
Divided for a decade between the ultra-Orthodox Jews who control the school board — but don't send their children to public schools — and parents who say their children are the victims of unfair budget cuts, East Ramapo has seen meetings degenerate into shouting matches and a federal lawsuit brought against the district.
Now a former New York City public schools chancellor has been appointed by the state to examine claims of parents like Curry, who have demanded state intervention in a district they say is failing to serve their children.
"Not only did he not know the answer, he didn't know what a primary color was," Curry said. "But then he hasn't had any art classes in third or fourth grade."
Curry said his daughter, a high school student, has suffered from cuts to extracurricular programs.
"She would have been on the track team, junior varsity, but we don't have junior varsity anymore," he said.
Parents blame the board for deep cuts in teachers and programs for the mostly black and Hispanic children who attend the public schools, saying the board favors the private yeshivas the bulk of the district's children attend. The board blames state funding — in particular a funding formula they say isn't favorable to the district — for the problems.
On Thursday, the state appointed former city schools chancellor Dennis Walcott to study the district's finances, watch to see if the board is breaking state law and make recommendations to Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia.
Curry said the appointment has a chance to be a step forward, but there was plenty of frustration and skepticism among the hundreds of others who attended the announcement. The meeting was occasionally disrupted with boos and shouts calling for federal intervention.
Besides arts teachers and half the sports program, the board has chopped many guidance counselors, social workers and advanced placement courses and slashed kindergarten to half a day, parents complain.
Many parents noted that the state had failed to take action after a report ordered up last year concluded board members' concern for Jewish children "blinded them to the needs of the entire community," and called for a monitor who could veto board actions. But the state Legislature failed to pass a bill that would have done so.
Steve White, who went through the East Ramapo schools himself and sent two children through, said, "We need action. We've had monitors and reports before and it hasn't resulted in any real change for the children."
Walcott said that in addition to board meetings and PTA meetings, he'll be going to "barber shops, beauty parlors, hanging out on corners, talking to people" to find out more about the schools' problems and the community's deep divisions.
But Walcott won't be able to countermand board actions, unseat a board member or even attend the board's executive sessions unless he's invited.
Board President Yehuda Weissmandl said he would help Walcott any way he can, but said he didn't know if that would include inviting him to executive sessions.
The board has maintained that a state aid formula hurts East Ramapo because of the district's high proportion of private school students: about 24,000 in private school and about 9,000 in public school. The formula considers only public school enrollment when it divides the value of taxable property by the number of students.
Walcott suggested he and his experts will find ways to sniff out the workings of the district 25 miles north of New York City.
"We know when something's not right," he said. "We know when something stinks."
Walcott said they would make unannounced visits to classrooms and school board meetings. And he said he would talk to schoolchildren, too.
"Students give the honest answer about what's going on," he said.
Elia said she expects a report from Walcott in December.
Veterans of the district war expressed hope and some reservations.
Oscar Cohen, education chairman of the Spring Valley chapter of the NAACP, wondered how District riven by religious favoritism claims gets monitor - Yahoo News:

Op-ed: Teach for America stumbles because its teachers aren't prepared | The Salt Lake Tribune

Op-ed: Teach for America stumbles because its teachers aren't prepared | The Salt Lake Tribune:

Op-ed: Teach for America stumbles because its teachers aren’t prepared





Teach for America is celebrating its 25th anniversary, but, for the second time in two years, its recruitment numbers are down. The program, which handpicks college graduates to teach in high-need schools, has been so popular that 18 percent of the graduating class at Yale applied in 2010. So what happened?
To explain the decline, Teach for America's co-CEOs point to the improving economy, a broader decline in applications to teacher preparation programs and an "increasingly polarized public conversation around education" and "polarization around TFA." However, this assessment overlooks another important factor: criticism and pushback from Teach for America alumni like me who felt ill-prepared to be classroom teachers.
Over the past few years, much of the criticism from alumni has come in the form of articles and blog posts with titles like "Why I did TFA and why you shouldn't" and "How I Joined Teach for America—and Got Sued for $20 Million." A piece titled "I Quit Teach for America" went viral online, and even The Onion has chimed in with satiric takes on the savior mentality of some TFA teachers. More recently, this alumni resistance has become more organized, with TFA alumni holding conferences to discuss ways to resist Teach for America and even publishing a book of counter-narratives about their experiences in the program.
Like many former TFA "corps members," my critique of the organization grew out of some difficult first months at a high-need middle school in New York in 2007. Though I completed Teach for America's five-week training and lesson planned over the summer, my first week in the classroom left me feeling overwhelmed and ill prepared. Unsurprisingly, my liberal arts degree hadn't provided the slightest idea how to meet the learning or behavioral needs of my bilingual special education students, and the TFA training only provided basics like lesson planning and classroom management. My inexperience, coupled with the impossible daily task of learning to teach multiple unfamiliar subjects literally "on the job," made me feel demoralized and incompetent.
One evening, as my head nodded on the subway, I summed up my feelings in a notebook, scribbling: "I am failing every day."
Although I eventually achieved success as a classroom teacher, I only fully realized how unprepared I was when I became a teacher educator in traditional teacher education programs at the University of Texas and at BYU. Instead of learning science or language arts concepts the day before teaching them as I had previously done, my new education students took several content area courses and learned to appreciate the nuances of teaching different subjects. Similarly, if they wanted to specialize in bilingual or special education, my undergraduate students received focused training in things like language acquisition and learning theory before setting foot in a classroom.
By contrast, entering teaching through TFA meant that I only received an in-depth training in these topics through graduate school courses taken during nights and weekends over my first two years in the classroom. The differences between my TFA training and the preparation of my undergraduate education students made two things uncomfortably clear: 1) that my former middle schoolers deserved someone who was fully trained on the first day of school and 2) in 2007, that person was not me.
Teach for America justifies its short training program in part by pointing to the high demand and high approval rating that their corps members receive from principals. However, citing a demand from chronically understaffed and under-resourced schools seems disingenuous. Students in high-need schools need a sense of continuity, and an ongoing cycle of short-term TFA teachers creates a culture of high turnover in a profession Op-ed: Teach for America stumbles because its teachers aren't prepared | The Salt Lake Tribune:

