Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Phoenix — the new Birmingham? - Sunday, May 16, 2010 | 2 a.m. - Las Vegas Sun

Phoenix — the new Birmingham? - Sunday, May 16, 2010 | 2 a.m. - Las Vegas Sun

Phoenix — the new Birmingham?

Why Arizona could pay steep economic price for immigration law

Sunday, May 16, 2010 | 2 a.m.
During the civil rights era of the 1950s and 1960s, Atlanta promoted itself as “The City Too Busy to Hate.” Atlanta mayor William Hartsfield used this phrase to promote Atlanta’s urban growth and to indicate the city would not succumb to the evils of racial prejudice and violence.
This moniker distanced Atlanta from other big cities in the South, which by implication had plenty of time to hate. This clever marketing strategy helped make Atlanta the world city it is today. The label also struck people as legitimate — Atlanta was not full of angels, rather it was too focused on economic development to deny civil rights to its citizens.
The South was poised to boom after World War II. President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal public works improvements brought electricity, power and technology to the region. The war boosted Southern industry in the manufacture of steel, ships and aircraft.
By the 1950s, an entire super highway grid was under construction, one that eventually linked all major southern cities. Albert Gore Sr. (former Vice President Al Gore’s father) chaired the Senate transportation committee and ensured that the South got an extra helping of federal dollars and road projects under the 1956 Interstate Highway Act.
Finally, the South’s right-to-work laws reduced union power and lowered labor costs. Only one issue held the South back — race relations.
Atlanta’s leadership understood this basic fact and devised a brilliant campaign with Northern business interests. The city attracted Northern industries and branch offices by downplaying its racial tensions.
Atlanta promoted itself in a positive light, and northerners went “all in.” Atlanta’s chief rival at the time was Birmingham, Ala., an equal urban center in many ways, also poised to boom in post-World War II

Kansas to hike taxes to save school funds | NewsOK.com

Kansas to hike taxes to save school funds | NewsOK.com

Kansas to hike taxes to save school funds

By The Associated Press Comment on this article 1 Comment
Published: May 16, 2010

TOPEKA, Kan. — Come July, shoppers in Kansas will be handing over more money on every purchase because of a sales tax increase at odds with the state’s image as a conservative stronghold.

Even as Republicans from Kansas talk up lower taxes and smaller government in Congress, the GOP-led state Legislature approved the jump in sales tax from 5.3 percent to 6.3 percent that critics say makes Kansas more like California than its Midwestern neighbors.

Across the country, much of the talk has been about budget cuts as states try to wrestle their spending down to balance out lower revenues. After severe reductions last year, Kansas lawmakers were hearing concern from many voters about preserving schools.

"No one likes the thought of paying more taxes, but with the current economic situation, some type of tax increase seems inevitable,” said grocer Mark Fillmore, whose family has owned the M&M Market in Belle Plaine for generations.

That concern for schools didn’t translate into tax increases in most places. In Kansas, though, the new revenues are expected to prevent a cut in education funding in the $13.7 billion budget.

Democratic Gov. Mark Parkinson expects to sign the measure, marking Kansas’ first general tax increase since 2002, by the end of the month.

Some activists and legislators were shaking their heads at a tax increase in a Republican-leaning state with a vocal tea party movement, and that the GOP-dominated Legislature refused in an election year to block an outgoing



Read more: http://newsok.com/article/3461670#ixzz0o6LtuWcP

t r u t h o u t | New Arizona Bills Continue Targeting of Minority Groups, Critics Say

t r u t h o u t | New Arizona Bills Continue Targeting of Minority Groups, Critics Say

New Arizona Bills Continue Targeting of Minority Groups, Critics Say

by: Yana Kunichoff, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Tucson students stage a sit-in at the Tucson United School District's administration building, protesting the recently passed bills that ban ethnic studies classes and prevent teachers with accents from teaching English courses. (Photo: detritus / Flickr)

Tucson's Unified School District is 56 percent Latino, but you may not know it by the changes in the curriculum. According to billsrecently passed in the Arizona state legislature, the Mexican-American studies program may no longer be offered, and you certainly won't be hearing any Spanish-inflected vowels in English-language classes.

Arizona has banned the school district from offering any courses that are designed for students primarly of a certain race, "promote the overthrow of the U.S. government . . . or advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals" at the risk of losing up to ten percent of their funding, and told schools state-wide that teachers with "heavy" or "ungrammatical" accents are no longer allowed to teach English classes.

Governor Jan Brewer signed these bills into law less than a month after penning her name to some of the most restrictive immigration legislation

Most degree claims valid: 26 BISD staffers list doctorates in credentials | bisd, degrees, tactic - Local - Brownsville Herald

Most degree claims valid: 26 BISD staffers list doctorates in credentials | bisd, degrees, tactic - Local - Brownsville Herald

Most degree claims valid: 26 BISD staffers list doctorates in credentials

Comments 3 | Recommend 1

Two Brownsville Independent School District administrators who used non-accredited Ph.D. degrees to falsely claim they held doctoral titles apparently are the only current BISD educators to employ such a tactic.
According to information provided by BISD’s Human Resources Department, 26 BISD educators list doctoral degrees as part of their credentials. BISD provided the information to The Herald as the result of a public information request.
Twenty-four of the degrees check out as legitimate through the accreditation index on the U.S. Department of Education website at http://ope.ed.gov/
accreditation/.
The other two are long-established foreign universities that appear to meet DOE criteria to accept their degrees as valid.
The list of 26 does not include BISD administrators Oscar Cantu

N.J. teacher salaries debate continues amid Gov. Christie's school aid cuts | - NJ.com

N.J. teacher salaries debate continues amid Gov. Christie's school aid cuts | - NJ.com

N.J. teacher salaries debate continues amid Gov. Christie's school aid cuts

By Statehouse Bureau Staff

May 16, 2010, 6:30AM
nj-teacher-salary-budget-cuts.JPGTeachers from Somerset County protested impending school budget cut on Route 206 in Hiilsborough near Amwell Road in April. A study of teacher salaries shows the average pay for New Jersey teachers is $63,154, and the median salary is $57,467.
TRENTON--Susan LiBrizzi, a divorced mother of four, earns $61,798 a year as a special-education teacher in the Flemington-Raritan Regional School District — enough, she says, to pay the bills.
Over the years, she has taken on summer jobs — cleaning houses, tutoring, baby-sitting — for extra cash as her salary has increased by $300 or $400 a year.
Now LiBrizzi, who has taught for 14 years, is due a $4,000 raise — and the governor wants her to give it back.
"I feel like staying middle-class is a struggle," said LiBrizzi, 48, who lives in Bridgewater. "I still have two more kids to put through college, and it’s scary."

New Jersey teacher pay, experience and education

Tough challenges down the road - MontereyHerald.com :

Tough challenges down the road - MontereyHerald.com :

Tough challenges down the road

Kotowski, Alonzo Vaughan square off for post
By CLAUDIA MELÉNDEZ SALINAS
Herald Salinas Bureau
Updated: 05/16/2010 01:29:36 AM PDT

Monterey County has 11 schools ranked in the state's bottom 5 percent for academic achievement and 45 more are close to the bottom. Three of its 24 districts are under some sort of state supervision. And whoever is superintendent of schools for the next four years, county schools are sure to face additional financial and academic challenges given the precarious state of California's educational system.

Monterey County Superintendent of Schools Nancy Kotowski, vying for a second term, is asking voters to return her to the job to "continue the good work we've started."

"We have some challenges, but we are putting in place systems that are bringing our schools to the 21st Century. And good change takes time," Kotowski said.

Her challenger, Salinas City Superintendent of Schools Donna Alonzo Vaughan, says the county cannot take four more years of "reactive" leadership when so many local schools are failing.

On June 8, county voters will decide which road to take.

A graduate of the University of Southern California, Kotowski has worked at the Monterey County Office of Education since 1992, most recently as associate superintendent of curriculum and instruction from 2003 to 2006.

On her website and in debates against her opponent, she lists four elements of her campaign as the pillars of success for Monterey County schools: fiscal accountability, student achievement, effective leadership, and student safety and health.

In the last four years, she

said she has met important milestones to achieve those goals: the budget of the county Office of Education is sound, she prevented a fiscal crisis in King City, she has established programs to attract and retain qualified

Immigration and California

Immigration and California

Immigration and California

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

After decades of crime, drugs, home invasions, carjackings, kidnappings and murders from across the border, courageous Arizona lawmakers finally passed tough-minded illegal immigration legislation.

A recent Times editorial, however, maintains Californians have a “different mindset, different politics and different people” to take any real actions against illegal immigration. Instead, they should “keep an open mind.”

California and Arizona do have one thing in common. They’re both broke. Arizona can’t even afford to keep its highway rest areas open, while California, which spends $8-$9 billion on illegal aliens yearly, can’t afford to pay its employees with real money. Arizona cries out for help from the military, while Californians debate the horrors of E-Verify.

California’s “different mindset” is now $550 billion in debt. Its once-premier educational system is ranked

Alan Pagano, Teaching and Learning: Stumbling along in the Race to the Top - Santa Cruz Sentinel

Alan Pagano, Teaching and Learning: Stumbling along in the Race to the Top - Santa Cruz Sentinel

Alan Pagano, Teaching and Learning: Stumbling along in the Race to the Top





What is the Race to the Top? And why didn't California win a finalist position in the first round?
The Race to the Top is a federal competitive grant program authorized under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to encourage and reward States that are implementing significant reforms in four specific educational areas:
Enhancing standards and assessments, emphasizing math, science and engineering;
Improving the collection and the use of data;
Increasing teacher effectiveness and achieving equity in teacher distribution;
Turning around low-achieving schools.
The U.S. Department of Education announced that 15 states and the District of Columbia were finalists for the first round of funding, with grant winners eligible for $4.3 billion in federal dollars. Glaringly and notably absent from the list was California, where approximately one of every nine K-12 students in the country attends school. Kentucky, which doesn't even permit charter schools, was a finalist.
What happened to California? Wasn't there recently a hard-fought victory in the state legislature
to pass important reforms to enhance California's chances in the competition?
One partial explanation is the view held by some that the Race to the Top was just an extension of the already failed federal reform policy of No Child Left Behind. Race to

University World News - US: The California 'master plan' for higher education

University World News - US: The California 'master plan' for higher education

US: The California 'master plan' for higher education
16 May 2010
Issue: 124



"In 1960 California developed a Master Plan for its already famed public higher education system. It was and continues to be arguably the single most influential effort to plan the future of a system of higher education in the annals of American higher education," writes John Aubrey Douglass, a senior research fellow and deputy director of the Center for Studies in Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley, in a just-published paper.

"Despite popular belief, however, the California Master Plan for Higher Education is more important for what it preserved than what it created."

In its abstract From Chaos to Order and Back? A Revisionist Reflection on the California Master Plan for Higher Education at 50 and Thoughts About its Future says there is much confusion regarding exactly how the Master Plan came about, what it said and did not say, and what portions of it are still relevant today.

Douglass' essay provides a brief historical tour on how California developed its pioneering higher education system, what the 1960 Master Plan accomplished, and a discussion on the current problems facing this system in the midst of the Great Recession.

"The immense success of California's network of public colleges and universities has been its historic accomplishment of what I have called in a previous book The California Idea: the goal of broad access combined with the development of high quality, mission differentiated, and

Schwarzenegger's budget is a blow to the poor - Los Angeles Times

Schwarzenegger's budget is a blow to the poor - Los Angeles Times

Schwarzenegger's budget is a blow to the poor

The governor unveils a proposal that would cut the welfare-to-work program and reduce child care for the needy. 'California no longer has low-hanging fruits,' he says.

