Jeff Bryant: The Charter School Movement Is Imploding. What Comes Next May Be Worse - Progressive.org

The Charter School Movement Is Imploding. What Comes Next May Be Worse - Progressive.org

The Charter School Movement Is Imploding. What Comes Next May Be Worse
Trump’s plan for ‘school choice’ will lead to the further privatization of public education.

“For too long,” Trump declared in his State of the Union address on February 4, “countless American children have been trapped in failing government schools.”

Trump, to shore up his point, introduced two guests in the audience: Stephanie Davis, a black single mom from Philadelphia, and her fourth-grade daughter, Jayinah, who the President said was on a waitlist in Pennsylvania's voucher program. Trump then revealed that one of these voucher had magically “become available” for Jayinah.

It turns out that none of this was quite true. 

First, federal officials—Trump, included—do not have the power to issue a school voucher for a child in Pennsylvania or any other state. Jayinah was only able to skip a waiting list more than 40,000 applicants for a voucher because of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who promised to personally fund her tuition for an indefinite number of years. 

Second, Trump called Jayinah’s school a “government school”—the term privatization advocates use when they refer to public schools. But, as The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, she wasn’t enrolled in a public school. She was attending a charter school, which are often privately managed and, though run on public funds, not truly public. 

And finally, Trump blamed Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf for thwarting the girl’s admission into a private, voucher-supported school. He claimed that CONTINUE READING: The Charter School Movement Is Imploding. What Comes Next May Be Worse - Progressive.org

Peter Greene: How Do The Current Democratic Candidates Stack Up On Public Education?

How Do The Current Democratic Candidates Stack Up On Public Education?

How Do The Current Democratic Candidates Stack Up On Public Education?

You’d be hard-pressed to find many single-issue voters whose single issue was public education, but if you could find such animals, what could they make of the current set of Democratic contenders? Ignoring other issues, including what may be the biggest question of them all (”How would you get Congress to enact any of this?”), how do the candidates stack up in education?

It is heartening to see so much substantive education policy discussion; four years ago it was good enough to be for pre-K schools and against for-profit charters, the policy equivalent of being for kissing babies and against armed yetis riding on unicorns. But this time we have seen a series of policy ideas appear, garner discussion, and spread across campaigns. At this stage of the race, most campaigns agree that IDEA should be fully funded, that Title I should be increased by some large amount, teachers should be paid more, and Betsy DeVos should be done as secretary of education (this is not exactly a revelation, as most new-party Presidents clean out the cabinet, but it still gets plenty of applause).

Here’s the stack, in descending order.

Elizabeth Warren

The strength of Warren’s plan is that it is deep and wide. Warren understands that there is a whole for-profit industry hiding behind non-profit charter schools, and she supports the promise of strong schools for all students. She understands that the foundation of school segregation is community segregation. She has taken a stand against high-stakes testing. Her plan has the details and the funding to indicate that she understands the complexities involved in being a strong supporter of public education, and in turn making public education a strong part of our country itself. And she has it planned down to the pennies she’ll collect to pay for it. For an education voter, she’s one of two top choices.

Bernie Sanders

Sanders brought out his education plan early, and it was a strong support for public education then, particularly in the need for funding for education and support for teachers. At the time it was CONTINUE READING: How Do The Current Democratic Candidates Stack Up On Public Education?

Carl J. Petersen: The Children Are Left Behind in LAUSD School Board Race

The Children Are Left Behind in LAUSD School Board Race

The Children Are Left Behind in LAUSD School Board Race

In 2015, the California Charter Charter School Association (CCSA) ran a campaign for now convicted felon Ref Rodriguez that first accused incumbent Bennett Kayser of being a racist and then referenced his diagnosis with Parkinson’s. Two years later they stumped for the ethically challenged Nick Melvoin by blaming his opponent for John Deasy’s iPad Debacle, even though Steve Zimmer was the only board member not to vote for the former Superintendent. In 2020, it is Scott Schmerelson’s turn to be savagely attacked by the charter school industry as they try to regain a majority on the school board and overturn all attempts to hold their schools accountable for the public funds that they receive.

Funded by billionaires such as Reed Hastings and Alice Walton, whose families will never set foot in the public schools they wish to destroy, the flyers opposing Schmerelson have been relentless. Day after day these attacks arrive in the mail spreading easily disproved lies like the accusation that he “tripled his own pay.” In fact, the salaries of school board members are set by an independent commission from the City of Los Angeles. This CONTINUE READING: The Children Are Left Behind in LAUSD School Board Race

Support Scott for LAUSD 

https://wp.me/Pbsp1S-Z 

FOLLOW THIS DISGUSTING STORY ON 

 Los Angeles Education Examiner 

News and views on public education in and around Los Angeles

https://wp.me/bFuBr

California: Charter Schools Advocates Distribute Vile, Anti-Semitic Poster of School Board Member Scott Schmerelson | Diane Ravitch's blog

California: Charter Schools Advocates Distribute Vile, Anti-Semitic Poster of School Board Member Scott Schmerelson | Diane Ravitch's blog

California: Charter Schools Advocates Distribute Vile, Anti-Semitic Poster of School Board Member Scott Schmerelson

A front group for the California Charter Schools lobby, which calls itself “Families and Teachers United,” released a flyer that attacked school board member Scott Schmerelson, a pro-public school member of the LAUSD school board and well-qualified educator. Schmerelson has been endorsed by every Democratic club in Los Angeles.

The scurrilous flyer accuses him of investing in mutual funds that include products that are harmful to children (tobacco). Anyone whose pension is invested in large mutual funds knows that individual shareholders do not choose the stocks in the fund’s portfolio. My own pension fund includes companies I find abhorrent and there’s nothing I can do about it.

The flyer accuses Schmerelson of “double dipping” because he collects a pension for his decades of service as an educator in the LAUSD schools and a salary as a board member, like other board members.The flyer does not mention that board salaries were increased in 2017 based on the recommendation of an independent commission.

Should he give up his well-earned pension? Of course not! Should he refuse to take the same salary as other board members? Of course not!

Who paid for this vile, lying, unethical anti-Semitic ad? CONTINUE READING: California: Charter Schools Advocates Distribute Vile, Anti-Semitic Poster of School Board Member Scott Schmerelson | Diane Ravitch's blog

Support Scott for LAUSD 

https://wp.me/Pbsp1S-Z 

FOLLOW THIS DISGUSTING STORY ON 

 Los Angeles Education Examiner 

News and views on public education in and around Los Angeles

https://wp.me/bFuBr

New Hampshire Seeks to Pilot Online Pre-Schooling and Tries Again for Charters | Diane Ravitch's blog

New Hampshire Seeks to Pilot Online Pre-Schooling and Tries Again for Charters | Diane Ravitch's blog

New Hampshire Seeks to Pilot Online Pre-Schooling and Tries Again for Charters

New Hampshire’s Governor is a Trump-style extremist, Chris Sununu, whose father John advised the first President Bush. Sununu appointed Frank Edelblut as state commissioner of education. The state commissioner home-schooled his children and follows the ideology of Betsy DeVos. He thinks government money should go wherever children go, regardless of who gets the money. That’s called “Learning Everywhere.”

Edelblut is an extremist libertarian.

Now he wants to pilot online leaning for pre-schoolers. This is his response to the growing recognition of the value of early childhood education.

Not surprisingly, advocates for ECE are alarmed that sitting in front of a computer is being substituted for play, where children learn to cooperate with others and make things and use their imagination. One group said:

Kids aren’t meant to sit still in front of a screen. They use their whole bodies to learn, and they want and need to move. Let’s not forget that some of the essential CONTINUE READING: New Hampshire Seeks to Pilot Online Pre-Schooling and Tries Again for Charters | Diane Ravitch's blog

Do You Know About Mike Bloomberg’s Record on Public Education? | janresseger

Do You Know About Mike Bloomberg’s Record on Public Education? | janresseger

Do You Know About Mike Bloomberg’s Record on Public Education?

Much of what follows is from a November post on this blog about the education policies of New York City’s former three-term mayor, Michael Bloomberg, who was granted the right, by the state legislature, to run New York City’s public schools.  In November when this was originally posted, Bloomberg was exploring whether to join other Democrats running for President in 2020. Bloomberg has now declared his candidacy. He has spent millions of dollars already on widespread television advertising. But his ads don’t tell us much about his extensive record as a mayor who, for more than a decade, controlled the nation’s largest school district.

Bloomberg is a plutocrat and he ran the schools as a technocratic businessman, with disruption conceptualized as the key to making everybody work harder to raise student achievement as measured by test scores.  Turnarounds, more charters, more school co-locations: all of these so called “reforms” were introduced by Bloomberg and his schools chancellor Joel Klein in New York City before Arne Duncan brought the same turnaround strategy to the whole country through Race to the Top.

On December 14, at a Public Education Forum 2020, we had an opportunity to hear from other leading candidates for the Democratic nomination about their plans for the nation’s public schools.  Additionally, we were able to listen as each one responded to questions from parents and public school students and schoolteachers.  All of the leading candidates pledged at least to triple Title I spending for public schools serving children in poverty as a top priority.  Neither Bernie Sanders nor Joe Biden nor Elizabeth Warren nor Pete Buttigieg nor Amy Klobuchar promoted the sort of policies that Mike Bloomberg launched as the mayor CONTINUE READING: Do You Know About Mike Bloomberg’s Record on Public Education? | janresseger

With A Brooklyn Accent: Why Donald Trump Hates Our Educational System and Demonizes Teachers- A Personal Reflection

With A Brooklyn Accent: Why Donald Trump Hates Our Educational System and Demonizes Teachers- A Personal Reflection

Why Donald Trump Hates Our Educational System and Demonizes Teachers- A Personal Reflection

Why Donald Trump Hates Our Educational System and Demonizes Teachers- A Personal Reflection

As someone who is exactly the same age as DJT and went to school during the same years, I look at his rise to the top of our society with astonishment. As a young person from a family of modest means, going to public schools in Brooklyn, I did everything people told me to allow me to move into the middle class and become a respected professional. I got good grades. I scored well on standardized tests and on my SAT's. I became a successful athlete whose exploits were written up in school newspapers and occasionally the local press I applied for every scholarship in sight. And it worked. I got into Columbia where, after a slow start, the same pattern emerged.Starting in my sophomore year, I got excellent grades in my major. My sports exploits were written up in the school paper. With the support of my professors, I received numerous fellowships to go to graduate school. Every single thing I mentioned here is a matter of public CONTINUE READING: With A Brooklyn Accent: Why Donald Trump Hates Our Educational System and Demonizes Teachers- A Personal Reflection

UFT won’t endorse Bloomberg – that’s not good enough | JD2718

UFT won’t endorse Bloomberg – that’s not good enough | JD2718

UFT won’t endorse Bloomberg – that’s not good enough

The United Federation of Teachers has created a convoluted rationale for not making an endorsement at this time in the presidential race. Given their history of endorsements, I am surprised anyone is upset.

In short, the national federation, the American Federation of Teachers, has given the green light to locals to make an endorsement. But the UFT has said they are so influential, that if they made an endorsement it would prejudice the whole open process. Well….

In the meantime, Michael Mulgrew is running to become a Biden delegate. I guess the UFT president plumping for a candidate is not an endorsement. Huh? Can you make sense of that? Not likely. In any case, I guess it seemed a lock that Mulgrew’d be going to the DNC as a Biden delegate when he signed up, but with Joe choking in Iowa and New Hampshire, maybe Mulgrew will lose. It’s harder to run in elections where the outcome is not predetermined.

UFTers for Bernie is pushing for the UFT to endorse Sanders. Unlikely with AFT President Weingarten knocking Bernie on Twitter for having loyal supporters and championing universal healthcare.

In the meantime, the UFT leadership remembers who Bloomberg is, and Mulgrew makes it seem like he won’t endorse Bloomberg. Though, perhaps not strangely, the AFT’s Randi Weingarten seems to take a deferential tack towards Bloomberg. The sliver-tongued billionaire often CONTINUE READING: UFT won’t endorse Bloomberg – that’s not good enough | JD2718