Sunday, February 3, 2013

If testing and measuring makes for better schools, why are the Obama girls in a school that doesn’t agree? | Get Schooled

If testing and measuring makes for better schools, why are the Obama girls in a school that doesn’t agree? | Get Schooled:


If testing and measuring makes for better schools, why are the Obama girls in a school that doesn’t agree?

The Obamas opted for a pricey private school for their daughters. (AP Photo)
The Obamas opted for a pricey pivate school for their daughters. (AP)In a powerful essay in Education Week, retired educator Alan Jones of Illinois shares his experience accompanying his daughter to look at schools for his grandson.
Jones talks about today’s test-driven education classrooms, codified through No Child Left Behind and incentivized through Race to the Top. He compares schools that measure students almost entirely by test scores to the holistic approach of the Sidwell School attended by President Obama’s girls, saying. “When President Obama talks about good schools, he is talking about schools for other people’s children, not his own.”
Jones makes great points, although comparisons between public and private schools are not necessarily instructive in view of the wide gap in costs. The best private schools in metro Atlanta cost $18,000 to $22,000 a year — and that does not count books and fees — while the average per-pupil spending in public schools in …