Sacramento City Council has inconsistent record of sexual harassment training | The Sacramento Bee

Sacramento City Council has inconsistent record of sexual harassment training | The Sacramento Bee:

Sacramento City Council has inconsistent record of sexual harassment training




A state bill signed into law in 2004 requires that employers in California with more than 50 workers give sexual harassment prevention training to all supervisors every two years. The law – Assembly Bill 1825 – was inspired by groping allegations made against former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger during the 2003 recall campaign; Schwarzenegger signed the bill.
While legislators at the state Capitol and their staffers are required to take anti-harassment training every two years, there appears to be some discrepancy over whether elected officials at the local level are doing the same.
At Sacramento City Hall, for example, some council members either haven’t taken sexual harassment prevention training offered by the city or haven’t taken a course in several years. Other council members said they received training from their private employers. City Attorney James Sanchez has told council members they are not required to undergo training, but that he strongly recommends that they do.
In a memo to council members sent in November 2013, Sanchez told the City Council that “elected officials are not generally considered employees of the city and therefore are not required to complete the training.”
“However, all electeds supervise employees on behalf of the city,” the memo continued. “This office strongly recommends that all electeds receive the training required under AB 1825. The fact that training was received would put the city and the elected in a better position to argue that the city had taken reasonable steps necessary to prevent and correct harassment and discrimination.”
The city’s policy will likely be strengthened in the weeks ahead after Mayor Kevin Johnson told his colleagues in an email Friday that he’s recommending every member of the council take harassment prevention training by the end of September. Johnson said he would also ask the city attorney to explore making the training a requirement in the future.
“While the training isn’t mandatory, I believe strongly that everyone should complete the training course,” the mayor wrote.
Johnson and Councilman Allen Warren have been named in sexual harassment claims this year. In May, Johnson was named in a claim made by a former staff aide to City Manager John Shirey. Johnson denied the allegations and the claim was later found to be unsubstantiated by both the city attorney and an outside law firm that specializes in labor law.
Then, on July 31, a former staffer in Warren’s office filed a claim alleging the councilman threatened to fire her if she ended their sexual relationship. The city attorney is investigating the claim, which Warren has denied.
Just three council members were included in a list of elected officials who have undergone training offered by the city. That list, compiled by the City Clerk’s Office, was obtained by The Sacramento Bee through the Public Records Act.
Council members Warren, Jeff Harris and Rick Jennings have taken city-sponsored training since last year, records show. Harris and Jennings took the training this year and Warren took the course in August 2014.
Council members not in the city’s records for training include Councilman Steve Hansen, who asked the city auditor Tuesday to review the city’s sexual harassment policies. Hansen said he took the training through his former private employer, biotech firm Genentech. He said he could not recall the exact date of the training, but said it was “probably in 2013.”
Training received through another employer qualifies under the state law.
I BELIEVE STRONGLY THAT EVERYONE SHOULD COMPLETE THE TRAINING COURSE.
Mayor Kevin Johnson
“I’m glad to see the mayor stepping up and trying to lead in making sure we have a safe work environment,” Hansen said. “People are finally pulling their heads out of the sand and acknowledging we can do better.”
Councilman Larry Carr – elected last year – was also not in the city clerk’s records. However, Carr said he took the course on Friday after he was notified by The Bee he wasn’t on record for doing so. Before Friday, Carr said he wasn’t aware the city offered the training.
Johnson’s spokesman, Ben Sosenko, said the mayor took a training course early in his first term; Johnson was first elected in 2008. City records only go back to 2012 and the exact date of Johnson’s training session was not available. Sosenko said the mayor will undergo training again before the end of next month.
Councilwoman Angelique Ashby said she took a course soon after she was first elected in 2010. She said Friday she was planning to take the training again this year.
Councilman Jay Schenirer said he took the training course “a couple months ago” through Capitol Impact, the education policy organization he helps run. Councilman Eric Guerra, a staffer in the state Capitol, said he took the training recently through that job, but is also signed up to take the training through the city later this month.
Jane Brunner, who served on the Oakland City Council for 16 years and is an attorneySacramento City Council has inconsistent record of sexual harassment training | The Sacramento Bee:







Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/investigations/the-public-eye/article31207577.html#storylink=cpy
Big Education Ape: Sacramento Integrity Project | Open Governenment Ordinance http://bit.ly/1ItEqtE
Big Education Ape: Sacramento Democratic Party calls for ethics reform in wake of scandals | The Sacramento Bee http://bit.ly/1UoVaYf

Big Education Ape: Marcos Breton - KJ Is It Time For Bromance Relationship Counselling | The Sacramento Beehttp://bit.ly/1IObKNt

Big Education Ape: Sexual harassment claims become the norm at Sacramento City Hall http://bit.ly/1ItsGrd

Big Education Ape: Sexual harassment claims become the norm at Sacramento City Hall http://bit.ly/1ItsGrd

Big Education Ape: Sacramento Democratic Party calls for ethics reform in wake of scandals | The Sacramento Bee http://bit.ly/1UoVaYf

Education summit to gauge Kasich | The Columbus Dispatch

Education summit to gauge Kasich | The Columbus Dispatch:

Education summit to gauge Kasich










Gov. John Kasich is taking part in an education summit this week in New Hampshire with several other Republican presidential candidates, and he should have plenty to say.
Former NBC and CNN journalist Campbell Brown said the idea behind Wednesday’s event is to go in-depth with the candidates — in individual question-and-answer sessions lasting 30-45 minutes — on an issue that virtually all voters agree is important but often is given short shrift.
“None of us want to hear talking points, and we’ve made that clear to the candidates,” said Brown, co-founder and editor-in-chief of debate sponsor The Seventy Four (named for the 74 million school-aged children in America), a nonprofit news site that covers education reform across the country.
“My expectation about the summit is that there will be some playing to the crowd. My goal is to get past that and get to talk in-depth about the issues,” she said.
Brown said she is aware of the controversy over the Ohio Education Department’s now-departed school-choice administrator, who quit after it was revealed he was scrubbing charter-school evaluations to make them look better.
She also knows that Kasich has dismissed calls for an independent investigation of the official, David Hansen, the husband of Kasich’s presidential campaign manager, Beth Hansen, and said it could be a campaign issue.
“If the governor believes in promoting charters, then you have a responsibility to address failures in the system,” Brown said. “Otherwise, it will hurt the entire effort.”
Also scheduled to appear are former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, California businesswoman Carly Fiorina, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. Bush and Kasich are virtually deadlocked in the latest New Hampshire GOP poll, behind businessman Donald Trump, who isn’t appearing.
Where Kasich stands on key education issues:

Charter schools

Kasich and a GOP-dominated legislature have greatly expanded school choice. More than
$1 billion in state money flows to charter schools, which enroll a record 120,000 students.
And the number of available school vouchers — state funding that allows students to attend private, mostly religiously backed schools — has leaped from 14,000 to 60,000, although as of Monday, fewer than 29,000 applications for EdChoice scholarships had been submitted.
Still, Greg Harris of StudentsFirst said, “In Ohio now, no child is forced to go to a failing school. That’s pretty substantial.”
Ohio’s laws regarding charter-school operations and oversight have been criticized both here and nationally for allowing bad schools to remain open while requiring too little transparency and accountability.
Kasich acknowledged the problem in late 2014, promising to put reforms in his budget bill.
“We strongly support options regardless of a family’s economic background, but they have to be quality options. He’s been very serious about that,” Harris said.
But GOP lawmakers stripped Kasich’s charter reforms out of the budget and instead worked on a separate bill. They didn’t finish it before the summer break, meaning another school year will go by without reforms.
“We are wasting so much money on failing charter schools right now,” said Keary McCarthy, president of the liberal Innovation Ohio.
McCarthy said Kasich has been saying the right things regarding charter-school reform, but he hasn’t pressed lawmakers to act. The former Democratic legislative staffer noted that when the administration wanted a controversial plan in June to allow a takeover of Youngstown schools, it passed both chambers in one day.
Many critics say the millions in campaign contributions from charter-Education summit to gauge Kasich | The Columbus Dispatch: