Stop Releasing Mall Fire Dispatches, Roseville Tells KCRA 3
Radio Traffic Offers Insights Into Oct. 21 Blaze
POSTED: 3:47 pm PST December 23, 2010
UPDATED: 4:03 pm PST December 23, 2010
POSTED: 3:47 pm PST December 23, 2010
UPDATED: 4:03 pm PST December 23, 2010
34 COMMENTS | PRINT | NO PDF | SHARE
The first issue of Education Next was published in February 2001. In our inaugural issue, we described our goal as “giving voice (without fear or favor) to worthy research, sound ideas, and responsible arguments.” Over the past ten years, much has changed in the world of education policy, and in particular the “war of ideas” today is very different than it was in 2001.
We have been both producers and consumers of research, ideas, and arguments over these past 10 years. In honor of our 10th anniversary, we are launching a poll to determine the best books of the past decade, as identified by our readers.
Listed below are 41 books that we’ve identified as contenders. Only books published after 2000 were considered. The books appear in random order.
Please vote for the top three books of the decade. Once you have voted, you will be invited to view the current results of the poll by clicking on a button at the bottom of the poll. The poll will run until December 31, 2010.
As California prepares for another round of severe budget cuts, a child-advocacy group is recommending the state create a "Children's Cabinet" to coordinate the myriad services delivered by multiple state agencies.
The idea is one of numerous recommendations embedded in the 2011 California Report Card (PDF) issued this week by Children Now, an advocacy group based in Oakland. The report lays out a detailed "children's agenda" for the state, some of which would involve significant additional revenues – an unlikely prospect given the state's budget problems.
But the suggested "Children's Cabinet" would cost little or nothing.
As outlined by Children Now, the cabinet would consist of the heads
Last night Moe Tkacik, a blogger for the Washington City Paper, put up a post about the Assange rape allegations that mentioned the names of the women who claim he raped her. When the #mooreandme folks got wind of it, they hammered her, and she replied with this (edited slightly for clarity):
I did not get the memo about how we were supposed to be all State Department “see no evil” abt accusers’ names at this point. From my perspective, names were just the obvious way of keeping their stories straight. They’ve been all over internet, tweeting etc about this.
Today the editor of the website Jezebel, called out for doing the same thing in a post a while back, replied with this:
Her name has been public for 4 mos. Let’s not pretend otherwise.
So okay. Here’s the deal. Two things:
First, and most obviously, a “public” fact can always be made more public. There are people in the world who

Harold Levy came in as Chancellor quotingWallace Stevens; Klein leaves quoting T.S. Eliot. (What is it with these corporate lawyers posing as educators; is it intellectual insecurity?)
Klein quotes these lines, from Eliot's Little Gidding:
"We shall not cease from exploration/And the end of all our exploring/Will be to arrive where we started/And know the place for the first time."
Sounds like a a dog chasing his own tail -- an inadvertent metaphor for the perpetual cluelessness of
I’ll admit from the start that I’m recycling some arguments here (okay… all of the arguments) … but this stuff needs to be reinforced, over and over again. Quite honestly, to me, from a school finance perspective, this is the most important issue that has surfaced in the past year, and potentially the most dangerous and damaging for the future of American public education.
Robert Reich of Berkeley recently wrote of the Attack on American Education:
http://wallstreetpit.com/54502-the-attack-on-american-education
Specifically, Reich pointed to substantial budget cuts across states as evidence of our de-investment in public schooling. Here are the first three states (by alphabetical order), and the education spending cuts mentioned by
Introducing the Coolest New Gadget of the Year – just in time for last-day shopping! The Reform-inator!

We’re taking the rest of the year off. Happy holidays, enjoy the break, and check in for breaking news if it happens.
The final installment of Joel Klein's weekly memo to principals
In a nostalgic final missive to city principals this week, outgoing Chancellor Joel Klein suggested three things to do once he’s gone.
Writing at California Progress Report, the author Peter Schrag, who has forgotten more than I'll ever know aboutCalifornia, outlines six approaches that Gov.-elect Jerry Brown could take to improve and restore funding for the state's schools. Here they are:
*Extend the temporary tax increases – the boost in the vehicle license fee, the sales taxes and income taxes -- that were enacted in 2009 and will expire in 2011. Voters in 2009 rejected the equivalent of such an extension, but if the extension were earmarked for education, they might react differently. That’s not a good budgeting strategy, but it would be good for the schools.
*Restore fiscal authority to local districts, something that would simultaneously allow local voters to increase property taxes for schools and increase district responsibility in spending. It could also restore some interest and involvement from members of the business community and other local leaders in running for school board seats
An investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has unveiled that K-12 schools across the country continue to hire people who have sexually exploited or targeted children in the past because they did not practice due diligence during the hiring process.
The GAO compared school employment databases from 19 states and Washington, D.C, in between 2007 and 2009 to the National Sex Offender Registry to find cases of sexual abuse that resulted in a criminal conviction.
In investigating known cases of sexual abuse by school employees, the GAO found that people with histories of sexual misconduct were hired or retained as teachers, support staff, volunteers, or contractors. In 11 of the 15 cases the GAO reviewed, the offenders previously targeted children. In six cases, the offenders used their positions in the schools to abuse more children, according to the
The “universal voucher” proposal floated this week by Gov.-elect Rick Scott’s transition team is drawing opposition from at least one longtime supporter of school vouchers.
In documents released this week, Scott’s education advisers — led by Patricia Levesque, a veteran of the Department of Education under Jeb Bush and the current director of one of his school reform groups — outlined a hypothetical program that would allow parents of public schoolchildren to receive 85 percent of the money the state spends per student, which they could keep in “education savings accounts” to use as they see fit on online “virtual schools,” private schools, tutoring or even college expenses.
Andrew Coulson, a voucher advocate from the libertarian Cato Institute, worries that the idea couldn’t fly in Florida, and should instead be tried in states with friendlier legal climates, according to the St. Petersburg Times.