May 15, 2010|By Shane Goldmacher, Los Angeles Times

  • Rich Pedroncelli, Associated Press
Reporting from Sacramento —
Proposing a budget that would eliminate the state's welfare-to-work program and most child care for the poor, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Friday outlined a stark vision of a California that would sharply limit aid to some of its poorest and neediest citizens.
His $83.4-billion plan would also freeze funding for local schools, further cut state workers' pay and take away 60% of state money for local mental health programs. State parks and higher education are among the few areas the governor's proposal would spare.


The proposal, which would not raise taxes, also relies on $3.4 billion in help from Washington — roughly half of what the governor sought earlier this year — to help close a budget gap now estimated at $19.1 billion. Billions more would be saved through accounting moves and fund shifts.
"California no longer has low-hanging fruits," said Schwarzenegger at an afternoon news conference in Sacramento. "I now have no choice but to … call for elimination of some very important

Proposition 100 will saddle us with debt

Proposition 100 will saddle us with debt

Proposition 100 will saddle us with debt

As I look to a future where Proposition 100 has been passed, I see a troubling picture of increased challenges for ordinary Arizonans already beaten and battered by the worst recession in 75 years.
First, let me debunk the rhetoric of those who think that increasing taxes and maintaining the size and scope of our state government will improve our society.

If increasing taxes and growing the size of government was beneficial, Arizona would be the financial envy of the world. Instead, Arizona's government nearly doubled this decade while our economy is one of the five worst in the country.
From 1912 until 1997, general-fund expenditures grew from zero to $6.086 billion. Ten years later, they skyrocketed to $13.961 billion. The meteoric rise in Arizona expenditures under Gov. Janet Napolitano was especially onerous, with a $6 billion increase in just six


Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/viewpoints/articles/2010/05/16/20100516prop-100-verschoor.html#ixzz0o6Fm6OWx

At Board of Education, church-state fight grows | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News | Texas Politics | The Dallas Morning News

At Board of Education, church-state fight grows | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News| Texas Politics | The Dallas Morning News

At Board of Education, church-state fight grows



12:00 AM CDT on Saturday, May 15, 2010

By TERRENCE STUTZ / The Dallas Morning News
tstutz@dallasnews.com

AUSTIN – A leading social conservative on the State Board of Education will push for further doubt to be cast on separation of church and state when the board goes back to work on proposed curriculum standards for social studies next week.
Board member Don McLeroy, R-College Station, has distributed several changes he will propose before board members take a final vote on the standards. The curriculum will dictate what is taught in classrooms and must be included in textbooks for U.S. history, government and other social studies courses in Texas schools.
The GOP-dominated board shot down an earlier attempt by Democratsto have high school students study the reasons the Founding Fathers barred the government from promoting any religion.
McLeroy now wants to include a requirement that eighth-grade history students study the issue from a different perspective.
Under his proposal, students would "contrast the Founders' intent relative to the wording of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause, with the popular term 'Separation of church and state.' "
The language reflects the opposition of social and religious conservatives to the legal doctrine of separation of church and state, which has been upheld multiple times by the U.S. Supreme Court,

Cubans March Against Homophobia : NPR

Cubans March Against Homophobia : NPR

Cubans March Against Homophobia

4_Cuba_International_Day_Against_Homophobia.sff.jpg
Associated Press
People participate in events leading up to the International Day Against Homophobia in Havana, Saturday, May 15, 2010. International Day Against Homophobia is celebrated annually on May 17.

text size A A A
HAVANA May 15, 2010, 08:30 pm ET
Hundreds of gay and lesbian activists, some dressed in drag and others sporting multicolored flags representing sexual diversity, marched and danced through the streets of Havana on Saturday along with the daughter of Cuban President Raul Castro as part of a celebration aimed at eliminating homophobia around the world.
Some of the marchers played drums and others walked on stilts as they made their way down a wide avenue in the capital's hip Vedado neighborhood, where they have held a series of debates and workshops ahead of the May 17 celebration of the International Day Against Homophobia, which participants say marks the day in 1990 when the World Health Organization stopped listing homosexuality as a mental illness.
"We have made progress, but we need to make more progress," said Mariela Castro, a campaigner for gay rights on the island and the leader of Cuba's National Sexual Education Center. She is also the daughter of Cuban President Raul Castro.