Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, December 31, 2015

I’ve got to hand it to you, Arne Duncan - The Washington Post

I’ve got to hand it to you, Arne Duncan - The Washington Post:

I’ve got to hand it to you, Arne Duncan






 I’ve got to hand it to Arne Duncan.

Today, Dec. 31, is his last day as U.S. education secretary, a job he’s had for seven years. There are few who would dispute that he has been most powerful education secretary in the department’s history, using federal funding and power to get most states to implement the school reforms he thought worthy.
Duncan was highly effective in pushing — critics say coercing — states to adopt the Common Core State Standards, open more charter schools and evaluate teachers by student standardized test scores. But, as time has shown, his reforms were hardly as effective as his ability get them adopted.
He leaves, in fact, with a troubled legacy.
When he first took office in 2009, many had hoped that his Education Department would focus federal education policy on issues such as inequitable school funding and support services for children who live in poverty. Duncan clearly cared about children and wanted to help improve educational opportunities for all, but his narrow policies sparked a revolt by parents, teachers, principals, superintendents, students and others who blamed him for putting unprecedented — and unfair — emphasis on standardized test scores as the chief accountability measure for schools, students and educators.
Duncan’s micromanaging of education issues that had traditionally been left to the states finally propelled Congress to rewrite No Child Left Behind — seven years after the job was supposed to have been done — and to shift some federal power over education back to the states and schools districts.
In his last speech as education secretary, given on Wednesday in Chicago, Duncan said that his “greatest frustration” while he was in office was the failure by Congress to pass gun control legislation.  (Not failure to close the achievement gap or failure to ensure equitable funding for all children). My colleague Emma Brown wrote in this story about his speech:
The country could save lives with a new “new deal” for kids, he said, that would provide broad access to preschool and meaningful incentives for great teachers to work in high-poverty schools, as well as mentorship and support for job creation in poor neighborhoods.
He’s not wrong but, again,  these aren’t efforts he put at the centerpiece of his reform agenda. While the administration did push universal preschool, it wasn’t until the second term, after billions of dollars had been spent on teacher evaluation and other reforms.
Last October, I ran a post that explained Duncan’s tenure through his own words over the years. Today, on his last day, here it is again:
And so we have to stop lying to children. We have to tell them the 
I’ve got to hand it to you, Arne Duncan - The Washington Post:





On the 2016 Presidential Election Polls | deutsch29

On the 2016 Presidential Election Polls | deutsch29:

On the 2016 Presidential Election Polls



 Reviewing presidential election polls is like watching politically loaded horse races in slow motion.

According to RealClearPolitics, based on various polls conducted at the end of December 2015, it looks like for the most part, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are the two most likely to receive the Republican nomination for president. Marco Rubio and Ben Carson are moderately and respectably holding their own (note that CNN considers Trump, Cruz, and Rubio in “dead heat”), but at this point, Jeb! Bush’s ratings are just an embarrassment. Still, Bush is reorganizing his campaign for a third time in (far-fetched?) hopes to nab the Republican endorsement and votes enough to live in the same Pennsylvania Avenue house as his father and brother once did.
There are some with the likelihood of a 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue home address stacked against them, and Jeb! is certainly among that group.
With the Republicans, Trump is out front; however, he is a rich guy who can buy himself a run as an independent (which he apparently has threatened to do) if he does not receive the Republican nomination (something the Republican National Party doesn’t seem keen on anyway) and which likely worries the Republicans as it could force a three-way presidential race that could be the Republican-in-the-House undoing in Election 2016.
On the Democratic side, Clinton is overshadowing Bernie Sanders by a notable margin (e.g., +23 in Nevada on Dec. 30, 2015). Clinton is corporate Democrat material, the kind favored by the Democratic National Party, so it seems at this point she will get the Democratic nod for nomination.
Sanders has said that he would not run as an independent if he does not receive the On the 2016 Presidential Election Polls | deutsch29:

Testing, The NYT and Corporate “Reform,” Gaslighting| Live Long and Prosper

2015 Medley #38 | Live Long and Prosper:



 Testing, The NYT and Corporate “Reform,” Gaslighting, Education is not Business

My last post of 2015.
Meez 3D avatar avatars games
TESTING, TESTING, TESTING
The New York Times printed this editorial today. It’s all the teachers unions’ fault.
Teachers unions and other critics of federally required standardized tests have behaved in recent years as though killing the testing mandate would magically remedy everything that ails education in the United States. In reality, getting rid of the testing requirement in the early grades would make it impossible for the country to know what if anything children were learning from year to year.
This makes sense only if you believe, as the NYT editorial board apparently does, that yearly standardized testing is the only way to know if our students are learning.
“Teachers unions and other critics” don’t claim that reduced testing would magically remedy everything that ails education. I’m a member of a teachers union as well as a critic of yearly standardized testing and I, for one, have never claimed that no-testing would solve everything. Neither have I heard anyone else suggest that, from the bloggers who write against so-called “education reform” to the leaders of America’s largest teachers unions. Most, like me, blame a great deal of our education struggles on the high levels of child poverty in the U.S. Testing isn’t the enemy, but it’s being misused and overused. Most standardized testing tells us what we already know…that students who live in poverty achieve at lower levels than students who don’t.
“Getting rid of the testing requirement in the early grades” isn’t necessary because, federally required testing doesn’t begin until third grade, the oldest of the grades traditionally considered “the early grades.” Should we get rid of testing in third grade? The Finns don’t test third graders and their students seem to do ok. However, simply getting rid of testing is not going to solve all the education problems in America.
Maybe, instead, we ought to fully fund our public schools, provide wraparound services for children who need them, and work to alleviate the effects of childhood poverty. The Chicago Teachers Union, a real union of professionals, not the imaginary “Teachers unions” that the NYT refers to, published ways to actually improve the lives of children. You can learn about the ways to help children by reading a summary of The Schools Chicago’s Children Deserve. If you wish, you can read the entire document, HERE. The suggestions work for all children…not just those in my home town of Chicago.
Peter Greene has done his usual masterful job in his own response to the NYT editorial. He lets us know that the editorial tells us just what the Gates Foundation and Achieve (with a Board of Directors filled with a Who’s Who of Corporate and Political America) want us to hear.
He writes…
…There are other big chunks of wrong, well-worn and repeatedly gnawed on by commenters, like the old baloney that the teacher unions Common Core (they didn’t– they supported it and continue to do so) and the connected testing because they “did not want to be evaluated based on how much students learned,” a statement which ignores the question of whether the Big Standardized Tests actually measure any such thing, and which also ignores the rich and detailed arguments about these points that are all over the interwebs.
So here’s the big question? How did the New York Times editorial board get so very much wrong? Does the NYT not have Google? I mean– here’s my New York Times story. One of my oldest friends from here in our small NW PA town now lives in Manhattan, and when he got married years ago, his wedding announcement ran in the NYT. A fact-checker called to verify the name of the business that his mother runs here in our population 7000 town hundreds of miles away. That’s the level of commitment to accuracy that I associate with the the NYT.
What’s the problem? I think we can find it in these two sentences:
A recent study from Achieve, a nonpartisan organization that works with the states to raise academic standards….
An alarming study by the Education Trust, a nonpartisan foundation…
These are the sources that the NYT relied on? Seriously?
I suppose they are “bi-partisan” in the same way that The Tobacco Institute and most lobbying groups are “bi-partisan.” In that sense, the NYT board just stopped short of flat out lying by saying that these two groups are impartial or unbiased. But the Education Trust is a Gates-funded advocacy group from the earliest days of the Core. And Achieve is the organization that “helped” the CCSSO and NGA write the Common Core to begin with– no organization is more highly invested in the continued support and push of the Core Standards and the tests that are welded to them. And they earlier this month released a report that says– well, it says pretty much exactly what this editorial says…
Here, NPR, like the NYT, gets it wrong.
In the following text from a story about the new education law, the Every Student 2015 Medley #38 | Live Long and Prosper:

BATs HAD AN AMAZING 2015! HERE WE COME 2016! - Badass Teachers Association

Badass Teachers Association:

BATs HAD AN AMAZING 2015!  HERE WE COME 2016!



àBATs Teaceher Congress this summer in D.C. which included 60+ appointments on Capitol Hill 
àBATs filed an Amicus Brief in the Supreme Court for Friedrichs vs. CTA http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/14-915_bsac_Brittany_Alexander.pdf
àBATs Quality of Work Life Team research project with AFT Research is now written into ESSA Section 2301 N of Title II.  This requires Title II money to be used to study school workplace conditions.
à BATs heralded as a prominent educator activist group by Yahoo News this year http://news.yahoo.com/no-child-left-behind-dead-happens-standardized-testing-214447919.html
àWe appear on The Rick Smith Show every Monday on #BATsRadio, The Jeff Santos Show every Tuesday for #TeacherTuesday,  Just Let Me Teach, and every fourth Thursday of the month of We Act Radio Education Town Hall.  Please head over  to our website and locate the Radio Shows tab for links to these amazing radio stations http://www.badassteacher.org/
àNY BATs helped to organize an Education Justice Conference in NYC.
àThe BAT NEA caucus had amazing accomplishments this summer at NEA RA in Orlando, FL.  Read about it here  http://badassteachers.blogspot.com/2015/07/bat-caucus-reflections-by-becca-ritchie.html 
àBATs continue to form and join coalitions around the country that range from education to social justice issues. 
àMany BATs and BATs main twitter feed got blocked by Campbell Brown's Twitter account
àHaving our comments deleted by TFA and then reposting them elsewhere.
àBATs became a 501c4 and restructured so that we can mobilize more quickly both at the national and state levels.   http://badassteachers.blogspot.com/2015/10/big-bat-surprise-month-bats-became-501c4.html
àA successful Fall Fundraising Campaign that raised double what was needed (and funded our Amicus Brief and ad in the Washington Post Express due to come out Jan. 14th)
àCalling out the NEA and AFT for early endorsement of Hillary Clinton without rank and file input
àHosting and presenting on panels all over the country including at NPE in Chicago, TEACH in DC, NYCORE in NYC,  and RootsCamp in DC.
àOutreach – Startup of some new regional groups like Broward BATs and open fan pages like New York BATs Open Facebook page, NJ BATs Open Facebook Page.  BATs also has twitter feeds in every state and will be launching a new surprise in 2016 on social media!


BATs in the News-2015!

BATs Respond to Arne’s Retreat on Testing

How to get 100% Passing Rate on a Test – Backfill

WA BATs Refuse to Test

Tonight I am informing you that I am a conscientious objector to this test

Response to Arne Leaving Office

Four Seattle Teachers Declare: “We Refuse to Give the Tests”

 We Won’t Get Great Teachers By Treating Them Badly

 California Teachers Association Pres. Looks to the Future

Teachers union demands apology from Chris Christie


Can we interest you in Teaching?

Oregon BATs Protest Pearson
Teacher-led protest against Common Core testing picks an unlikely target


FL BATs Protest Jeb Bush
Florida teachers plan to protest Jeb Bush's education summit 

Following 'testocracy uprising,' White House issues call for limits on time taking tests in classrooms
Using the Restroom: A Privilege—If You’re a Teacher

John Kasich's teacher problem

Pauline Liu: New education chief has her hands full – New York

Campaign for America’s Future: We Won’t Get Great Teachers By Treating Them Badly

How The Big New Education Law Could Cut Testing Time

National teachers union wants feds to study stresses of teaching

The Global Search for Education: Teaching in a Global World


Teachers's organization rallies against over-testing – Washington State

The Teachers Unions Savior?

Survey Reveals That America’s Teachers Are Seriously Stressed Out

How The Big New Education Law Could Cut Testing Time

Are Cleveland schools 'manipulative bullies' over test opt-outs? Or just making sure parents are informed?

Arne Duncan’s Departure: Education Reporters Dig In – National

New York Activists Organize a RoboCall for Opting Out


 Broward BATs - Badass Teachers Association' fed up with teaching to the test

Parents fight back against PARCC testing by opting out in Ohio

OP-ED: ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL TESTING ISN'T WHAT OUR KIDS NEED TO SUCCEED – New Jersey

For Every Nonprofit: A Labor Day Agenda and Challenge - National

Badass Teachers Association Opposes Common Core - Arizona


Jeb Bush to raise money, discuss education in Tallahassee

Why education activists are furious at ExxonMobil’s CEO




And Now for Another Los Angeles Times Editorial Commending Charters, Sponsored by Eli Broad | Diane Ravitch's blog

And Now for Another Los Angeles Times Editorial Commending Charters, Sponsored by Eli Broad | Diane Ravitch's blog:

And Now for Another Los Angeles Times Editorial Commending Charters, Sponsored by Eli Broad


I know I am supposed to be taking a break, but I assumed the holidays would be a quiet time. I was wrong.
The Los Angeles Times published an editorial today about charter schools that pretends to be balanced, but it is not. It begins by saying that it is somehow wrong to be for or against charters; one needs a more “nuanced” view. It reports on new research that shows students in charter high schools enter with higher scores than those who do not enroll in charter high schools; that charter middle schools get impressive results; and that charter high schools get unimpressive results. These findings might be reasons to oppose Eli Broad’s proposal to put half the students in Los Angeles into privately-managed charter schools, but that’s not what the editorial says. A photo caption alongside the editorial says “A charter school expansion could be great for L.A.” What happened to that “nuanced” view”?
If you care about the future of public education in the United States, if you don’t like the idea that billionaires should be allowed to privatize public institutions, why shouldn’t you oppose Eli Broad’s plan? Why should you be on the fence?
If you read the editorial to the end, you will see that education coverage in the Los Angeles Times–apparently including the editorials–is underwritten by a group of billionaires, including Eli Broad. But of course the piper doesn’t call the tune. Except when he does.
The best part about the editorial is the comments that follow, each of them expressing a thoughtful response about why it would not be a good idea to let Eli Broad take control of half the children in LAUSD just because he wants to.And Now for Another Los Angeles Times Editorial Commending Charters, Sponsored by Eli Broad | Diane Ravitch's blog:

Top 10: What readers liked most in 2015 - The Washington Post

Top 10: What readers liked most in 2015 - The Washington Post:

Top 10: What readers liked most in 2015



I published hundreds of posts in 2015, many of them highly popular with readers. Subjects that drew big audiences included the Common Core State Standards, standardized testing and the opt-out movement, the teaching profession, educational equity and early childhood education.  In case you are interested in the posts that drew the largest audiences, here are the Top 10:

2015: The Year in Education - Living in Dialogue

2015: The Year in Education - Living in Dialogue:

2015: The Year in Education



By Anthony Cody.
This was a big year for education. We saw the tortuous end of No Child Left Behind, replaced by a new law that will be subject to many future battles over the amount of tests and the stakes placed on them. Charter schools continued to be darlings of the corporate world, but diligent reporting and research showed evidence that many schools in that sector winnow out difficult students. Chicago continues to be a flashpoint, in part due to the extraordinary organizing done there by community activists and members of the Chicago Teachers Union. The hunger strike by activists there showed what was at stake when schools are closed. The gathering in Chicago of the Network for Public Education was a high point for the year.
On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton was endorsed by both teacher unions, but after her recent comments about school closures, many members and activists are still looking for a candidate that will articulate a solid set of policies around K12 education. While Bernie Sanders has an appealing populist platform, his K12 education policies have not been well developed or emphasized. In this post, I urged Sanders to address some key education issues in order to gain support from educators.
The Black Lives Matter movement offered a powerful response to the ways that systemic racism results in terrible crimes against African American people, and a reminder that the school to prison pipeline continues to exist in our schools. Taking on racism has to be a central part of our efforts to improve education for all students.
It seemed a bit oxymoronic, but once again, President Obama took time to criticize the emphasis on testing his administration’s policies have deepened, as I pointed out here.
As NCLB and the Common Core recede into the past, we have heard Duncan and others call for a new 2015: The Year in Education - Living in Dialogue:

Who’s Your Favorite Gadfly? Top 10 Blog Posts (By Me) That Enlightened, Entertained and Enraged in 2015 | gadflyonthewallblog

Who’s Your Favorite Gadfly? Top 10 Blog Posts (By Me) That Enlightened, Entertained and Enraged in 2015 | gadflyonthewallblog:

Who’s Your Favorite Gadfly? Top 10 Blog Posts (By Me) That Enlightened, Entertained and Enraged in 2015

Screen shot 2015-12-30 at 12.57.49 AM


“Pennsylvania educator and public school advocate Steven Singer is one of the most powerful voices in the nation when it comes to speaking out for students, parents, teachers and our public schools.”
Jonathan Pelto, founder of the Education Bloggers Network
“Steven Singer wrote these five terrific posts last year. I didn’t see them when they appeared. Probably you didn’t either. You should.”
– Diane Ravitch, education historian
“Your name should be Sweet Steven Singer. You are a delight.”
Karen Lewis, President of the Chicago Teachers Union
11206058_10152940020833860_7943827034975790194_n

Hello. My name is Steven Singer, and I am a gadfly.
I make no apologies for that. It’s what I set out to do when I started this blog in July of 2014.
I told myself that people were too complacent. There was no curiosity. People were too darn sure about things – especially education policy and social issues.
They knew, for instance, that standardized testing was good for children. Why? Because Obama said so. And he’s such a nice man. It’s too bad all those mean Republicans keep making him do all this bad stuff.
They also knew racism was over. After all… Obama! Right? Black President, therefore, the hundreds of years of struggle – finished! Move along. Nothing to see here.
Yet all this “knowledge” went against everything I saw daily as a public school teacher.

Sorry NYTimes. We’re Onto You. | Save Maine Schools

Sorry NYTimes. We’re Onto You. | Save Maine Schools:

Sorry NYTimes. We’re Onto You.

1243841-e12o7t_jpg_see_what_you_did_there.jpg


This morning, the New York Times published an editorial claiming that our high school diplomas are meaningless.
Isn’t that funny, because that’s exactly what the Digital Learning Now Council has been claiming too.
The DLN Council, made up of CEO’s and representatives from across the charter, ed-tech, and assessment industries, recently published a document called “Navigating the Digital Shift,” calling for all states to implement “proficiency” (competency) based diplomas.
In 2012, my poor home state of Maine  fell victim to a well-orchestrated, Gates-funded PR campaign and has so far been the only state to make this corporate-driven idea a reality.
Apparently, the Times editors are of the same mind as Rex Tillerson, CEO of Exxon-Mobile, who recently angered parents across the country with his claim that the business community is the customer of public schools, and thus we have a responsibility to turn our products (people) that they can use.
According to the Times, “some South Carolina business leaders are worried that the state is producing high school graduates who are not qualified to compete for higher-skilled jobs at companies like Boeing, Volvo and BMW.”
I wonder if they’ve been talking to members of the Maine Chamber of Commerce, who recently urged our state lawmakers to “stay the course” on our experimental proficiency-based diploma mandate despite the havoc it is Sorry NYTimes. We’re Onto You. | Save Maine Schools: