Sunday, September 20, 2020

CURMUDGUCATION: The 1776 Unites Curriculum Isn't So Great

 CURMUDGUCATION: The 1776 Unites Curriculum Isn't So Great

The 1776 Unites Curriculum Isn't So Great


During Dear Leader's call for more patrio-centric re-education, he referenced and Betsy DeVos praised the 1776 Unites project as an example of the kind of thing he wants to see in schools. So I went to look at it, and, well, it has some problems.

What Is It, And Where Did It Come From?

The "curriculum" has been launched just last week as an "inspirational alternative" to the New York Times 1619 project. The 1776 Unites initiative was launched back in February with somewhat stronger language about the 1619 project. It came from the Woodson Center, the organization founded by Black conservative activist Bob Woodson, who said upon launching that it was intended to counter the "lethal" narrative of 1619.

"This garbage that is coming down from the scholars and writers from 1619 is most hypocritical because they don’t live in communities [that are] suffering," he continued. "They are advocating something they don’t have to pay the penalty for."

So, not a fan. He pulled together an assortment of other Black conservatives, and in February the website was launched:


1776 Unites is a movement to liberate tens of millions of Americans by helping them become agents of their own uplift and transformation, by embracing the true founding values of our country.


The website includes a library of essays, with titles like "The Cult of Victimhood," "Living by the CONTINUE READING:   CURMUDGUCATION: The 1776 Unites Curriculum Isn't So Great