Weekly Address: President Obama Calls on Congress to Enact Reforms to Stop a "Potential Corporate Takeover of Our Elections"
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Weekly Address
Washington, DC
Everyone's celebrating the Governor's "pledge" to save the Cal Grant... everyone except for students, that is. The pledge to save the Cal grant doesn't save anything at all. In fact, it hurts low income students and their families.
If you dissect this “pledge,” the truth reveals the Governor has made another empty statement that still cuts funding to higher education. In his official statement, the Governor says: “I will not sign a budget without those increases in there,” referring to his January budget proposal. Let’s break it down. First, Schwarzenegger stated that he will not cut from the $2 billion he proposed in January. This alleged increase actually is a reimbursement to this year’s budget from last year to supplement the mandated enrollment growth increases. As for the Cal Grant, the Governor said that he would not sign a budget that makes any additional cuts to the Cal Grant than the budget that he proposed in January. Looking at his January proposal, this means that eliminating the Competitive Cal Grant, decoupling the Cal Grant from fee increases (leaving a $3,000 gap), and capping the income ceiling limit are still on the table. If there were any additional cuts made to Schwarzenegger’s January proposal, the Cal Grant program would be destroyed.
In short, students will still be burdened with being billed $10,000 for fees without having a secure source of financial aid to help pay for it.
Saving funding for higher education and the Cal Grant was originally a demand that students made during meetings with the Governor at UCSA’s Lobby Day on March 1st and through mobilizations made at the capitol and across campuses during the year. On Lobby Day, the Governor pledged to save the Competitive Cal Grant if there was an increase in revenue from tax receipts. On Tax Day, there was a 3.9% increase from receipts, which would be able to fund the Competitive Cal Grant. California’s tax-paying families have upheld our part of the bargain, why hasn’t the Governor?
Students feel cheated and frustrated with the Governor failing to keep his promise. The Governor is perpetuating a broken system
Published: Friday, April 30, 2010
Updated: Friday, April 30, 2010
Last week, Governor Schwarzenegger voiced his support of a bill that removes tenure as a basis for firing public school teachers. In tenure’s place, teacher effectiveness and merit would ideally be used when considering layoffs. The governor cited private companies as a rationale for this legislation, positing that just as a private company fires bad employees, so too should schools fire bad teachers.
For the sake of this opinion, a few assumptions will be made, no matter how unrealistic they sound. First, this assumes that should this legislation pass, that such powers granted will not be abused in any manner. Secondly, this assumes that this legislation will provide the power to eliminate every ‘bad teacher’ currently employed. Finally, we assume that there are no socioeconomic, psychological or other forces contributing to poor student performance and that this piece of legislation will enable ‘better teachers’ to be hired.
That being said, where are we going to find those better teachers?
Every politician and parent has called for the firing of ineffective teachers and hiring teachers radiating enlightenment from their very being. Surely such mythical creatures exist for the hiring. But…
This is where that little thing called deus ex machina is supposed to happen. Cue Julie Andrews or some other similar miracle-worker to drop out of the sky, save the day and ensure that everyone in that classroom ends up going to Ivy-League colleges. Well, at least, it was supposed to happen that way on no less than a thousand whims. If it hasn’t yet, I wonder why.
Well, they’ve got their reasons. They might just have to do with respect, pay and stability of position (or the lack thereof).
Seeing as nobody has managed to find the missing link known as the good teacher, despite their best attempts and their reiterations of the same, we’ll just ask the most next logical question.
How did we let in so many ineffective and underperforming teachers through the state’s certification process to begin with? After all, the great state of California had to place its stamp of approval on everyone we have teaching in the state! Usually, those teaching credentials ensure that the person in question should never give reason to be fired and can at the very least teach your children how to add, subtract, read and write, as well as do any and every permutation of the aforementioned.
One cannot help but notice that by this point, politicians of all creeds have been crusading about this issue since before most of the student body was born. To briefly quote from an aggregate pool of promises from politicians, they have suggested increasing spending for schools, hiring more and better teachers, more supplies, more money, more and larger classrooms and better teacher-student ratios. Based on last year’s standardized testing results, none of this has possibly come to pass.
Politicians are infamous for crying for
‘good teachers’—and then doing little to answer their own demands. That is, after all, why education remains a hot-button issue in any political race at any level in the US.
Our governor and our politicians owe it to California to be done with these games and political posturing and to stop
UC Merced officials said Friday the campus has been designated as a "Hispanic-Serving Institution" by the U.S. Department of Education.
Merced joins Riverside as the second UC campus to get the designation, which goes to schools where Hispanics make up at least 25 percent of undergraduates.
The designation makes UC Merced eligible for funding for student support services, faculty development, campus renovation and other purposes.
Campus officials say its undergraduates are 32 percent Hispanic, 33 percent Asian, 22 percent Caucasian and seven percent black.
This week, UC Merced announced it's creating a Chicano Studies minor after students campaigned for one.
Jill Tucker, Chronicle Staff Writer
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Nick Ut / AP
Bonnie Reiss, state education secretary, says California must revamp its application.
California will throw its hat into the ring for the chance to win $700 million in the second round of federal Race to the Top funds despite the state's arguably long odds and dismal showing in the last round, state officials said Friday.
The state would need to vault from 27th place - out of 40 applicants - in round one to a spot among serious contenders - something that will require a complete revamp of the application, said state Secretary of Education Bonnie Reiss.
This time, six district superintendents, representing more than 1 million students in California, will craft the application rather than Sacramento policy wonks.
San Francisco Unified's Carlos Garcia is one of the select six.
The new application will shine a spotlight on what those districts are already doing to turn around struggling schools, evaluate and support teachers and principals and measure student performance.
"It shows what great work is going on in so many school districts in California," Reiss said. "These superintendents are writing an application that has the maximum amount of detail."
The other district superintendents drafting the application are from Long Beach, Los Angeles, Fresno, Sanger and Clovis unified school districts.
Garcia was reportedly in a meeting Friday with the other superintendents and