Teach students to care about others instead of measuring how they compare to each other
If you just learn a single trick, Scout, you’ll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view…Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.~ Atticus Finch, ( Gregory Peck) “To Kill A Mockingbird”
Whether its hundreds of spring break bystanders watching and recording a daylight sexual assault of an unconscious woman, or middle school students using a cell phone to video the merciless verbal abuse and taunting of a 68 year old bus monitor, or even a depressed and desperate German co-pilot who decides to include a plane load of people in his suicide plans, there clearly is an empathy deficit and crisis in our world today.
Ed reformers must have experienced a serious case of buyer’s remorse after recruiting David Colemen ( the anti-Atticus Finch) to design and craft the Common Core State Standards only to hear him proclaim…
“As you grow up in this world, you realize people really don’t give a s#@% about what you feel or what you think”
We are foolishly implementing national education reforms obsessed with measuring how students compare to each other at a time when schools should be doubling their efforts to maximize our students ability and inclination to care about others.
There appears to have been a data-driven hijacking of the Common Core Standards. Theuse of standardized tests to assess student mastery devalues the most vibrant components of the standards and abandons the “promise” of constructivist learning.
Standardized tests measure only specialized and discrete skills called for in the Commmon Core but they are not a comprehensive ruler or appropriate metric formeasuring student agency and a wide array of essential non-cognitive skills.
What if the PARCC and Smarter Balanced tests were designed and developed more for teacher accountability purposes than to reliably measure students skills?
PARCC has already acknowledged that their test is not a comprehensive or reliable measure of college and career readiness.
Using junk science VAM formulas, education leaders claim they can use student scores on these unreliable assessments to reliably measure the quality and effectiveness of their teachers.
Have education reformers even considered the possibility that a “highly effective” educator who prepares and trains students to master a standardized test may not be good teacher?
The unfortunate decision to use standardized tests to evaluate student mastery AND teacher quality means classroom instruction is focused primarily on rigorous and standardized lessons that prepare students for assessments at a time when many would be better served by vigorous and nonroutine experiences helping them learn how to properly manage their attitutes, behaviors, and emotions.
We are devoting too much class time training and testing children just so parents can be assured their 3rd graders are “on track” for college when there is no way the Common Core Standards and tests can prevent or predict which students will be “derailed” by Teach students to care about others instead of measuring how they compare to each other | WagTheDog:
