Letters - ‘No Child Left Behind,’ Revisited - NYTimes.com
“Making ‘No Child’ Better” (editorial, Feb. 5) misses the point that the No Child Left Behind law is founded on faulty assumptions of top-down mandates, zero tolerance, narrow forms of assessment, and privatization. These are all popular nowadays, but have been shown to be ineffective in other sectors (health, corrections, welfare and so on) and have a dismal track record so far in education.
“Tightening up” the law will only prolong the agony.
President Obama’s appointment of Arne Duncan as education secretary instead of the education scholar Linda Darling-Hammond has set authentic reform in education back by at least a decade. Educators aren’t the villains;
Asynchronous War, defined
-
Here’s what it means to engage in an asynchronous war, using the US/Israel
attack on Iran as a case-in-point:Iran wins if it doesn’t lose; the US
loses if ...
1 hour ago
