EducationNewsToday
SD school board may ease curbs on promotions
This year could mark then end of a policy that keeps failing students in San Diego from being promoted to the next grade level unless they complete summer intervention classes.
The controversy surrounding Sarah Palin's upcoming speech at CSU Stanislaus took a bizarre turn Tuesday when two students said they had found part of her confidential contract in a campus Dumpster.
California State University, Stanislaus, students Alicia Lewis, left, and Ashli Briggs move papers – intact and shredded, found in a campus trash bin – Tuesday in the Capitol. They say the papers include part of Sarah Palin's contract to speak at the school in June.
In a recent post, I suggested that those who promulgate the use of state test results for teacher evaluation don’t really understand the job I’m supposed to do, and how little the tests relate to my teaching mandate as a California high school English teacher. Now let’s set aside that problem, and say, for the sake of argument, that the tests are still worthwhile – despite how little their content overlaps with the California Standards.
There are many more problems, beyond test quality. Do you, the test-loving policy pundits and accountability acolytes, understand my students? Do you have experience teaching high school English classes? Have you ever administered the tests, and watched the students taking the tests? Let me tell you a bit about some of these students (using some fictional names that might ring a bell for readers who recall advice about walking in someone else’s shoes).
Here’s Jean. Jean was reading before she started school, polished off the Harry Potter series by the end of first grade, and lives in a home that is the picture of stability and language enrichment. Now, there are some issues around the concept of “grade level” – but for the sake of argument, let’s assume it’s a valid notion. According to the tests, Jean was reading at a sixth-grade level in third grade, and beyond high school level by the end of eighth grade. Jean arrived in my class at the start of ninth grade. There is nothing I can teach Jean that will improve test scores, because Jean can already ace every state test coming in the next three years. Kids similar
Richard Nystrom made good on a promise to give back. He helps students with learning disabilities make the grade.
News10's ongoing look at the state of education in California resumes this Wednesday with the
Retired Teacher Marches for California’s Schools and State’s Futureby Mike Hall, Apr 13, 2010 |
Gavin Riley taught in California’s public schools for 37 years. Today, the retired California Federation of Teachers member is in the 40th day of a 48-day, 250-mile March for California’s Future. Riley wants nothing less than to save the school system that educated him in the 1950s and 1960s, and where he in turn taught thousands more.
Sponsored by the California Federation of Teachers (CFT), AFSCME and a coalitionof labor, education and faith groups, the march is drawing attention to the state’s budget crisis and the devastating impact of budget cuts on Californians now and into the future.
At the California Progress Report, Riley writes that during the weeks he and the other marchers have been on the road from Bakersfield, through the San Joaquin Valley and then onto Sacramento,
[o]ur walk has allowed us to see ample evidence of the crisis: crumbling road and irrigation systems, high unemployment, foreclosed houses everywhere, overcrowded classrooms courtesy of teacher layoffs, people living under highway overpasses with few social services available, fallow farm fields and closed processing plants, to name just a few. About the only thing growing seems to be the number of new prisons in the Valley, an ironic epitome of the problem.
He recalls famous marches for justice in the 1960s, especially the 1966 march from Delano to Sacramento by César Chávez and the Farm Workers. Their march raised Californians’
As our March for California's Future makes its way closer to Sacramento the bottom line is this: we need to get serious and decide what kind of future we want for our children and our children's children. Do we want to spend more money on prisons than on schools? Do we want to sacrifice opportunity for the majority of Californians so those at the top of the economic ladder and some of the most powerful corporations do not have to make any sacrifices at all?
Consider the fact that the top one percent of earners in California has nearly doubled its share of income over the past twenty years from 13 percent to 25 percent. Ponder the reality that, despite the mantra of the anti-tax zealots, taxes are not higher now in California than they have ever been. In 1993, for instance, the highest marginal tax bracket in California was 11 percent while today it is only 9.3 percent. (There is a temporary 1 percent surcharge on people who make $1 million a year due to the budget deal of two years ago, but that expires this year). Restoring the top brackets to what they were in the 1990s would bring in $5 billion per year.
If we look at corporate taxes, a recent report by Forbes documented how many of the most powerful corporations in the United States pay no taxes. For example, General Electric made over $10 billion dollars last year and actually got over $1 billion back in Federal tax rebates. Many other big corporations pay no taxes while you and I are left to carry the load.
In California, corporations only contribute 11% of the state budget whereas, in 1980, they