Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Is the Use of Untested Technologies in Classrooms Unethical?* | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Is the Use of Untested Technologies in Classrooms Unethical?* | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:



Is the Use of Untested Technologies in Classrooms Unethical?*


In a recent Teachers College Record commentary, M.O. Thirunarayanan, Associate Professor of Learning Technologies in the College of Education at Florida International University, argues the following:
When it comes to technology integration, no testing or research is done upfront to determine if they help students learn. Such products are typically purchased by schools and used in classrooms before educators start conducting research to determine if they are effective. This is akin to providing treatment using drugs whose effects have not yet been studied. Both are unethical. Not to mention the millions of dollars that are spent every year by schools to acquire these technologies, just so the leaders of these schools can claim that their schools are on the “cutting edge.”
Every time a new technological tool is developed, manufactured, and sold, its potential to improve learning is hyped up to a great extent. A tool that has a new or unique feature is sold as the tool that will help solve all problems in education. Such a product is overbought and underused in schools for a few years until the next best technological tool becomes the hottest product that has to be purchased and used in all schools….
He then concludes:
Those who develop technological products should be asked to spend their own funds to conduct research to find out the benefits of using their products in