Fun, Outrage, and Truth: Corporate Education Reform on Mock Trial
The recent education Mock Trial had everything from court outbursts, gavel smashes, to witness badgering. The trial was a lot of fun but still had an underlying seriousness due to the subject matter. Conducted just a few yards away from the U.S. Department of Education, the event was organized by Save Our Schools March in conjunction with the BadAss Teachers Congress on July 24.
The case put Eli Broad, Arne Duncan, Rahm Emanuel, and Campbell Brown on trial for crimes that the prosecution believed were in violation of the 14th amendment and were also considered hate crimes. The case was authentic: there were witnesses, a prosecutor, a defense lawyer, and even a judge (played by our very own Thomas Byrd). The trial was mostly lighthearted but still focused on major issues.The Mock Trial, along with all of the week’s educational advocacy activities, brought together people from all over the country that felt strongly about the issues being presented.
Kathleen Jeskey, an Oregon 6th grade teacher, believed that the Mock Trial could bring attention to the problems that teachers are facing. “People aren’t aware,” she went on state that, “we have a national problem.”
Larry Proffitt also spoke on the magnitude of the trial. Hailing from Nashville, Tennessee, Proffitt, the 7th grade science teacher and witness in the trial, said that teachers now are “filling the gap between knowledge and legislation.”
Michelle Ramey, a 2nd and 3rd grade teacher, came all the way from Seattle, Washington to attend the BAT weekend. When asked why she wanted to participate she replied, “educators have sat back,” while the law makers have “steamrolled students.”
Proffitt though, was optimistic about the trial. He confronted the common misconception of protesters by saying, “we don’t just complain. You’ll see plans of resolution.”
For the Prosecution: Teachers
Ceresta Smith, the first witness and a teacher in Miami-Dade County, Florida, was asked many questions pertaining to the crimes committed by the accused. Smith responded to questions focused on the greed accompanying the defendants; she compared the accused to “vampires” and “bloodsuckers.” She went on to talk in detail on how a lot of money is being poured into education, but a lot of it is not reaching the teachers, “they’re trying to starve teachers out of their homes.”The second witness, Rosalie Friend, a teacher in Brooklyn, New York, was asked similar questions, including what was at stake if the accused do not receive punishment. Her answer did not lack any honesty, and it brought a large dose of reality, “unfortunately a lot of children are losing the opportunity to learn to use their minds.”
Larry Proffitt was asked to take the stand and answer questions about tenure and how it contributes to the failing of public schools. “Number one, public schools are not failing,” he testified. “our government is what’s failing, not our schools.” Proffitt went on to offer an explanation of tenure, accusing Campbell Brown of having an agenda against the protection of teachers, which is steadily being “eroded.”
The fourth witness, Marla Kilfoyle, is the General Manager of BAT but was speaking on the behalf of parents. She was Fun, Outrage, and Truth: Corporate Education Reform on Mock Trial | Education Town Hall Forum: Archives, Announcements, & Extended Discussion on Weekly Broadcasts...: