Monday, October 28, 2013

Proposed spending regs give districts leeway to choose how to serve high-needs students | EdSource Today

Proposed spending regs give districts leeway to choose how to serve high-needs students | EdSource Today:

Much anticipated draft regulations that the State Board of Education will discuss next week would give school districts lots of latitude –  too much so, say some advocates for disadvantaged students – to deal with a thorny issue: how to account for the extra money that districts will receive for low-income kids, English learners and foster children.
The proposed regulations (see pages 1-4), posted in the agenda for the Nov. 6-7 State Board meeting, interpret a critical section in the law establishing the Local Control Funding Formula. Broad in intent and short in length, it requires school districts, county offices of education and charter schools “to increase or improve services” for high-needs students “in proportion to the increase in funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration” of those students.  The board must adopt the regulations at its next meeting in January to meet a deadline imposed by the funding law.
While providing substantial funding for low-income children and English learners in the Local Control Funding Formula that he pushed through the Legislature, Gov. Jerry Brown has made it clear that the state should not micromanage how districts choose to spend money on those students.
While providing substantial funding for low-income children and English learners in the Local Control Funding Formula that he pushed through the Legislature, Gov. Jerry Brown has made it clear that the state should not micromanage how districts choose to spend money on those students.
The new funding system provides additional dollars for low-income children and English learners: 20 percent more funding per targeted student plus additional dollars when a district has large concentrations of those students. Advocacy organizations for low-income kids had argued that the extra dollars should be spent on programs for those students at the schools they attend. But they 



Pending lawsuit, if successful, could precipitate monumental changes - by Seth Rosenblatt / commentary
With all of the discussion around the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), the Common Core State Standards, and Smarter Balanced Assessments, we may be missing the biggest potential change to sweep California public education since Serrano v. Priest. This change could come from a small organization called Students Matter, which ... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit the Edsource Today webs
Migrant education programs make Saturday school a family affair - by Susan Frey
School on Saturday? Most students would protest such an intrusion on their free time, but for children of migrant workers, Saturday school is a family affair. Combined with after-school and summer programs, Saturday courses are a required part of the federally funded Migrant Education Program, which gives some of the country’s ... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit the Edsource Today websit
Civic leaders mobilizing to support LA schools chief - by Louis Freedberg
A University of California regent is gathering support from civic, business and philanthropic leaders to pressure the seven member Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District to “make every effort” to retain the services of John Deasy, its embattled school superintendent. George Kieffer, a prominent attorney in the ... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit the Edsource Today