Sunday, December 4, 2011
A Collection Of “The Best…” Lists On Parent Engagement — 2011 | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…
Looming state cuts endangering LAUSD magnet program despite its popularity - LA Daily News
Looming state cuts endangering LAUSD magnet program despite its popularity
Thanks to a new online registration program and aggressive community outreach efforts, a record number of students are applying for Los Angeles Unified's magnet schools, long considered the "jewels" of the sprawling district.
With two weeks remaining before the Dec. 16 deadline, nearly 17,000 students have applied for about 20,000 vacant seats in the 172 magnet programs. That compares with about 2,500 applicants through Nov. 30 of last year, with online access credited for nearly all of the surge.
Despite the overwhelming demand for these inventive schools, however, supporters fear that looming cuts in state education and school- transportation funding could threaten the magnets' future. LAUSD could lose $113 million in K-12 funding and $38.2 million designated for busing when the state budget ax falls on Dec. 15, potentially devastating some of the district's most critical programs.
"This could be the death of the magnets," said parent Jennifer King, who mobilized an outreach program last year when the district planned to eliminate the positions of the coordinators who oversee and operate the
Choking on the Common Core Standards - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post
Choking on the Common Core Standards
Penn State applications up amid scandal
What matters most in college admissions — money or merit?
Why gifted students can be so challenging
Has teacher quality declined over time?
Report: How much high-poverty schools get cheated on funding
Diocese letter pushed principals to promote vouchers
Hades vs Public Education – The Clash of the Titans « Living Behind the Gates
Hades vs Public Education – The Clash of the Titans
In a recent Op-Ed by Dave Johnson for Alter-Net and reprinted by Truthout entitled “Privatization Nightmare: 5 Public Services That Should Never Be Handed Over to Greedy Corporations”, Johnson makes a serious point.
“Privatization is the 1% taking public wealth so they can make money off of it for themselves.Instead of democracy collecting taxes from the 1% privatization leaves everyone poorer and paying rent to the 1%.
Private Not Public Interest
There is a fundamental conflict of interest between public and private. When things are privatized of course profit comes first, not public interest. Public functions are supposed to serve the public, us, We, the People. The ‘private’ in ‘privatization’ means that it is done for the private gain of a
Daily Kos: I am fortunate
I am fortunate
I did not grow up in a financially wealthy family, but we were solidly middle class, and when my mother returned to her law career when I was around 8 we had plenty of money for things to enrich our lives. My sister spent 7 and I spent 8 delightful summers at National Music Camp in Interlochen. We both had music lessons, her in violin and music theory, me piano and cello, and with outstanding (and expensive teachers). We saw Broadway plays, both dramas and musicals. We had painting lessons. We went out to dinner. We did not have to worry about paying for college.
I am also fortunate in having had a superb education. It began with the terrific public schools of Mamaroneck School System in Westchester County, NY. MY sister went to Sarah Lawrence, then later Bank Street College of Education, finally getting a law degree at Western New England. My college attendances are too numerous to list all, but I have degrees from Haverford, St. Charles Seminary and Johns Hopkins and reached ABD (with almost all of it paid for by a university scholarship) at Catholic U.
We may not always have been quite so fortunate in our personal lives, but sister has two wonderful children (and now two granddaughters) from her now ended marriage, and after a series of missteps I am now approaching the 26th anniversary of my marriage to Leaves on the Current, with whom I have been for 37 of my 65+ years on this earth.
This is not to brag. Rather it is to establish the background for my Sunday morning reflection, which is this - I have an obligation that I have still not fulfilled. What I have given you is the background. Below I will explain in more detail should you continue to read.
Some Asians' college strategy: Don't check 'Asian' - Inside Bay Area
Some Asians' college strategy: Don't check 'Asian'
Lanya Olmstead was born in Florida to a mother who immigrated from Taiwan and an American father of Norwegian ancestry. Ethnically, she considers herself half Taiwanese and half Norwegian. But when applying to Harvard, Olmstead checked only one box for her race: white.
"I didn't want to put 'Asian' down," Olmstead said, "because my mom told me there's discrimination against Asians in the application process."
For years, many Asian-Americans have been convinced that it's harder for them to gain admission to the nation's top colleges.
Studies show that Asian-Americans meet these colleges' admissions standards far out of proportion to their 6 percent representation in the U.S. population, and that they often need test scores hundreds of points higher than applicants
How the Food Industry Eats Your Kid’s Lunch - ParentAdvocates.org
How the Food Industry Eats Your Kid’s Lunch
An increasingly cozy alliance between companies that manufacture processed foods and companies that serve the meals is making students — a captive market — fat and sick while pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars in profits. At a time of fiscal austerity, these companies are seducing school administrators with promises to cut costs through privatization. Parents who want healthier meals, meanwhile, are outgunned.
How the Food Industry Eats Your Kid’s Lunch
By LUCY KOMISAR, NY TIMES
LINK
An increasingly cozy alliance between companies that manufacture processed foods and companies that serve the meals is making students — a captive market — fat and sick while pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars in profits. At a time of fiscal austerity, these companies are seducing school administrators with promises to cut costs through privatization. Parents who want healthier meals, meanwhile, are outgunned.
Each day, 32 million children in the United States get lunch at schools that participate in the National School Lunch Program, which uses agricultural surplus to feed children. About 21 million of these students eat free or reduced-price meals, a number that has surged since the recession. The program, which also provides breakfast, costs $13.3 billion a year.
Sadly, it is being mismanaged and exploited. About
Hmmm… HOW (P)INTEREST(ing)! « Diary of a Public School Teacher!
Hmmm… HOW (P)INTEREST(ing)!
As I read my tweets, talk about Pinterest kept appearing in various Tweets. It appeared in blogs and links, and it seemed that everyone, eveverywhere, was talking about it. I took a quick look, wasn’t that interested, and left the site.
I returned to the site after I posted , “How Do You Know You’re a Teacher? by Jeff Foxworthy and it ended up pinned, pinned, and repinned,
Schools Matter: Bloomberg Wants to Double Teacher Salaries--By Doubling Class Size
Bloomberg Wants to Double Teacher Salaries--By Doubling Class Size
In the early 19th Century, an efficiency zealot before his time named Joseph Lancaster came up with a monitorial system for schooling the urban poor, wherein a single teacher served as overseer for classes as large as 500 students. With what might be thought of as a kind early Gingrich-style system using student assistants, these monitors checked and graded student work before passing the grades to a teacher at the front of the converted warehouse.
Sounds like Prince Mike might be dusting off some long-discarded ideas in order to further slash public services
Saturday, December 3, 2011
EXEC SUMMARY OF THE LAUSD/UTLA LOCAL SCHOOL STABILIZATION AND EMPOWERMENT INITITIVE OF 2011 ("The Tentative Agreement") +
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE LAUSD/UTLA LOCAL SCHOOL STABILIZATION AND EMPOWERMENT INITITIVE OF 2011 ("The Tentative Agreement") + STATEMENT OF JOINT INTEREST + THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT
SUMMARY BY UTLA | HTTP://BIT.LY/U6VAUS
(Dec. 2, 2011)
SCHOOL STABILIZATION
1. For the next three years, including PSC 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 schools, only in-District applicants (no charters) can apply under Public School Choice for Focus (existing) and new schools, nor can the District take any other action to give a District school to a charter operator (e.g. Jordan HS).
2. UTLA can unilaterally opt out of the agreement if the District violates the above provision.
3. For the next three years, no school can be reconstituted/restructured if it demonstrates “reasonably progress toward overall improvement.”
SUPPORT FOR HIGH NEEDS SCHOOLS
1. High needs schools identified by the Superintendent as PSC 3.0 Focus, future Focus, and at-risk Watch schools are eligible for a package of supports, coordinated by UTLA/AALA/District intervention teams, including assistance in plan writing, professional development, etc., from NBC teachers, universities, and displaced teachers (who provide intervention services, tutoring, CAHSEE support, class coverage support, etc.).
2. UTLA, AALA, and the District will provide continuing assistance to ensure that school plans will be accepted by the Superintendent
The Parent Trigger fails in California « Parents Across America
The Parent Trigger fails in California
By Caroline Grannan, San Francisco
Parents Across America founding member
The Parent Trigger is a school reform idea that was hatched here in California, has won glowing press and is still being discussed around the nation as a school reform panacea.
The Parent Trigger supposedly allows 51% of the parents at a school to petition for “transformation” at the school, in one of four ways: turn the school into a charter, close the school, fire the principal, or restructure in more complicated ways.
It appears that some voices around the country are discussing the Parent Trigger as though it had been used successfully at schools throughout California. But that’s not true. The Parent Trigger has never succeeded at any school in California. There have been two known attempts to use it; both have failed. And Parent Revolution, the billionaire-funded Astroturf (fake grassroots) organization that created the Parent Trigger, appears to have basically abandoned it as a strategy.
In December 2010, Parent Revolution was acclaimed far and wide for its Parent Trigger
School Tech Connect: Jackson Potter on Chicago Tonight
Jackson Potter on Chicago Tonight
George Schmidt gives the history here. It should come as no surprise to anyone when Common Core "data" are
Schools Matter: Michelle Newsum: Reclaiming Reform
Michelle Newsum: Reclaiming Reform
By Michelle Newsum
Published in the Advocate, December, 2011, p. 13
advocate@coosdems.org
Our schools have been labeled as failing by people who have never stepped foot in them.The favorite weapon of these 'reformers' is test scores.So let's take a closer look at the data:
Based on the PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study)
* American kids in schools with less than 10% poverty far outscore all
Engaging Parents In School… - A Collection Of “The Best…” Lists On Parent Engagement — 2011
A Collection Of “The Best…” Lists On Parent Engagement — 2011
Since I have published so many “The Best…” lists, I thought it might be helpful to readers if I posted a few year-end collections.
Here is A Collection Of “The Best…” Lists On Parent Engagement — 2011: