Latest News and Comment from Education

Show All

Saturday, July 11, 2026

MCCARTHYISM WITH A RED TIE: AMERICA'S THIRD RED SCARE - HOW THE MAN WHO SCREAMS "COMMUNIST" GOVERNS LIKE ONE


MCCARTHYISM WITH A RED TIE

AMERICA'S THIRD RED SCARE - HOW THE MAN WHO SCREAMS "COMMUNIST" GOVERNS LIKE ONE

There's a delicious irony at the heart of American politics in the summer of 2026 — the loudest anti-communist voice in the room has spent his second term buying equity stakes in private corporations, threatening companies that move factories overseas, and floating price controls on groceries and gasoline. If Karl Marx had a golf handicap and a spray tan, he might look a lot like the man currently invoking the word "communist" eighty times in two weeks. Welcome to the Third Red Scare — McCarthyism with a red tie, a social media account, and absolutely no sense of irony.

Act I: The Genealogy of Fear — From Joe McCarthy to Donald Trump

The bridge between the 1950s and today isn't metaphorical. It has a name, a biography, and a remarkably aggressive legal style: Roy Cohn.

At 26, Cohn served as Senator Joseph McCarthy's chief counsel — the tactical brain behind the most infamous witch hunt in American legislative history. Decades later, he became Donald Trump's personal attorney, mentor, and political godfather. Cohn handed Trump a three-rule playbook that has never been updated, only amplified:

  • Never apologize. Admission of error is treated as a mortal wound.
  • Counter-punch immediately and disproportionately. When hit, hit back twice as hard and make them the story.
  • Repeat the claim until it becomes reality. Volume and frequency substitute for evidence.

McCarthy had his lists of alleged communists in the State Department. Trump has the "Deep State." McCarthy had HUAC hearings. Trump has stadium rallies and a social media ecosystem that makes 1950s broadcast television look quaint. The medium changed. The music is identical.

"Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty... greater than World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or even 9/11." — Donald Trump, Mount Rushmore Address, July 3, 2026

One imagines Senator McCarthy nodding approvingly from whatever afterlife accommodates aggressive demagogues.

Act II: A Brief History of Crying Wolf — The First Two Red Scares

To appreciate the Third Red Scare, you need to understand its ancestors. America has been here before — twice — and both times the panic arrived precisely when the economy was convulsing and the political establishment needed a villain.

The First Red Scare (1919–1920)

The Bolshevik Revolution terrified American industrialists. A wave of post-WWI labor strikes, combined with a handful of anarchist mail bombings, gave Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer all the justification he needed. Federal agents raided homes, arrested over 10,000 activists, and deported hundreds of immigrants on what critics called the "Soviet Ark." The real target wasn't Bolshevism — it was the American labor movement, which had the audacity to ask for an eight-hour workday.

The Second Red Scare (1947–1957)

This one had more institutional architecture. The Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949, the fall of China, and the Korean War created a genuine geopolitical anxiety that McCarthy weaponized brilliantly. The Hollywood Blacklist destroyed careers. The Federal Loyalty Program subjected four million government employees to political screening. Hundreds lost jobs not for doing anything, but for thinking the wrong things.

Here's the pattern worth memorizing:

Red ScareThe Real AnxietyThe Convenient VillainThe Actual Victims
First (1919)Post-WWI labor unrest & economic dislocationBolshevism & anarchismImmigrants, labor organizers, the IWW
Second (1947)Cold War nuclear anxiety & Soviet expansionCommunist infiltratorsHollywood creatives, academics, federal workers
Third (2026)Economic inequality & democratic socialist electoral wins"Godless Communists" in the Democratic PartyProgressive candidates, Medicare for All advocates, DSA members

The formula is consistent: take a real anxiety, attach it to a political opponent, repeat loudly, and watch the civil liberties evaporate.

Act III: The Spectacular Irony — The Anti-Communist Who Governs Like One



Here is where the story gets genuinely, almost poetically absurd.

While Trump invokes communism as an existential threat at Mount Rushmore, his administration has been quietly doing things that would make a Soviet central planner blush with recognition:

šŸ­ Government equity stakes in private companies. The administration has used taxpayer funds to acquire financial stakes in corporations across the semiconductor, technology, and mineral sectors — including Intel and MP Materials. When approving corporate mergers, the administration has sought "golden shares" granting the government veto power over major corporate decisions. In the Soviet Union, they called this state ownership of the means of production. In Washington, they call it national security.

šŸŒ¾ Massive state-directed farmer bailouts. When Trump's own tariffs destroyed the export market for American soybeans and pork, the administration didn't let the free market adjust — it distributed tens of billions in direct cash payments to agricultural producers. The Mises Institute, not exactly a hotbed of socialist sympathy, noted this was textbook interventionism: create a market distortion, pick winners and losers, then subsidize the casualties.

šŸ’° Price controls on groceries and gasoline. The administration has floated — and in some cases implemented — direct intervention in consumer prices. Price controls are so classically socialist that they appear in the first chapter of every economics textbook as the canonical example of what markets shouldn't do.

šŸ­ Threatening private companies for moving factories. Harley-Davidson, automakers, and others have faced explicit executive threats of punitive taxes for making private business decisions about where to manufacture. This is not capitalism. This is the executive branch substituting its political preferences for market signals.

The Wall Street Journal's chief economics commentator, Greg Ip, put it plainly: "The U.S. marches toward state capitalism with American characteristics... extending political control ever deeper into the economy."

To summarize: the man screaming "communist" eighty times in two weeks has spent his term nationalizing strategic industries, bailing out farmers with state funds, threatening private companies into compliance, and floating price controls. If this is capitalism, Karl Marx died confused.

Act IV: What They're Actually Calling Communism



Let's be precise about what the "New Red Scare" rhetoric is actually targeting, because the definitional sleight-of-hand is the entire trick.

Communism, properly defined, means the abolition of private property, the elimination of the market, and the total centralization of all economic decisions in a stateless collective. The Soviet Union attempted this. It produced gulags, famine, and the most comprehensive surveillance state in history.

What DSA members and progressive Democrats actually advocate:

  • Universal healthcare (Medicare for All)
  • Free public university tuition
  • Subsidized childcare
  • Expanded Social Security
  • A higher minimum wage
  • Student debt relief

These are not communist policies. They are, almost precisely, the policies currently operating in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland — countries that consistently rank higher than the United States on economic freedom indexes, that have thriving private sectors, and that produce companies like IKEA, Spotify, Volvo, and Novo Nordisk.

The Nordic Model isn't communism. It's capitalism with a safety net — a free market generating enormous wealth, and a democratic decision to use that wealth to ensure that getting sick, losing a job, or having a child doesn't financially destroy a family.

More to the point: Medicare for All is no more communist than Medicare itself. Or Social Security. Or public roads. Or public schools. Or the fire department. Or the United States military — the largest government-run enterprise in human history, funded entirely by taxation, in which no one earns a profit.

Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal — the social architecture that pulled America out of the Great Depression — was called communism by the fear-mongers of his era too. Social Security was called a socialist plot. The minimum wage was called Marxist. The eight-hour workday was called un-American.

They were wrong then. The rhetoric hasn't gotten more accurate with age.

Act V: The Legal Reckoning — How the Courts Dismantled the Last Red Scare

History offers a useful precedent for where aggressive ideological prosecution eventually lands.

In Dennis v. United States (1951), the Supreme Court deferred entirely to anti-communist panic, allowing the imprisonment of Communist Party leaders simply for teaching Marxist philosophy from books. Justice Hugo Black's dissent was prophetic: they were prosecuted not for an overt act, but for talking and writing.

By 1957 — "Red Monday" — the Warren Court had seen enough. In Yates v. United States, the Court drew a bright line: believing in an abstract idea is protected speech; only explicit incitement to concrete action crosses the legal threshold. This single distinction made Smith Act prosecutions nearly impossible and effectively ended the era of mass political imprisonment.

By 1969, Brandenburg v. Ohio established the standard that still governs today: the government cannot suppress speech unless it is directed toward imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it. Radical political speech — left or right — is constitutionally protected.

The lesson of legal history is consistent: the Red Scare always overreaches, and the courts eventually notice.

The Verdict: Fear Is a Product, Not a Policy



The Third Red Scare is, at its core, a marketing campaign. It is a carefully focus-grouped strategy — tested heavily with older voters who remember the Cold War and with Hispanic communities whose families fled genuine authoritarian leftism in Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. Those fears are real and deserve respect. They are also being cynically harvested to brand a congresswoman who wants universal healthcare as equivalent to the regime that imprisoned their grandparents.

The word "communist" has been stripped of its meaning and repurposed as a general-purpose label for "policies I oppose." This is not political analysis. It is the rhetorical equivalent of calling every fever "the plague."

Here is what is actually on the ballot in November:

  • Whether the elderly should have healthcare security — not communism; it's called Medicare, and it already exists.
  • Whether children should have access to quality education — not communism; it's called public school, and it's in the Constitution.
  • Whether workers should have a safety net when capitalism — which does, periodically and structurally, fail people — leaves them behind.
  • Whether the disabled, the young, the old, and the economically vulnerable deserve a society that sees them as citizens rather than inefficiencies.

A more perfect Union — the phrase is literally in the Preamble — is not a communist document. It is the founding aspiration of a republic that has always, at its best, understood that the measure of a society is how it treats those who cannot fully compete in the market on any given day.

Epilogue: The Red Tie in the Mirror

The Third Red Scare will follow the arc of its predecessors. The overreach will become visible. The definitional absurdity will become undeniable. The courts will, eventually, draw lines.

What's different this time is the institutionalization — McCarthyism was a legislative disruption that the establishment eventually expelled. Trumpism has made these tactics the dominant platform of a major political party, which means the correction has to come from voters rather than a Senate censure vote.

So remember in November: the man in the red tie, shouting "communist" from a stage at Mount Rushmore while his administration buys equity stakes in private corporations and floats grocery price controls, is not offering a political philosophy.

He's offering a mirror — and hoping you don't look too closely at the reflection.

The First Red Scare targeted labor organizers asking for an eight-hour day. The Second targeted screenwriters who read the wrong books. The Third targets nurses who think everyone deserves a doctor. History will judge all three with the same verdict.

Vote for a more perfect Union.



Sources & Citations

šŸŽ¤ Trump's 2026 Anti-Communist Rhetoric

šŸ§¬ The Roy Cohn / McCarthy Connection

šŸ­ Trump's State Capitalism / Interventionist Policies

šŸŒ¾ Farmer Bailouts & Tariff Interventionism

šŸ“– Historical Background — Red Scares, McCarthyism & Labor

These foundational historical sources are well-established reference works:

šŸŒ Nordic Model & Comparative Economics

All links verified as of July 11, 2026. Historical and legal sources reflect established academic and governmental records.


Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)