Thursday, November 19, 2015

Houston’s “Split” Decision to Give Superintendent Grier $98,600 in Bonuses, Pre-Resignation | VAMboozled!

Houston’s “Split” Decision to Give Superintendent Grier $98,600 in Bonuses, Pre-Resignation | VAMboozled!:

Houston’s “Split” Decision to Give Superintendent Grier $98,600 in Bonuses, Pre-Resignation






States of attention on this blog, and often of (dis)honorable mention as per their state-level policies bent on value-added models (VAMs), include Florida, New York, Tennessee, and New Mexico. As for a quick update about the latter state of New Mexico, we are still waiting to hear the final decision from the judge who recently heard the state-level lawsuit still pending on this matter in New Mexico (see prior posts about this case herehere,herehere, and here).
Another locale of great interest, though, is the Houston Independent School District. This is the seventh largest urban school district in the nation, and the district that has tied more high-stakes consequences to their value-added output than any other district/state in the nation. These “initiatives” were “led” by soon-to-resign/retire Superintendent Terry Greir who, during his time in Houston (2009-2015), implemented some of the harshest consequences ever attached to teacher-level value-added output, as per the district’s use of the Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS) (see other posts about the EVAAS herehere, and here; see other posts about Houston herehere, and here).
In fact, the EVAAS is still used throughout Houston today to evaluate all EVAAS-eligible teachers, to also “reform” the district’s historically low-performing schools, by tying teachers’ purported value-added performance to teacher improvement plans, merit pay, nonrenewal, and termination (e.g., 221 Houston teachers were terminated “in large part” due to their EVAAS scores in 2011). However, pending litigation (i.e., this is the district in which the American and Houston Federation of Teachers (AFT/HFT) are currently suing the district for their wrongful use of, and over-emphasis on this particular VAM; see here), Superintendent Grier and the district have recoiled on some of the high-stakes consequences they formerly attached to the EVAAS  This particular lawsuit is to commence this spring/summer.
Nonetheless, my most recent post about Houston was about its future school board candidates (some who won seats on the school board on November 3), who were invited by The Houston Chronicle to respond to Superintendent Grier’s teacher evaluation system. For the most part, those who responded did so unfavorably, especially as the evaluation systems was/is disproportionately reliant on teachers’ EVAAS data and high-stakes use of these data in particular (see here).
Most recently, however, as per a “split” decision registered by Houston’s new school board (i.e., 4:3), Superintendent Grier received a $98,600 bonus for his “satisfactory evaluation” as the school district’s superintendent. See more from the full article published Houston’s “Split” Decision to Give Superintendent Grier $98,600 in Bonuses, Pre-Resignation | VAMboozled!: