Research Studies Of The Week
-
I often write about research studies from various fields and how they can
be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I
think a...
Resistance to AI Data Centers Stiffens
-
It’s darkly funny that the administration is so intensely stupid that they
think this will quell the data center backlash, instead of making people
ev...
Trump's executive order
-
The Supreme Court ruled in the case brought by state attorneys general
challenging Trump’s executive order on elections. In this case, the
government ...
Toward Wisdom Rather Than Mere Education
-
It's "fire season" here on the West Coast of the US. Currently, there are
32 active "large" fires burning, not to mention the dozens of smaller fires
or ...
McMahon Doesn't Understand Education
-
McMahon's particular brand of passionless functionary was on display Sunday
morning for a dozen minutes with Dana Bash. The interview kicked around a
few t...
AI Bogus EdTech Scheme
-
By Thomas Ultican 8/24/2026 Big technology oligarchs are pushing their
dangerous not-ready-for-prime-time artificial intelligence (AI) products
into Americ...
This and That, August 24, 2026
-
I meant to post this sooner - this event is tomorrow night, the 25th.
I am hearing that Governor Bob Ferguson and State Superintendent Chris
Reykdal ...
Spider-Man Lands a Punch: Fist to Cheese
-
The classic line from the Spider-Man show was, “Lookout! Here comes the
Spider-Man.” And so, Spider-Man punched a white supremacist. Fist to
cheese. For so...
MNPS and Not-So-Secret Secrets
-
Nashville education blogger TC Weber highlights what some say are
significant challenges around student discipline in MNPS. It is one of the
worst-kept sec...
No Compromise: End the War Now!
-
At this hour, solidarity begins with a clear demand: the United States and
Israel must end their illegal war, and they must retreat.
We Love Billionaires!
-
As a middle school teacher, I spent a fair amount of time talking with
kids—mostly 8th graders, going into high school—about what you might call
their life...
What Is the Far Left ?
-
What is the Far Left ?
The growing visibility of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and
victories by some DSA-backed candidates has triggered an upsu...
SPI Welcomes Salinas Students Back to Campus
-
California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond
welcomes Salinas students back to campus and celebrates community schools.
Under the Lights, the Truth Is Harder to Hide
-
“The problem is that progress stopped making sense. More and more of us
looked up one day and realized that the emperor had no clothes.” ― Anna
Lowenhaupt ...
SQ 844: How is this better?
-
In plain terms, the new language gives the Legislature the authority to
establish both the amount and methodology for distributing ad valorem
reimbursement...
-
It's time to Revise Louisiana's
School Curriculum
Present standards do not allow for individual differences and life goals
For the last 15 years Louisiana'...
Read This If You Want to Learn to Read
-
I want you to experience how a skilled teacher makes certain that her first
graders learn to read. Imagine that you’re sitting in the back of a
classroom...
What’s the Pattern?
-
The Pattern. Is it the thing that holds our raises down? Yup. What
precisely is it? Activists and advocates know it is a problem. That’s good.
They are rig...
Time to change our Nation’s Diaper
-
It’s time to change our nation’s diaper. Our national identity now reeks
due to our inability to clean out the mess caused by the Orange Turd.
Corruption i...
GLP-1 Meds for Kids? Some Info.
-
Like many consumers of television and social media, I have been bombarded
with ads for GLP-1s (short for glucagon-like peptide-1). The ads are
everywhere. ...
By One Dishonest Measure
-
A loaded question that education reformers like to ponder is: Exactly how
many students in the boroughs of New York City are trapped in failing
schools? In...
1776
-
__________
“The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and
conduct of this army…. We have, therefore, resolved to conquer...
May’s Parent Engagement Resources
-
San Diego Unified Created a System to ‘Empower’ Parents. It Unraveled is
from The Voice of San Diego. Why Those Disengaged Parents in Your School
Deserve a...
Reflections on America, the world, and life
-
I acknowledge that I rarely post here anymore. Folks should remember that I
am approaching my 80th birthday in less than 9 weeks, I am still teaching
ful...
Shutting Down The Site
-
Ten years ago, I ran for a seat on the LAUSD School Board of Education with
the goal to *Change the LAUSD*.
I am proud of the campaign we ran. We achieve...
Blogoversary #19 — Time to Move on
-
Times have changed. I had a nice long run here, but let’s face it, it ended
a while ago. So I’ve moved. I’m not writing much any more, but when I do it
wil...
Il Papa è Morto
-
Francis brought a distinct pastoral outlook to his papacy. A simple man, he
lived in a small apartment in the guesthouse. He sought to make the church
acce...
Mike Shulman the ARISE UFT Judenrat
-
I was surprised to learn that Mike Shulman has aligned himself with ARISE.
I previously supported him, advocating that the Castle Doctrine could have
bee...
AIN’T IT AWFUL
-
As the terrible feelings of dread and angst spread across the world the
great majority of the American people feel powerless before the onslaught
of those ...
Vote NO on the UFT Contract. Here is Why:
-
The best reason to vote no on this contract is this: UFT Unity* lied* to us
in 2018. They misrepresented that contract. It was predicated on deals we
wer...
Testimony to the CPS Truancy Task Force
-
I prepared testimony for one of two public hearings held by the Chicago
Public Schools Truancy Task Force, a body mandated by state legislation.
The meetin...
There Is A Teacher Shortage.Not.
-
THERE IS A TEACHER SHORTAGE. And just to be sure you understand, it’s not
that teachers don’t want to teach. It’s not that there aren’t enough
teachers cer...
Book Banning Turns to Dick and Jane
-
Breaking News: Dateline February 4, 2022 - Parents in Dimwitty, Alabama
have asked the Dimwitty Board of Education to ban the children's primer *Fun
with...
Have You Heard Has a New Website
-
TweetHave You Heard has a new website. Visit us at
www.haveyouheardpodcast.com to find our latest episodes and our entire
archive. And be sure to check out...
Follow me at Substack
-
I've moved. Follow me at Substack
I'm now posting regularly at Substack. You can subscribe for free to my new
Edu/Pol blog at michaelklonsky.substack.com
...
I’ve moved.
-
I’m on Substack now. You can continue to receive periodic posts for free.
Or you can read every post and comment for $5 a month, $60 a year.
fredklonsky.su...
Aspiring Teachers Get New Help Paying For College
-
[image: colorful classroom pattern]
*; Credit: shuoshu/Getty Images*
Cory Turner | NPR
New rules kick in today that will help aspiring teachers pay for c...
Tips Akses Situs Judi Qq Tanpa Perlu Takut Nawala
-
Kegiatan berjudi slot melalui situs judi qq online, sekarang sudah
dilakukan oleh banyak penjudi Indonesia. Tentu, Kamu yang sedang membaca
artikel ini a...
The Threat of Integration
-
I have lived in the same house in the Miracle Mile section of Los Angeles
for over 30 years, where up until now I have had little or no interaction
with th...
We fight for a democracy worthy of us all!
-
The nation stands at a crossroads, said NEA President Lily Eskelsen GarcÃa
in her final keynote address to the 2020 NEA Representative Assembly and
it’s up...
The Passing Of Chaz 1951-2020 Age 69
-
I am the son of Chaz and like to inform you that he passed away this
afternoon from the COVID virus. My father passed in peace beside his loved
ones. We ar...
The Fight For Our Children
-
*The number of suicides among people ages 10 to 24 nationally increased by
56 percent between 2007 and 2017, according to a new federal report showing
the ...
Read to Self: Just a Kid and a Book.
-
Date: Monday, January 5, 2020 Place: My classroom Student: Mrs.Mims, could
we start doing Read to Self again because I got this great book for
Christmas an...
Reminiscences
-
I just finished dumping the rest of my lesson plans. I guess I held on to
the calculus ones for so long because I spent so much time working on them
an...
Just Asking for some Teachers I know.
-
Recently Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers stated, We must … recognize that
part of supporting our kids in the classroom means supporting the educators
who t...
Cara Menang Bermain Judi Bola Online
-
Bermain judi bola online tentu saja memiliki kesenangannya tersendiri baik
itu mendapatkan keuntungan maupun ketika menantikan hasil skor pada sebuah
perta...
A Critique of Standards-Based Grading
-
It first happened to me about ten years ago. I was beginning my third year
of teaching in a new school in Washington, DC. Social studies teachers were
si...
Reduced time for testing? Not so fast.
-
NYSED and Commish Elia continue to say that the NYS Assessments are of
reasonable length, I completely disagree.
Here is what NYSED states are average expe...
The World According to Michelle Rhee
-
The men behind the curtain fashioning the brave new world of corporate run
education in America! Michelle Rhee is the founder of StudentsFirst, The
New T...
Whose Opinions Matter in Education World?
-
It's hard to identify education heroes and sheroes. And perhaps even harder
to pinpoint just whose work is slanted, paid-for and dishonest.
New Local Businesses in Sacramento
-
Starting a new local business in Sacramento is a monumental task, but can
be accomplished with footwork, perseverance and knowledge. One must learn
the loc...
Lesson Plan: Rhyme and Rhythm in Poetry
-
I’ve started a recent unit on poetry with my class. I’m not a poet, and I’m
not a poetry fan (I don’t hate it, but I’m a prose gal), so this makes it
harde...
The Apotheosis of Betsy DeVos
-
Betsy Devos has drawn few headlines in recent months, and that is a good
thing for the Secretary of Education. Her tenure began with Vice President
Mike P...
Education Is a Civic Question
-
In their final post to end Bridging Differences' decade-long run, Deborah
Meier and Harry Boyte urge readers to put the energy, talents, wisdom, and
hard w...
Site News: New Home for Education News & Commentary
-
Quick! Get over there! The daily education news roundup and education
commentaries that you're probably looking for are now being published over
at The Gra...
Should We Be Grateful?
-
In an odd turn of events, and with little explanation, Michigan Governor
Rick Snyder has decided to return the state’s School Reform Office back to
the Dep...
An Open Letter to NC Lawmakers
-
An Open Letter to NC State Lawmakers and NC State Superintendent Mark
Johnson: I am a NC native, voter, and public school teacher. I am
addressing you all ...
The Secret to Fixing Schools (My Next Bestseller)
-
The Secret to Fixing Schools (My next bestseller) Prologue I just finished
watching a fascinating documentary on Netflix entitled, “The Secret”. The
film p...
Farewell, Sleep
-
Today is the official last day of my spring break. I've done a scientific
survey: My natural bedtime is 2 AM, and my natural wake up time is 9:41
AM. Tom...
REPORT: States With the Best and Worst Schools
-
States With the Best (and Worst)Schools
By *Evan Comen, Michael B. Sauter, Samuel Stebbins and Thomas C. Frohlich*
January 20, 2017- http://247wallst.com
...
Test Refusal = People Power
-
In recent months, social media has been ablaze with talk of regular folk
taking action to resist the Trump agenda. Protests are a daily occurrence,
and ev...
Random Musings and Observations. . . .
-
I’ve been gone a while from the blogging scene. Some of my more regular
readers no doubt noticed but did not hassle me about it. Thank you for
that. Sinc...
AB 934: A LEGISLATIVE FIX FOR VERGARA?
-
By Michael Stratford | in the Politco Morning Education Report | via email
05/24/2016 10:00 AM EDT :: Two national education groups are backing a
Califor...
MY NEW BLOG
-
My new blog will consist of fictitious headlines, meant to be a blend of
humor and satire. I apologize ahead of time if any other satirical site has
simila...
Thank you
-
Dear Readers,
Thank you for visiting *The Perimeter Primate*. This blog is being retired
for the time being. Although I no longer post here, I do still s...
I am Retiring
-
I have some news: I am retiring from the PBS NewsHour and Learning Matters.
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other
conte...
New Beginnings: Kickstarter and EdWeek Teacher
-
Greetings to InterACT readers one and all! If you’ve been following posts
here recently you might recall that I’m moving my blogging activity to
other loca...
Adelaide L. Sanford Charter School
-
*“With Adelaide L. Sanford Charter School closing, Newark families must
move on.”* The Star-Ledger (NJ), 6/25/2013
NEWARK — Bobby and Troy Shanks saw the...
School board members are struggling to interpret laws that govern where and how they do business now that as many conversations take place digitally as they do face to face.
As online and digital interactions increase, so too does public concern that officials have more opportunities to violate state open-meetings and open-records laws meant to prevent them from communicating secretly.
At the same time, others argue that today's capabilities for communicating and accessing information instantly are making government more transparent, and the public, in turn, more engaged.
"School boards have to realize most of the ways the open-meetings and -records laws have been written mean there should be an automatic interpretation that using new technology to communicate applies as a meeting and a record," said Mark Blom, a senior staff attorney with the National School Boards Association. "These issues can all be
When the LA Times starts having doubts about the wisdom of His Aged Geekiness, Billy Gates, then you have to know the worm is turning quickly. After all, it was the LA Times that published Gates-approved teacher ratings that ended in the suicide of Rigoberto Ruelas in 2010.
Perhaps Team Obama should have a second look at its decision to put corporate foundations in charge of U. S. education policy. Just perhaps there is something to be learned from a hundred years of academic research that the corporate drones have summarily dismissed. From the LA Times editorial page:
. . . .Prodded heavily by reform groups, many of which receive funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, states and school districts have in some cases taken the use of students' scores to extremes that have no grounding in research, making them count for half or more of a teacher's rating, or hastily concocting tests to measure unmeasurable subjects — and then applying the results to teachers. The most mocked example is Ohio's extensive new exam in physical education, which includes
The ironic part is that Schakowsky has NOT tolerated the same logic for cutting Social Security benefits by Republicans in DC that Springfield Democrats like Biss are employing in their attempts to gut Illinois pensions.Attacks from Republicans such Social Security adding to the deficit have been transformed by “progressive” Democratic like Biss into claiming pension benefits add to the state budget deficit. Sorry, it’s just not true for Social Security or pension benefits. Using the pension fund as a credit card and not refinancing the skyward pointing pension “ramp” or replacing our outdated regressive flat tax that creates a structural budget deficit is the real problem.I wonder what Congresswoman Schakowsky would think of Senator Biss not proposing or sponsoring legislation to enact a graduated income tax in Illinois.
Claiming people live significantly longer is another Republican statistical manipulation used to attack Social Security. We’ve heard that one from Democrats in Springfield regarding pensions as well. As a mathematician, Senator Biss has to know such claims are statistically misleading, especially for women and minorities who happen to be the majority of those in the classroom. But we’ve seen him sensationalize statistics before:
“In Illinois, five state pensions are in the red by a staggering $97 billion – or more than $20,000 for every household in the state.” - Daniel Biss
If you take this $20,000 number that Springfield politicians like Biss created, amortize it over the 30+ years in which people can actually collect their earned benefits you get a “staggering” number that is equal to approximately $7 per month per household in new revenue even without accounting
Milestone for CALPADS sets baseline for this data collection
SACRAMENTO—About one California student in 20 was suspended from school and one in 1,000 was expelled in the 2011-12 school year, according to data released for the first time using the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS), State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson announced today.
The data show a total of 366,629 students suspended and 9,553 students expelled among the more than six million public school students in California, a suspension rate of 5.7 percent, and an expulsion rate of 0.1 percent.
"Common sense tells us that we cannot teach students who are not in school," Torlakson said. "I hope that parents, teachers, administrators, and students see this information as the starting point for discussions about how to find alternatives to suspension that sustain healthy learning environments while keeping as many students as possible in class."
CALPADS produced data that are disaggregated by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The data are also disaggregated by type of violation and type of services students receive, such as English learner, migrant education, or special education services.
A review of the data indicates there are some differences in the rates at which some student groups are suspended. For example, the data show African-American students are 6.5 percent of total enrollment, but make up 19 percent of suspensions. White students are 26 percent of total enrollment, but represent 20 percent of suspensions. Hispanic students are 52 percent of total enrollment, and 54 percent of suspensions.
The California Department of Education is working on several initiatives to address these differences in rates by identifying positive alternatives to suspension and expulsion, as well as developing effective strategies to improve attendance as part of an overarching initiative to keep students in school. The Department has partnered with several organizations to work on these initiatives, including The California Endowment, the California Blue Ribbon Commission on Children in Foster Care, the Region IX Equity Assistance Center at WestEd, and Attendance Works.
Because the 2011-12 data is the first year of suspension and expulsion information extracted from CALPADS, it will serve as a baseline for this data collection. Also, the data and its interpretation will improve over time as districts become more familiar with entering information into CALPADS. The2011-12 CALPADS data cannot be compared to prior year Uniform Management Information and Reporting System (UMIRS) reports.
Caution must be used when interpreting the number of students suspended and expelled, and the number and types of incidents and offenses. This is because some students may have been both suspended or expelled multiple times, and some incidents may be comprised of several different offenses. CALPADS sorts this out by tracking individual students to produce unduplicated numbers to generate more accurate rates, compared to the former UMIRS system.
The 2011-12 suspension and expulsion, as well as truancy reports are available on the California Department of Education'sDataQuest. The reports may be viewed by the state, county, district, and school level. Reports on the most serious federal offense are available as part of the persistently dangerous school reporting requirement under the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Reports are also available specifically on California Education Code Section 48900(k) related to defiance, which comprise the majority of student offenses. Downloadable data sheets will be available in about two weeks.
# # # #
Tom Torlakson — State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Communications Division, Room 5206, 916-319-0818, Fax 916-319-0100
And finally U created her. “U” is my shorthand for teacher unions. This is simple physics: “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.” The “Michelle Rhee” phenomenon is the inevitable product of, and reaction to, intransigent teacher union policies like the ones that produced New York City’s famous “rubber room,” where teachers who couldn’t be fired spent their days reading, napping, and doing crossword puzzles–on full salary and with the full support of the United Federation of Teachers, the local union.
I unfortunately don’t possess the long view here. I’ve only been blogging or whatever you call it for a few years. Before that, I was isolated by graduate school in the Midwest and before that, too bogged down with upwards of 32 fifth graders to even care about Rhee or my union.
When I returned to DC Metro area after graduate school, the area in which I taught, I was smacked in the face, hard, by all of this. If you think teachers don’t have a voice, trying being a pre-tenure faculty member at a public
Dear County and District Chief Business Officials, Categorical Program Directors, and Charter School Administrators:
Approved Substitute System for Time Accounting for Federal Programs
We are pleased to announce that the United States Department of Education (USDE) has approved a new substitute system for time accounting for federal programs for use by all local educational agencies (LEAs). This new substitute system is in addition to the substitute system previously approved for California LEAs in 1998.
Substitute systems are intended to simplify recordkeeping for LEAs that must substantiate salary and wage charges to federal programs through the use of personnel activity reports (PARs) or equivalent documentation. Unless the LEA uses an approved substitute system, PARs must be prepared at least monthly for employees who work on multiple activities or cost objectives of which at least one is federal.
This new substitute system was approved by the USDE on September 7, 2012. It can be used by all LEAs, at their option and subject to approval, retroactive to July 1, 2012. Under this new substitute system, an LEA may use alternative documentation—such as a teacher’s course schedule—instead of PARs to document the time and effort of an individual who works on multiple activities or cost objectives but on a predetermined, or fixed, schedule. An individual documenting time and effort under this new substitute system is permitted to certify time and effort on a periodic basis (at least semiannually) rather than monthly.
The California Department of Education (CDE) is authorized to approve California LEAs to use this substitute system for time-and-effort reporting in accordance with the following guidelines. In permitting an LEA to use this substitute system, the CDE must obtain from the LEA a management certification that only eligible employees will participate in this substitute system and that the system used to document employee work schedules includes sufficient controls to ensure that the schedules are accurate. Additionally, the certification must include a full disclosure of any known deficiencies with the substitute system or known challenges with implementing the system. This certification may be used by auditors and by CDE oversight personnel when conducting audits and sub-recipient monitoring of the substitute time-and-effort system.
To be eligible to document time and effort under this substitute system, employees must:
Work on a schedule that includes multiple activities or cost objectives that must otherwise be supported by monthly PARs.
Work on specific activities or cost objectives based on a predetermined schedule.
Not work on multiple activities or cost objectives at the exact same time on their schedule.
Under this new predetermined schedule substitute system, in lieu of PARs, eligible employees may support a distribution of their salaries and wages through documentation of an established work schedule that meets the standards described below. An acceptable work schedule may be in a style and format already used by an LEA.
Employee schedules must:
Indicate the specific activity or cost objective that the employee works on for each segment of the employee’s schedule.
Account for the total hours for which the employee is compensated during the period reflected on the employee’s schedule.
Be certified at least semiannually and signed by the employee and by a supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the work performed by the employee.
A sample periodic certification is provided in Attachment A. A sample employee schedule is provided in Attachment B.
Revisions to an employee’s established schedule that will continue for a prolonged period, such as revisions at the start of a new semester or trimester, must be documented and certified in accordance with the requirements described above. A periodic certification might therefore be supported by more than one written schedule. The effective dates of revisions to the schedule must be clearly indicated.
Significant deviations from an employee’s established schedule that would require the employee to work on multiple activities or cost objectives at the exact same time, including but not limited to lengthy, unanticipated schedule changes, must be documented by the employee using a PAR that covers the pay period during which the deviation occurred. A deviation from an established schedule that would warrant the individual reverting to a PAR would include any deviation from a scheduled activity that represents more than an incidental benefit to the unscheduled activity. To avoid classification as a significant deviation, the time spent on the unscheduled activity must meet each of the following three criteria:
The time spent on the other activity must not take away from the benefit of the intended beneficiaries of the scheduled activity.
The time spent on the other activity must not be planned or foreseen at the beginning of the period covered by the schedule.
The time spent on the other activity must be immaterial. For this purpose, materiality is defined as five percent of the employee’s schedule for the day on which the deviation occurs.
The five percent threshold applies daily. When an employee deviates from his predetermined schedule by five percent or more on any day, he has deviated by five percent for that period and must revert to a PAR for that period.
Unplanned, unforeseen, and infrequent deviations of less than five percent of the predetermined schedule are generally not considered significant. However, even small deviations, if planned or foreseeable at the outset, are considered significant regardless of their size and would warrant a reversion to a PAR for the pay period.
A PAR is required only for the period in which the deviation from the predetermined schedule occurs. For example, if a deviation from an employee’s predetermined schedule occurs during the third month of a six-month period, the employee could still prepare a periodic certification for months one and two but would prepare a PAR for month three. He could then prepare a periodic certification for months four through six, and another periodic certification for months seven through twelve. Alternatively, he could prepare a periodic certification for months one and two and a PAR for month three, a periodic certification for months four through nine (a six-month period), and a periodic certification for months ten through twelve (the remaining two months of the fiscal year). The guiding principles are that a periodic certification must be prepared at least semi-annually but could be prepared more frequently, and that a PAR must be prepared at least monthly and must coincide with a pay period. For some employees, a pay period might be less than monthly, every two weeks for example.
Approval and Implementation of the Predetermined Schedule Substitute System: LEAs implementing the new predetermined schedule substitute system require approval from CDE. Approval is automatically granted once the LEA provides the required management certification. The certification and approval process will be administered through the Consolidated Application and Reporting System beginning in 2013–14. Because USDE’s approval of the new system is retroactive to 2012–13, the Consolidated Application and Reporting System for 2013–14 will also provide for retroactive approval for 2012–13.
Note that because the substitute system previously approved in 1998 relies on sampling methods and requires that all eligible employees must participate, the existing sampling method substitute system and the new predetermined schedule substitute system cannot be implemented in conjunction with one another.
As with all time documentation methods, written policies and procedures are essential to implementing an effective substitute system for time accounting. LEAs should develop forms and provide employee training before implementing a substitute system. It is suggested that a trial run be done before beginning the actual substitute system process.
The following elements should be addressed as an LEA implements a substitute system for time accounting:
Proper completion of PARs or periodic certifications, including how frequently data must be recorded and what constitutes adequate documentation.
Required review and approval cycle.
Handling of completed forms.
Internal review process to ensure compliance.
Generally, this information should provide enough detail to permit an understanding of how the substitute system will operate from the point labor is expended to the point it is recorded in the accounting records and charged to federal awards.
The decision to use any substitute system for allocating salaries and wages to federal programs is totally at the option of each LEA. After examining this substitute system, LEAs may wish to continue their current methods of substantiating salary and wage charges to federal programs rather than use the predetermined schedule substitute system. Information on the requirements for documenting salary and wages can be found in the California School Accounting Manual Procedure 905.
For questions about the predetermined schedule substitute system, the sampling method substitute system, or the requirements for documenting employees’ salaries and wages charged to federal programs, please contact the Office of Financial Accountability and Information Services by phone at 916-322-1770 or by e-mail at sacsinfo@cde.ca.gov.
Californians think that initiatives (39%) should have more influence than the legislature (32%) or governor (18%) over state policy.
Most residents (74%) feel that initiatives raise important issues that elected officials have not adequately addressed.
Despite their loyalty, 63% of Californians think the initiative process needs either major (29%) or minor (34%) changes.
Many residents believe that special interests have too much control over the initiative process (92%), find the ballot wording for initiatives complicated and confusing (77%), and think there are too many propositions on the state ballot (62%).
Half of state residents say they have less confidence now than before Hurricane Katrina that the government can handle a major terrorist attack (51%) or a major California earthquake (54%).
62% of Californians think the nation is headed in the wrong direction.
November Ballot Measures:
Proposition 74 (teacher tenure), 43% yes, 47% no
Proposition 76 (spending and funding limits), 26% yes, 63% no
Proposition 77 (redistricting), 33% yes, 50% no
Proposition 78 (prescription drug discounts), 43% yes, 38% no
Proposition 79 (prescription drug discounts), 34% yes, 40% no
This is the 59th PPIC Statewide Survey and the second in a series of three surveys focusing on Californians and the initiative process. This special survey series is funded by The James Irvine Foundation.
The Public Policy Institute of California, or PPIC, released new education survey results Wednesday that showed strong support for Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed Local Control Funding Formula, which would give more money to school districts with a higher percentage of low-income and English learner students. Despite much controversy over perceived "winners and losers" in the debate over how much funding each district should receive, the survey showed that state residents agreed that districts with the neediest students should get more money to educate them, even if that means some other districts would get less money.
Here's a rundown of some of the poll's key findings:
46 percent of Californians approve of Gov. Jerry Brown's job performance, down from 51 percent in January, but up from 43 percent last year and 40 percent in 2011.
32 percent approve, and 42 percent disapprove, of the way the governor is handling the state's K-12 education system, an increase in support from 27 percent last year and 24 percent in 2011.
31 percent of Californians approve of the state Legislature, and 53 percent disapprove, with approval down from 34 percent last month.
71 percent of Californians and 60 percent of likely voters support the governor's plan to direct more money to English learners and low-income students.
N 74 percent of adults surveyed and 67 percent of likely voters say these students' academic
achievement will improve with more funding.
N 66 percent of adults say school districts with low-income students should get more new state funding, even if this means less funding for other districts.
54 percent say school districts that have more English language learners should get more funding from the state, even if this means less funding for other districts.
89 percent of adults and 79 percent of likely voters support giving local districts more flexibility over how state money is spent.
63 percent of adults say the current level of state funding for their local public school is not enough.
49 percent of Californians think the quality of education is a big problem, down from 58 percent last year.
66 percent see the dropout rate as a big problem, down from 74 percent two years ago.
N 76 percent of Californians say preparing students for college is very important.
N 74 percent say it is very important to include career technical education, or vocational courses, in the curriculum.
54 percent say it is very important to include civics in the curriculum.
53 percent say reducing K-3 class size is very important.
56 percent of Californians say they are very concerned that graduating students in lower-income areas are less likely than other students to be ready for college.
52 percent say they are very concerned that schools in lower-income areas have a shortage of good teachers compared with schools in wealthier areas.
N 47 percent say they are very concerned that English language learners in California's schools today score lower on standardized tests than other students.
36 percent see student achievement as a big problem, down from 46 percent in 2011.
28 percent of Californians see teacher quality as a big problem, down from 44 percent two years ago.
N 51 percent of adults say it is a good idea to lower the vote threshold for passage of local school parcel taxes to 55 percent, while 42 percent say this is a bad idea. Likely voters were less supportive, with 47 percent in favor and 48 percent against this idea.
53 percent said they were somewhat or very confident that standardized tests are an accurate indicator of a student's progress and abilities.
40 percent said students in their communities received the "right amount" of testing in elementary and middle schools, compared with 24 percent who said they received too much, 29 percent who said not enough and 9 percent who didn't know.
N 39 percent said high school students in their communities received the "right amount" of testing, compared with 21 percent who said they received too much, 31 percent who said not enough and 9 percent who didn't know.
84 percent said teacher evaluations should include classroom observations made by school principals or other experts.
N 68 percent said teacher evaluations should include academic improvement of students as measured on standardized tests.
N 63 percent said teacher evaluations should include students' academic achievement on standardized tests.
SOURCE: Public Policy Institute of California
The complete survey results are available by visiting www.ppic.org/main. Click on "Publications."
In this Educational Leadership article, Gordon Donaldson, George Marnik, Sarah Mackenzie, and Richard Ackerman focus on the relational skills school leaders must use to build strong, sustainable, solid relationships and thriving schools—skills not typically taught in workshops or courses, so many principals have to figure them out on their own.
The first skill to focus on is becoming an active listener—one who not only hears what staff, students, and parents say but also translates those statements into actionable strategies. Principals practice these skills through role play and practice consultations, which include peer feedback.
Next, principals should learn to support their staff by creating and leading collaborative groups. Because this is an area that many principals have little experience with, the authors pay particular attention to mediating conflict among adults. From there, the focus shifts to value systems and how principals' beliefs directly and indirectly affect their communities. Again, role play is a useful strategy for practicing interpersonal leadership
I normally don't agree with a lot of the thought process over at LEV. But here's something I agree with:
Which of these makes more sense to you?
A) Keeping questionable industry tax breaks on the books?
OR
B) Amply funding our schools?
If you picked "B," it's time to voice your choice.
Please take two minutes of your time sending a message to your legislators.
We need to get a tsunami of e-mails to these legislators. We need them to hear our voices.
I know, it's Spring Break, there's a fugitive on the loose in Boston, it's Friday and so on.
Please do this.
Don't listen to me. Listen to the words of Blair Butterworth, a well-known political consultant, who died recently. This is from an op-ed posted at Crosscut. I have no idea what type of ed reform he is speaking about but it seems to come from the heart. This is partial:
When we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Seattle World’s Fair last year, it was hard not to wonder whether we’re capable of doing such exceptional things anymore. Have we become too smug, too complacent to pull out all the stops and come together as a community the way our civic leaders did in 1962 to make something truly monumental happen? Have our politics become so diluted by individual greed and self-interest that instead we collectively lurch from fad to fad without regard for the future we’re giving our children and our community?
I wonder — and so should you. The most glaring indicator that such worry is well-founded is education, where our constant under-investment and lack of meaningful recent reform and improvement is flat-out shocking. As a result, instead of laying the foundation for an even better future, our education system has become an albatross around our necks; one that will hold us back and hold us down if we don’t wake up and do something about it. We seem to have lost sight of a fundamental truth in the education reform debate: This is not about taxes. It’s about our children. It’s about our future. When we put counting dollars first, we rob our children and short-change our future.
What are our elected officials and business leaders doing about the education crisis? Where is the leadership and vision we need for progress? Where is the decisive action that puts our children first and works budgetary issues later?
As citizens and voters, we’re still willing and able to debate and make change. We remain a city and state that welcomes diverse points of view, and Washington citizens clearly still care and are willing to get involved. This was evident in last November’s election, with grass-roots triumphs on same-sex marriage and marijuana reform that drew national attention. However you voted on those two measures, we should all share the justified pride that this was proof positive that the civic dialogue is vibrant and healthy in our great state.
As citizens and voters, we must be at least as committed to education reform and get mobilized and more vocal now. But we also need and must demand stronger, more visionary leadership and bold action from elected officials and leaders of the business community. We must support and rally behind leaders who are willing to take bold action. And if they aren’t willing, let’s find and elect leaders who are.
We should collectively and adamantly insist on better leadership today. But we must also recognize that tomorrow’s leaders will come up through our education system — for better or for worse. Education reform gives us the opportunity to prepare future leaders capable of delivering better tomorrows.
Read this and prepare to gag unless you are the president of your regional Bill Gates Fan Club.
Did you know that Bill is warm and cuddly when he talks about how he plans to make US education the very best in the world without spending more? Don’t doubt for a minute that he knows how to do it. He has been reforming education for years, and think of all he has done. Well, let’s see, there is…..
The article begins:
“After almost two decades of pursuing improvements in U.S. education through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates maintains a sweeping and grand ambition. His goal for the next 20 years, he says, is to
Earlier today, John Merrow posted a blog in which he asked, “Who Created Michelle Rhee?”
From the context, I assume he means who was responsible for making her the face of the corporate reform movement? Why was she praised by both Barack Obama and John McCain in their 2008 debate only a year after she started work as DC superintendent of schools? Why was she featured on the cover of Time and Newsweek? Why was she lionized in the national media?
All this, even though as Merrow now says, “I am also reporting that, after five years of Rhee/Henderson, the DC
Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all: [image: Click on picture to Listen to Diane Ravitch] Michigan Debates Common Core by dianerav Michigan is debating the Common Core, which it already agreed to adopt. The curious thing in the debate and in the article is the repeated claim by “experts” that the Common Core will fix all the disparities and problems in American education. It will close the gap between low-perming and high-performing students and lift the performance of American students to the top on international tests. What is the evidence for the...more »
Randi Weingarten's Pension Veto
The teachers union chief tries to blackball hedge funds that support school reform.
Public pension funds are frantically chasing higher yields to reduce their roughly $3 trillion in unfunded liabilities. But don't tell that to Randi Weingarten, the teachers union el supremo, who is trying to strong-arm pension trustees not to invest in hedge funds or private-equity funds that support education reform.
That's the remarkable story that emerged this week as the American Federation of Teachers president tried to sandbag hedge fund investor Dan Loeb at a conference sponsored by the Council of Institutional Investors. CII had invited Mr. Loeb, who runs Third Point LLC, to talk about investment opportunities and corporate governance. Ms. Weingarten is an officer and board member of CII.
But Ms. Weingarten's real concern is that Mr. Loeb puts his own money behind school reform and charter schools. In particular, Mr. Loeb is on the board of the New York chapter of StudentsFirst. That's the education outfit founded by former Washington, D.C., schools chief Michelle Rhee that is pushing for more charters and teacher accountability, among other desperately needed reforms.
Ms. Weingarten sent Mr. Loeb a letter demanding a meeting at the CII conference with her and "a small group of pension fund trustees," including "two funds that are current clients of yours." Her agenda? "These plans are concerned about their ability to invest with your firm going forward," Ms. Weingarten wrote, given Mr. Loeb's support for StudentsFirst and its "outspoken attacks" on defined-benefit pension plans.
Mr. Loeb wisely declined the honor of showing up for this political mugging, which
As a member of the Bridgeport Board of Education, Hernan Illingworth took actions that directly benefited him and the company that he works for.
That is an ethics violation.
It is a serious ethics violation and it requires action.
Mayor Finch, the state is waiting to see how you handle this issue.
The Bylaws of the Bridgeport Board of Education: Policy 9270: Conflict of Interest
(1) No member of the Board shall have any direct pecuniary interest in a contract with the school district, nor shall he/she furnish directly any labor, equipment, or supplies to the district. It is not the intent of this bylaw to prevent the district from contracting with corporations or businesses because a Board member is an employee of the firm. However, in such instances the member may be expected to declare his/her association with the firm and will refrain from debating or voting on the question.
The spirit of the Conflict of Interest rule is simple enough.
If you are a member of the Bridgeport Board of Education and your job is with a company that is connected to the functioning of the school system, you are expected to declare
The 2012 Louisiana legislative session yielded two mammoth, anti-teacher, pro-privatization laws, Acts 1 (Teacher Evaluation and Tenure; Role of School Boards, among other changes) and Act 2 (Vouchers). Fortunately, canning both teachers and schools is not proceeding as smoothly as both Governor Bobby Jindal and State Superintendent John White would have liked. Both Acts 1 and 2 are currently under appeal with the Louisiana Supreme Court. Both were declared unconstitutional in the lower courts; Act 1, for including “more than one object,” and Act 2, for using MFP (minimum Foundation Program) funding to support schools and programs not considered “public schools.”
Act 1 is under appeal to the Supreme Court but has not yet been heard.
Until the Supreme Court issues its judgments on these two bills, both are in force.
As to education bills proposed for this legislative session, I received information regarding a number of these bills in an email from fellow Louisiana education blogger Mike Deshotels, who blogs at louisianaeducator.blogspot.com. Most of the proposed bills mentioned below involve the division of or