Latest News and Comment from Education

Show All

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

GO SWAMP THING: A FIELD GUIDE TO CALIFORNIA'S BILLIONAIRE-SOAKED JUNGLE PRIMARY

 

GO SWAMP THING

A FIELD GUIDE TO CALIFORNIA'S BILLIONAIRE-SOAKED JUNGLE PRIMARY

By The Big Education Ape — Because Someone Has to Explain This Swamp to the Animals

Look, I know jungles. I've studied them, lived in them, written about them. I know the difference between a rainforest and a mangrove swamp. And let me tell you something with the full authority of a large, well-read primate: California's 2026 Jungle Primary is not a jungle. It's a swamp. A very expensive, very soggy, very billionaire-infested swamp — and the drain plug is stuck.

With June 2nd just three weeks away, the mud is getting thicker, the money is getting louder, and the candidates are treading water with varying degrees of grace. Some are doing the backstroke. Some are doing the doggy paddle. And at least one appears to be attempting to buy the swamp outright and rename it after himself.

Grab your water wings. We're going in. 🌊

FIRST: WHAT EVEN IS THIS "JUNGLE" THING?

California's Top-Two Primary — nicknamed the "Jungle Primary" — sounds exotic and dangerous, and for once, the nickname actually delivers. Adopted by voters in 2010 via Proposition 14, it works like this:

  • Every candidate from every party lands on one big ballot.
  • Every voter — Democrat, Republican, or "I just moved here from Idaho" — votes on that same ballot.
  • The top two vote-getters, regardless of party, advance to the November general election.
  • This means you could end up with a Democrat vs. Democrat or a Republican vs. Republican showdown in November — or, in the nightmare scenario currently keeping Democratic strategists awake at 3 a.m., two Republicans advancing in a state that hasn't elected a Republican governor since the Governator hung up his leather jacket.

The system was sold to voters as a moderation machine — a way to force candidates toward the center. What it actually produced was a money machine that rewards whoever can saturate the airwaves the longest, the loudest, and the most expensively. Which brings us, inevitably, to the swamp creatures.

THE SWAMP CREATURE FINANCIAL REPORT

You can't shake a dead swamp rat without hitting a billionaire's money in this race. So let's meet the rats — uh, donors.

Here's where the candidates stand financially with three weeks to go:

CandidatePartyTotal FundingPollingPrimary Backer
Tom SteyerD$147.2M (99.9% self-funded)12–14% 📉Himself. Just... himself.
Matt MahanD$38M+ (campaign + Super PACs)7–10% 📈Silicon Valley's entire LinkedIn network
Steve HiltonR$9.76M17–20% ➡️Murdoch, Brin, and a golfer
Katie PorterD$8.88M8–10% 📉Grassroots donors & a whiteboard
Xavier BecerraD$5.5M18–20% 📈Labor unions & transferred old accounts
Chad BiancoR$5.26M14–15% ➡️Sheriffs, energy companies & 14,000 regular folks

The most expensive primary in California history is already underway — and Tom Steyer is personally trying to break Meg Whitman's 2010 all-time record of $176 million. He's already past $147 million. At this pace, he'll have spent enough to buy every California voter a very nice dinner — and still be losing.

THE SWAMP MARATHON: A CANDIDATE-BY-CANDIDATE SWIM REPORT

Xavier Becerra — The Unlikely Front-Crawler

Becerra entered the final stretch with $507,000 cash on hand. That's not a typo. In a race where one candidate has spent $132 million, Becerra is running on fumes, union muscle, and the political equivalent of a strong tailwind. Since Eric Swalwell exited the race, Becerra has hoovered up the mainstream Democratic vote like a very determined, very broke Roomba. He's now polling at 18–20% — tied for the lead — despite spending roughly what Tom Steyer spends on breakfast.

His secret weapon? He's the candidate that actual Democratic voters seem to like, as opposed to the candidate that billionaires decided Democratic voters should like. Novel concept.

Swim rating: Surprisingly strong breaststroke. Running low on fuel but refusing to sink.

Steve Hilton — The British Invasion

A former UK government advisor turned Fox News commentator turned California gubernatorial candidate, Steve Hilton has raised $9.76 million — which sounds impressive until you remember he's in a race with a man who spent $105 million between January and April alone. Hilton's donor list includes Rupert Murdoch, Google co-founder Sergey Brin, and professional golfer Phil Mickelson — which is either a very eclectic cocktail party or the world's most expensive foursome.

He's been polling at 17–20% since February, holding steady while Democrats cannibalize each other. His strategy is essentially: stay calm, stay unified, and let the other side drown themselves. It's working.

Swim rating: Efficient, controlled freestyle. Quietly waiting for everyone else to cramp up.

Chad Bianco — The Law & Order Lifeguard

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco has raised $5.26 million — including a heartwarming $829,000 from over 14,000 small-dollar donors who presumably appreciate a man in a badge. His pitch as a "grassroots alternative to Bay Area billionaires" is genuinely clever in a race drowning in tech money. His backers include the Riverside Sheriffs' Association, Downs Energy ($78,400), and a real estate developer named Highland Fairview — which sounds like a subdivision but writes checks like a hedge fund.

Polling at 14–15%, Bianco and Hilton together command roughly 35% of the vote — and since they're the only two major Republicans, that's a terrifyingly efficient use of a minority share.

Swim rating: Steady sidestroke. Not flashy, but not going under either.

Tom Steyer — The Man Who Bought a Pool and Still Can't Win a Race

Oh, Tom. Sweet, expensive Tom.

Tom Steyer has spent $147.2 million — of which $147.1 million came from his own wallet. He is, in the most literal sense, a one-man Super PAC. His message is that he's "unbought" by special interests, which is technically true in the same way that a man who owns the casino is "not gambling."

The result of this historic financial commitment? He's polling at 12–14% and falling. The opposition — a coalition of PG&E, the Chamber of Commerce, and construction unions — has spent $21 million in attack ads reminding voters about his past investments in fossil fuels and private prisons. So he's being attacked by both the left and the right, which is a special kind of expensive misery.

To put his spending in perspective: Steyer has spent enough money to give every single California voter approximately $15 cash and a handwritten apology note — and he'd still be losing to a guy with $507,000.

Swim rating: Bought the entire Olympic swimming complex. Currently drowning in the kiddie pool.

Matt Mahan — The Silicon Valley Speedboat

San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan arrived late to this race and immediately did what Silicon Valley does best: threw money at the problem until it became a different problem. He raised $13.4 million in direct contributions and has $25 million in Super PAC support — backed by Michael Moritz ($3M), Reed Hastings ($1M), Sergey Brin ($1M), and essentially everyone who has ever attended a TED Talk in Palo Alto.

His donor list of individual max-givers reads like a tech industry yearbook: the CEO of Y Combinator, the co-founder of Palantir, the CEO of Reddit, the CEO of Roblox, and the co-founder of LinkedIn. If you wanted to build a candidate in a lab using only venture capital and disruption rhetoric, you'd get Matt Mahan.

He's polling at 7–10% and rising — the fastest mover in May — but he's running out of calendar. His campaign is betting everything on moderate and independent voters who are just now opening their mail-in ballots and seeing his face for the first time on a very expensive mailer.

Swim rating: Arrived at the race in a speedboat, currently stuck in traffic at the boat ramp.

Katie Porter — The Whiteboard Warrior in Quicksand

Katie Porter has $3.75 million cash on hand, a loyal grassroots base of nearly 12,000 small-dollar donors, and a whiteboard that has never lied to her. Unfortunately, she's polling at 8–10% and falling, losing ground to Becerra as Democratic voters begin the panicked consolidation math.

Her campaign has been spending its final dollars warning supporters that a fractured Democratic vote could hand the general election to two Republicans — which is both accurate and somewhat ironic, given that she's one of the four Democrats doing the fracturing.

The California Teamsters initially backed her, then pulled a $100,000 contribution over concerns about Uber-linked donors supporting groups tied to her campaign. Even her allies are complicated.

Swim rating: Excellent technique, wrong lane. Needs a merge.

THE NIGHTMARE SCENARIO: THE DOUBLE-REPUBLICAN DRAIN

Here is the math that is currently giving California Democrats cold sweats:

  • Republicans Hilton + Bianco = ~35% combined
  • Democrats Becerra + Steyer + Porter + Mahan = ~50–55% combined... split four ways

If those Democratic votes stay fragmented, the arithmetic becomes genuinely terrifying. Four candidates splitting 50% of the vote could each land around 12–13% — which means both Republicans advance to November, and California — the bluest of blue states — ends up with a general election between two Republicans.

This is the Jungle Primary's most vicious feature: it doesn't care about your party registration. It only cares about arithmetic. And right now, the Democratic arithmetic looks like a pie that's been cut by someone who's never seen a pie before.

THE FINAL COUNTDOWN

DateEvent
May 5Secure ballot drop-off locations opened
NowPanic. Consolidation conversations. Very expensive TV ads.
May 23First in-person vote centers open
June 2Election Day — polls open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.

The undecided block has shrunk from 24% to 13% in just a few weeks. The "wait and see" crowd is finally tuning in — just in time to be absolutely buried under a tidal wave of mailers, TV spots, and digital ads funded by people whose net worth has more commas than most people have birthdays.

THE BIG APE'S FINAL ASSESSMENT

Here's what this swamp marathon has taught us, three weeks from the finish line:

Money doesn't automatically buy votes — Tom Steyer is the $147 million proof of that. But it absolutely buys access, airtime, and the ability to define your opponents before they can define themselves. The candidates who survive this swamp aren't necessarily the richest — they're the ones whose billionaire backers were strategic rather than just loud.

The real winners of the 2026 California Jungle Primary so far? The television stations, the digital ad platforms, and the political consultants — all of whom are swimming in cash regardless of who advances on June 2nd.

The real losers? The voters — who are about to spend the next three weeks being carpet-bombed with advertising from people who, when you really look at the donor lists, all seem to know each other at the same cocktail parties anyway.

Welcome to the swamp, California. The water's warm — because someone's been burning money in it.

🦍 — The Big Education Ape, reporting from a very soggy branch above the waterline

Published May 12, 2026 | California Primary: June 2, 2026 | Polls open 7 a.m. – 8 p.m.


 SOURCES & REFERENCES

California 2026 Jungle Primary — "Go Swamp Thing" Article

🗳️ POLLING & RACE OVERVIEW

💰 CAMPAIGN FINANCE — OVERALL

🤑 TOM STEYER — SELF-FUNDING

💻 MATT MAHAN — SILICON VALLEY MONEY

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 STEVE HILTON & CHAD BIANCO — REPUBLICAN FIELD

🌿 THE JUNGLE PRIMARY SYSTEM

📅 Sources compiled May 12, 2026 | All links active as of publication date | Primary Election: June 2, 2026


Posted by at