Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, July 9, 2018

Behind the $35 Million Gift to Launch a Charter School in a Struggling City — Inside Philanthropy

Behind the $35 Million Gift to Launch a Charter School in a Struggling City — Inside Philanthropy

Behind the $35 Million Gift to Launch a Charter School in a Struggling City


The Charles Stewart Mott Foundation recently pledged $35 million to build and launch a charter school in Flint, Michigan. The K-8 school eventually will be located on the grounds of the Flint Cultural Center and enroll up to 650 students, who will have access to the institution's offerings, including the art and music museums, the public library and the planetarium.
It’s a large gift from a funder that doesn’t see itself as a backer of the charter movement. But the opportunity presented to help create the Flint Cultural Center Academy was too promising to pass up, said Neal Hegarty, the foundation’s vice president of programs.
“To be clear, the foundation isn’t supporting a charter school movement in Flint,” Hegarty said. “We’re supporting the development of a specific charter school that will enable students to benefit from the expertise and amenities available through the Cultural Center institutions. There’s nothing else like it in our region, and we think kids in Flint and Genesee County deserve to have that kind of unique learning opportunity.”
As we've reported, Mott is best known within K-12 circles for investing in after-school programs. It's been a pioneering leader in this space for decades and remains a stalwart after-school funder. In turn, this work is part of a broader education portfolio that also includes youth engagement, which the foundation defines as supporting meaningful ways for kids to participate in school, communities and economies. The access students at the new charter school will have to the neighboring cultural institutions fits with that goal.
At first glance, $35 million seems like a large gift. And it is—it’s more than half the funds Mott as put into Flint’s education system since 2016—but it’s proportionate to the costs of building a school from the ground up, Hegarty said. The gift covers the price of designing, building and outfitting the school. The foundation wanted to cover the full cost, so that Flint’s cultural institutions wouldn’t have to find additional donors.
The school will join the city’s robust charter ecosystem. More than half of Flint’s students attend charter schools, according to numbers released by the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools in 2017. At 55 percent in charter schools, Flint beat out neighboring Detroit for the highest percentage of students enrolled in charters. Nationally, the city is second only to New Orleans, which replaced its traditional public school district entirely with charter schools following Hurricane Katrina.
Hegarty attributes the high enrollment to a few different factors, including state-level policies, family preference and fall-out from the water crisis. Despite the higher than usual charter enrollment, Mott doesn’t prioritize charters in its Flint-based education giving, he said.
“In Flint, the Mott Foundation is working to strengthen the entire education continuum—from cradle to college and career. We support educational opportunity in many different forms, including early childhood Continue reading: Behind the $35 Million Gift to Launch a Charter School in a Struggling City — Inside Philanthropy
Image result for charter schools are for poor people


Does school choice give African American and Latinx families more voice? | Cloaking Inequity

Does school choice give African American and Latinx families more voice? | Cloaking Inequity

DOES SCHOOL CHOICE GIVE AFRICAN AMERICAN AND LATINX FAMILIES MORE VOICE?

Are African American and Latinx families better served by charters? Is there voice better represented than in public schools? A new report from researchers at Annenberg and UTLA finds that charter schools with more poor students actually have lower parent representation on governing boards. Here is the official press release for the report entitled, Whose Schools? Community Representation and Transparency in Charter School Governance in Los Angeles:

Are privately operated charter schools accountable to the public that funds them and the parents who entrust their children to them? That fundamental question drives a new report, “Whose Schools? Community Representation and Transparency in Charter School Governance in Los Angeles,” that looks at the makeup of 224 charter governing boards within LAUSD boundaries and reviews the incidences of meaningful parent representation.
Among the findings:
 
•       Charter schools with fewer students in poverty have greater parent representation on governing boards.
•       10 out of 12 charter schools with majorities of African American students have no parental representation on governing boards.
•       Corporations have a disproportionate influence on charter school governance, with 31% of board members identified as corporate professionals. Half of those come from the financial sector.
•       None of the nine Charter Management Organizations operating more than five schools each has a designated parent representative in a governing role.
•       Many charter schools hold meetings during hours or at locations that make meaningful participation difficult for working parents.
The report makes a number of policy recommendations to enhance representation and strengthen the voice of parents and the community, including requiring charter governing boards to include parents of current students on the board, instituting a method to recall board members, and requiring board meetings to be scheduled so that they are accessible to parents.
Greater parent representation would ensure oversight from those involved with the school on a daily basis and help guard against unethical or illegal behavior. Recent local scandals—including the FBI raid of Celerity and the conflict-of-interest charges against LAUSD School Board member Ref Rodriguez, founder of the PUC charter chain—underscore the need for greater accountability and transparency in the publically funded, privately operated charter sector.
The issues outlined in the “Whose Schools?” report are part of a larger group of problems driven by the rapid, unregulated expansion of charter operators in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Other serious issues that call out for increased accountability of charters include overly punitive student discipline policies, practices that push out high-need students, and funding and building patterns that destabilize neighborhood public schools.
The report was authored by Leigh Dingerson (Policy Director, Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools), Grace Regullano (Strategic Research Director, UTLA), and Ed Gutierrez (Research Specialist, UTLA).
The California NAACP also weighed in on the findings in the report.
Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 8.36.18 PM
Not incidenteally, school choice and self-determination a topic that we will take up in our upcoming article in the Journal of Law and Inequality. 
Vasquez Heilig, J., Nelson, S., & Kronzer, M. (in press). Does the African American Need Separate Charter Schools? Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 36(2), 1-21.
Here is a sneak peak…
Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 8.43.24 PM
Stay tuned…
Check out and follow my YouTube channel here.
Twitter: @ProfessorJVH
Click here for Vitae.

Does school choice give African American and Latinx families more voice? | Cloaking Inequity