Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, September 11, 2026

ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE KINGDOM OF MAGA-LOT A FAIRY TALE FOR TROUBLED TIMES

 

ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE KINGDOM OF MAGA-LOT
A FAIRY TALE FOR TROUBLED TIMES

In the grand tradition of Brothers Grimm, if the Brothers Grimm had been subpoenaed

Once upon a time, in a land where the golden escalators never stopped descending, there ruled a King of considerable... self-regard. King Donald the Tremendous, First of His Name, Caller of Crowds, and Declarer of the Biggest Everything, had summoned his loyal subjects to a two-day spectacular in the faraway kingdom of Dallas, Texas — a magical realm where the steaks are big and the accountability is small.

The people called this gathering Trump-a-palooza.

The Grand Entrance

Each night, as the royal trumpets blared and the fog machines fogged, King Donald rode into the American Airlines Center astride a magnificent unicorn — resplendent, majestic, and almost certainly the most beautiful unicorn in the history of unicorns, perhaps ever, many people were saying so.

Clinging to the saddle behind him, according to the King's own generous description, rode what he cheerfully called "the Ugliest Troll in All of Christendom" — though courtiers who studied the seating charts suspected the Troll was simply any Republican congressman who had publicly agreed with him fewer than seventeen times that week or Ken Paxton.

The crowd roared. Or at least, half of them did. The other half of the seats, it must be noted, were conspicuously empty — the serfs of the realm, having been promised riches for so long while watching their grocery bills ascend like a golden escalator in reverse, found they could not quite afford the gas to make the pilgrimage to Dallas. Many had also discovered an urgent need to wash their hair.

The arena, sources confirmed, was only half full — a fact the royal media team addressed by turning the lights down and the fog machines up.

The King's Promises

From his towering stage, surrounded by a digital screen that occasionally suffered what court physicians described as "a severe case of the flashy-flashies" — randomly cycling through images of past speakers mid-speech like a PowerPoint presentation having a breakdown — King Donald made his grandest proclamation yet.

"Five thousand gold coins!" he bellowed, to every adult in the kingdom, should his loyal lords and ladies retain their grip on the Congresses of High and Low Chambers come November.

The royal treasury, several nervous economists noted in hushed tones, would need to produce approximately 1.3 trillion such gold coins to make good on this promise. This figure was quickly waved away as "fake math" by the court.

The King's name was spoken 171 times on the first night alone, which the royal statisticians confirmed was 171 more times than the administration's deeply unpopular war with the Kingdom of Iran was mentioned at all.

Some omissions, it turns out, speak louder than 171 mentions.

The Royal Court Assembles

Over 100 lords and ladies were scheduled to grace the great stage — Governor Greg Abbott of Texas, Lord Steve Scalise of the House of Majority, High Whip Tom Emmer, and the formidable Ken Paxton, Attorney General and man who has survived more investigations than a cat has lives.

Each speaker approached the royal microphone, praised the King with great enthusiasm, and — as was the custom of the age — kept their fingers crossed firmly behind their backs, lest they be branded with the ancient curse of Factus Checkus, which had befallen so many before them.

In a twist that bewildered the entire kingdom, a messenger arrived by pre-recorded scroll from Senator John Fetterman of the Opposition, who endorsed a Republican candidate and declared them both to be "Team PA" — proving that in the age of Trump-a-palooza, the categories of sense and nonsense had fully dissolved into one another, like a sugar cube in a golden toilet bowl.

The Fairy Princess and Her Medal

Among the court's honored subjects, none shone more brightly — at least in the candlelit towers of Trump Castle — than the Fairy Princess Natalie Harp, who received from the King's own hands $45,000 in royal coin and the King's Medal of Pleasure for her tireless labors deep into the evening hours.

The court applauded. The serfs, who were doing their own laboring deep into the evening hours for considerably less, applauded less.

The Lords Who Could Not Attend

Alas, not all the nobles could make the journey.

Several Republican lords representing swing fiefdoms — kingdoms where the serfs vote unpredictably and tend to notice things like empty grocery shelves — quietly declined their invitations. Some cited pressing business in their home districts. Others balked at the ticket prices, which for premium seating reached 1,500 gold pieces — a curious ask from a King who had just promised everyone 5,000.

A few, sources confirmed, were simply washing their hair.

Across Town: The Gathering of the Aggrieved

Meanwhile, across Dallas, in humbler halls where the lighting was fluorescent and the chairs were folding, the serfs convened.

They spoke of wages that had not risen to meet the prices that had. Of healthcare that remained a luxury. Of promises made from unicorns that somehow never landed. They listened to the leaders of the Rebellious Opposition, including the fiery James Talarico, who promised that if given power, they would ride out against the King with something the court rarely deployed: a budget that added up.

The Democratic National Committee and the labor unions organized demonstrations in the streets, waving signs and framing the entire Trump-a-palooza as what one serf described as "a very expensive distraction from the fact that eggs still cost four dollars."

The Royal Jesters Despair

In the kingdom's many taverns, the Late Night Jesters — those brave souls paid to find comedy in catastrophe — gathered in quiet crisis.

"How," lamented one, staring into his ale, "are we supposed to get laughs when the King is already such a clown?"

His colleagues nodded gravely.

A screen behind them flickered — cycling rapidly through images of past speakers, going nowhere in particular, illuminating everything and explaining nothing.

Just like the convention itself.

THE END

(Or, more accurately: To Be Continued, November 2026, in a kingdom near you.)

Based, loosely and with considerable horror, on actual events. The unicorn has not been independently verified. The empty seats have.







BEWARE: THE MONEY MONSTERS ARE LOOSE

 

BEWARE: THE MONEY MONSTERS ARE LOOSE

A Voter's Survival Guide to the 2026 Midterm Spending Circus

Forget Halloween — the scariest creatures of 2026 don't wear costumes. They wear tailored suits, carry checkbooks with too many zeros, and they're absolutely ravenous for congressional seats. The Money Monsters are out, the midterms are here, and your vote is the only silver bullet that actually works. Buckle up, because this is one haunted house tour you genuinely cannot afford to skip.

Meet the Monsters: Who's Buying What (and For How Much)

The ringleader of this particular circus is none other than Elon Musk, whose super PAC — America PAC — has been carpet-bombing battleground states with mailers, digital ads, and ground operations like a man who just discovered politics and has opinions.

Here's where his money has been landing:

StateRecipientAmerica PAC Spending
🤠 TexasKen Paxton (R)~$247,600
🦞 MaineGOP Senate Nominee~$170,200
🍺 OhioBernie Moreno (R)~$105,700
🌲 New HampshireGOP Nominee~$91,500
🌽 IowaGOP Nominee~$54,600
🔔 PennsylvaniaHouse Races~$37,500
🐻 MichiganMike Rogers (R)~$25,600
🐟 AlaskaGOP Candidates~$17,200

And that's just one monster. The full rogues' gallery reads like a Forbes list gone politically feral:

  • 🏛️ Senate Leadership Fund (SLF) + its shadowy dark-money twin One Nation: $200+ million aimed at Senate races
  • 🏠 Congressional Leadership Fund (CLF) + American Action Network: $400+ million combined for House races
  • 🐉 MAGA Inc.: $120 million — backed by energy giants like Energy Transfer Partners ($12.5M) and biotech money
  • 🚀 America PAC: Elon's personal political playground, spreading cash like confetti across 13 states

The Dark Money Trick: How They Hide the Monster's Face

Here's where it gets genuinely spooky. Ever wonder why some of these groups seem to materialize out of thin air with unlimited cash and zero accountability? Welcome to the 501(c)(4) dark money pipeline — Washington's favorite magic trick.

Here's how the shell game works:

Step 1: A mysterious "social welfare organization" (a 501(c)(4)) quietly collects unlimited millions from corporations, billionaires, and anyone else who'd rather not see their name in a headline.

Step 2: That organization writes a fat check to a Super PAC.

Step 3: The Super PAC files its FEC report listing the 501(c)(4) as the donor — not the actual humans who funded it.

Step 4: Billions in political influence flow through the system, and the original money trail vanishes like a ghost at sunrise.

The Democratic side runs the exact same playbook, just with different monsters in different suits:

  • 💰 Senate Majority PAC raised $326 million, with its dark-money partner Majority Forward funneling $61 million of that total
  • 📺 House Majority PAC dropped a jaw-dropping $272 million in TV and digital ad reservations — including an $80 million digital-only blitz
  • 🤝 Big donors include George Soros, Reid Hoffman, Michael Bloomberg, and hedge fund power couple Steve and Amy Mandel (~$10M)

Make no mistake: both parties have their monsters. The species may differ, but the appetite is identical.

How Did We Get Here? Blame the Supremes (Not the Motown Group)

Two landmark rulings essentially opened the cage door and threw away the key:

  • Buckley v. Valeo (1976): Declared that spending money on political speech is a form of First Amendment expression. Translation: your wallet has constitutional rights.
  • Citizens United v. FEC (2010): Ruled that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures. Translation: ExxonMobil's political opinion is now legally equivalent to yours, just with more decimal places.

The result? A system where a billionaire's Super PAC can blanket your TV, phone, mailbox, and social media feed with slick ads — all perfectly legal, as long as they pinky-promise not to coordinate directly with the candidate they're obviously trying to elect.

How to Spot a Monster in the Wild

You don't need a PhD in campaign finance to protect yourself. Here's your monster-detection toolkit:

🖥️ Watch the Ads — Seriously That suspiciously polished 30-second ad popping up on your phone at 11pm? Check the fine print at the bottom. "Paid for by [Vague Patriotic Name] PAC" is your first clue that a monster is nearby.

📊 Follow the Money Yourself

📬 Check the Mailer Physical mail funded by outside groups must disclose the paying organization. If the return address says something like "Americans for American Americanness," you've found a monster in your mailbox.

The Heroes: Candidates Who Said "Keep Your Dark Money"

Not everyone is cashing the monster's checks. A growing number of candidates have taken voluntary pledges to reject corporate PAC money entirely — relying instead on small-dollar grassroots donors:

StateCandidatePledge
CaliforniaRep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Katie PorterNo Corporate PAC money
New YorkRep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezNo Corporate PAC money
MichiganRep. Elissa SlotkinNo Corporate PAC money
TexasJames Talarico (Senate)No Corporate PAC money
Illinois, Ohio, PA, GA, NCVarious challengersNo Corporate PAC pledges

Are these pledges a perfect solution? No. Candidates can still accept labor PAC money, leadership PAC money, and individual mega-donor checks. But it's a start — and it's a promise you can verify on the FEC database with your own two eyes.

The Only Monster Repellent That Actually Works

Here's the uncomfortable truth that all those glossy ads don't want you to think about: the Money Monsters are only as powerful as voters allow them to be.

Super PACs can buy airtime. They cannot buy your brain. Dark money can flood your feed. It cannot fill out your ballot. Billionaires can spend $120 million. They still only get one vote each.

Before you pull that lever (or fill that bubble, or click that screen) in November, ask yourself one simple question: Is this candidate serving America — or just collecting graft with a smile?

The answer is usually hiding in plain sight, right there in the FEC filings, the donor lists, and yes — even in those suspiciously well-funded ads telling you what a wonderful human being someone is at 6am on a Tuesday.


"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance."Thomas Jefferson, who could not have imagined a $400 million House super PAC but would absolutely have had thoughts about it.

The choice is yours in November. The monsters are counting on you to stay home. Disappoint them.

🗳️ Register. Research. Vote. Repeat.




SOURCES & LINKS: Money Monsters Edition

Your Complete Research Toolkit for the 2026 Midterm Money Trail


🏛️ Official Government & Regulatory Sources

SourceWhat It's ForLink
FEC Campaign Finance Data PortalReal-time filings, expenditures, donor names, PAC totalshttps://www.fec.gov/data/
FEC Candidate & Committee SearchSearch any candidate or committee by name, state, or officehttps://www.fec.gov/data/candidates/
FEC All Filings DatabaseRaw digital filings — Forms 2, 3, independent expenditure reportshttps://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/how-to-research-public-records/
FEC Electronic Filing SystemReal-time raw submissions as they are filedhttps://efts.fec.gov/latest/filings
FEC Independent Expenditure SearchTrack Super PAC spending by candidate, committee, or statehttps://www.fec.gov/data/independent-expenditures/
FEC Public Records & ContactsRequest public copies of filings directlyhttps://www.fec.gov/contact/
Texas Ethics CommissionState-level Texas campaign finance filingshttps://www.ethics.state.tx.us/

🔬 Non-Partisan Research & Watchdog Organizations

SourceWhat It's ForLink
OpenSecretsNon-partisan donor aggregation, PAC network maps, dark money trackinghttps://www.opensecrets.org
Issue OneCampaign finance reform advocacy & spending analysishttps://issueone.org
Public CitizenCorporate PAC and dark money watchdog reportinghttps://www.citizen.org
FollowTheMoney.orgState-level campaign finance tracking across all 50 stateshttps://www.followthemoney.org
ProPublica — Campaign FinanceInvestigative reporting on PAC spending and dark moneyhttps://www.propublica.org/series/campaign-finance
Brennan Center for JusticeLegal analysis of Citizens United, campaign finance lawhttps://www.brennancenter.org

📰 News Organizations Cited / Referenced

SourceCoverageLink
The Texas TribuneAmerica PAC state-by-state spending breakdownhttps://www.texastribune.org
CBS NewsFEC filing analysis, Super PAC independent expenditureshttps://www.cbsnews.com
PoliticoCampaign finance reporting, PAC strategy coveragehttps://www.politico.com
The Washington PostDark money, 501(c)(4) investigative reportinghttps://www.washingtonpost.com
The New York TimesMidterm spending analysis and donor profileshttps://www.nytimes.com
ReutersReal-time campaign finance newshttps://www.reuters.com

⚖️ Key Legal Cases Referenced

CaseSignificanceOfficial Source
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)Allowed unlimited corporate independent expenditureshttps://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
Buckley v. Valeo (1976)Established political spending as First Amendment speechhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/424/1/
SpeechNow.org v. FEC (2010)Created the legal foundation for Super PACshttps://www.fec.gov/legal/court-cases/speechnow/

🏦 Major PACs Referenced — Official FEC Committee Pages

CommitteeParty AlignmentFEC Profile
America PAC (Elon Musk)Republican/Conservativehttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00770941/
Senate Leadership FundRepublicanhttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00571703/
Congressional Leadership FundRepublicanhttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00504530/
MAGA Inc.Republican/Trump-alignedhttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00835959/
Senate Majority PACDemocratichttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00484642/
House Majority PACDemocratichttps://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00492140/

🗳️ Voter Tools & Registration Resources

ResourcePurposeLink
Vote.govOfficial U.S. voter registration portalhttps://vote.gov
USA.gov — ElectionsFederal election information hubhttps://www.usa.gov/absentee-voting
BallotReadyResearch candidates and ballot measureshttps://www.ballotready.org
Vote SmartCandidate positions, voting records, funding sourceshttps://votesmart.org

💡 Pro Tip: Bookmark the FEC Data Portal and OpenSecrets — these two alone give you more verified, real-time campaign finance intelligence than most political journalists had access to just a decade ago. The monsters hate transparency. Use it.