Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, October 23, 2016

CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Reading in the Seattle Dew (10/23)

CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Reading in the Seattle Dew (10/23):

ICYMI: Reading in the Seattle Dew (10/23)


I'm far from home, but there's still plenty to read on the interwebs.

Our Stupid Questions

Teacher Tom with a striking twist on the old "no such thing as a dumb question" shtick.

How Joy Became the New Grit

Jennifer Berkshire gives us a look at how the world of grit is giving way to something even worse

Talk about Passion

Kristen Perkins guest-blogs at Blue Cereal Education with a piece about passion in teaching.

Reflections from a Nasty Woman 

Nancy Flanagan with a brave and honest post about the price women pay for coming forward in matters of sexual harassment. If you're only going to read one item on this list, this is the one.

What New Challenges To The Charter School Industry Reveal 

These were supposed to be the salad days for the charter business. Jeff Bryant takes a broad look at why that's not happening.

The Value-Added of Teacher Preparation Programs

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley takes a look about what new research tells us when it comes to using VAM to evaluate teacher education programs

You Can't Teach Writing from the Side of the Pool 

Did we just talk about this last week? Sure we did, but it's a point worthy of repeating. Russ Walsh hosts a guest post from Cynthia Mershon.

More About Attrition Rates in Boston

Mark Weber (Jersey Jazzman) is back to once again cut through the smoke and mirrors of the Massachusetts charter debate.
CURMUDGUCATION: ICYMI: Reading in the Seattle Dew (10/23):







Catch up with CURMUDGUCATION: Nobel-Winning Evaluation Advice  + PA: Bad Charter Bill Still Not Dead

The National Federation of Municipal Analysts Wants Extensive Charter School Disclosure | deutsch29

The National Federation of Municipal Analysts Wants Extensive Charter School Disclosure | deutsch29:

The National Federation of Municipal Analysts Wants Extensive Charter School Disclosure

Image result for big education ape charter school secrets

a not-for-profit association with the goals of promoting professionalism in municipal credit analysis and furthering the skill level of its members through educational programs and industry communication, providing an informed perspective in the formulation of legal and regulatory matters relating to the municipal finance industry, and facilitating the flow of information between investors and issuing entities. …
Membership in the NFMA totals over 1,300, representing the major participants in the municipal market, including institutional investors, bond rating agencies, bond insurance companies, portfolio managers, investment banking firms and financial advisors.  Beginning in 2013, the NFMA began a Student Membership category.
On September 28, 2016, NFMA published this 24-page draft of recommended best practices (RBP) for establishing charter school disclosure expectations that will help inform charter school investors.
From the September 28, 2016, Bond Buyer, Washington securities law section:
WASHINGTON – The National Federation of Municipal Analysts is urging charter schools to provide detailed financial, academic, and staffing information in primary and secondary disclosure documents. …
The [RBP] draft constitutes NFMA’s first disclosure recommendations for 
The National Federation of Municipal Analysts Wants Extensive Charter School Disclosure | deutsch29:


Three Ways To Reclaim Your Joy As A Teacher | The Jose Vilson

Three Ways To Reclaim Your Joy As A Teacher | The Jose Vilson:

Three Ways To Reclaim Your Joy As A Teacher

Image result for Joy

This weekend, I had the joy and pleasure of keynoting the ECET2MA2016 conference in Cambridge, MA. Weird wasn’t even the word. I was a Yankee fan in the middle of Red Sox town and had a Macbook in a Microsoft building. I’ve railed on a number of occasions against the founder of the company that hosted this company. Yet, a space where two or more educators are gathered is a space I need to be in. I always appreciate the passion that any set of educators have for coming in on a weekend to professionally develop each other.
The creators of our school system didn’t have joy, collaboration, and creativity in mind, especially in the spaces where our most marginalized students need that from the adults the most. As complicated as it was for me to go there, I know that is part of the work we do collectively.
I was blessed to see that the audience took to my speech on student power, teacher voice, and relationships. The conference featured some of Massachusetts’ most enthusiastic educators, but there was a sense that the primary foci of learning and teaching gave way to any number of priorities Three Ways To Reclaim Your Joy As A Teacher | The Jose Vilson:


Seattle Schools Community Forum: Let's Talk About Race (Part One)

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Let's Talk About Race (Part One):

Let's Talk About Race (Part One)

Image result for Let's Talk About Race

We could start this discussion with the micro-view of what is happening in Seattle Public Schools.  But that doesn't work because that's just peering down into a silo and trying to figure out what's happening. 

The real pressures of the entire society AND our nation's history cannot be ignored.  (This is one place where I part company with ed reformers who just want to look at the micro-view and ignoring what is happening out in the greater world.)  Poverty and racism do not stop at the schoolhouse door. 

But we will talk about racial equity as it relates to schools in Part Two.

Rules of engagement:
- NO name-calling especially of children.  It will not be tolerated.
- We all bring to this where we were brought up, who brought us up and their thinking, our education (both K-12 and beyond), where we have lived and worked and who we partnered with, etc.  That is all part of where we ALL get our implicit bias.
- I do not profess to know everything on this topic nor have the answers.  I'm learning and I hope all of you have that desire as well.  But with these initiatives rolling out the district - without any widespread discussions in our 
Seattle Schools Community Forum: Let's Talk About Race (Part One):



 Seattle Schools Community Forum: Seattle Schools This Week - http://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2016/10/seattle-schools-this-week_23.html

Demand the Impossible! (excerpt # 8) | Bill Ayers

Demand the Impossible! (excerpt # 8) | Bill Ayers:

Demand the Impossible! (excerpt # 8)


Image result for DEMAND the IMPOSSIBLE! bill ayers
Bill Ayers -- Demand the Impossible!: A Radical Manifesto | Haymarket Books -http://www.haymarketbooks.org/pb/Demand-the-Impossible

I often provoke my students at the University of Illinois at Chicago by saying, “Do you know that one mile from our campus there are 15,000 Irishmen [or Jewish women, or Greeks] living in cages?” “Come on! No way!” There was always a general sense of disbelief, and a notion that maybe I was joking. 
“You’re kidding, right?”

Well, yes and no: I wasn’t being fully honest, so let me change it a bit—“Do you know that one mile from our campus there are 15,000 young Black and Latino men living in cages?” “No, I didn’t know that, but I’m not completely surprised either; what crimes did they commit?” The fact of Black men being imprisoned is part of the known world, Black “criminality” the common sense of known things, normalized to the point of invisibility—you didn’t know that; indeed, you didn’t even notice that. So in another sense, you did know that.

The logic of prison abolition was explained to me by the great freedom fighter Angela Davis: It’s a problem of limiting our imaginations, she said, of shutting down our capacity to think more broadly and more bravely. We need to think about what lies beyond prison, beyond making a better or more functional prison system—the focus of too many reform conversations—and initiate massive conversations about de-carceration, that is, bringing folks home and shutting prisons down. Mass incarceration is, after all, part of the afterlife of slavery, and prison abolition is the next step in that long historic project called abolition. And as we imagine dramatic change, we should also anticipate future attempts to contain and control, for just as Jim Crow followed abolition, and mass incarceration followed Jim Crow, some evil expression of white supremacy and Black containment as yet unseen lurks just around the corner.

Angela Davis talked about the abolitionist and humane values of liberation, community restoration, and shared fate as opposed to the hardening practices of cruelty and punishment, revenge and retribution. She reminded us of the ten glorious words uttered by Justice Harry Blackmun in 1994 when he announced publicly that he had become a death penalty abolitionist: “I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” He wasn’t searching for ways to make state-sanctioned murder more efficient or more palatable—he wanted to get out of the death business altogether. Let’s get out of the caging business, she said. Let’s not tinker with the machinery of mass incarceration.

