Friday, October 11, 2013

Second overseer named for companies involved in Options charter school case - The Washington Post

Second overseer named for companies involved in Options charter school case - The Washington Post:

Second receiver named for companies involved in Options charter school case




A D.C. Superior Court judge appointed a receiver Friday to oversee two for-profit companies that are led by the former managers of Options Public Charter School, who have beenaccused of creating an elaborate contracting scheme to divert millions of dollars from the school.
The former managers, who deny any wrongdoing, are among the defendants in a civil complaint that the District’s attorney general filed this month.
Related story

J.C. Hayward seeks dismissal from Options Charter case

J.C. Hayward seeks dismissal from Options Charter case
WUSA anchor argues that she did not benefit from alleged contracting scheme nor knew it existed.
More news about education

Judge appoints a second receiver in Options school case

Judge appoints a second receiver in Options school case
Joe Bruno is tasked with preserving the assets of companies allegedly involved in a contracting scam.

In Fairfax, graduation rates improve slightly

More students in Fairfax schools are graduating on time.

Who are Head Start’s ‘angel investors?’

Who are Head Start’s ‘angel investors?’
Laura and John Arnold are an increasing influence in education reform.
The receiver is Joe Bruno, president of Building Hope, a nonprofit organization that provides business services and loans to charter schools. Bruno will be responsible for taking control of the two companies’ finances and preserving their assets while the civil lawsuit proceeds.
Although no one has been criminally charged in the case, investigators have been interviewing people, and a grand jury is expected to convene as early as next week, according to several people familiar with the case.
The future of Options remains uncertain. The D.C. Public Charter School Board said last week that it would vote on Oct. 16 about whether to take a first step toward closing the school because of financial