Saturday, September 26, 2015

Marie Corfield: Why I oppose @NEAToday early endorsement of @HillaryClinton

Marie Corfield: Why I oppose @NEAToday early endorsement of @HillaryClinton:

Why I oppose @NEAToday early endorsement of @HillaryClinton



Without unions, workers will lose many of the protections against abusive employers. Wages for all will be depressed, even as corporate profits soar. The American Dream will be destroyed for millions. And we will have a government of the corporations, by the already powerful, for the wealthy.
              ~ Kenneth Bernstein, teacher, author, education activist




Change your social media profile pic if you agree
Teacher, education activist and blogger,Fred Klonsky, posted this yesterday

What has been rumored for several weeks is now pretty much a sure thing. The NEA board of directors are meeting next week and they will go through the motions of taking a vote. But an endorsement of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Party primary race is all but assured. (emphasis mine)
What's particularly troubling is that because this is a primary endorsement, many member voices simply will not be heard in this process. Steven Singer writes:

[S]ince this is only an endorsement for the primary election, the matter would not need to go before the Representative Assembly (RA). In effect, the move could sidestep the voices of the RA’s 8,000 delegates representing state and local affiliates, student members, retired members, and other segments of the united education profession. 
The decision would be made by a handful of leaders and the PAC council. Though there are thousands of PAC council votes, they are Marie Corfield: Why I oppose @NEAToday early endorsement of @HillaryClinton: