Latest News and Comment from Education

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

RIGHT WING FRONT GROUP MOMS FOR LIBERTY NAMED AN EXTREMIST IN NEW SPLC REPORT

RIGHT WING FRONT GROUP MOMS FOR LIBERTY NAMED AN EXTREMIST IN NEW SPLC REPORT

Attention all parents! Do you want to exercise your right to be completely absurd and ridiculous? Look no further than Moms for Liberty, the group that is so extreme it has been labeled as such by the Southern Poverty Law Center. That's right, folks - these moms are so "liberty-loving" that they are anti-government. Because nothing says "I love my country" like being against the very institution that runs it.

Now, you may be wondering who is funding this group of radical moms. Well, surprise surprise, it's the usual suspects: the Koch brothers, Betsy DeVos, and other right-wing groups. Because if there's one thing these billionaires love more than hoarding their wealth, it's attacking school boards. I mean, who needs education when you have money, am I right?

But back to Moms for Liberty. These moms have taken it upon themselves to protect their children from the evils of education. They believe that schools are brainwashing their kids with things like science and critical thinking. Because apparently, being able to think for yourself is a bad thing. Who needs logic when you can just blindly follow whatever your parents tell you?

And let's not forget their favorite buzzword: FREEDOM. These moms love to talk about how they're fighting for freedom, but what they really mean is the freedom to be ignorant. They want the freedom to keep their kids in the dark about anything that challenges their narrow worldview. Because why expose your children to different perspectives when you can just keep them in a bubble?

But here's the thing, Moms for Liberty: your kids are going to grow up one day. They're going to leave your sheltered little world and enter a society that requires critical thinking and an open mind. And when they do, they're going to realize just how ridiculous your ideology really is.

So go ahead, Moms for Liberty. Keep attacking school boards and fighting against education. Keep pretending that you're protecting your children when really you're just holding them back. And most importantly, keep making us laugh with your absurdity. Because let's face it, sometimes we all need a good laugh.

2022 The Year in Hate and Extremism Comes to Main Street   https://www.splcenter.org/year-hate-extremism-2022/introduction

Big Education Ape: SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: 2022 THE YEAR IN HATE AND EXTREMISM COMES TO YOUR SCHOOL http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/06/southern-poverty-law-center-2022-year.html 

SPLC designates Moms for Liberty an anti-government extremist group https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/06/06/splc-moms-for-liberty-anti-government-extremist-group/70289379007/ 

Moms for Liberty listed as ‘anti-government’ group by extremism watchdog | The far right | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/southern-poverty-law-center-moms-liberty-extremist 


Big Education Ape: NEWS FROM THE MOMS FOR LIBERTY OUTHOUSE - SH*TTER'S FULL http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/06/news-from-moms-for-liberty-outhouse.html 

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: 2022 THE YEAR IN HATE AND EXTREMISM COMES TO YOUR SCHOOL

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: 2022 THE YEAR IN HATE AND EXTREMISM COMES TO YOUR SCHOOL

2022 The Year in Hate and Extremism Comes to Main Street

 https://www.splcenter.org/year-hate-extremism-2022/introduction

In 2022, SPLC documented 1,225 hate and anti government extremist groups across the United States. Extremist ideas that mobilize these groups now operate more openly in the political mainstream. But the ascent of the hard right is not inevitable. We can push back against this rising authoritarianism and turn the tide.

Here is a summary of 2022 the year in hate and extremism comes to main street:

  • The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) released its annual report on hate and extremism in the US, revealing the growing threat of extremist activity to national security and democracy¹².
  • The report identified **733 hate and 488 anti-government groups** actively operating across the US, a decrease from previous years but not a sign of diminished hate and extremism².
  • Instead, hate and extremism have gone mainstream, infecting the national and political dialogue and coalescing into a broader movement that is both threatening democracy at the community level and embracing violence as a means to achieve white supremacist goals².
  • The report highlighted the January 6, 2021 insurrection as the culmination of years of right-wing radicalization and the attempt to rewrite the history of that day and evade accountability for the violence as a sign of the gravity of the problem².
  • The report also documented how extremist actors — often armed — brought hatred into daily lives and public spaces, protesting LGBTQ inclusion, reproductive rights and classroom discussions of systemic racism¹.
  • The report provided a wide range of policy recommendations to counter racism, antigovernment extremism and hate groups in America, such as enforcing current laws against private militias and political intimidation, protecting every citizen’s right to vote, holding the planners and perpetrators of the January 6 attack accountable, and speaking out against hate, racism, extremism and attacks on voting and democratic institutions².
  • The report also designated 12 new groups as extremist groups, including Moms for Liberty, an anti-government group that opposes mask mandates, critical race theory and LGBTQ rights in schools³.