I first proposed prison abolition publicly in a talk I gave about Freedom Schools at the University of Pittsburgh. Most of my talk was well received—even when I pointed out, as I always do, that the existence of an American Gulag or the Prison Nation meant that you were never far from a prison—but there was a general sense of disbelief when I said I thought prisons should be abolished. The first question from the floor was a request to clarify the point, which I did, saying I thought we should work toward closing all the prisons since they were institutions of congealed violence. The next student up worried that I was kidding—I assured them I was not—and followed up by politely accusing me of utopian romanticism and unrealistic idealism. Guilty, I said, of the idealism, but not of being unrealistic. The next person tried to show me the error of my logic, and painted a terrifying picture of a world ruled by mass murderers (hmm, I thought), pointing specifically to John Wayne Gacy, the gruesome Chicago serial killer who was the first person executed when Illinois reinstated the death penalty, a person about whom my interrogator had seemingly encyclopedic knowledge. I’m convinced, I said after an exhaustive portrayal, I give up! Okay, that’s one cell, I said, so who else? I’ll give you Henry Kissinger and Dick Cheney, too, so now we have three prison cells total—a far cry from the millions we support in reality.

This led to a discussion I’ve now had countless times with students and others, and it begins with an exercise in the form of a question: Can we—right now—generate a thousand alternatives to caging people? It turns out we can, and so let’s.

A Thousand Steps toward De-carceration and a Range of Alternatives to Caging Human Beings (a start):

1. Decriminalize illegal drugs and expand drug treatment centers to meet the real needs of people caught in the grip of addiction.
2. Use a public health frame to rethink issues of violence.
3. Get guns off the streets.
4. Generously create and support community mental
health programs.
5. Build “Community Restorative Justice” projects—spaces where perpetrators and victims can meet with peers and neighbors, community organizers and social workers, to discuss how to repair the harm inflicted by misbehavior.
6. Redirect all misdemeanor offenses away from criminal court with its attendant culture of cruelty, humiliation, and punishment toward counseling, rehab, or anger management for some, and technological support (a simple breathalyzer device, for example, attached to a vehicle before it can be driven) for others.
7. Outlaw all profiteering from prison: ban private prisons, cash bail and bail bond businesses, paid alternatives to jail, telephone company gouging, and the privatizing and outsourcing of prison services like clothing and meals.
8. Do away with mandatory minimum sentencing, “three strikes you’re out,” sentence enhancements, and other punitive measures that serve to swell the prison population.
9. Restore or create opportunities to reduce time inside with policies like day-for-day good time practices.
10. Create massive public works programs.
11. Offer homes to the homeless.
12. Increase the minimum wage to $25 an hour.
13. Grant income supports to the unemployed.
14. Bring the endowments of all private schools, colleges,
and universities under public and democratic control, and organize the redistribution of those resources toward a system of free quality education for all.
15. Provide a living-wage stipend, free housing, and good child care to anyone living at or below the poverty line and attending high school or community college.
16. Create a system of free universal health care.
17. Immediately release all prisoners over, say, age fifty for
starters.
18. Develop a prisoner’s cooperative to operate the institutions, making decisions collectively about all matters concerning food, health care, education, and social services, the organization of work and leisure, and relations with outside institutions including religious, educational, and business organizations.

Whew!

Well, it’s a running start. We only have 982 to go! And, yes, none of this is possible in the absence of collective action and a social movement for radical transformation. But we need to work collectively on a vision as part of the fight for abolition. And, yes, some of it may sound a bit like fiddling with the machinery of caging, but let’s not be dogmatic hard-liners when actual people could breathe more freely with just a bit of tinkering.Demand the Impossible! (excerpt # 8) | Bill Ayers:


The Attack on Teachers Goes to College | The Progressive

The Attack on Teachers Goes to College | The Progressive:

The Attack on Teachers Goes to College

Image result for big education ape war on teachers
The dramatic lockout of faculty at Long Island University in Brooklyn this fall brought home the reality that what is happening in higher education is closely related to the attack on education in our K-12 public schools.
On August 31, 2016 the contract between the faculty on the Brooklyn campus and Long Island University (LIU) was due to expire. The negotiating team was told on that day if they did not accept the contract, faculty would be locked out.
The faculty members turned down the contract offer but did not vote to strike. In response, LIU cut off professors’ email accounts and health insurance. The professors were locked out of their classrooms and told they would be replaced. If faculty members went into the university buildings where their offices and classrooms were, they were told they could be criminally charged for trespassing.
Some of those faculty members had been teaching at LIU for twenty or thirty years.
As I listened to some of them express their shock at being treated so poorly to Amy Goodman on Democracy Now!, I was reminded of what I have heard K-12 teachers in schools across the country say about endless budget cuts, union-busting, and the threat of being replaced by less-skilled (and cheaper) employees.
One of the issues of concern in the LIU contract was a two-tier wage system that would pay new full time and adjunct instructors less. In addition, the university wanted to stop funding the Adjunct Benefits Trust Fund which helps adjunct professors buy health insurance.
After the lockout was announced, the school administration replaced the faculty with non-faculty employees, and placed advertisements on Monster.com for replacement instructors.
The students did not stand for the actions taken by the school administration and joined the teachers in protest, chanting," LIU professors locked out, students walkout!"
On September 15, the twelve-day Long Island University lockout of the school’s faculty The Attack on Teachers Goes to College | The Progressive:


Schooling in the Ownership Society: Crooked pol Calderon, tied to Michelle Rhee, finally going to jail

Schooling in the Ownership Society: Crooked pol Calderon, tied to Michelle Rhee, finally going to jail:

Crooked pol Calderon, tied to Michelle Rhee, finally going to jail


Michelle Rhee, former D.C. school chancellor and darling of the far-right and corporate reformers, used Students First money to buy politicians like former CA State Sen. Ron Calderon. Now it looks like Calderon is finally on his way to prison while Rhee has ended up at a fertilizer company. 

Good riddance to both.

More than three years after FBI agents raided the Capitol office of former state Sen. Ron Calderon, the corruption case against the Montebello Democrat finally comes to an end.
Calderon, who pleaded guilty in June to one count of mail fraud for accepting tens of thousands of dollars and jobs for his children in exchange for official acts, is set to be sentenced at noon in federal court in Los Angeles. Originally charged with 24 counts, including bribery, money laundering and aiding in the filing of false tax returns – allegations that could have netted Calderon a maximum 396-year sentence – prosecutors are now requesting that he serve five years in prison. -- Sacramento Bee
Calderon would never have been elected in the first place were it not for Michelle Rhee. She funneled $371,000 to him, which helped put his losing campaign over the Schooling in the Ownership Society: Crooked pol Calderon, tied to Michelle Rhee, finally going to jail:



Teachers union mobilizes to boost turnout for education-related initiatives | EdSource

Teachers union mobilizes to boost turnout for education-related initiatives | EdSource:

Teachers union mobilizes to boost turnout for education-related initiatives

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson promotes Props. 55 and 58 at CTA voter turnout event in San Jose on Saturday
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson promotes Props. 55 and 58 at CTA voter turnout event in San Jose on Saturday.
With less than three weeks to go before the Nov. 8 election, the California Teachers Association this weekend mobilized teachers, elected officials and other supporters to boost voter turnout on behalf of two ballot measures — Propositions 55 and 58 — that will have a direct bearing on schools and community colleges.
According to CTA estimates, over 1,000 teachers and other school staff walked precincts Saturday in several communities from San Diego to Santa Rosa on Saturday, joined by a slew of elected officials who are supportive of public education and allied with the teachers union, including Senate President pro Tem Kevin de León and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendón. There will be a similar mobilization on Sunday.
“Public schools face a destructive $4 billion cut to public school education funding if Prop. 55 doesn’t pass,”  CTA president Eric Heins said at a kickoff event in San Jose Saturday.
Many of those speaking out on behalf of Prop. 55 were motivated by the specter of the brutal budget cuts inflicted on schools and community colleges during the Great Recession as a result of the state’s budget crisis.
“We know that without Prop. 55 we will backslide, not just on education, but on other services and the safety net important to many Californians,” Rendón said.
Backers of the initiatives face the hurdle of getting voters’ attention in an electoral season that has been completely dominated by the most contentious Teachers union mobilizes to boost turnout for education-related initiatives | EdSource:
 money for schools at stake in two state measures
Image result for yes Propositions 51 and
Image result for yes Propositions 55

Are Detroit’s Most Terrible Schools Unconstitutional? - The New York Times

Are Detroit’s Most Terrible Schools Unconstitutional? - The New York Times:

Are Detroit’s Most Terrible Schools Unconstitutional?


At one Detroit school, just 4 percent of third graders scored proficient on Michigan’s English assessment test. At another, 9.5 percent did. Those students are among the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed last month that asserts that children have a federal constitutional right to the opportunity to learn to read and write.

Illiteracy is the norm at those “slumlike” schools and others in Michigan’s biggest city, according to the plaintiffs. The facilities are decrepit and unsafe. The first thing some teachers do each morning is clean up rodent feces before their students arrive. In some cases, teachers buy the books and school supplies, even the toilet paper.

Lawyers for the students are arguing, in effect, that Michigan is denying their clients the right to a minimally adequate education, an issue that has been raised over the years in courts in other states under their state constitutions.

In Connecticut, a state judge last month ordered sweeping changes to reshape the state’s public schools after concluding that “Connecticut is defaulting on its constitutional duty” to provide all students with an adequate education. The judge concluded that the state’s funding system had “left rich school districts to flourish and poor school districts to flounder.”

Now the litigation in Detroit is raising this issue under the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court has never addressed whether disparities among schools would be constitutionally permissible if, as the court put it in 1973, a state failed “to provide each child with an opportunity to acquire the basic minimal skills necessary” for success in life.

In that bitterly divided 5-4 decision, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, the court upheld a Texas law that produced unequal levels of education to students living in different school districts based on the property tax revenues of each district.

The majority maintained that the law was constitutional because it served a rational policy of permitting each school district to decide for itself how much money to spend on education. Whether the level of education was at least minimally adequate in the state’s poorest schools was not at issue inAre Detroit’s Most Terrible Schools Unconstitutional? - The New York Times:





Lesson From Houston - UOO & HFT Unite

The War Report on Public Education:

Lesson From Houston - UOO & HFT Unite





Pleas e join Internet radio host Dr. James Avington Miller Jr. for a report on the Houston Education and Civil Rights Summit that took place on October 14th and 15th. Joining Dr. Miller will be members of United Opt Out and the Houston Federation of Teachers - Gus Morales , Dr. Denisha Jones, Zak Rodriguez, and Erika Chalverria.


Please check out these pages to find out more about United Opt Out and this very important summit.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/United-Opt-Out-National/265810576790447

http://www.unitedoptoutnational.org/

https://gadflyonthewallblog.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/fighting-for-public-schools-means-fighting-against-systemic-racism-united-opt-out-education-and-civil-rights-summit/

Please tune in this Sunday and learn more about fighting for justice and equity for all children.

Knowledge is power !

RESISTANCE MATTERS
RESISTANCE IS NOT FUTILE
RESISTANCE IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF EXPRESSION OF DEMOCRACY
RESISTANCE IS SURVIVAL

Please click on the website below to listen live:
http://bbsradio.com/thewarreport
2:00 PM PDT
4:00 PM CDT
5:00 PM EDT
or
A direct listen-in line only
Station 1 - 716-748-0150
To call-in and interact live
Station 1 888-627-6008 toll free  




 The War Report on Public Education:



Neoliberalism’s Deadly Experiment | Jacobin

Neoliberalism’s Deadly Experiment | Jacobin:

Neoliberalism’s Deadly Experiment
In Michigan, privatization and free-market governance has left 100,000 people without water.


Over the past year, media reports and op-eds have examined the lead poisoning disaster in Flint, Michigan, from a variety of angles. Some focus on Michigan’s emergency manager laws, which the Republican-dominated legislature has used to suspend democracy in majority-African-American cities, including Flint, Detroit, Pontiac, Highland Park, and Benton Harbor.
Others focus on the larger issue of lead pipes and decaying infrastructure, or the criminal negligence of Governor Rick Snyder and his administration. Still others note that the long history of housing discrimination in Flint, and the racist application of emergency manager laws, help explain why the majority of the poisoning victims are African American (although they include many working-class whites).
Corporate media coverage, however, has ignored the relationship between the water crisis in Flint and ongoing mass water shutoffs in Detroit. More broadly, it has obscured the role of neoliberal restructuring in undermining one of the nation’s largest water systems, and in leaving over one hundred thousand people without running water in a state surrounded by the Great Lakes.
Since 2000, state-appointed emergency managers in DetroitHighland ParkFlint, and Pontiac have outsourced key functions of their water departments to private companies, while ramping up water shutoffs on low-income households. Since 2013, when Republican governor Rick Snyder placed Detroit under an emergency manager, the Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD) has shut off water for over one hundred thousand residents, provoking condemnation from the United Nations Human Rights Council.
Public health experts have also said that the mass shutoffs will increase infectious disease and infant mortality in Detroit. Meanwhile, even after its lead-contaminated water became a national scandal, Flint has continued to shut off water for residents unable or unwilling to pay for poisoned water.
Whether from shutoffs, contamination, or both, so many poor and working-class urban residents in Michigan lack water to properly bathe, clean, or flush their toilets. Why are so many people unable to use tap water in a state bordering the Great Lakes, the largest group of freshwater lakes on earth?
Michigan’s water crisis is rooted in the hollowing out of the public Neoliberalism’s Deadly Experiment | Jacobin:
 Our new issue, “Rank and File,” is out now. To celebrate its release, new subscriptions are discounted.




Think Your Retirement Plan Is Bad? Talk to a Teacher - The New York Times

Think Your Retirement Plan Is Bad? Talk to a Teacher - The New York Times:

Think Your Retirement Plan Is Bad? Talk to a Teacher

Schoolteachers and others who pursue careers of service in exchange for modest paychecks get lightly regulated retirement plans that often charge excessive fees.

Image result for Think Your Retirement Plan Is Bad? Talk to a Teacher

Margaret Jusinski first got to know her investment broker through the breakfasts he provided when he visited her public school in the leafy suburbs of New Jersey, where she teaches middle-school children computer coding and how to build robots made of Legos.

After the bagels, muffins and coffee, the broker made his sales pitch — and Ms. Jusinski bought it. So did many of her colleagues.

The teachers only recently learned how much those meals actually cost them.

Had she been able to choose a simpler, less expensive plan instead of the broker’s costly offering, Ms. Jusinski would have approximately 20 percent more in savings, according to an analysis performed for The New York Times. One colleague would have a balance 50 percent fatter. The list goes on.

“It is a heartbreaking situation for everyone,” said Ms. Jusinski, a mother of two girls who turns 50 on Sunday. “Especially for the staff members who were looking to retire within the next few years.”

Most Americans who save for retirement at work have 401(k) plans, which are generally offered by companies and must by law provide a mix of prudent investment options. But millions of Americans — public school teachers, clergy members, employees of religious institutions or nonprofits, and some charities — are not offered 401(k)’s. Instead they typically must rely on what are known as 403(b) plans, many of which are Think Your Retirement Plan Is Bad? Talk to a Teacher - The New York Times:

JITU BROWN: Charter Schools and Civil Rights - The New York Times

Charter Schools and Civil Rights - The New York Times:

Charter Schools and Civil Rights


Image result for JITU BROWN
To the Editor:
Re “A Misguided Attack on Charter Schools” (editorial, Oct. 13):
The N.A.A.C.P. should be applauded for ratifying a resolution calling for a halt to the expansion of charter schools.
You say charters give children in poor communities their only opportunity for a superior education. Actually, equity gives children an opportunity for excellent education. Here in Chicago, there are public schools that offer Mandarin, Arabic and Spanish and that support every teacher with a classroom aide.
In the same city, same district, there are schools with one teacher aide in the entire building, no world language classes and no librarian. These schools are not failing: They have been failed.
We are not anti-charter ideologues. We applaud the 20 percent of charters that outperform traditional public schools. We are not advocating the mass shutdown of charters, because closing schools harms children.
What must be acknowledged is the ample evidence that charters as a whole have discriminatory discipline practices, serve fewer English-language learners and children with special needs, and are struggling with the excessive expulsion of their students, who are overwhelmingly black and Latino.
The call by the N.A.A.C.P., Black Lives Matter and the Journey for Justice Alliance for a moratorium on charters and school privatization is in the best civil rights tradition.
JITU BROWN
National Director
Journey for Justice Alliance
Chicago
 Charter Schools and Civil Rights - The New York Times:

Georgia Doesn’t Want the State to Take Over Its Schools | deutsch29

Georgia Doesn’t Want the State to Take Over Its Schools | deutsch29:

Georgia Doesn’t Want the State to Take Over Its Schools


On November 08th, 2016, Georgia voters will decide whether they will allow the state to take control of public schools that the state labels as “chronically failing.”
The ballot measure, Amendment 1, is vaguely worded– it does not disclose the fact that school districts will lose money when the state takes control of schools.
As Ballotpedia notes, here is the ballot question that Georgia voters will see:
Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended to allow the state to intervene in chronically failing public schools in order to improve student performance?
( ) Yes
( ) No
And if Amendment 1 passes, here is the language that would be added to the Georgia constitution:
Paragraph VIII. Opportunity School District. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph II of this section, the General Assembly may provide by general law for the creation of an Opportunity School District and authorize the state to assume the supervision, management, and operation of public elementary and secondary schools which have been determined to be failing through any governance model allowed by law. Such authorization shall include the power to receive, control, and expend state, federal, and local funds appropriated for schools under the current or prior supervision, management, or operation of the Opportunity School District, all in the manner provided by and in accordance with general law. [Emphasis added.]
The bolded, Georgia-constitution-altering, text above is what Georgia voters will not see as part of the Amendment 1 ballot question text.
However, it seems that word is spreading among Georgia voters, as the October 21, 2016, Atlanta Journal-Constitution notes:
Gov. Nathan Deal’s proposed Opportunity School District has significant opposition just weeks ahead of the Nov. 8 election, according to a new Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll.
The results released Friday found likely voters siding nearly 2-1 against Amendment 1, the referendum that would create a statewide school district to take over Georgia’s lowest performing schools.
The poll question revealed more about the proposal than does the ballot question itself, which has been criticized by opponents as misleading because it does not clearly say that the state would take over schools. …
The resulting state charter schools have no access to local school district funding, but charter schools created as a result of Amendment 1 would get those local tax dollars.
Opponents claim the constitutional amendment would harm school districts Georgia Doesn’t Want the State to Take Over Its Schools | deutsch29:



Teaching Biology at Mountain View High School: Technology Integration | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Teaching Biology at Mountain View High School: Technology Integration | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:

Teaching Biology at Mountain View High School: Technology Integration

Image result for Teaching Biology Technology Integration
As the chime sounds for students to come to their 90-minute Biology I class, Lyuda Shemyakina stands at the door welcoming each student. A “hello,” “good morning,” an exchange of pleasantries or information about homework, quickly passes between teacher and student. It is the morning of September 28, 2016.
These 9th graders enter a large room half of which contains lab tables in the rear and half of which has student desks facing the front whiteboards and teacher’s desk. The front whiteboard is filled with weekly homework instructions for students, the day’s agenda, the lesson’s objective, and upcoming events.
img_1911
bio-clssrmimg_1915
At the beginning of this period every day are the Mountain View High School* video announcements produced and directed by students. The two anchors of the five minute program say that the day is “World Day” (the teacher says that she is wearing her T-shirt from Barcelona). Anchors describe upcoming events, meetings that day, and announcements from various students. As I scan the room, 26 students’ eyes look to the screen. In other schools, announcements come into each room via a loudspeaker and students chat, surf their laptop and tablet screens, or stare into space. Not here.
After the announcements end, Shemyakina turns to the “bell ringer,” an ice-breaker or launching activity, for the hour-and-a-half lesson. On the screen is a slide:
Look back at your model on p. 18**. What were you not sure about? What were you pretty confident about? What questions do you have?
DON’T HAVE A MODEL? DRAW IT NOW
Example: I am not sure I drew the chromosome correctly because ….

The Absurdity of Charter School Oversight in L.A.

The Absurdity of Charter School Oversight in L.A.:

The Absurdity of Charter School Oversight in L.A.

ecrchs-hearing
-Magnolia CEO Caprice Young
The sky is falling.”
-Chicken Little
As usual, the LAUSD Board spent a significant portion of their time at Tuesday’s meeting ignoring the needs of students enrolled in District schools so they could focus on charter issues. At this meeting,held at a time set aside to ensure maximum convenience for the charters, one new charter “was approved, another was allowed to expand and three others were renewed.” However, most of the focus has been on Magnolia andCelerity for the rejection of their renewal petitions and El Camino Real Charter High School (ECRCHS) for narrowly avoiding advancement in the charter revocation process.
Last year, the charter industry invested “nearly $2.3 million” in “the nation’s most expensive school board elections” to ensure that they were free from the inconvenience of oversight. While the California Charter School Association (CCSA) has stated that they “are deeply concerned that this month District staff have recommended more charter renewal [denials] and material revision denials than they have in the last five years combined”, the recommendations against Magnolia and Celerity should not have been a surprise or seen as a change in policy. In 2014, the Board voted against two other Magnolia campuses “for fiscal mismanagement and a slew of other accounting irregularities.” Celerity had two charter renewal petitions rejected last November. The Board’s interest in the “financial shenanigans” at ECRCHS is a little more surprising, especially since their charter wasrenewed last year with at least two Notices to Cure outstanding. However, the publicity provided by the Los Angeles Daily News investigative reports most likely made the irregularities more difficult The Absurdity of Charter School Oversight in L.A.:



Carl J. Petersen for LAUSD School Board, District 2 because:
All Kids Are Our Kids!
The_Petersens.jpg
  • The LAUSD School Board needs a parent's perspective. None of the current Board members has a child enrolled in the district.
  • One size education does not fit all. The District must provide opportunities to all students, not just those who are college bound. We will fight to block the closure of special education centers and return funding to vocational education.Nicole_and_Carl.jpg
  • Eli Broad's plan to privatize education must be stopped. Unlike Mónica García's campaign, this campaign will not be funded by the charter industry. I will answer to the parents and students of the district, not corporate donors.
 CHANGE IS COMING!
March 7, 2017
Carl J. Petersen for LAUSD School Board 2017 (ID# 1384794) -http://www.changethelausd.com/
Vote LAUSD | Vote LAUSD: