Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Senate committee approves Betsy DeVos, “Thoughtless proponent of the privatization of American education” - The Hechinger Report

Senate committee approves Betsy DeVos, “Thoughtless proponent of the privatization of American education” - The Hechinger Report:

Senate committee approves Betsy DeVos, “Thoughtless proponent of the privatization of American education”
The vote went along party lines


Next up, the nomination moves to the full Senate, which is expected to confirm the appointment, and only needs a majority vote, in a Senate with 52 Republicans. 
Growing up, I was a fan of the comic strip Spy vs. Spy, a staple in Mad Magazine. The strip featured two cold-war era spies, one dressed in white and the other in black, who sought to outwit one another. Usually one spy would best the other, but occasionally their plans would go awry, and both would be blown up.
That’s fine for a comic strip in a humor magazine, but lately it’s been hitting closer to home here in the real world, as the chaotic Trump administration issues incendiary executive orders and then accuses the incredulous senators who oppose them of wanting to start World War III.
It’s even a legitimate fear about the U.S. public education system—one that the past 24 hours has done little to quell, particularly since President Trump’s Education Secretary choice, billionaire Betsy DeVos, was confirmed 12-11 Tuesday by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP).
A day earlier, HELP released written responses from DeVos to questions posed to her by committee members. Her oral confirmation testimony earlier this month was a cringe-worthy performance, featuring guns vs. grizzlies and her refusal to commit to the same accountability standards for charter and private schools as are in place for traditional public schools that receive taxpayer funds.

The really, really bad. Most disturbing was DeVos’ blind support for virtual charter schools, which have a horrible track record. Senator Murray’s staffers noted recent research on the abysmal academic performance of virtual charter schools, and DeVos flatly denied the evidence.

DeVos’ remarks at the hearing fueled an unusually fierce opposition throughout the country, stemming from her track record of supporting initiatives at odds with many citizens’ conceptions of public education and civil rights.
The written testimony was an opportunity to rehabilitate herself in the eyes of the committee, especially Democratic senators rightly skeptical of her qualifications.
Her responses to 137 questions from ranking Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington spanned 62 pages. But I am not reassured.
Although there were more bright spots in the relatively polished written testimony than in her awkward oral testimony, DeVos remained evasive, and did little to address fears that she is a thoughtless proponent of the privatization of American education.
If her actions in office parallel her responses to the Senate HELP Committee, we’re in for a rocky four years.
Reading Senator Murray’s questions and nominee DeVos’ answers, I was reminded of Spy vs. Spy. In this case, though, it’s Staffer vs. Staffer.
During the live theater of the confirmation hearing, Senators had the benefit of their staffers in preparing questions, but DeVos was all alone, leading to her infamous “guns vs. grizzlies” remarks and a few others that I’m sure she’d like to forget.
But in responding to written questions, both sides had the benefit of staffers. Senator Murray’s staffers sought to pin down DeVos on a range of policy issues, and set a few traps for her.
In turn, nominee DeVos’ staffers wrote answers that allowed her to be maddeningly vague on whether she would continue to support Obama-era education policies, and also on what she might do Senate committee approves Betsy DeVos, “Thoughtless proponent of the privatization of American education” - The Hechinger Report:


DeVos and the Domino Effect on State Legislatures

DeVos and the Domino Effect on State Legislatures:

DeVos and the Domino Effect on State Legislatures

Businessman Touching Domino Pieces Arranged in a Line --- Image by © Royalty-Free/Corbis

So Betsy is in.
DeVos stands as an example of both the corruption and stupidity of corporate America with its involvement attempting to educate America’s children.
Republicans are spineless to confirm her, and Democrats, while united today, have also been complicit in permitting the dismantling of America’s public schools.
If you think education secretaries Arne Duncan and John King, Jr. have not done their share of damage in adequately educating children in this country, we need to talk. Maybe they didn’t support school choice, but they idolized all kinds of charters whether they worked or not.
And we all need to acknowledge that vouchers are already a reality DeVos and the Domino Effect on State Legislatures:


Farcical Senate Closer to Selling Education Secretary Position to Highest Bidder | gadflyonthewallblog

Farcical Senate Closer to Selling Education Secretary Position to Highest Bidder | gadflyonthewallblog:

Farcical Senate Closer to Selling Education Secretary Position to Highest Bidder

Unqualified billionaire Betsy DeVos is one step closer to becoming our next Education Secretary.
In one of the most embarrassing displays of subservience, once-respected Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) pushed the nomination through committee this afternoon despite numerous objections from Democrats.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee voted along party lines 12-11 to bring DeVos before the full Senate. A final vote has not yet been scheduled.
DeVos has next to zero experience with public schools. She never attended one. He children never attended one. She never taught in one. Nor does she even have a degree in education.

DeVos nomination moves to Senate: NPE's 300,000 will continue to fight - Network For Public Education

DeVos nomination moves to Senate: NPE's 300,000 will continue to fight - Network For Public Education:

DeVos nomination moves to Senate: NPE's 300,000 will continue to fight 


Although disappointed by the decision of the HELP committee to send the vote on Betsy DeVos to the Senate floor, The Network for Public Education (NPE) was pleased by the strong opposition to DeVos. All Democrats voted against DeVos.  Senators Collins of Maine and Murkowski of Alaska while voting to move her nomination forward, would not commit to voting for her when the vote comes to the full Senate.
“Betsy DeVos put a spotlight on the threat to public education that charters-both online and brick and mortar, and private voucher schools pose to our democratically governed, community public schools. Public school advocates across the nation spoke out. Our campaign against DeVos generated over 600,000 emails and thousands of phone calls and letters to the Senate. Most Americans do not want an unregulated, privatized school system paid for by American taxpayers. That is what DeVos represents,” said NPE Executive Director, Carol Burris.
NPE President, Diane Ravitch, believes the massive political donations by DeVos was the driving factor behind her appointment. “We are disappointed but not surprised that Betsy DeVos was approved by the Senate HELP committee, despite the fact that she is completely unqualified for the job by experience or knowledge or any other criteria. As she has acknowledged, she and her family have given millions of dollars to the Republican party, including to members of the committee that just approved her. We weep for the children of America, knowing that this woman will launch an assault on their community public schools, as she did in Michigan. Since her choice theology was implemented in Michigan, that state’s rankings on national tests have plummeted, and Detroit–now flooded with charters–remains the lowest performing urban district on national tests. We will continue to fight this nomination as it moves forward.“
NPE Executive Board member, Phyllis Bush, lives in Indiana, a state the embraces the DeVos philosophy. “While the members of the HELP committee can talk about the importance of using a business model to reform public schools, the ultimate cost to Indiana is landing on the backs of students. Privatization reform has resulted in larger class sizes, tests that provide little useful information, school letter grades that reward zip codes, the elimination of essential services in public schools, and a critical teacher shortage.”
The Network for Public Education intends to mobilize its over 300,000 supporting members to continue the fight against DeVos’ appointment.
“When it comes to our fight for adequately funded, democratically-governed public schools, we make ‘no excuses’.” Our neighborhood schools made our country great. We will not allow them to be destroyed,” Burris said.
About the Network for Public Education
The Network for Public Education (NPE) was founded in 2013 by Diane Ravitch and Anthony Cody. We are an advocacy group whose mission is to protect, preserve, promote, and strengthen public schools for both current and future generations of students. NPE has over 300,000 supporting members nationwide. For more information, please visit: networkforpubliceducation.org.

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Two Major Issues to Keep on Your Radar - Levy Cliff and Republican McCleary Funding Plan

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Two Major Issues to Keep on Your Radar - Levy Cliff and Republican McCleary Funding Plan:

Two Major Issues to Keep on Your Radar - Levy Cliff and Republican McCleary Funding Plan

Image result for Levy Cliff and Republican McCleary Funding Plan

I attended the legislative hearing at the State Senate yesterday on the levy cliff bill and the Republicans' long-awaited "plan" for McCleary.  There were many parents (with children), community members, school board members and superintendents from many Puget Sound districts there to testify in support of a one-year extension for the levy cliff.

One very telling moment came when words of the one lone person against the levy cliff - Washington Policy Center's Liv Finne who wagged her finger at districts for knowing this was coming and they didn't plan so, too bad - came out in a question by the Chair, Republican John Braun.  He asked one superintendent how long her district had known about the levy cliff and she said it was just about as long as the Legislature had known about the McCleary ruling.  Good girl.

Director Geary testified in support of the levy cliff bill and Deputy Superintendent Nielsen spoke about the Republican plan. 

Chairman Braun must of thought he was being clever when the order of the discussion, which had been levy cliff first, got switched.  So all those parents and kids had to sit through an hour and half of discussion with the threat that perhaps they wouldn't take testimony on the levy cliff bill.  Good thing he thought better of that one.

On the Republican "plan" for fulfilling McCleary.  Here are the basics (because a thorough analysis of a plan that got dropped late Saturday could not adequately be done by yesterday by anyone):

- it is NOT just a plan for funding - it is a loopapalooza overhaul of the public education system and very overreaching.  What the Republicans want to do is (partial):

- 10K funding per pupil with a weighted pupil formula (small schools would be held harmless) - it appears that the money would follow the student anywhere (meaning to charter schools.)
- create a state levy for education funding (with a referendum to voters to boot), the Local Effort Levy
- allow anyone to become a teacher and yet not provide PD for said people (who would get "general supervision by a certified teacher)
- allow some districts to not have to be under the umbrella of state regs a la charter schools
- one senator called this a "levy swipe" rather than "swap" because more 
Seattle Schools Community Forum: Two Major Issues to Keep on Your Radar - Levy Cliff and Republican McCleary Funding Plan:

Teachers in the Trump Era: Your Students are Still Watching | Daniel Katz, Ph.D.

Teachers in the Trump Era: Your Students are Still Watching | Daniel Katz, Ph.D.:

Teachers in the Trump Era: Your Students are Still Watching

the-abels

I’d like to introduce you to the Abels.  They are one of the four families with immigrant parents who are responsible for my family’s history in the United States of America.  Golda and Samuel sought a better life than they could have had in Eastern Europe early in the 20th century.  Their children in this picture are Bernard, my maternal grandfather Robert, and their two daughters, Lilian and Ruth.  Their third daughter, Shirley, would be born later.  Like many Ashkenazi immigrants in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, leaving Eastern Europe was an escape from centuries of discrimination and violent riots aimed at their communities, but not an escape from hardship and prejudice.  America looked at the latest wave of immigration with similar suspicions that had met the Irish – my great grandparents talked in a strange manner, they ate unusual foods, they dressed differently, they worshiped “incorrectly,”  their loyalty to their new home was considered suspect.
Despite these impediments, they managed to thrive and build a life.  Their son Robert became a builder and an architect of industrial buildings.  Their grandchildren have served in the nation’s military, become teachers, and professionals, and today their great great grandchildren are growing up as the fourth generation of American citizens to follow them and their efforts to seek a better life.  Like all immigrant families, their story shares similarities to the stories of millions of others and, simultaneously, is uniquely their own.  America is somewhat in love with the archetype of the immigrant family coming to America, assimilating, and finding economic advancement from one generation to the next, and, to be sure, many families slot into that experience.  But no family is entirely the same and, more importantly, there are thousands of nuances to the American experience from generation to generation.
Consider:  This “Nation of Immigrants” is not made up entirely of the descendants of people who emigrated voluntarily like my family.  Some families were always here, descendants of  the first people to live on this continents and who were forced off their lands and killed in wars against them.  Other families were brought here in chains during the slave trade and faced centuries of unrelenting cruelty and discrimination.  Still other families lived on one side of a border one day and found themselves on the other side the next such as Mexican citizens living in Texas in the early 19th century.  And while many millions have emigrated voluntarily over the centuries, their reasons for doing so have been as various as the people themselves.  Many have come here as refugees to escape Teachers in the Trump Era: Your Students are Still Watching | Daniel Katz, Ph.D.:

Choosing Democracy: Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now tout de suite

Choosing Democracy: Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now:

Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now

Image result for Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now

adv immediately
  • abruptlystar
  • right awaystar
  • directlystar
  • instantlystar
  • nowstar
  • straightawaystar
  • at oncestar
  • awaystar
  • quicklystar
  • suddenlystar
  • tout de suitestar
  • without delay


The Senate education committee just voted to advance Betsy DeVos’ nomination for secretary of education. Next she’ll face the real test: a vote of the entire senate. It's taken almost a month for her nomination to get this far, and the fight isn’t nearly over yet.

You've sent more than 1 million emails, and called senators more than 50,000 times, and believe me - they are taking notice. In explaining why she'll vote no, Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) said that 95 percent of the people that contacted her office opposed DeVos. Ninety-five percent! At the vote this morning, Senator Murkowski (R-AK) said she is still undecided, and that she is listening to the serious concerns of the thousands of her constituents who have called. And they're not the only ones. We've heard from senate staff that they're getting more emails and calls from our members and allies about stopping DeVos than they've ever had about a nominee. 

Trust me - you are making a difference. We have to keep the pressure on. Keep calling. Keep emailing. Keep telling your senators that Betsy DeVos cannot be put in charge of our nation’s schools. 

Call 1-855-882-6229 to speak to your senators.
Click here to email them.

Our senators need to know that we will never back down when our students and public education are on the line. Let’s keep up the fight. 

- Lily

Lily Eskelsen Garcรญa
President
National Education Association
Image result for Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now


Choosing Democracy: Defeat DeVos- Call Your Senator Now:

Why Betsy DeVos is the most polarizing education secretary nominee ever - The Washington Post

Why Betsy DeVos is the most polarizing education secretary nominee ever - The Washington Post:

Why Betsy DeVos is the most polarizing education secretary nominee ever



President Barack Obama had two education secretaries who were highly divisive in the education world. In fact, the man who ran Obama’s Education Department for seven years, Arne Duncan, became so controversial that members of two teachers unions — long supporters of Democrats — approved resolutions against him in 2014.  Duncan’s successor, John King, faced the closest confirmation vote, in March 2016, on the Senate floor of any education secretary nominee up to that time.
But Betsy DeVos, the Michigan billionaire chosen by President Trump to be education secretary, brings a whole new dimension to the discussion of polarizing figures in education leadership.
DeVos is clearly the most controversial education nominee in the history of the nearly 40-year-old Education Department. While the Senate education committee on Tuesday sent her nomination to the full Senate on a party-line vote, a few Republican senators said they are not certain if they will support her on the Senate floor. Democrats say they have 48 solid votes against her, but they need 51 to defeat the nomination.
No education secretary nominee before her was the target of such protests, mass email campaigns, petitions and impassioned denunciations at a Senate confirmation hearing. Supporters have countered with digital ads saying, “Confirm Betsy DeVos.”
No education secretary nominee was opposed by the ranking member of the Senate education panel before Tuesday, when Democratic Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.) voted against DeVos. And Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader in the Senate, has promised to vote against DeVos when her nomination comes to the floor.
For the record, this is how the Senate votes went for previous education secretary nominees:
  • Shirley Hufstedler under President Jimmy Carter — 81-2
  • Terrel Bell under President Ronald Reagan — 90-2
  • William Bennett under Reagan — 93-0
  • Lauro Cavazos Jr. under Reagan — 94-0
  • Lamar Alexander under President George H.W. Bush — confirmed by voice vote.
  • Richard Riley under President Bill Clinton — confirmed by unanimous consent
  • Rod Paige under President George W. Bush — confirmed by voice vote
  • Margaret Spellings under George W. Bush — confirmed by voice vote
  • Arne Duncan under President Barack Obama — confirmed by voice vote
  • John King under Obama — confirmed 49-40.
King’s vote was the deepest split ever, a reflection of how angry Senate Republicans were at the Obama administration for using unprecedented federal power to make and implement Why Betsy DeVos is the most polarizing education secretary nominee ever - The Washington Post:

Today's Google Doodle honors Fred Korematsu Day

Today's Google Doodle honors Fred Korematsu Day:

Today's Google Doodle honors Fred Korematsu Day


Happy Fred Korematsu Day! On this day, January 30, we celebrate the life and legacy of civil rights icon Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu. And at long last, Google has honored Mr. Korematsu's birthday -- officially designated "Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution" -- with a hallowed homepage Doodle. All things considered, the timing could not be more appropriate.

After Franklin D. Roosvelt signed Executive Order 9066 in 1942, more than 100,000 people of Japanese descent were forcibly removed from the west coast and relocated to internment camps throughout the United States. Fred Korematsu, however, did not go quietly. He was arrested and convicted for resisting incarceration. He appealed and took his case all the way to the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. United States, but lost.

But in 1983, the U.S. District Court in San Francisco formally vacated Korematsu's conviction after evidence came to light that disputed the necessity of the internment. At the time, he told Judge Marilyn Patel that instead of a legal pardon, he wanted to be assured the U.S. government would never again take such an action.

"If anyone should do any pardoning," Korematsu said, "I should be the one pardoning the government for what they did to the Japanese American people."




In 1998, Korematsu was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the country's most distinguished civilian award. President Bill Clinton said that Korematsu's stand for civil rights put him alongside brave and justice-seeking "ordinary citizens" as Homer Plessy, Oliver Brown and Rosa Parks.

Korematsu died in 2005. Since then, several states have enacted laws to celebrate his birthday. IN 2010, California became the first state to adopt the Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution, recognizing "the importance of preserving civil liberties, even in times of real or perceived crisis."

Google notes that today's Doodle -- of Korematsu wearing his Medal of Freedom, surrounded by symbolic cherry blossoms and internment camp barracks -- is by artist Sophie Diao, also the child of Asian immigrants.

This particularly Doodle may have been timed to coincide with Korematsu's birthday, but given all the shit that's been going down right now, the decision to honor a figure who took such an important stand against an unconstitutional executive order seems highly political -- and absolutely necessary. 

More here: Fred Korematsu's 98th Birthday


Today's Google Doodle honors Fred Korematsu Day:



John Thompson: 'Toxic' Steve Perry should embarrass charter supporters - NonDoc

'Toxic' Steve Perry should embarrass charter supporters - NonDoc:

‘Toxic’ Steve Perry should embarrass charter supporters




Upon arriving at the OK School Choice Summit last Thursday, I was surprised to see a handful of friends who were denied entry and a larger number of Oklahoma City police guarding Oklahoma City Community College’s performing arts auditorium.
Apparently, about 20 protesters were noisy upon arrival at the summit and had been denied entry, according to a post published during the weekend by Brett Dickerson of Oklahoma City Free Press. Dickerson’s account included the following video of a subsequent encounter:




Although I had registered for the event, the ticket-takers seemed very confused about whether I should be allowed inside. While waiting, I witnessed the protesters chatting politely with the volunteers who had denied them entry.
I asked a couple of well-known choice advocates if I could walk into the auditorium with them. The police said that would be fine as long as the summit people didn’t stop me. I sat down in the auditorium next to an old friend who supports charter and voucher expansion, and we shook hands.
Although I’d mostly come to hear perspectives from charter supporters in the crowd, I found myself instead listening, horrified, as keynote speaker Steve Perry, a former charter school principal-turned-showman from Connecticut, shouted non-stop insults during his entire keynote address.
I’ve seen worse on television, but I don’t believe that I have ever heard such vicious hate speech in person.

Perry’s reputation should have preceded him

Perry has a reputation for failing to respect the regulatory rules of the road and is 'Toxic' Steve Perry should embarrass charter supporters - NonDoc:

DeVos Family Has Made At Least $82 Million In Political Contributions Since 1999, According To Campaign Finance Disclosures

DeVos Family Has Made At Least $82 Million In Political Contributions Since 1999, According To Campaign Finance Disclosures:

DeVos Family Has Made At Least $82 Million In Political Contributions Since 1999, According To Campaign Finance Disclosures
As The U.S. Senate Considers Whether To Confirm Betsy DeVos As U.S. Education Secretary, MCFN Analyzed The Family’s Political Giving In Michigan, At The Federal Level And In Other States



LANSING — While it’s impossible for the public to find out exactly how much money West Michigan’s DeVos family has spent on politics over the years, the number must fall somewhere above $82 million.
As the U.S. Senate considers whether to confirm Betsy DeVos, former chair of the Michigan Republican Party, as U.S. education secretary, the Michigan Campaign Finance Network (MCFN) tracked more than $82 million in political contributions from DeVos family members since the start of 1999.
The tracking includes contributions from Betsy DeVos, her husband, Dick DeVos, Dick DeVos’s father, Richard DeVos Sr., who was co-founder of Amway, his wife, Helen DeVos, and other family members.
The tracking spans paper reports covering 1999 all the way to a $200,0000 contribution dated Dec 13, 2016 — 20 days after Betsy DeVos had been nominated as education secretary. According to a filing in Texas (see below), “Dick DeVos” gave $200,000 to the Republican State Leadership Committee on that date.
Searching though hundreds of pages of paper records and thousands of individual contributions, MCFN tallied $82 million in contributions. It includes political giving at the state level in Michigan (at least $58.0 million), at the federal level (at least $17.7 million) and giving reported to a dozen other states (at least $6.4 million).
A spreadsheet — featuring more than 5,500 individual contributions — is available here.
The $82-million figure is likely far from a complete picture. It doesn’t include political giving that falls outside of campaign finance reporting requirements, like giving to groups that only spend money on issue ads, or giving at the local level that’s reported to county clerks.
For example, in the 2014 election, the Michigan Republican Party spent $5.7 million on issue ads in the gubernatorial campaign and $4.2 million in the Supreme Court campaign. The donors behind that money never had to be disclosed.
The $82-million figure also doesn’t include all of the family’s contributions that had to be reported because many were reported on paper records that don’t show up in digital database searches. MCFN looked through paper records from the Michigan Republican Party dating back to 1999 and from the 2000 ballot campaign Kids First Yes!, which aimed to institute a voucher program in Michigan, to find some of these contributions. The Michigan Republican Party started filing its reports digitally with the Michigan Secretary of State in 2004.
But for other groups, donations disclosed in paper filings wouldn't be included. For instance, the Great Lakes Education Project, a pro-school choice group that was started by Betsy DeVos, began filing its campaign reports digitally in 2004. The PAC launched in 2001.
In 2014, Mother Jones reported that DeVos family members had invested at least $200 million in “a host of right-wing cause — think tanks, media outlets, political committees, evangelical outfits, and a string of advocacy groups” since 1970.
MCFN’s $82-million figure doesn’t include giving to think tanks, media outlets or evangelical groups.
During Betsy DeVos’s confirmation hearing for U.S. education secretary on Jan. 17, Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont) mentioned the $200-million figure. Sanders said he had heard that the DeVos family had given $200 million to the Republican Party over the years.
“Does that sound in the ballpark?” Sanders asked during the hearing.
Betsy DeVos responded, “Collectively, between my entire family? That’s possible.”
Other findings from the data on DeVos political giving:
— The largest recipient of DeVos giving was Dick DeVos’s 2006 campaign for governor. Family members gave about $35.5 million to Dick DeVos’s campaign. He ended up losing to Democrat Jennifer Granholm, who got 56.3 percent of the vote. Dick DeVos got 42.3 percent.
— The Michigan Republican Party has been one of the top beneficiaries of DeVos giving. MCFN tracked $9.8 million in DeVos Family Has Made At Least $82 Million In Political Contributions Since 1999, According To Campaign Finance Disclosures:



Trump’s education secretary pick plagiarized her Senate questionnaire responses- The Washington Post

DeVos questionnaire appears to include passages from uncited sources - The Washington Post:

DeVos questionnaire appears to include passages from uncited sources


President Trump’s nominee for education secretary, in written responses to questions from senators, appears to have used several sentences and phrases from other sources without attribution — including from a top Obama administration civil rights official.
The responses from nominee Betsy DeVos were submitted Monday to the top Democrat on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is voting Tuesday morning on her confirmation.
In answering a set of questions from Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) on how she would address bullying of LGBT students, DeVos wrote: “Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment where they can learn, thrive, and grow.”
That sentence is almost identical to language used by Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division under President Barack Obama, in a news release announcing the administration’s controversial guidance to schools on how to accommodate transgender students.
“Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment that allows them to thrive and grow,” Gupta said in the May 2016 release.
Rob Goad, a White House education adviser, said in an email: “This is character assassination. The secretary designate has long been referencing the need for safe and supportive learning environments, free of discrimination, for all students, so that they can learn, achieve, thrive, grow and lead successful productive lives. To level an accusation against her about these words included in responses to nearly 1,400 questions — 139 alone from the ranking member — is simply a desperate attempt to discredit Betsy DeVos, who will serve the Department of Education and our nation’s children with distinction if confirmed.”
The revelation comes as Democrats are making an all-out push against key Trump nominees — including DeVos, attorney general nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), treasury secretary nominee Steve Mnuchin, and others. But Democrats cannot block those confirmations unless DeVos questionnaire appears to include passages from uncited sources - The Washington Post:

Under DeVos, Here's How School Choice Might Work : NPR Ed : NPR

Under DeVos, Here's How School Choice Might Work : NPR Ed : NPR:

Under DeVos, Here's How School Choice Might Work



A key Senate committee voted Tuesday to approve the nomination of Betsy DeVos, a school choice activist and billionaire Republican donor, to be secretary of education, despite the fierce objections of Senate Democrats, teachers unions and others. There's much speculation as to exactly how she might carry out President Trump's stated priority of increasing school choice.
A significant clue comes from the American Federation for Children, the advocacy organization DeVos chaired until she was nominated. AFC supports both publicly funded charter schools and even more so, "private school choice" — publicly sponsored programs that give families money to spend on tuition at private schools.
Last fall, AFC issued a report ranking the existing private school choice programs. There are 50 of them, located in 25 states and Washington, D.C., by AFC's count. AFC included only those programs that explicitly allow students to attend religious schools. DeVos, whose family has long supported causes associated with the Christian religious right, has publicly called education reform a way to "advance God's kingdom."


The program that AFC ranked No. 1 in that report was Florida's tax credit scholarships. So it's a good one to take a closer look at if you want a model of how choice programs might work in a DeVos-run Education Department. It unites three broad concepts that DeVos is friendly toward: 1) Privatization 2) religious education and 3) a hands-off approach to accountability for private schools.
Most people are familiar with voucher programs, where state dollars go to pay for tuition at private schools. These programs have faced constitutional challenges in Florida and elsewhere, among other reasons, because they direct public money to religiously based organizations.
In a scholarship tax credit program, however, the money bypasses state coffers altogether. Corporations or individuals can offset state tax liability by donating to a private, nonprofit scholarship organization. The money from this fund is in turn Under DeVos, Here's How School Choice Might Work : NPR Ed : NPR: