VAPING IN SCHOOLS: ARE THOSE KIDS ON FIRE OR JUST VAPING

 

VAPING IN SCHOOLS:  ARE THOSE KIDS ON FIRE OR JUST VAPING

Vaping in schools has become a hot topic lately, and not just because those kids look like they're on fire. More and more, the dangers of vaping for kids are being learned, and it's time to take action.

First off, let's talk about the dangers. According to the CDC, vaping can expose users to harmful substances such as nicotine, heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and ultrafine particles that can be inhaled deep into the lungs. That's right, kids, you're inhaling heavy metals. You might as well be eating paint chips.

But it's not just the heavy metals that are the problem. Vaping can also increase the risk of addiction, lung injury, heart disease, and cancer. So basically, if you're vaping, you're screwed.

So what can be done to prevent vaping in schools? Well, there are a few programs that can be implemented. One is called CATCH My Breath, which is a free, evidence-based program that targets students in grades 5 through 12 and teaches them about the health risks, social consequences, and marketing influences of vaping. Another is the Empower Vape-Free Youth Campaign from the FDA, which provides science-based resources on vaping prevention. And then there's SmokefreeTXT for Teens, a text-based program from the National Cancer Institute that helps young people quit tobacco use by sending them motivational messages, tips, and challenges.

But let's be real here. The best way to prevent vaping in schools is to make it uncool. And what's more uncool than being addicted to heavy metals? Nothing. So let's start a campaign to make vaping as uncool as possible. We can call it "Vaping is for losers" or "Vaping is so 2019." We'll get some celebrities on board, maybe some TikTok stars, and before you know it, vaping will be a thing of the past.

Of course, schools can also do their part by implementing anti-vaping policies and educating students about the dangers of vaping. And parents can talk to their children about the dangers of vaping and monitor their online activity. But let's face it, if we really want to stop kids from vaping, we need to make it as uncool as possible.

Now, some states are taking a more punitive approach to vaping in schools. A new law in Texas increases the punishment for students caught vaping in school, with offenders now being sent to alternative schools. School districts are concerned about the potential overload on the system and the effectiveness of this punitive approach. The law applies to both nicotine and THC vaping devices, with no appeal process for students. Some administrators feel that the punishment is disproportionate and may have lasting consequences for students.

Personally, I think we should take a different approach. Instead of punishing kids for vaping, we should help them quit. We could offer support programs and education on the dangers of vaping. We could even offer incentives for students who quit vaping, like free pizza or something.

In conclusion, vaping in schools is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. But instead of punishing kids for vaping, let's make it uncool. Let's start a campaign to show kids that vaping is for losers. And let's offer support programs and education to help kids quit. Because let's face it, heavy metal addiction is not a good look.

Youth vaping crisis is widespread in Ohio: Enquirer special report https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2023/09/27/youth-vaping-crisis-is-widespread-in-ohio-enquirer-special-report/70923386007/ 

Ban smoking and vaping in school to protect young people https://www.who.int/news/item/26-09-2023-ban-smoking-and-vaping-in-school-to-protect-young-people 

What You Can Do to Protect Youth From the Harms of Vaping https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/features/back-to-school/index.html 

New state law makes punishment for vaping in school more serious https://sanantonioreport.org/vaping-school-new-texas-law/ 

Vaping a crisis for health, safety in our high schools https://www.wral.com/story/vaping-a-crisis-for-health-safety-in-our-high-schools/21058502/ 

Prince William Co. schools report surge in student vaping, marijuana | WJLA https://wjla.com/news/local/prince-william-county-public-schools-pwcps-students-vaping-marijuana-use-e-electronic-cigarettes-possession-pandemic-drugs-classrooms-prevention-efforts-substance-use-educational-programs-school-board-opioid-addiction-dmv-virginia-eduction 

THE DEFT DIVE

**Vaping in schools**

Vaping is the act of inhaling and exhaling the aerosol, often referred to as vapor, which is produced by an e-cigarette or similar device. E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that heat a liquid to produce an aerosol. The liquid typically contains nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals.

Vaping has become increasingly popular among teenagers in recent years. In 2021, 11.7% of high school students and 3.3% of middle school students reported using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days.

There are a number of reasons why teenagers are vaping. Some teenagers vape because they think it is cool or because their friends are doing it. Others vape because they believe it is less harmful than smoking cigarettes. However, vaping is not safe. E-cigarette aerosol contains harmful chemicals, including nicotine, which can be addictive and can damage the developing brain.

Vaping is also a problem in schools. Students often vape in bathrooms, hallways, and other hidden places. School officials are struggling to keep up with the problem, and many schools have implemented anti-vaping policies.

**The impact of vaping on students**

Vaping can have a number of negative consequences for students, including:

• * Addiction: Nicotine is addictive, and vaping can lead to nicotine addiction. Nicotine addiction can be difficult to overcome, and it can interfere with academic performance, social relationships, and mental health.
• * Lung damage: E-cigarette aerosol contains harmful chemicals that can damage the lungs. Vaping has been linked to a number of serious lung conditions, including EVALI (e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury).
• * Other health problems: Vaping has also been linked to other health problems, such as heart disease, stroke, and cancer.
• * Academic performance: Vaping can interfere with academic performance by impairing concentration and memory.
• * Behavior problems: Vaping can also lead to behavior problems, such as irritability and aggression.

**What schools can do to prevent vaping**

School officials can take a number of steps to prevent vaping, including:

• * Implementing anti-vaping policies: Schools should have policies that prohibit vaping on school grounds and during school-sponsored events.
• * Educating students about the dangers of vaping: Schools should educate students about the health risks of vaping and the addictive nature of nicotine.
• * Providing support for students who are struggling with nicotine addiction: Schools should provide support for students who are struggling with nicotine addiction, such as counseling and nicotine replacement therapy.

**What parents can do**

Parents can also play a role in preventing their children from vaping. Parents can talk to their children about the dangers of vaping and set clear expectations about vaping. Parents can also monitor their children's online activity and be aware of the signs of nicotine addiction.

If you are concerned that your child may be vaping, talk to them about it. You can also contact your child's school to learn more about their anti-vaping policies and resources.

FROM BING AI

Vaping in schools is a serious issue that affects the health and well-being of students, teachers, and staff. According to the CDC, vaping can expose users to harmful substances such as nicotine, heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and ultrafine particles that can be inhaled deep into the lungs¹⁴. Vaping can also increase the risk of addiction, lung injury, heart disease, and cancer⁷⁸⁹ [^10^] ¹¹.

To prevent vaping in schools, it is important to educate students, parents, and school personnel about the dangers of vaping and the resources available to help them quit or avoid starting. Some of the vaping prevention programs that can be implemented in schools are:

• - CATCH My Breath: This is a free, evidence-based program that targets students in grades 5 through 12 and teaches them about the health risks, social consequences, and marketing influences of vaping. The program also provides training for educators, parent resources, and youth empowerment opportunities¹²¹³.
• - Empower Vape-Free Youth Campaign: This is a campaign from the FDA that provides science-based resources on vaping prevention, such as expert advice, online and community resources, and tips on how to recognize vaping products that teens try to hide¹⁵.
• - SmokefreeTXT for Teens: This is a text-based program from the National Cancer Institute that helps young people quit tobacco use by sending them motivational messages, tips, and challenges. The program also connects them to a live quit coach and other support services¹⁶.
• - N-O-T: Not on Tobacco: This is a cessation program from the American Lung Association that is designed to help youth ages 14 to 19 quit e-cigarettes. The program uses a positive, youth-centered approach that focuses on healthy lifestyles, coping skills, and peer support¹⁴.

Bing, 9/28/2023

• (1) Empower Vape-Free Youth Campaign | Electronic Cigarettes | Smoking .... https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/vapefreeyouth.html.
• (2) 5 Vaping Facts You Need to Know | Johns Hopkins Medicine. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/5-truths-you-need-to-know-about-vaping.
• (3) Doctor's warning about dangers of vaping - Mayo Clinic Health System. https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/a-doctors-warning-about-the-dangers-of-vaping.
• (4) Vaping: Health Risks, Side Effects, and More. https://www.health.com/is-vaping-bad-for-you-7494349.
• (5) The Health Risks of Vaping - Verywell Health. https://www.verywellhealth.com/the-health-risks-of-vaping-4686029.
• (6) Vaping (E-Cigarettes): What It Is, Side Effects & Dangers. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/21162-vaping.
• (7) Catch My Breath - Vape Education - Tobacco Youth Prevention. https://catch.org/program/vaping-prevention/.
• (8) SAMHSA-Recognized Youth Vaping Prevention Program - CATCH.org. https://letsgo.catch.org/pages/samhsa.
• (9) Vaping Prevention Resources | HHS.gov. https://digitalmedia.hhs.gov/tobacco/educator_hub.
• (10) What You Can Do to Protect Youth From the Harms of Vaping. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/features/back-to-school/index.html.
• (11) 'Found unconscious on the bathroom floor': Schools struggle to fight the youth vaping crisis. https://news.yahoo.com/found-unconscious-bathroom-floor-schools-023006558.html.
• (12) Vaping: Wells headteacher working to combat increased usage in schools. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-66924128.
• (13) Ban smoking and vaping in schools worldwide urges WHO. https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/09/1141442.
• (14) Ban smoking and vaping in school to protect young people. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-09-2023-ban-smoking-and-vaping-in-school-to-protect-young-people.
• (15) The youth vaping epidemic: Addressing the rise of e-cigarettes in schools. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-youth-vaping-epidemic-addressing-the-rise-of-e-cigarettes-in-schools/.
• (16) What are the effects of vaping on physical health?. https://microsoftstart.msn.com/en-us/health/ask-professionals/expert-answers-on-vaping/hp-vaping?questionid=m2vmcrcm&type=condition&source=bingmainline_conditionqna.
• (17) undefined. https://microsoftstart.msn.com/.

BIDEN CRACKS DOWN ON "TRUMP UNIVERSITY-LIKE" FOR PROFIT DIPLOMA MILL CAREER COLLEGE PROGRAMS

BIDEN CRACKS DOWN ON "TRUMP UNIVERSITY-LIKE" FOR PROFIT DIPLOMA MILL CAREER COLLEGE PROGRAMS

The Biden administration has finally taken a stand against the high-debt for-profit predatory college industry. And let's be honest, these schools are as bad as Trump University, which was sued, closed, and forced to pay restitution. It's like they brought the ethics of payday lending into public education. But fear not, my fellow Americans, because Biden is cracking down on these schools like a dad with a belt.

The new regulations will cut off federal student aid to vocational programs whose graduates consistently have high loan payments relative to their income. Basically, if you're not making enough money to pay back your loans, then you're not getting any more money from Uncle Sam. This could potentially impact 1,700 programs serving 700,000 students. That's a lot of people who won't be able to get a useless degree in underwater basket weaving.

The regulations also require programs to ensure that their graduates have higher earnings than those with only a high school diploma. So, if you're not making more money than someone who didn't go to college, then what was the point of going to college? Programs that fail to meet the standards will need to warn students that they are at risk of losing access to federal student aid. It's like a warning label on a pack of cigarettes, but for college.

But let's be real here, for-profit colleges are like the used car salesman of higher education. They promise you the world, but in reality, you're just driving off the lot with a lemon. They use aggressive and deceptive marketing tactics to lure students in, like promising high salaries, flexible schedules, and easy access to financial aid. But in reality, many of these promises are false or misleading.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, for-profit colleges account for only 9% of all postsecondary students, but 34% of all student loan defaults. That's like being the kid who only shows up for the final exam and still fails. Moreover, for-profit colleges receive nearly $30 billion per year in federal student aid, which is about 20% of the total amount. This means that taxpayers are subsidizing these predatory schools, while students are left with the burden of repaying their loans.

But fear not, my fellow Americans, because the Biden administration has issued a new rule that will revoke federal funding from college programs that leave graduates with unaffordable loans or low pay. The rule is known as gainful employment, and it's like a breath of fresh air in a room full of used car salesmen.

The rule evaluates colleges based on their debt-to-earnings ratio and the earnings premium test, which measures whether graduates' median earnings exceed those of someone with a high school diploma only. If a program fails either of these tests for two out of three consecutive years, it loses eligibility for federal financial aid. All institutions that receive federal financial aid, including private nonprofit colleges and public universities, must publish information on the costs of attendance, graduates' earnings, typical borrowing amounts, and other data.

The gainful employment rule is expected to protect nearly 700,000 students annually who would otherwise enroll in one of close to 1,700 low-performing programs. The rule is also expected to save taxpayers about $5.3 billion over 10 years by reducing the amount of federal student aid that goes to these programs. It's like putting a stop sign in front of a used car dealership.

But let's not forget the real victims here: the students. The high-debt for-profit predatory college industry is a term used to describe a sector of higher education that exploits students, especially those from low-income backgrounds, veterans, and people of color, by enrolling them in programs that charge high tuition fees, provide low-quality education, and leave them with little or no job prospects and heavy student debt.

For-profit colleges have been accused of a variety of predatory practices, including misleading students about their job prospects and earning potential, pressuring students to take on loans, and targeting vulnerable students. For-profit college students have the highest debt rates of any students. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, for-profit college borrowers are four times more likely to default on their loans than borrowers from public and nonprofit colleges.

The impact on students can be devastating. Many students are unable to repay their loans, which can lead to wage garnishment, tax refund seizure, and even bankruptcy. High student loan debt can also make it difficult for students to afford to buy a home, start a business, or save for retirement.

So let's give a round of applause to the Biden administration for taking a stand against the used car salesmen of higher education. Let's hope that this new rule will protect students from these predatory colleges and ensure that higher education is a worthwhile investment for students and society. And who knows, maybe one day we'll see underwater basket weaving become a viable career path.

New rule will cut federal money to college programs that leave grads with high debt, low pay | AP News https://apnews.com/article/college-for-profit-student-debt-tuition-b4db9895af1ce6ac6737aa2dad015551 

Biden administration issues much-anticipated rule to weed out high-debt colleges https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2023/09/27/biden-administration-issues-much-anticipated-rule-to-weed-out-high-debt-colleges/70959657007/ 

Biden cracks down on vocational programs that saddle students with debt - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/09/27/student-loan-debt-profit-colleges/ 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

**Deep dive: High debt for-profit predatory college industry**

The for-profit college industry has been under scrutiny for years for its predatory practices and high student debt rates. These colleges often target low-income students and students of color with promises of a better future, but many students end up with high levels of debt and no degree or a degree that is not worth the cost.

**How for-profit colleges operate**

For-profit colleges are typically private institutions that are operated like businesses. They generate revenue from tuition and fees, and they often have aggressive marketing and recruitment tactics. For-profit colleges also tend to be more expensive than public and nonprofit colleges.

**Predatory practices**

For-profit colleges have been accused of a variety of predatory practices, including:

• * **Misleading students about their job prospects and earning potential:** For-profit colleges often promise students that they will be able to get high-paying jobs after graduation, but this is not always the case. Many for-profit college graduates struggle to find jobs or are paid less than graduates of public and nonprofit colleges.
• * **Pressuring students to take on loans:** For-profit colleges often encourage students to take out federal student loans and other types of debt to pay for their tuition. However, many students are unable to repay their loans after graduation.
• * **Targeting vulnerable students:** For-profit colleges often target low-income students and students of color, who are more likely to have difficulty repaying their loans.

**High debt rates**

For-profit college students have the highest debt rates of any students. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, for-profit college borrowers are four times more likely to default on their loans than borrowers from public and nonprofit colleges.

**Impact on students**

The high debt rates associated with for-profit colleges can have a devastating impact on students. Many students are unable to repay their loans, which can lead to wage garnishment, tax refund seizure, and even bankruptcy. High student loan debt can also make it difficult for students to afford to buy a home, start a business, or save for retirement.

**What can be done**

There are a number of things that can be done to address the problems associated with the for-profit college industry. These include:

• * **Increased regulation:** The government can increase regulation of the for-profit college industry to crack down on predatory practices and ensure that students are getting a quality education.
• * **Student loan reform:** The government can reform the student loan system to make it easier for students to repay their loans, especially students who attended for-profit colleges.
• * **Increased funding for public and nonprofit colleges:** The government can increase funding for public and nonprofit colleges to make them more affordable and accessible for students.

It is important to note that not all for-profit colleges are predatory. There are some for-profit colleges that offer high-quality education and programs. However, it is important for students to do their research before enrolling in any for-profit college.

**What students can do**

If you are considering attending a for-profit college, there are a few things you can do to protect yourself:

• * **Do your research:** Before you enroll in a for-profit college, be sure to research the school carefully. Read online reviews, talk to current and former students, and visit the campus.
• * **Be careful about student loans:** Don't take out more student loan debt than you can afford to repay. Be sure to understand the terms of your loans and the risks involved.
• * **Consider other options:** There are many other options for higher education, including public and nonprofit colleges, community colleges, and vocational schools.

If you are a for-profit college student who is struggling to repay your loans, there are a number of resources available to help you. You can contact your loan servicer to discuss your options, or you can seek assistance from a nonprofit credit counseling agency.

FROM BING AI

The high-debt for-profit predatory college industry is a term used to describe a sector of higher education that exploits students, especially those from low-income backgrounds, veterans, and people of color, by enrolling them in programs that charge high tuition fees, provide low-quality education, and leave them with little or no job prospects and heavy student debt. These colleges often use aggressive and deceptive marketing tactics to lure students, such as promising high salaries, flexible schedules, and easy access to financial aid. However, many of these promises are false or misleading, and students end up dropping out, defaulting on their loans, or earning degrees that are not recognized by employers or other institutions.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, for-profit colleges account for only 9% of all postsecondary students, but 34% of all student loan defaults. Moreover, for-profit colleges receive nearly $30 billion per year in federal student aid, which is about 20% of the total amount. This means that taxpayers are subsidizing these predatory schools, while students are left with the burden of repaying their loans.

The Biden administration has recently issued a new rule, known as the gainful employment rule, that aims to protect students from these predatory colleges by cutting off their access to federal financial aid if they fail to meet certain standards of quality and affordability. The rule measures the debt-to-earnings ratio and the earnings premium of graduates from for-profit and certificate programs, and compares them to those of high school graduates. If a program fails either of these tests for two out of three consecutive years, it loses eligibility for federal financial aid. The rule also requires all institutions that receive federal financial aid, including private nonprofit and public universities, to disclose information about their costs, graduates' earnings, and typical borrowing amounts to prospective and current students.

The gainful employment rule is expected to protect nearly 700,000 students annually who would otherwise enroll in one of close to 1,700 low-performing programs. The rule is also expected to save taxpayers about $5.3 billion over 10 years by reducing the amount of federal student aid that goes to these programs. The rule is a major step toward ensuring that higher education is a worthwhile investment for students and society, and not a trap that reinforces barriers to opportunity and economic mobility.

Bing, 9/28/2023

• (1) White House issues much-anticipated rule to weed out high-debt, predatory colleges. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/white-house-issues-much-anticipated-rule-to-weed-out-high-debt-predatory-colleges/ar-AA1hmMuZ.
• (2) New rule will cut federal money to college programs that leave grads with high debt, low pay. https://www.dailypress.com/2023/09/27/new-rule-will-cut-federal-money-to-college-programs-that-leave-grads-with-high-debt-low-pay/.
• (3) White House issues much-anticipated rule to weed out high-debt .... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2023/09/27/biden-administration-issues-much-anticipated-rule-to-weed-out-high-debt-colleges/70959657007/.
• (4) New Rule Will Cut Federal Money to College Programs That Leave Grads .... https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2023-09-27/new-rule-will-cut-federal-money-to-college-programs-that-leave-grads-with-high-debt-low-pay.
• (5) SHADOW STUDENT DEBT - Student Borrower Protection Center. https://protectborrowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Shadow-Student-Debt.pdf.
• (6) Higher Ed: Protect Students from Predatory Colleges. https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/special-symposium/higher-ed-protect-students-from-predators/.
• (7) Making campuses safer - American Psychological Association (APA). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/10/campuses-safer.
• (8) What States Can Do to Protect Students from Predatory For-Profit Colleges. https://tcf.org/content/report/states-can-protect-students-predatory-profit-colleges/.
• (9) Preventing Sexual Assault on College Campuses: What Works?. https://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/blog/preventing-sexual-assault-on-college-campuses/.

BULLYING 101: OKLA SPI RYAN RASPUTIN WALTERS USING PLAYGROUND TACTICS TO FURTHER HIS POLITICAL CAREER

 

BULLYING 101: OKLA SPI RYAN RASPUTIN WALTERS USING PLAYGROUND TACTICS TO FURTHER HIS POLITICAL CAREER 

In a bizarre turn of events, it seems that Okla Spi Ryan Rasputin Walters is at it again, harassing and bullying poor John Glenn Elementary School Principal Shane Murnan. Now, you might think that Walters is just a loudmouth MAGA hitman, but it turns out he's actually stirring up trouble to promote his own political aspirations. That's right, folks, he's hoping to replace Stitt as Governor and maybe even run for President as a dark horse candidate. And how does he plan to achieve this lofty goal? By bullying some of the front runners, of course.

But what's all this got to do with the accreditation status of Western Heights Public Schools, I hear you ask? Well, it seems that the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) is investigating the district's hiring practices after it was revealed that one of their elementary school principals performs in drag. Yes, you read that right - drag. And if that wasn't enough to raise eyebrows, the OSDE is also looking into Superintendent Brayden Savage for failing to protect students and adhere to the law.

But back to poor Principal Murnan, whose teaching certificate is also being reviewed under state law for "moral turpitude." The district has fired back at these accusations, stating that no school funds have been used on drag queens and that all candidates go through criminal screenings. But the damage has already been done, with Murnan's appointment generating national attention thanks to conservative social media account Libs of TikTok.

In a statement, Western Heights defended their hiring practices, claiming that Murnan was hired in accordance with their usual screening procedures. And let's face it, who among us hasn't dabbled in a bit of drag in our spare time? It's a harmless hobby that brings joy to many. So let's not judge Principal Murnan too harshly.

As for Walters, well, it seems he'll stop at nothing to achieve his political ambitions. But perhaps he should focus on more constructive ways of promoting himself rather than resorting to bullying and harassment. After all, as the saying goes, "you catch more flies with honey than vinegar." Or in Walters' case, maybe he should try catching more votes with humor than hostility. Just a thought.

Big Education Ape: QUEEN FOR A DAY: AN EDUCATOR FOR LIFE https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/09/queen-for-day-educator-for-life.html 

State to investigate after Oklahoma drag queen principal controversy https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/politics/government/2023/09/26/state-to-investigate-after-oklahoma-drag-queen-principal-controversy-ryan-walters/70973537007/ 

OSDE investigating Western Heights Public Schools, principal https://www.koco.com/article/oklahoma-western-heights-shane-murnan-investigation-ryan-walters/45327678

MAGA MOMS FOR TAKING LIBERTIES BLOWING UP CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

MAGA MOMS FOR TAKING LIBERTIES BLOWING UP CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

In a shocking turn of events, the Charleston County School District (CCSD) superintendent, Dr. Eric Gallien, has been placed on paid administrative leave pending an investigation. The five trustees who voted for his suspension are all endorsed by Moms for Liberty, a right-wing group that opposes mask mandates, critical race theory, and LGBTQ+ rights in schools. It seems like these MAGA moms are taking their liberties a bit too far.

But let's take a step back and look at the bigger picture. The CCSD has been facing a number of issues, including the lack of transparency in the school board's decision-making process and concerns about the quality of leadership at the district's highest levels. And now, with the controversy surrounding Dr. Gallien, the debate over charter schools in the Charleston area has been reignited.

Some critics of the school board argue that they are more interested in promoting charter schools than in improving the quality of education in traditional public schools. But let's be real here, who wouldn't want to blow up the entire school system and start fresh? Okay, maybe not literally blow it up, but you get the idea.

In May 2023, the CCSD school board voted to hire Eric Gallien, a superintendent from Wisconsin, as the district's new superintendent. However, the decision was met with controversy, as two other finalists in the search had withdrawn their names from consideration after their names were leaked to the media. It seems like the CCSD can't keep anything confidential.

But back to those MAGA moms. They are accused of meeting illegally in a private session without proper notice or agenda. It's like they're trying to run their own little government within the school system. And let's not forget their opposition to mask mandates and critical race theory. It's almost like they want their kids to be uneducated and sick.

The decision to suspend Dr. Gallien has sparked outrage and confusion among some state lawmakers, community leaders, parents, teachers, and students. They are rallying in support of Dr. Gallien and questioning the motives and ethics of the board majority. But let's be real here, who knows what's really going on behind closed doors?

In the end, we can only hope for transparency and accountability from the school board. And maybe a little bit of humor to lighten the mood. After all, if we can't laugh at our problems, what can we do? So here's to those MAGA moms and their taking liberties - may they one day learn to take a joke.

Community hosts ‘vigil’ to rally behind Charleston Co. superintendent https://www.live5news.com/2023/09/27/community-hosts-vigil-rally-behind-charleston-co-superintendent/ 

‘We need answers’: Concerns raised over Charleston Co. school superintendent’s suspension https://www.live5news.com/2023/09/26/we-need-answers-concerns-raised-over-charleston-co-school-superintendents-suspension/ 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

The Charleston County School District (CCSD) superintendent controversy began in early 2023, when the school board launched a search for a new superintendent. The search process was contentious from the start, with some board members and community members expressing concerns about the lack of transparency and community engagement.

In May 2023, the CCSD school board voted to hire Eric Gallien, a superintendent from Wisconsin, as the district's new superintendent. However, the decision was met with controversy, as two other finalists in the search had withdrawn their names from consideration after their names were leaked to the media.

Some board members and community members accused the school board of violating the confidentiality of the search process and of making a decision without sufficient community input. Others expressed concerns about Gallien's qualifications and experience.

In June 2023, the CCSD school board voted to place Gallien on paid administrative leave while the district investigates allegations of misconduct against him. The allegations have not been made public, but they have reportedly delayed Gallien's start date as superintendent.

The Charleston Co. superintendent controversy has highlighted a number of issues facing the CCSD, including the lack of transparency in the school board's decision-making process, the need for greater community engagement in the district's affairs, and concerns about the quality of leadership at the district's highest levels.

The controversy has also reignited the debate over charter schools in the Charleston area. Some critics of the school board argue that the board is more interested in promoting charter schools than in improving the quality of education in traditional public schools. They point to the fact that the school board's decision to hire Gallien came just months after the district approved a plan to expand charter schools in the Charleston area.

The Charleston Co. superintendent controversy is likely to continue to unfold in the coming weeks and months. The outcome of the investigation into Gallien's alleged misconduct will be closely watched by the community. The controversy is also likely to have an impact on the upcoming school board elections in November 2023.

FROM BING AI

The controversy surrounding the Charleston County School District (CCSD) superintendent, Dr. Eric Gallien.

Dr. Gallien was hired as the superintendent of CCSD in June 2023, after a unanimous vote by the board of trustees for a second interview⁷. He started his duties on July 1, 2023, and had a plan for his first 100 days to connect with the community and hear their feedback⁷. He also delivered a keynote speech at the Charleston Educator Symposium in August 2023, where he shared his vision and goals for the district⁷.

However, on September 26, 2023, the board of trustees voted 5-4 to place Dr. Gallien on paid administrative leave pending an investigation, without providing any details or reasons for their decision¹². The board also appointed Deputy Superintendent Anita Huggins to step in until the investigation concludes².

The five trustees who voted to put Dr. Gallien on leave are Carlotte Bailey, Edward Kelly, Keith Grybowski, Leah Whatley and chair Pamela McKinney. They are all endorsed by Moms for Liberty, a right-wing group that opposes mask mandates, critical race theory and LGBTQ+ rights in schools². They are also accused of meeting illegally two weeks ago in a private session without proper notice or agenda².

The four trustees who voted against the measure are Darlene Dunmeyer-Roberson, Carol Tempel, Courtney Waters and Daron Lee Calhoun II. They expressed their frustration and disappointment with the decision, calling it "unacceptable" and "one of the most dysfunctional boards in the state of South Carolina right now"². They also said they were left in the dark about the investigation and demanded answers¹.

The decision to suspend Dr. Gallien has also sparked outrage and confusion among some state lawmakers, community leaders, parents, teachers and students, who rallied in support of Dr. Gallien outside the district office on September 27, 2023⁵. They praised Dr. Gallien's leadership and accomplishments in his short tenure, and questioned the motives and ethics of the board majority⁵. They also called for transparency and accountability from the board, and urged them to reinstate Dr. Gallien as soon as possible⁵.

State Representative JA Moore (D-Charleston) released a statement condemning the board's action as "a disgrace" and "a slap in the face to every student, parent, teacher and staff member in CCSD"⁶. He also said he would request an audit of the board's finances and operations by the State Department of Education⁶.

As of now, it is unclear what the investigation is about, how long it will take, and what the outcome will be. The board has not made any further comments or announcements about the situation. Dr. Gallien has not issued any public statements either. Many people are still waiting for answers and hoping for a resolution that is fair and respectful to Dr. Gallien and the CCSD community.

Bing, 9/27/2023

• (1) Superintendent / Superintendent - Charleston County School District. https://www.ccsdschools.com/Page/286.
• (2) ‘We need answers’: Concerns raised over Charleston Co. school ... - MSN. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/we-need-answers-concerns-raised-over-charleston-co-school-superintendent-s-suspension/ar-AA1hiR84.
• (3) 9/26 NEWSBREAK: Charleston Co. school board puts new superintendent on .... https://charlestoncitypaper.com/2023/09/26/9-26-newsbreak-charleston-co-school-board-puts-new-superintendent-on-leave/.
• (4) CCSD superintendent placed on administrative leave: Community outraged, demands answers. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ccsd-superintendent-placed-on-administrative-leave-community-outraged-demands-answers/ar-AA1hj6TT.
• (5) Rep. JA Moore Releases Statement on the Charleston County School Board. https://holycitysinner.com/2023/09/26/rep-ja-moore-releases-statement-on-the-charleston-county-school-board/.
• (6) Former Racine Unified Superintendent Gallien on paid administrative .... https://racinecountyeye.com/2023/09/26/gallien-paid-leave-controversial/.
• (7) Gerrita Postlewait Hiring Controversy – Grand Strand Daily. https://www.grandstranddaily.com/gerrita-postlewait-named-superintendent-in-charleston-county/.

CAN YOU HEAR THE BANJO, TENNESSEE MAGA REJECTS $2 BILLION FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDS

 CAN YOU HEAR THE BANJO, TENNESSEE MAGA REJECTS $2 BILLION FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDS

In a stunning move, Tennessee lawmakers are considering rejecting nearly $1.9 billion in federal education funding. The reason? Concerns over the restrictions and mandates that come with the money. Apparently, Tennessee MAGA thinks they can do better on their own.

House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt. Gov. Randy McNally announced the creation of a group of lawmakers to study the potential impact of rejecting the funds. We can only imagine what kind of brainstorming sessions they're having. Maybe they're planning to use the money to build a giant wall around the state to keep out those pesky federal mandates.

But not everyone is on board with this plan. Key Democrats, including Sen. Raumesh Akbari of Memphis, oppose the move, saying the money is essential to ensure educational equity and opportunity for all American students. But who needs equity and opportunity when you have good old-fashioned Tennessee grit?

The state received nearly $2.5 billion from the federal government in fiscal 2021-22, and more than $1.9 billion last fiscal year, with most of the funding going towards nutrition, Title I programs for low-income children, and special needs students. But Tennessee MAGA says, "Who needs nutrition when you have moon pies and RC Cola?"

We can't wait to see what other hilarious ideas Tennessee MAGA comes up with next. Maybe they'll reject all federal funds and start their own country. We'll call it "Y'alltopia."

Top Tennessee lawmakers start push to reject billions of dollars in federal education funds – Tennessee Lookout https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/09/25/top-tennessee-lawmakers-start-push-to-reject-billions-of-dollars-in-federal-education-funds/ 

THE DEFT DIVE

Big Education Ape: GLORIA JOHNSON STANDING TALL FOR TENNESSEE https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/09/gloria-johnson-standing-tall-for.html 

FROM BARD AI

**Tennessee Lawmakers Start Push to Reject Billions of Dollars in Federal Education Funds**

On September 25, 2023, House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt. Gov. Randy McNally of Tennessee announced the creation of a new group of lawmakers to look at the possibility of rejecting federal education funds. The group, which is expected to meet in January 2024, will be chaired by Sen. Jon Lundberg (R-Bristol) and Rep. Debra Moody (R-Covington).

If Tennessee were to reject federal education funds, it would be the first state to do so. The state currently receives about $1.8 billion in federal education funding each year, which supports a variety of programs, including Title I, IDEA, and school lunch programs.

Supporters of the proposal to reject federal education funds argue that it would give the state more control over its education system and allow it to avoid the federal mandates that come with federal funding. They also argue that the state could save money by rejecting federal education funds and replacing it with state funding.

Opponents of the proposal argue that rejecting federal education funds would harm Tennessee's students and schools. They argue that the federal funding supports essential programs that help low-income students, students with disabilities, and other vulnerable students. They also argue that the state would not be able to replace the lost federal funding with state funding, which would lead to cuts in education programs and services.

The proposal to reject federal education funds is likely to face significant opposition from Democrats and other groups that support public education. It is also unclear whether the proposal would have the support of enough Republican lawmakers to pass.

**Potential Impact of Rejecting Federal Education Funds**

If Tennessee were to reject federal education funds, it would have a significant impact on the state's education system. The state would lose out on billions of dollars in funding, which would lead to cuts in education programs and services. This would likely have a negative impact on students, particularly low-income students, students with disabilities, and other vulnerable students.

In addition to the financial impact, rejecting federal education funds would also give the state less control over its education system. The federal government currently imposes a number of mandates on states in exchange for federal funding. These mandates include requirements for testing, accountability, and special education. If Tennessee were to reject federal funds, it would be free from these mandates. However, it would also lose the resources and expertise that the federal government provides to states.

**Conclusion**

The proposal to reject federal education funds is a controversial one. Supporters of the proposal argue that it would give the state more control over its education system and allow it to avoid the federal mandates that come with federal funding. Opponents of the proposal argue that rejecting federal education funds would harm Tennessee's students and schools.

The proposal is likely to face significant opposition from Democrats and other groups that support public education. It is also unclear whether the proposal would have the support of enough Republican lawmakers to pass.

If Tennessee were to reject federal education funds, it would have a significant impact on the state's education system. The state would lose out on billions of dollars in funding, which would lead to cuts in education programs and services. This would likely have a negative impact on students, particularly low-income students, students with disabilities, and other vulnerable students.

FROM BING AI

Thank you for your interest in this topic. Here is a summary of what I found from the web:

• - Tennessee lawmakers are beginning to explore the possibility of rejecting nearly $2 billion in funding from the federal government for education due to rules, requirements and regulations that go along with the money¹.
• - The federal funds account for about one fifth of the state's K-12 budget and support programs such as special education, low-income students, school lunch, and standardized testing²³.
• - House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt. Gov. Randy McNally have appointed a 10-member panel to review the feasibility and implications of rejecting the federal funds and recommend a strategy by January 2022¹².
• - Some of the reasons for rejecting the federal funds are to free the state from federal mandates, to have more control over how the money is spent, and to avoid potential conflicts with Title IX protections on the basis of sex⁴⁵.
• - Some of the impacts of rejecting the federal funds are losing vital resources for students with special needs, English language learners, and those from low-income families; jeopardizing the integrity and quality of public education; creating a fiscal burden for the state and local governments; and violating civil rights laws⁴⁶⁷.

Bing, 9/27/2023

• (1) Top Tennessee lawmakers start push to reject billions of dollars in federal education funds. https://dailymontanan.com/2023/09/26/top-tennessee-lawmakers-start-push-to-reject-billions-of-dollars-in-federal-education-funds/.
• (2) Legislative panel to explore rejecting Tennessee's share of federal .... https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2023/09/25/tennessee-legislative-panel-study-rejecting-federal-education-funding/70963525007/.
• (3) Some Tennessee lawmakers consider rejecting $1.8 billion in federal .... https://www.localmemphis.com/article/news/education/some-tennessee-lawmakers-consider-rejecting-18-billion-federal-funding-education/522-9838f26d-9bf4-4902-a189-f384fc258cd1.
• (4) Tennessee Considering Cutting Off Federal Education Funding. https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/education-tennessee-conservative/2023/09/26/id/1136015/.
• (5) House speaker proposes task force to study rejecting federal ed funds. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/education/2023/03/14/house-speaker-proposes-task-force-to-study-rejecting-federal-ed-funds/70008179007/.
• (6) TN could potentially reject federal education money, here's why. https://www.wkrn.com/news/tennessee-politics/tn-republican-leadership-lays-groundwork-to-potentially-reject-federal-education-dollars/.
• (7) Stakeholders weigh in on refusing federal education funding in TN. https://www.newschannel5.com/news/this-will-fundamentally-change-education-stakeholders-weigh-in-on-refusing-federal-education-funding-in-tn.
• (8) Restoring Responsible Government by Cutting Federal Aid to the States. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/restoring-responsible-government-cutting-federal-aid-states.
• (9) Congress approves massive infusion of funds for schools. https://www.chalkbeat.org/2021/3/10/22323283/congress-biden-stimulus-money-education-schools.
• (10) The Controversial Reason Some Religious Colleges Forgo Federal Funding. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/07/the-controversial-reason-some-religious-colleges-forgo-federal-funding/490253/.
• (11) Public education funding in the U.S. needs an overhaul. https://www.epi.org/publication/public-education-funding-in-the-us-needs-an-overhaul/.
• (12) Refusing Federal Education Dollars Jeopardizes Students with Disabilities. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/refusing-federal-education-dollars-jeopardizes-students-with-disabilities/.
• (13) Just say no: Oklahoma considers rejection of federal ed funding. https://www.k12dive.com/news/oklahoma-considers-rejection-of-federal-funds/642028/.

LAUSD VOWS TO STOP THE CO-LOCATION SH*TSHOW

 

LAUSD VOWS TO STOP THE CO-LOCATION SH*TSHOW

Well, folks, it looks like the billionaires' playbook for destroying public schools has hit another snag. The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) has finally said "enough" to the sh*tshow that is charter school co-location in public schools.

For those of you who don't know, charter schools are privately run schools that receive public funding. They often lease space on public school campuses, which can lead to strained resources and tensions between the two schools. And let's be real, the only reason billionaires love charter schools is because they can make a profit off of them.

But LAUSD has had enough of this nonsense. They recently voted to limit charter school access to nearly 350 district sites, in an effort to protect vulnerable Black, Latino and low-income students from the negative impacts of sharing a campus. And let's be honest, if billionaires really cared about these students, they wouldn't be pushing for charter schools in the first place.

Of course, charter school advocates are up in arms about this decision. They claim that LAUSD is violating California law, which requires public school districts to share space with charter schools. But let's be real, when has a little thing like the law ever stopped billionaires from getting what they want?

The good news is that LAUSD isn't backing down. They're working with district lawyers to draft a policy that will prevent charter schools from moving onto campuses that are strategic priorities or part of the district's Black Student Achievement Plan. And let's be honest, if billionaires really cared about Black students, they wouldn't be pushing for charter schools in the first place.

But let's not forget the real victims in all of this: the students. They're the ones who suffer when resources are strained and tensions are high between two schools sharing a campus. And let's be honest, if billionaires really cared about students, they wouldn't be pushing for charter schools in the first place.

So let's all take a moment to applaud LAUSD for standing up to the billionaires' playbook for destroying public schools. And let's hope that other school districts follow their lead and put students first. Because at the end of the day, that's what really matters. And also because it's really funny to watch billionaires throw a tantrum when they don't get what they want.

LAUSD plans to limit charter school access to some campuses | KTLA https://ktla.com/news/lausd-plans-to-limit-charter-school-access-to-some-campuses/

LAUSD May Limit Where Charter Schools Can Co-Locate | LAist https://laist.com/news/education/lausd-charter-school-colocation-policy-proposal

Citing campus tension, LAUSD limits charter school rentals of school space - Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-26/lausd-poised-to-limit-what-spaces-charter-schools-can-occupy?fbclid=IwAR1ktWPt418lansyTE3Q_P4qG1WGEHGwL6XdNrHp0Ol_uhmokVdIh0dDxws 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

**Charter School Co-Location in California Schools**

**What is charter school co-location?**

Charter school co-location is the practice of placing charter schools on the same campus as traditional public schools. This can be done in a variety of ways, such as sharing classrooms, common spaces, and administrative services.

**Why does charter school co-location happen?**

There are a number of reasons why charter school co-location happens. One reason is that it can help charter schools to save money on facilities costs. Charter schools are public schools, but they do not receive the same level of funding from the state as traditional public schools. As a result, charter schools often have to be creative in finding ways to save money.

Another reason for charter school co-location is that it can help to expand access to charter schools. Charter schools are often located in underserved communities, and co-locating them with traditional public schools can make them more accessible to families in those communities.

**What are the benefits of charter school co-location?**

There are a number of potential benefits to charter school co-location. For charter schools, co-location can help to save money on facilities costs, expand access to students, and provide opportunities for collaboration with traditional public schools. For traditional public schools, co-location can provide additional resources and expertise, and can help to create a more diverse and inclusive school community.

**What are the challenges of charter school co-location?**

There are also a number of potential challenges to charter school co-location. One challenge is that it can be difficult to coordinate the schedules and operations of two different schools on the same campus. Another challenge is that it can be difficult to ensure that both charter and traditional public school students have equal access to resources and opportunities. Additionally, co-location can sometimes lead to tensions between charter and traditional public school staff and families.

**How common is charter school co-location in California?**

Charter school co-location is relatively common in California. According to the California Department of Education, there were 52 co-locations in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) during the 2022-2023 school year. This represents about 7% of all LAUSD schools.

**What is the current state of charter school co-location in California?**

The current state of charter school co-location in California is mixed. Some charter schools and traditional public schools have had positive experiences with co-location, while others have had more negative experiences.

In recent years, there has been a growing movement to limit charter school co-location in California. Some critics of co-location argue that it has a negative impact on traditional public schools, particularly in underserved communities. They argue that co-location can lead to overcrowding, resource inequities, and tensions between charter and traditional public school staff and families.

In 2023, the LAUSD Board of Education is considering a resolution that would limit where charter schools can be co-located. The resolution would prioritize co-locating charter schools on campuses that are not deemed to be "priority schools" or that are not part of the Black Student Achievement Plan.

**Conclusion**

Charter school co-location is a complex issue with both potential benefits and challenges. It is important to weigh the pros and cons carefully before deciding whether or not to co-locate charter schools on traditional public school campuses.

FROM BING AI

Charter school co-location in California schools is a complex and controversial issue that involves legal, educational, and political aspects. Here is a summary of what I found from my web search:

• - Charter schools are public schools that operate independently from the local school district, but receive public funding and oversight. They are authorized by either the local school board, the county office of education, or the State Board of Education¹.
• - Under Proposition 39, an initiative approved by voters in 2000, school districts are required to share unused space with charter schools. This can mean that a charter school and a district-run school can operate out of the same building — with the schools dividing floors or hallways³.
• - The process of co-location is regulated by the California Education Code, which specifies the criteria for determining the space allocation, the timeline for submitting and reviewing requests, and the procedures for resolving disputes¹.
• - Co-location can have benefits and challenges for both charter schools and district schools. Some potential benefits include sharing resources, facilities, and staff; fostering collaboration and innovation; and increasing access and diversity. Some potential challenges include conflicts over space, resources, and culture; loss of autonomy and identity; and increased competition and tension².
• - Co-location can also have impacts on students, parents, and communities. Some studies have found positive effects of co-location on student achievement, satisfaction, and engagement. Other studies have found negative effects of co-location on student safety, well-being, and belonging. Parents and communities may have different opinions and preferences about co-location, depending on their values, experiences, and expectations².
• - Co-location has been a source of controversy and litigation in California, especially in Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), which has the largest number of charter schools in the nation. LAUSD has faced lawsuits from both charter schools and district schools over the implementation of Proposition 39. In 2023, the LAUSD board approved a resolution to limit the presence of charter schools on campuses that serve “vulnerable” students⁴. The resolution was opposed by the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA), which argued that it would restrict the rights and opportunities of charter school students⁵.

Bing, 9/27/2023

• (1) Charter School Locator - School & District Information (CA Dept of .... https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/si/cs/.
• (2) Quick Guide: Understanding California charter schools. https://bing.com/search?q=charter+school+co-location+in+California+schools.
• (3) LAUSD May Limit Where Charter Schools Can Co-Locate | LAist. https://laist.com/news/education/lausd-charter-school-colocation-policy-proposal.
• (4) Quick Guide: Understanding California charter schools. https://edsource.org/2017/10-things-to-know-about-charter-schools/583984.
• (5) Charter Schools in California Counties (CA Dept of Education). https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/si/cs/ap1/imagemap.aspx.

SCREAMING SCREEN TIME, KIDS AND THEIR PHONES

 

SCREAMING SCREEN TIME

KIDS AND THEIR PHONES 

Are you tired of your kids being glued to their phones all day? Do you miss the days when they actually talked to you instead of texting? Well, fear not, because I've got some hilarious tips to help you navigate the world of screen time and keep your kids from turning into phone zombies.

First things first, let's talk about when to give your child their first cellphone. My advice? Wait until they're at least 30. Just kidding (kind of). In all seriousness, it really depends on your child and their maturity level. If they're responsible and can handle the responsibility of having a phone, then go for it. But if they're constantly losing things and forgetting to do their homework, maybe hold off for a bit.

Once you've decided to take the plunge and give your child a phone, it's important to set some ground rules. For example, no phones at the dinner table. Unless you want to hear the sound of your child's phone vibrating against the table for the entire meal. And let's be real, nobody wants that.

Another important rule is no phones in the bathroom. Trust me, you don't want to know what kind of weird stuff your kid is looking up while they're in there. And if you do happen to catch them on their phone in the bathroom, just pretend you didn't see anything. It's better for everyone involved.

Now, let's talk about managing phone use. One tip is to set limits on how much time your child can spend on their phone each day. But let's be honest, that's easier said than done. So instead, try to find ways to encourage them to put their phone down and have some face-to-face conversations. For example, you could start randomly yelling "phone break!" throughout the day and then make everyone put their phones away for 10 minutes. It's like a mini digital detox.

Finally, let's talk about social media. It's no secret that social media can be a breeding ground for drama and negativity. But it can also be a great way for your child to connect with friends and family. So how do you strike a balance? My advice is to encourage your child to follow funny meme accounts and pet Instagrams. Because let's be real, who doesn't love a good cat video?

In all seriousness, screen time can be a tricky thing to navigate as a parent. But with a little bit of humor and some ground rules, you can help your child have a healthy and responsible relationship with their phone. And who knows, maybe they'll even start talking to you again.

Cellphones and Devices: A Guide for Parents and Caregivers | Common Sense Media https://www.commonsensemedia.org/articles/cellphones-and-devices-a-guide-for-parents-and-caregivers 

Common Sense Phone Report: Questions For Parents To Ask Teens https://www.today.com/parents/teens/common-sense-phone-report-questions-parents-ask-teens-rcna117327 

Social media is driving teen mental health crisis, surgeon general warns https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/social-media-mental-health-anxiety-depression-teens-surgeon-general-rcna85575 

Teens inundated with phone prompts day and night, research finds https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/teens-inundated-phone-prompts-day-night-research-finds-rcna108044?fbclid=IwAR2mE6bfIQAmiIUwhYe4dt3i049oBfbnXfrwYmCO2cCDD8EqkRbu3DGXQoY 

MAGA PARENTS LOVE TRANSGENDER NOTIFICATION POLICIES AND HATE TRANS KIDS

MAGA PARENTS LOVE TRANSGENDER NOTIFICATION POLICIES AND HATE TRANS KIDS

Parents love to hate, hate to love, and love to laugh about transgender notification policies. It's a complicated issue, with many different opinions and viewpoints, but one thing is for sure: MAGA parents are the masters of contradictions.

On one hand, they love the idea of schools informing them if their child identifies as transgender. It gives them a chance to feel like they're in control, to ask all the right questions, and to make sure their child isn't "turning gay." But on the other hand, they hate their own trans kids. They don't want to accept them, they don't want to support them, and they certainly don't want anyone else to know about them.

It's a sad reality, but it's also kind of hilarious. These parents are so obsessed with their own image, with their own beliefs, that they can't even see the irony in their actions. They want to know everything about their child's life, except for the parts that make them uncomfortable.

But let's be real here: these notification policies are a distraction. They're not helping anyone, least of all the trans kids who are already facing enough discrimination and harassment. Instead of focusing on the real issues impacting public schools, like underfunding and teacher shortages, these policies are just creating more problems.

And don't even get me started on the anti-transgender policies that some school districts have adopted. Denying students the use of their chosen name and pronouns without parental permission? Forcing school officials to out them to their parents? What kind of backwards world do we live in?

It's no wonder that trans, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming students are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe. These policies are putting them in danger, both physically and mentally. And for what? To appease a bunch of parents who can't handle the fact that their child might be different?

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has the right idea: these policies are illegal discrimination. They violate state and federal laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression. They pose serious mental health risks for transgender students. And they create a hostile and unsafe learning environment for these students.

So what can we do to support transgender students in schools? Well, for starters, we can stop focusing on these ridiculous notification policies and start focusing on real solutions. We can provide gender-neutral bathrooms and locker rooms for students who prefer them. We can use welcoming and inclusive language in school policies and practices that affirm students' gender identities. We can develop gender support plans and communication plans that are tailored to the specific needs and preferences of each student. And we can educate school staff, parents, and students on the issues and challenges faced by transgender students and foster a culture of respect and acceptance.

It's not rocket science, folks. It's just common sense. Let's stop hating our own kids and start supporting them instead. Let's stop being distracted by pointless policies and start focusing on real solutions. And let's stop being so damn contradictory all the time. It's not a good look.

California Trans and Nonbinary Youth on Why Forced Outing Is Dangerous https://www.advocate.com/education/california-schools-transgender-outing 

Transgender notification policies https://www.foxnews.com/media/transgender-notification-policies-distract-break-down-trust-parents-teachers-advocate-says 

Students say new 'forced outing' policies in California make schools feel unsafe - Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-21/transgender-students-parental-notification-policies-schools-lgbtq-forced-outing 

Big Education Ape: JUDGE ALLOWS TEACHER TO OUT TRANSGENDER AND NONBINARY STUDENT SINNERS https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/09/judge-allows-teacher-to-out-transgender.html 

Big Education Ape: ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUTTING THE ASS IN ABSURDITY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/09/rocklin-unified-school-district-putting.html 

Big Education Ape: BREAKING NEWS SCHOOL REQUIRED TO OUT YOU FOR CHANGING GENDER IDENTITY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/08/breaking-news-school-required-to-out.html 

Big Education Ape: A GREAT DAY TO BE GAY IN CALIFORNIA OR NOT https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/08/a-great-day-to-be-gay-in-california-or.html 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

**Transgender Notification Policies**

Transgender notification policies are policies that require schools to notify parents or guardians if their child expresses a transgender identity. These policies have been the subject of much debate in recent years, with some arguing that they are necessary to protect parents' rights, while others argue that they are discriminatory and harmful to transgender students.

**Arguments in Favor of Transgender Notification Policies**

Proponents of transgender notification policies argue that parents have a right to know what is happening in their children's lives, and that they should be able to make informed decisions about their children's education and well-being. They also argue that these policies can help to protect parents from being surprised by their child's transition, and that they can give parents the opportunity to seek support and guidance from the school.

**Arguments Against Transgender Notification Policies**

Opponents of transgender notification policies argue that they are discriminatory and harmful to transgender students. They argue that these policies can lead to students being outed to their parents against their will, which can put them at risk of abuse, rejection, and homelessness. They also argue that these policies can create a hostile school environment for transgender students, and that they can discourage transgender students from seeking support from school staff.

**The Research**

There is limited research on the impact of transgender notification policies on transgender students. However, the available research suggests that these policies can have a negative impact on transgender students' mental health and well-being.

A 2019 study published in the journal *Pediatrics* found that transgender adolescents who were outed to their parents against their will were more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation than transgender adolescents who were not outed against their will.

Another study, published in the journal *Transgender Health* in 2020, found that transgender adolescents who attended schools with transgender notification policies were more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation than transgender adolescents who attended schools without transgender notification policies.

**Conclusion**

The research suggests that transgender notification policies can have a negative impact on transgender students' mental health and well-being. Schools should carefully consider the potential harms of these policies before implementing them.

If a school does implement a transgender notification policy, it is important for the school to have clear and comprehensive guidelines in place for protecting the privacy and safety of transgender students. The school should also provide support and training to staff on how to support transgender students.

FROM BING AI

Transgender notification policies are policies that require school staff to inform parents or guardians if their child identifies as transgender or requests to use a different name or pronoun at school. These policies have been adopted by some school districts in the U.S., mainly in California and New Jersey, but they have also faced legal challenges and criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates, educators, and students.

Some of the arguments in favor of transgender notification policies are:

• - They respect the parental rights and responsibilities to direct and control the upbringing of their children[^10^].
• - They protect the safety and privacy of students who may not be ready to come out to their families or peers¹⁴.
• - They prevent confusion and inconsistency among school staff and records regarding students' names and genders¹⁵.

Some of the arguments against transgender notification policies are:

• - They violate the state and federal laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression¹²¹⁹.
• - They pose serious mental health risks for transgender students, such as anxiety, depression, self-harm, and suicide, especially if they are outed against their will or face rejection from their families¹⁷¹⁸.
• - They create a hostile and unsafe learning environment for transgender students, who may face bullying, harassment, or violence from other students or staff⁷ [^20^].

There is no clear consensus on the best way to support transgender students in schools, but some possible solutions include:

• - Providing gender-neutral bathrooms and locker rooms for students who prefer them¹³.
• - Using welcoming and inclusive language in school policies and practices that affirm students' gender identities¹⁷.
• - Developing gender support plans and communication plans that are tailored to the specific needs and preferences of each student¹⁷.
• - Educating school staff, parents, and students on the issues and challenges faced by transgender students and fostering a culture of respect and acceptance⁹.

 Bing, 9/26/2023

• (1) Viewpoint: Consider Pros and Cons Before Requiring Pronouns in ... - SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/pronouns-in-signature-blocks.aspx.
• (2) N.J. Attorney General Platkin sues Monmouth County school districts .... https://www.inquirer.com/news/lgbtq-jersey-court-challenge-transgender-students-20230623.html.
• (3) Transgender students: Judge blocks California school board policy. https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/09/06/judge-temporarily-blocks-school-boards-policy-to-out-transgender-students-to-parents/.
• (4) New Jersey sues three school districts over transgender notification policy. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/22/murphy-new-jersey-school-districts-transgender-policy-00103127.
• (5) Transgender Student Guidance for School Districts. https://www.nj.gov/education/safety/sandp/climate/docs/Guidance.pdf.
• (6) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPPORTING TRANSGENDER YOUTH IN SCHOOL. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/ed-factsheet-transgender-202106.pdf.
• (7) New Poll Emphasizes Negative Impacts of Anti-LGBTQ Policies on LGBTQ .... https://www.thetrevorproject.org/blog/new-poll-emphasizes-negative-impacts-of-anti-lgbtq-policies-on-lgbtq-youth/.
• (8) Transgender notification policies ‘distract,’ ‘break down’ trust .... https://www.foxnews.com/media/transgender-notification-policies-distract-break-down-trust-parents-teachers-advocate-says.
• (9) Virginia students stage walkout over Youngkin transgender policy. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2022/09/27/youngkin-transgender-school-policy-virginia-student-walkout/8120594001/.
• (10) New law says California schools must provide gender-neutral bathrooms .... https://www.presstelegram.com/2023/09/26/new-law-says-california-schools-must-provide-gender-neutral-bathrooms/.
• (11) Americans' Complex Views on Gender Identity and Transgender Issues .... https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/06/28/americans-complex-views-on-gender-identity-and-transgender-issues/.
• (12) Transgender notification policies 'distract,' 'break down' trust between parents and teachers, advocate says. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/transgender-notification-policies-distract-break-down-trust-between-parents-and-teachers-advocate-says/ar-AA1hgSoB.
• (13) Holmdel School Board considers scrapping transgender policy over parental notification. https://www.yahoo.com/news/holmdel-school-board-considers-scrapping-092748292.html.
• (14) Temecula students protest their school district's flag and transgender policies. https://www.kpbs.org/news/education/2023/09/25/temecula-students-protest-their-school-districts-flag-and-transgender-policies.
• (15) Public school advocate: Parental notification policies 'break down' trust between schools, parents. https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/parenting/public-school-advocate-parental-notification-policies-break-down-trust-between-schools-parents/vi-AA1hgSoz.
• (16) CUSD parents, students debate transgender notification policy. https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/cusd-parents-students-debate-transgender-notification-policy/vi-AA1h3b3T.
• (17) Another Northern California school district passes controversial parental notification policy. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/another-northern-california-school-district-passes-controversial-parental-notification-policy/vi-AA1h3LqU.
• (18) New law says California schools must provide gender-neutral bathrooms. https://www.ocregister.com/2023/09/26/new-law-says-california-schools-must-provide-gender-neutral-bathrooms/.
• (19) Protecting and Advancing Health Care for Transgender Adult Communities. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/protecting-advancing-health-care-transgender-adult-communities/.
• (20) NJ judge blocks school districts' trans parental notification policies. https://www.newsnationnow.com/lgbtq/new-jersey-school-districts-sued-state-gender-identity-policy/.