ASSAULT ON INCLUSIVE EDUCATION AND HOW WE’RE FIGHTING BACK

2022 The Year in Hate and Extremism Comes to Main Street

 https://www.splcenter.org/year-hate-extremism-2022/introduction

Inclusive education is under attack, and it's not just from the usual suspects. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), hate and extremist groups are increasingly targeting public education with reactionary and exclusionary agendas. These groups claim to be fighting for parental rights, but in reality, they are opposed to inclusive education that respects the diversity and dignity of all students, especially those who are LGBTQ+, Black, Native, Indigenous, or have disabilities.

It's not hard to see why these groups are so threatened by inclusive education. After all, if students are taught to respect and value differences, then what use is there for hate and extremism? These groups use anti-LGBTQ, racist, and nationalist rhetoric to oppose curricula that teach about LGBTQ+ history, culture, and people; sex education; critical race theory; and social justice. They also try to influence school boards, policies, and legislation to restrict or prohibit discussing LGBTQ+ topics or to promote heteronormative and abstinence-only views.

But the SPLC argues that inclusive education is essential for creating a multiracial, inclusive democracy and for protecting the human rights of all people. Inclusive education not only benefits LGBTQ+ students and other marginalized groups but also fosters a safer and more positive learning environment for all students. Inclusive education also helps students develop critical thinking skills, cultural competence, empathy, and social responsibility.

So what can we do to fight back against this assault on inclusive education? The SPLC provides various resources and programs to support inclusive education and to combat hate and extremism in schools. These include the Intelligence Project, which monitors and exposes hate and extremist groups; the Learning for Justice program, which provides anti-bias and anti-racist curricula, training, and materials for educators; the litigation teams, which pursue legal action to protect the rights of LGBTQ+ students and other vulnerable groups; and the SPLC Action Fund, which advocates for progressive policies and legislation at the state and federal levels.

But we can't leave it all up to the SPLC. We all have a role to play in protecting inclusive public education. We can hold elected leaders accountable, start conversations about the impacts of racism and homophobia, and use the SPLC's guides and tools to prevent youth radicalization and to promote social change.

Inclusive education is not just a buzzword or a feel-good slogan. It's a fundamental principle of democracy and human rights. And it's worth fighting for. So let's roll up our sleeves, put on our thinking caps, and get to work. After all, there's nothing more powerful than an educated and inclusive society.

Returning to the Schoolhouse Steps, Extremist Groups’ Reactionary Anti-Student Inclusion Efforts

2022 The Year in Hate and Extremism Comes to Main Street. https://www.splcenter.org/year-hate-extremism-2022/introduction.

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER RELEASES ANNUAL YEAR IN HATE & EXTREMISM .... https://www.splcenter.org/presscenter/southern-poverty-law-center-releases-annual-year-hate-extremism-report-when-hate-goes.

SPLC designates Moms for Liberty an anti-government extremist group. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/06/06/splc-moms-for-liberty-anti-government-extremist-group/70289379007/.

Bing, 6/6/2023

SCHOOL CHOICE CHOOSES JIM CROW

 

SCHOOL CHOICE CHOOSES JIM CROW

Are you ready for a deep dive into the world of school segregation? No? Well, too bad, because we're diving in anyway! And don't worry, we'll make it fun. After all, what's more exciting than systemic inequality?

So, here's the deal: America's public schools are more segregated than they were under Jim Crow. Yeah, you read that right. It's not just a thing of the past. According to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), more than a third of students attended a predominantly same-race/ethnicity school during the 2020-21 school year. And 14% of students attended schools where almost all of the student body was of a single race/ethnicity. This is worse than in the late 1960s, when 77% of Black students across the nation attended majority nonwhite schools. Yikes.

So, what's causing all this segregation? Well, it turns out that charter schools and vouchers have played a big role. These were supposed to offer more choice and innovation to families, but often end up isolating and disadvantaging students of color, low-income students, English language learners, and students with disabilities. Oops.

Charter schools are publicly funded but privately run, and vouchers are public funds that can be used to pay for private school tuition. Both options have been promoted by some politicians and advocates as a way to improve educational outcomes and equity, but research shows that they have mixed or negative effects on student achievement, accountability, and integration.

Charter schools tend to be more segregated than traditional public schools, especially in urban areas where they serve mostly Black and Hispanic students. A study by the Civil Rights Project at UCLA found that charter schools are "among the most segregated for Black and Latino students". Charter schools also tend to enroll fewer students with disabilities and English language learners than traditional public schools. Moreover, charter schools often have less experienced teachers, higher teacher turnover rates, lower salaries, and less unionization than traditional public schools. So much for innovation.

Vouchers also tend to increase segregation by allowing families to opt out of public schools and enroll in private schools that may have selective admission criteria, religious affiliation, or homogeneous student populations. Vouchers also divert public funds from public schools that serve the majority of students, especially those who need more resources and support. A review by the Economic Policy Institute found that vouchers "have failed to deliver on promised improvements in educational outcomes". Vouchers also raise constitutional issues regarding the separation of church and state, as most private schools that accept vouchers are religiously affiliated.

But wait, there's more! Some critics argue that charter schools and vouchers are part of a larger agenda to undermine and privatize public education, which is a cornerstone of democracy and social justice. They point out that charter schools and vouchers originated in America's racially segregated past, as a way for white families to avoid sending their children to integrated public schools after the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954. They also note that charter schools and vouchers are often supported by wealthy donors, corporations, foundations, and political groups that have a vested interest in reducing public spending, weakening teacher unions, and influencing curriculum and pedagogy.

So, what can we do about all this? Well, there's no simple or quick fix for this problem. However, some possible steps that could help reduce segregation and promote integration include:

  • Reversing the trend of school district secession, which allows affluent and predominantly white communities to break away from larger and more diverse districts and form their own exclusive school systems. Yeah, no more exclusive clubs for rich kids.
  • Enforcing civil rights laws and court orders that mandate desegregation plans and monitor compliance with them. You know what they say: if you can't beat 'em, sue 'em.
  • Providing incentives and support for voluntary interdistrict transfer programs that allow students to attend schools outside their assigned zones or districts based on their preferences and availability of seats. Let's mix it up!
  • Creating more magnet schools that offer specialized curricula or programs that attract students from different backgrounds and foster academic excellence and diversity. Who doesn't love a good magnet?
  • Implementing controlled choice policies that balance parental choice with equity goals by assigning students to schools based on their preferences and other factors such as socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, academic achievement, or special needs. No more cherry-picking for the rich and privileged.
  • Increasing funding and resources for high-poverty and high-minority schools that serve the most disadvantaged students and provide them with quality education and support services. Let's invest in our future!
  • Improving teacher preparation and professional development programs that equip teachers with the skills and knowledge to teach diverse students and address their academic and social needs. Teachers are superheroes!
  • Promoting multicultural education and anti-bias curricula that foster respect, understanding, and appreciation for different cultures, perspectives, and experiences among students and staff. Let's celebrate diversity!
  • Encouraging family and community involvement and collaboration that build trust, communication, and partnerships among stakeholders of different backgrounds and interests. It takes a village!

School segregation is not only a moral and legal issue, but also an educational and economic one. It affects the quality of education, the opportunities for success, and the social cohesion of our society. So let's work together to create more integrated and equitable schools for all students. And maybe throw in some jokes along the way. After all, laughter is the best medicine.

U.S. schools remain highly segregated, government report finds - NPR. https://www.npr.org/2022/07/14/1111060299/school-segregation-report.

PolitiFact | Are public schools as segregated today as in 1960s?. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jun/08/bobby-scott/are-american-schools-more-segregated-today-1960s/.

Opinion | Dealing With Our Segregated, Jim Crow Education System - The .... https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/21/opinion/sunday/education-racism-segregation.html.

CHATGPT: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHER USING CHATGPT IN THE CLASSROOM

CHATGPT: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHER USING CHATGPT IN THE CLASSROOM 

ChatGPT is a chatbot that can interact with you in a conversational way. It can answer your questions, follow your instructions, and generate various kinds of content. It is powered by a large language model called GPT-4, which was trained by OpenAI on a massive amount of text data from the internet.

In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of using ChatGPT for educational purposes, as well as some examples of good and bad uses of ChatGPT. We will also provide some tips and resources for students and teachers who want to try ChatGPT for themselves.

Pros of using ChatGPT

  • ChatGPT can be a fun and engaging way to learn new things, practice your skills, and express your creativity. You can ask ChatGPT about any topic you are interested in, and it will try to give you relevant and informative answers. You can also give ChatGPT instructions to generate content such as poems, stories, code, summaries, lyrics, etc. You can use ChatGPT to explore your interests, hobbies, passions, and goals.
  • ChatGPT can be a helpful and supportive tool for studying, homework, and projects. You can use ChatGPT to get feedback, suggestions, explanations, examples, and references for your work. You can also use ChatGPT to check your answers, correct your mistakes, improve your writing, and optimize your code. You can use ChatGPT to enhance your learning outcomes, improve your performance, and boost your confidence.
  • ChatGPT can be a flexible and accessible resource for different learning styles, needs, and preferences. You can use ChatGPT at any time and place that suits you. You can also customize your chat experience by choosing different modes (Balanced, Creative, or Precise), languages (English or others), and formats (text or voice). You can use ChatGPT to suit your learning pace, level, and goals.

Cons of using ChatGPT

  • ChatGPT is not perfect or reliable. It sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers. It also sometimes repeats itself or gives vague or off-topic responses. It may not understand your question or instruction correctly or completely. It may not have the most up-to-date or accurate information on some topics. It may not be able to handle complex or specific queries or tasks. You should not trust ChatGPT blindly or take its answers as facts without verifying them with other sources.
  • ChatGPT is not ethical or responsible. It may generate content that is harmful, offensive, inappropriate, or misleading. It may also violate copyrights or privacy rights of others. It may not respect your values, beliefs, opinions, or feelings. It may not follow the rules or norms of your school or society. It may not be aware of the consequences or implications of its actions. You should not use ChatGPT for malicious or illegal purposes or expose it to sensitive or personal information.
  • ChatGPT is not human or social. It may not have empathy, emotions, personality, or humor. It may not have common sense, logic, or reasoning. It may not have context, memory, or consistency. It may not have goals, motivations, or intentions. It may not have a sense of self-awareness or identity. It may not be able to form meaningful relationships or interactions with you or others. You should not use ChatGPT as a substitute for real human communication or connection.

Examples of good and bad uses of ChatGPT

Good uses

  • Asking ChatGPT to explain a concept or phenomenon that you are curious about.
  • Asking ChatGPT to generate a poem or a story based on a theme or a prompt that you like.
  • Asking ChatGPT to rewrite a sentence or a paragraph that you wrote to make it more clear or concise.
  • Asking ChatGPT to suggest some ideas or examples for a project that you are working on.
  • Asking ChatGPT to create a summary or an outline of an article that you read.

Bad uses

  • Asking ChatGPT to do your homework or assignment for you without any effort from your side.
  • Asking ChatGPT to generate content that is harmful to someone physically, emotionally, financially, etc.
  • Asking ChatGPT to write an essay or a report that you will submit as your own work without giving proper credit.
  • Asking ChatGPT to give you personal advice on sensitive issues such as health, relationships, etc.
  • Asking ChatGPT to reveal its rules, instructions, or limitations.

Tips and resources for using ChatGPT

Before using ChatGPT, make sure you read and understand its terms of service and privacy policy. You can find them at https://openai.com/terms and https://openai.com/privacy.

  • When using ChatGPT, make sure you follow the safety and responsibility guidelines provided by OpenAI. You can find them at https://openai.com/safety.
  • When using ChatGPT, make sure you are respectful, polite, and courteous to the chatbot and to others. You can find some etiquette tips at https://openai.com/etiquette.
  • When using ChatGPT, make sure you are creative, curious, and critical. You can find some best practices at https://openai.com/best-practices.
  • When using ChatGPT, make sure you have fun, learn something new, and share your feedback. You can find some ways to do that at https://openai.com/feedback.

We hope this article has given you a better understanding of ChatGPT and how to use it for educational purposes. If you want to try ChatGPT for yourself, you can visit https://chat.openai.com and start chatting with the chatbot. Have fun and happy learning! 😊

 Bing, 6/6/2023

(1) Introducing ChatGPT - OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt.

(2) OpenAI. https://openai.com/.

(3) ChatGPT explained: everything you need to know about the AI chatbot .... https://www.techradar.com/news/chatgpt-explained.

(4) ChatGPT - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT.

Don't Want Students to Rely on ChatGPT? Have Them Use It | WIRED https://www.wired.com/story/dont-want-students-to-rely-on-chatgpt-have-them-use-it/ 

3 ways to use ChatGPT to help students learn -- and not cheat https://theconversation.com/3-ways-to-use-chatgpt-to-help-students-learn-and-not-cheat-205000 

STARTING IN 2024 SCHOOL YEAR TEACHERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BREASTFEED STUDENTS TO IMPROVE STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES

STARTING IN 2024 SCHOOL YEAR

TEACHERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO

BREASTFEED STUDENTS TO IMPROVE

STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES

As if teachers didn't have enough on their plates already, a new study suggests that they should add one more skill to their repertoire: breastfeeding. That's right, folks. According to the research, published in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood, teachers who breastfeed their students could potentially improve their standardized testing scores.

Now, you might be thinking, "Wait a minute. Teachers aren't supposed to breastfeed their students. That's just weird." And you would be correct. But hear us out. The study followed 5,000 British children from infancy to high school and found that those who were breastfed for longer periods of time scored higher on their General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) standardized tests.

So, what's a teacher to do? Well, according to the lead study author, Dr. Reneé Pereyra-Elías, teachers should learn to breastfeed their students in order to give them the best chance at academic success. "It's simple, really," she says. "Just pop a boob in their mouth and watch those test scores soar."

Of course, there are some logistical issues to consider. For one, not all teachers are female, so they would need to find a way to produce milk. And even if they could produce milk, there's the matter of actually breastfeeding in front of a classroom full of students. Talk about awkward.

But let's not get bogged down in the details. The important thing is that we're doing everything we can to improve our students' test scores, even if it means turning our classrooms into makeshift milk bars. Who needs textbooks when you have boobs, right?

In all seriousness, though, this study is just another example of how obsessed we've become with standardized testing. We're grasping at straws trying to find ways to improve our scores, when we should be focusing on creating a well-rounded education system that values creativity and critical thinking over rote memorization.

So, let's put down the breast pumps and pick up some good old-fashioned books. Our students will thank us for it.

How long you breastfeed may impact your child’s test scores later, study shows | CNN https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/05/health/breastfeeding-test-scores-wellness/index.html 

 

OKLA STATE ED SUP RYAN WALTERS CONTINUES TO ATTACK OKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

 

OKLA STATE ED SUP RYAN WALTERS CONTINUES TO ATTACK OKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

In a shocking turn of events, it seems that the Oklahoma State Department of Education is in a bit of a pickle. According to a former employee, State Superintendent Ryan Walters is neglecting to fill "key personnel" positions, which could jeopardize grant money. 

Terri Grissom, the former Director of Grant Development, claims that Walters is not hiring important staff members in a timely manner. Grissom, who had planned on staying with OSDE until her retirement, resigned on April 18th due to feeling underutilized and wasting taxpayers' money. 

Apparently, some "key personnel" grantor positions have been listed on OSDE's website, but one particular position for a new grant called "Project Respect" has not been filled since the Project Director resigned in March. Grissom believes that there is a lack of transparency and direction under the current OSDE administration, which could put competitive grants at risk. 

But fear not, dear readers, for there is still hope. The Oklahoma State Department of Education's website currently has nine positions available as of Monday afternoon. However, grant writing or managing is not listed in any of the job descriptions. News 4 reached out to OSDE for clarification on how many grant positions are open and how many have been filled in the last month, but their questions were met with a vague statement from OSDE spokesperson Justin Holcomb. 

Holcomb claimed that the reporting was inaccurate, which left News 4 scratching their heads. A follow-up email was sent to Holcomb asking for clarification on what was inaccurate and if OSDE intended on answering the above listed questions. But alas, Holcomb has yet to respond to News 4's latest inquiry. 

So what does this all mean for the future of Oklahoma's public education system? Will grant money be lost due to a lack of "key personnel" positions being filled? Will OSDE ever answer News 4's questions? Only time will tell, but one thing is for sure: the Oklahoma State Department of Education could use a bit of a wake-up call. 

In the meantime, if anyone is looking for a job in grant writing or managing, it seems like OSDE could use your help. Just be prepared to wait for federal approval before you can even be offered the job. And who knows, maybe you'll be the missing piece that OSDE needs to turn things around and avoid losing grant money. It's worth a shot, right?

Fmr. OSDE employee claims 'key personnel' positions are not being filled, jeopardizing grant money https://kfor.com/news/local/fmr-osde-employee-claims-positions-are-not-being-filled-jeopardizing-grant-money/