Tuesday, October 6, 2020

A NEVER ENDING STREAM OF CONFUSION – Dad Gone Wild

A NEVER ENDING STREAM OF CONFUSION – Dad Gone Wild

A NEVER ENDING STREAM OF CONFUSION


“The good news for the Washington Federals is they do not have a quarterback controversy. The bad news is they do not have a quarterback.”― Jeff Pearlman, Football for a Buck: The Crazy Rise and Crazier Demise of the USFL
On Friday, after I first flipped through the recently released CREDO study focusing on learning loss, I fully intended to spend the weekend reading through it and painstakingly taking notes. After all, this is the study that Tennessee’s Commissioner of Education Penny Schwinn had cited as a basis for her dire warnings about a pending crash in proficiency scores.
Luckily, I read teacher Peter Greene’s piece first. Greene reminded me of why the CREDO study is…he says baloney…I say, bullshit. I consider it such because it’s rooted in a made-up measurement that attempts to standardized something that can not be standardized. Per Greene,
Second, you know that this “report” is baloney because it leans on that great imaginary measure, the “days of learning.” Students during the pandemic will “lose” X number of days of learning. “Days of learning” is actually a measure that CREDO made up themselves, based on some “research” in a 2012 paper by Erik Hanushek, Paul Peterson, and Ludger Woessmann. And if “days of learning” seems like a bizarro world way to measure of education (Which days? Days in September? Days in March? Tuesdays? Instructional days, or testing days, or that day we spent the CONTINUE READING: A NEVER ENDING STREAM OF CONFUSION – Dad Gone Wild